How do their growth rates compare?

Cursor has a month-over-month growth rate of +8.4%; TrustOSS has 0%.

How does pricing compare?

Cursor: Freemium. Cursor uses a freemium model: you can start for free with limited usage, then move to paid Pro, team, and enterprise tiers that unlock higher model limits, cloud agents, and administrative controls. Exact seats and credit allowances change over time, so check cursor.com/pricing for current numbers. TrustOSS: Free. Free. Searching, analyzing, comparing, deep scans, star audits and README badges require no payment and no account; sign-in with GitHub is optional and only unlocks a maintainer dashboard for your own repositories.

What are alternatives to Cursor and TrustOSS?

Other tools in related categories include Google Antigravity, Replit, VS Code, Qoder, Kiro.

Head-to-Head Benchmark

Cursor vs TrustOSS

Cursor records 23,297,751 monthly visits with +8.4% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. TrustOSS records 0 monthly visits with 0% growth and Free pricing.

CursorFreemiumTraffic Leader

The AI coding agent for building ambitious software

Monthly Visits

23.3M

MoM Velocity

+8.4%

Top Market

🇺🇸 United States

View Cursor Analysis

cursor.com

TrustOSSFree

Free GitHub repo analyzer for health scores, fake-star audits and dependency risk

Monthly Visits

0

MoM Velocity

0%

Top Market

🌐 Global

View TrustOSS Analysis trustoss.org

Side-by-Side Traffic & Specification Matrix

Dimension / Metric	Cursor	TrustOSS
Official Domain	cursor.com	trustoss.org
Pricing Model	Freemium	Free
Monthly Visits	23.3M (23,297,751)	0 (0)
MoM Traffic Delta

Primary Market & Share	🇺🇸 United States (24.1%)	🌐 Global (—)

Direct Visits / mo	14.68M	0

User Rating	4.7	4.6

Supported Platforms	Website	Website

Cursor

The AI coding agent for building ambitious software

Agent-driven code changes

An agentic mode that plans changes, edits several files at once, runs tests, and iterates until the task is complete.

Cloud and parallel agents

Background agents spin up their own environments to build, test, and demo features in parallel, then hand back results for review.

Tab completion and codebase context

Fast inline suggestions plus codebase-wide semantic search and indexing so answers reflect your actual repository.

Multi-model flexibility

Switch between leading frontier models from multiple providers, or let Cursor select a model automatically for each task.

Strengths & Pros

+Strong repository-wide context and multi-file edits
+Agent runs in the editor, cloud, CLI, Slack, and GitHub
+Choose from multiple frontier models in one place
+Familiar IDE experience for developers coming from other editors
+Enterprise controls and broad adoption at large companies

Frequently Asked Questions: Cursor vs TrustOSS

Cursor has 23,297,751 monthly visits, while TrustOSS has 0. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

More Head-to-Head Matchups

Cursor vs Google Antigravity

39.35M visits/mo

Google Antigravity vs TrustOSS

Best Alternatives to Cursor & TrustOSS (12)

Limitations

–Requires a paid plan for the most capable models and higher usage
–Learning curve to use agentic workflows effectively
–Heavy cloud agent usage can consume plan quota quickly
–Codebase indexing sends code to remote services, which some compliance teams must review

TrustOSS

Free GitHub repo analyzer for health scores, fake-star audits and dependency risk

Repository health score

A 0–100 score with a letter grade, broken into five weighted dimensions — activity, maintenance, community, documentation and maturity — computed entirely from public GitHub data.

Fake-star audit

Plots the star growth curve and profiles recent stargazers by account age, followers and repo count to flag bought popularity.

Deep scan

Checks known vulnerabilities from OSV, real dependent packages from deps.dev, bus factor from commit concentration, CI pass rate, PR merge rate and docs-only detection, reported as OK/WARN/RISK findings with evidence.

Side-by-side comparison

Pick 2–4 candidate libraries and get a radar chart plus a score table across all five dimensions, with the strongest pick highlighted.

Strengths & Pros

+Free with no account required for the core analysis, comparison, deep scan and star audit features.
+Reads signals that are hard to fake — commit concentration, real dependent packages, issue handling and stargazer profiles — instead of relying on star counts.
+Deep scan pulls concrete evidence from OSV vulnerabilities and deps.dev adoption data rather than vague quality claims.

