# Cursor vs Underleaf

Cursor records 23,297,751 monthly visits with +8.4% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Underleaf records 222,941 monthly visits with -1.9% growth and Freemium pricing.

| Metric | [Cursor](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor) | [Underleaf](https://openaitools.app/tool/underleaf) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.cursor.com | https://underleaf.ai |
| Categories | AI Code Assistant, AI Developer Tools, AI Agent | AI Writing, AI OCR, AI Thesis Generator, AI PDF |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 23,297,751 | 222,941 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +8.4% | -1.9% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 14,683,770 | 26,916 |
| Review Score | 4.7 | 4.5 |
| Saved Count | 29 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Cursor

Cursor's editor looks familiar to anyone who has used a modern IDE, but the center of gravity is the agent. Instead of only suggesting the next line, it can read a task description, inspect the repository, produce an implementation plan, modify many files, run commands, and report back with a summary of what changed. Developers keep control by approving plans, reviewing diffs, and stepping in wherever judgment is needed.

The product has expanded well beyond a single application. Cloud agents can run on their own machines for extended periods, Cursor ships a CLI, and integrations bring the same agent into Slack and GitHub so work can be handed off without switching tools. A model picker lets you use frontier models from several providers, or rely on automatic selection per task.

This makes Cursor a good fit for teams that want measurable velocity gains on large codebases while keeping human review in the loop. The trade-offs are mostly about cost and process: capable agents consume quota, remote indexing raises questions for security-conscious organizations, and teams need light conventions for when to delegate versus write code directly.

**Pricing & Plans:** Cursor uses a freemium model: you can start for free with limited usage, then move to paid Pro, team, and enterprise tiers that unlock higher model limits, cloud agents, and administrative controls. Exact seats and credit allowances change over time, so check cursor.com/pricing for current numbers.

- **Agent-driven code changes:** An agentic mode that plans changes, edits several files at once, runs tests, and iterates until the task is complete.
- **Cloud and parallel agents:** Background agents spin up their own environments to build, test, and demo features in parallel, then hand back results for review.
- **Tab completion and codebase context:** Fast inline suggestions plus codebase-wide semantic search and indexing so answers reflect your actual repository.
- **Multi-model flexibility:** Switch between leading frontier models from multiple providers, or let Cursor select a model automatically for each task.
- **CLI, Slack and GitHub workflows:** Run Cursor from the terminal, chat with it in Slack, and let it review or open pull requests in GitHub without leaving your workflow.

**Strengths:** Strong repository-wide context and multi-file edits; Agent runs in the editor, cloud, CLI, Slack, and GitHub; Choose from multiple frontier models in one place; Familiar IDE experience for developers coming from other editors

**Limitations:** Requires a paid plan for the most capable models and higher usage; Learning curve to use agentic workflows effectively; Heavy cloud agent usage can consume plan quota quickly; Codebase indexing sends code to remote services, which some compliance teams must review

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor.md)

## Underleaf

Underleaf focuses on the gap between what researchers already have — scanned notes, photos of a whiteboard, a journal PDF, a spreadsheet of results — and the LaTeX source they need. You upload the source material, pick the pages you care about when it is a multi-page document, and the tool returns one structured LaTeX document with sections, numbered equations, tables, and figures placed where they belong. It claims 98%+ accuracy on equations, including matrices, integrals, and aligned multi-line derivations, and shows a typeset preview before you download anything.

Beyond conversion, Underleaf bundles the writing work that usually happens afterwards: drafting abstracts and summaries, generating thesis statements, rewriting paragraphs for clarity while keeping your terminology, and looking up citations with BibTeX output. A browser extension brings the same rewriting, shortening, and explaining actions next to whatever draft you already have open, so you do not have to copy text into a separate tab.

The site reports 50,000+ academic users across 200+ universities and 240,000+ documents converted. A large set of single-purpose free tools (image to LaTeX, PDF to LaTeX, Excel to LaTeX, TikZ generator, table generator, citation generator, and more) can be used without an account, which makes it easy to test quality before paying.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. New users get 10 free credits with no credit card required, and many single-purpose converters and generators run free in the browser. Paid plans: Essentials at $12/month ($6/month billed annually, $72/year) with 200 credits per month and up to 10 pages per PDF; Pro at $24/month ($12/month billed annually, $144/year) with 500 credits per month, all LaTeX tools, and up to 20 pages per PDF. Both include the browser extension. A Team plan for groups of 5+ adds centralized billing, an admin dashboard, and reimbursable invoices.

