# Cursor vs Team-GPT (now Juma by Juma Labs)

Cursor records 23,297,751 monthly visits with +8.4% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Team-GPT (now Juma by Juma Labs) records 31,904 monthly visits with -14.7% growth and Paid pricing.

| Metric | [Cursor](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor) | [Team-GPT (now Juma by Juma Labs)](https://openaitools.app/tool/team-gpt) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.cursor.com | https://juma.ai |
| Categories | AI Code Assistant, AI Developer Tools, AI Agent | AI Marketing, AI Workflow, AI Productivity Tools, AI Project Management |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Paid |
| Monthly Visits | 23,297,751 | 31,904 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +8.4% | -14.7% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 14,683,770 | 12,948 |
| Review Score | 4.7 | 4.1 |
| Saved Count | 29 | 2 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Cursor

Cursor's editor looks familiar to anyone who has used a modern IDE, but the center of gravity is the agent. Instead of only suggesting the next line, it can read a task description, inspect the repository, produce an implementation plan, modify many files, run commands, and report back with a summary of what changed. Developers keep control by approving plans, reviewing diffs, and stepping in wherever judgment is needed.

The product has expanded well beyond a single application. Cloud agents can run on their own machines for extended periods, Cursor ships a CLI, and integrations bring the same agent into Slack and GitHub so work can be handed off without switching tools. A model picker lets you use frontier models from several providers, or rely on automatic selection per task.

This makes Cursor a good fit for teams that want measurable velocity gains on large codebases while keeping human review in the loop. The trade-offs are mostly about cost and process: capable agents consume quota, remote indexing raises questions for security-conscious organizations, and teams need light conventions for when to delegate versus write code directly.

**Pricing & Plans:** Cursor uses a freemium model: you can start for free with limited usage, then move to paid Pro, team, and enterprise tiers that unlock higher model limits, cloud agents, and administrative controls. Exact seats and credit allowances change over time, so check cursor.com/pricing for current numbers.

- **Agent-driven code changes:** An agentic mode that plans changes, edits several files at once, runs tests, and iterates until the task is complete.
- **Cloud and parallel agents:** Background agents spin up their own environments to build, test, and demo features in parallel, then hand back results for review.
- **Tab completion and codebase context:** Fast inline suggestions plus codebase-wide semantic search and indexing so answers reflect your actual repository.
- **Multi-model flexibility:** Switch between leading frontier models from multiple providers, or let Cursor select a model automatically for each task.
- **CLI, Slack and GitHub workflows:** Run Cursor from the terminal, chat with it in Slack, and let it review or open pull requests in GitHub without leaving your workflow.

**Strengths:** Strong repository-wide context and multi-file edits; Agent runs in the editor, cloud, CLI, Slack, and GitHub; Choose from multiple frontier models in one place; Familiar IDE experience for developers coming from other editors

**Limitations:** Requires a paid plan for the most capable models and higher usage; Learning curve to use agentic workflows effectively; Heavy cloud agent usage can consume plan quota quickly; Codebase indexing sends code to remote services, which some compliance teams must review

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor.md)

## Team-GPT (now Juma by Juma Labs)

Team-GPT started as a collaborative workspace built specifically for marketing teams, and that origin still shows in everything the product does today. The core idea is shared context: you load a client's website, brand guidelines, tone of voice and key documents into a project once, and from then on every prompt, chat and automated workflow draws on that same material. That removes the constant re-explaining that makes plain chat subscriptions painful at team scale.

The product has since been rebranded and now publishes at juma.ai as Juma by Juma Labs. Rather than just chatting, it runs what the company calls Flows - 700+ prebuilt workflows covering analytics and reporting, content writing, social, paid ads and strategy. You pick a Flow or describe a task, and it plans, executes and returns a finished asset such as a report, campaign brief, copy draft or landing page. Underneath, it connects to all the major AI models including GPT-5, Claude and Gemini, choosing automatically or letting you decide.

For teams, the commercial model is deliberately simple: unlimited seats on every plan with no per-user pricing, a free tier to start and Pro from $49 per month. Security is enterprise-grade with SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA and ISO 27001 compliance and zero data retention, and it integrates with the stack marketers already live in, from Google Drive and Notion to HubSpot, Meta Ads and Google Ads. An MCP connector also lets you drive it from Claude or Cursor.

**Pricing & Plans:** Team-GPT, now published as Juma by Juma Labs, is a paid product with a free plan to start. Every plan includes unlimited seats with no per-seat pricing, and Pro starts at $49 per month. Enterprise options and a private AWS deployment are available; check the current pricing page for the latest tiers.