+

Shareable report URLs, radar-chart comparisons and a README badge make results easy to circulate in dependency reviews.

+CLI and AI agent skill let you automate dependency vetting instead of checking repos by hand.

Limitations

01

Google Antigravity

16.1M/mo

Provides powerful parallel AI coding agents via a desktop command center, but is less integrated into a traditional editor.

AI AgentFreemium+8.1%

Screenshot of the Google Antigravity site showing downloads and agent product surfaces

02

Replit

10M/mo

SpecialistEnables instant cloud-based full-stack app building from natural language, but is less suited for local offline repositories.

AI App BuilderFreemium, Paid61% direct

Replit agent generating a working web application from a prompt

#2

03

VS Code

7.4M/mo

Free / Open-sourceOffers unmatched extension support and official Copilot integration, but lacks Cursor's out-of-the-box deep codebase indexing and agentic editing.

AI Code AssistantFreemium29% direct

Screenshot of VS Code with an agent session planning changes and a diff view for review

04

Qoder

5.1M/mo

Features advanced multi-file planning and codebase reading, but lacks Cursor's smooth chat-to-edit inline workflows.

AI Code AssistantFreemium, Free Trial, Free+81.8%

Qoder IDE showing an active coding agent editing files and planning tasks

05

Kiro

3.3M/mo

Focuses on spec-driven engineering and structured agent planning, but offers less fluid ad-hoc inline code generation than Cursor.

AI Code AssistantFreemium+4.6%

Kiro IDE showing a spec-driven agent session with plan, build, and review steps

06

Devin

2.5M/mo

SpecialistOperates as a fully autonomous software engineer for complex tasks, but lacks the snappy interactive inline editing of Cursor.

AI Code AssistantPaid+1%

Devin session view with task list, parallel agents, and a generated pull request

07

Command Code

2.4M/mo

Free / Open-sourceThe coding agent that learns your coding taste

AI Code AssistantFreemium, Contact for Pricing74% direct

Command Code CLI showing an agent editing files and running tests

08

DeepWiki by Cognition

879.5K/mo

AI-generated wikis and chat for any public GitHub repository

AI Code AssistantFree44% direct

DeepWiki wiki page showing repository architecture and chat panel

09

Trae

702.4K/mo

Delivers a polished AI-native IDE experience with multi-file generation, but has a smaller ecosystem than Cursor.

AI Code AssistantFreemium53% direct

Trae agent applying a multi-file code change with a reviewable diff in the editor

10

Warp

657.4K/mo

SpecialistAI-powered terminal and agentic software factory for development teams

AI Code AssistantFreemium, Contact for Pricing38% direct

Warp platform view with factories-as-code YAML configuration and agent run status panel

11

Augment Code

326.2K/mo

Excels at enterprise-grade context engines and team workflows, but is heavier to set up than Cursor.

AI AgentFreemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing+24.1%

Screenshot of Augment Code code review agent posting inline findings on a pull request

12

OSS Insight

97.2K/mo

Free / Open-sourceFree real-time analytics for open source projects on GitHub

AI GitHubFree48% direct

Screenshot of the OSS Insight data explorer with SQL query panel and repository ranking charts

#1

Visit

Google Antigravity

16.1M/mo+8.1%

Official

Provides powerful parallel AI coding agents via a desktop command center, but is less integrated into a traditional editor.

AI Agent27% direct

Freemium

Visit

Replit

10M/mo

Official

SpecialistEnables instant cloud-based full-stack app building from natural language, but is less suited for local offline repositories.

AI App Builder61% direct

Freemium, Paid

#3

Visit

VS Code

7.4M/mo

Open Source

Free / Open-sourceOffers unmatched extension support and official Copilot integration, but lacks Cursor's out-of-the-box deep codebase indexing and agentic editing.

AI Code Assistant29% direct

Freemium

Visit

Qoder

5.1M/mo+81.8%

Official

Features advanced multi-file planning and codebase reading, but lacks Cursor's smooth chat-to-edit inline workflows.

AI Code Assistant49% direct

Freemium, Free Trial, Free

Visit

Kiro

3.3M/mo+4.6%