- **Anything-to-LaTeX conversion:** Converts handwritten notes, photos and screenshots, scanned papers, Word documents, tables, and spreadsheets into LaTeX code that compiles rather than a rough approximation you must retype.
- **Whole-document PDF handling:** Uploads multi-page PDFs and lets you choose which pages to convert, returning one structured document with sections, numbered equations, tables, and figures in the right places.
- **Math and diagram recognition:** Reads equations, matrices, integrals, and aligned derivations at a stated 98%+ accuracy, and can turn diagrams and plots into TikZ.
- **Academic writing tools:** Drafts abstracts, summaries, and thesis statements; rewrites for clarity without losing your meaning; and looks up citations with BibTeX in the same place.
- **Browser extension and free tool library:** A browser extension adds rewrite, shorten, and explain actions beside your draft, while 60+ free single-purpose converters and generators run without an account.

**Strengths:** Handles many input types — handwriting, images, PDFs, Word, and spreadsheets — through one workflow; Produces structured, compilable LaTeX rather than plain-text approximations; Multi-page PDFs come back as a single document with sections, equations, and figures placed correctly; Free tier and 60+ no-account browser tools make quality easy to test before paying

**Limitations:** Credit-based limits mean heavy conversion work can require a paid tier quickly; Math accuracy is high but stated at 98%+, so output still needs a review pass; Team and institutional billing details are only available on request; Best experience depends on using the browser extension alongside your LaTeX editor

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/underleaf.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Cursor and Underleaf compare in monthly traffic?

Cursor has 23,297,751 monthly visits, while Underleaf has 222,941. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Cursor has a month-over-month growth rate of +8.4%; Underleaf has -1.9%.

### How does pricing compare?

Cursor: Freemium. Cursor uses a freemium model: you can start for free with limited usage, then move to paid Pro, team, and enterprise tiers that unlock higher model limits, cloud agents, and administrative controls. Exact seats and credit allowances change over time, so check cursor.com/pricing for current numbers. Underleaf: Freemium. Freemium. New users get 10 free credits with no credit card required, and many single-purpose converters and generators run free in the browser. Paid plans: Essentials at $12/month ($6/month billed annually, $72/year) with 200 credits per month and up to 10 pages per PDF; Pro at $24/month ($12/month billed annually, $144/year) with 500 credits per month, all LaTeX tools, and up to 20 pages per PDF. Both include the browser extension. A Team plan for groups of 5+ adds centralized billing, an admin dashboard, and reimbursable invoices.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [ChatGPT](https://openaitools.app/tool/chatgpt-4) | 6,048,022,723 | +2.2% | Freemium | OpenAI's flagship multimodal assistant powered by GPT-6 and GPT-5.6 for reasoning, coding, and deep research. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/chatgpt-4.md) |
| 2 | [DeepSeek](https://openaitools.app/tool/deepseek) | 372,761,591 | +4.3% | Freemium | High-efficiency open-weight and hosted reasoning AI powered by DeepSeek-V4 and R1 at ultra-low token costs. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/deepseek.md) |
| 3 | [Google Antigravity](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity) | 16,054,109 | +8.1% | Freemium | Provides powerful parallel AI coding agents via a desktop command center, but is less integrated into a traditional editor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity.md) |
| 4 | [Replit](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit) | 10,016,437 | -7.7% | Freemium, Paid | Enables instant cloud-based full-stack app building from natural language, but is less suited for local offline repositories. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit.md) |
| 5 | [VS Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/vs-code) | 7,397,370 | -3.8% | Freemium | Offers unmatched extension support and official Copilot integration, but lacks Cursor's out-of-the-box deep codebase indexing and agentic editing. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/vs-code.md) |
| 6 | [Qoder](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder) | 5,145,040 | +81.8% | Freemium, Free Trial, Free | Features advanced multi-file planning and codebase reading, but lacks Cursor's smooth chat-to-edit inline workflows. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder.md) |
| 7 | [Kiro](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro) | 3,330,476 | +4.6% | Freemium | Focuses on spec-driven engineering and structured agent planning, but offers less fluid ad-hoc inline code generation than Cursor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro.md) |
| 8 | [PDFgear](https://openaitools.app/tool/pdfgear) | 2,845,280 | -3.4% | Free | A free, AI-powered PDF editor for every device | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/pdfgear.md) |
| 9 | [Devin](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin) | 2,549,346 | +1% | Paid | Operates as a fully autonomous software engineer for complex tasks, but lacks the snappy interactive inline editing of Cursor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin.md) |
| 10 | [Command Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code) | 2,358,177 | -12.1% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | The coding agent that learns your coding taste | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/cursor-vs-underleaf

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)