- **Shared projects and knowledge:** Share projects, brand voice, documents and instructions once, then every prompt and Flow runs with the same context, so outputs stay consistent across the team.
- **700+ marketing Flows:** Pick from 700+ ready-made marketing Flows - ads reporting, social content, competitor analysis, SEO and more - or describe your task and get a finished deliverable.
- **All major models, one workspace:** Use GPT-5, Claude, Gemini and other major models from one workspace instead of juggling separate subscriptions and lost context.
- **Unlimited seats, flat pricing:** Unlimited seats on every plan with no per-seat charging, designed for teams and agencies that need everyone working from the same brief.
- **Enterprise security and integrations:** SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA and ISO 27001 compliance with zero data retention, plus integrations like Google Drive, Notion, HubSpot, Meta Ads and Google Ads and an MCP connector.

**Strengths:** Purpose-built for marketing teams rather than general chat; Shared projects and brand context keep outputs consistent; 700+ ready-made Flows turn repeatable tasks into finished deliverables; Unlimited seats on every plan with no per-seat pricing

**Limitations:** The product now publishes under the Juma name, so older Team-GPT documentation and links may be outdated; Pro tier starts at a monthly per-workspace price rather than a free-forever option for heavier use; Workflow automation assumes some comfort with structured prompts, projects and context setup; Best value is for teams and agencies - solo casual users may find it heavier than a simple chat subscription

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/team-gpt.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Cursor and Team-GPT (now Juma by Juma Labs) compare in monthly traffic?

Cursor has 23,297,751 monthly visits, while Team-GPT (now Juma by Juma Labs) has 31,904. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Cursor has a month-over-month growth rate of +8.4%; Team-GPT (now Juma by Juma Labs) has -14.7%.

### How does pricing compare?

Cursor: Freemium. Cursor uses a freemium model: you can start for free with limited usage, then move to paid Pro, team, and enterprise tiers that unlock higher model limits, cloud agents, and administrative controls. Exact seats and credit allowances change over time, so check cursor.com/pricing for current numbers. Team-GPT (now Juma by Juma Labs): Paid. Team-GPT, now published as Juma by Juma Labs, is a paid product with a free plan to start. Every plan includes unlimited seats with no per-seat pricing, and Pro starts at $49 per month. Enterprise options and a private AWS deployment are available; check the current pricing page for the latest tiers.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Miro](https://openaitools.app/tool/miro) | 30,749,206 | +1.7% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | An AI-powered visual workspace where teams think, plan, and build together | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/miro.md) |
| 2 | [Google Antigravity](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity) | 16,054,109 | +8.1% | Freemium | Provides powerful parallel AI coding agents via a desktop command center, but is less integrated into a traditional editor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity.md) |
| 3 | [Replit](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit) | 10,016,437 | -7.7% | Freemium, Paid | Enables instant cloud-based full-stack app building from natural language, but is less suited for local offline repositories. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit.md) |
| 4 | [VS Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/vs-code) | 7,397,370 | -3.8% | Freemium | Offers unmatched extension support and official Copilot integration, but lacks Cursor's out-of-the-box deep codebase indexing and agentic editing. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/vs-code.md) |
| 5 | [Qoder](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder) | 5,145,040 | +81.8% | Freemium, Free Trial, Free | Features advanced multi-file planning and codebase reading, but lacks Cursor's smooth chat-to-edit inline workflows. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder.md) |
| 6 | [Kiro](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro) | 3,330,476 | +4.6% | Freemium | Focuses on spec-driven engineering and structured agent planning, but offers less fluid ad-hoc inline code generation than Cursor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro.md) |
| 7 | [Devin](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin) | 2,549,346 | +1% | Paid | Operates as a fully autonomous software engineer for complex tasks, but lacks the snappy interactive inline editing of Cursor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin.md) |
| 8 | [Command Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code) | 2,358,177 | -12.1% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | The coding agent that learns your coding taste | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code.md) |
| 9 | [Dooray!](https://openaitools.app/tool/dooray) | 1,532,922 | -3.9% | Freemium, Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | All-in-one Korean collaboration suite for teams and public institutions | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/dooray.md) |
| 10 | [Trae](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae) | 702,366 | -7.8% | Freemium | Delivers a polished AI-native IDE experience with multi-file generation, but has a smaller ecosystem than Cursor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/cursor-vs-team-gpt

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)