How do Cursor and Userpilot compare in monthly traffic?

Cursor has 23,297,751 monthly visits, while Userpilot has 135,763. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

How do their growth rates compare?

Cursor has a month-over-month growth rate of +8.4%; Userpilot has -11.3%.

How does pricing compare?

Cursor: Freemium. Cursor uses a freemium model: you can start for free with limited usage, then move to paid Pro, team, and enterprise tiers that unlock higher model limits, cloud agents, and administrative controls. Exact seats and credit allowances change over time, so check cursor.com/pricing for current numbers. Userpilot: Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing. Userpilot offers a 14-day free trial with no credit card required, then monthly-active-user based plans. Starter costs $299 per month and covers up to 2,000 MAU with in-app engagement, user segmentation, usage trends and NPS surveys. Growth starts from $849 per month and adds advanced product analytics, event autocapture, resource centres, advanced surveys, 100k free emails and 5k session replays per month with three-year retention. Enterprise is quoted individually and adds mobile engagement, premium CRM integrations, bulk import and export, data warehouse sync, advanced user management and security and compliance features. Agent Analytics for AI agents and MCP usage is available as an add-on for Growth and Enterprise.

What are alternatives to Cursor and Userpilot?

Other tools in related categories include Google Antigravity, Replit, VS Code, Qoder, Kiro.

Open AI Tools

Cursor vs Userpilot — Traffic (23.3M vs 135.76K), Pricing & Verdict | Open AI Tools

Head-to-Head Benchmark

Cursor vs Userpilot

Cursor records 23,297,751 monthly visits with +8.4% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Userpilot records 135,763 monthly visits with -11.3% growth and Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing pricing.

CursorFreemiumTraffic Leader

The AI coding agent for building ambitious software

Monthly Visits

23.3M

MoM Velocity

+8.4%

Top Market

🇺🇸 United States

View Cursor Analysis cursor.com

UserpilotFree Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing

AI-powered product growth platform for onboarding, adoption and retention

Monthly Visits

135.76K

MoM Velocity

-11.3%

Top Market

🇺🇸 United States

View Userpilot Analysis userpilot.com

Side-by-Side Traffic & Specification Matrix

Dimension / Metric	Cursor	Userpilot
Official Domain	cursor.com	userpilot.com
Pricing Model	Freemium	Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing
Monthly Visits	23.3M (23,297,751)	135.76K (135,763)
MoM Traffic Delta

Primary Market & Share	🇺🇸 United States (24.1%)	🇺🇸 United States (18.1%)

Direct Visits / mo	14.68M	41.3K

User Rating	4.7	4.3

Supported Platforms	Website	Website

Cursor

The AI coding agent for building ambitious software

Agent-driven code changes

An agentic mode that plans changes, edits several files at once, runs tests, and iterates until the task is complete.

Cloud and parallel agents

Background agents spin up their own environments to build, test, and demo features in parallel, then hand back results for review.

Tab completion and codebase context

Fast inline suggestions plus codebase-wide semantic search and indexing so answers reflect your actual repository.

Multi-model flexibility

Switch between leading frontier models from multiple providers, or let Cursor select a model automatically for each task.

Strengths & Pros

+Strong repository-wide context and multi-file edits
+Agent runs in the editor, cloud, CLI, Slack, and GitHub
+Choose from multiple frontier models in one place
+Familiar IDE experience for developers coming from other editors
+Enterprise controls and broad adoption at large companies

Limitations

–Requires a paid plan for the most capable models and higher usage
–Learning curve to use agentic workflows effectively
–Heavy cloud agent usage can consume plan quota quickly
–Codebase indexing sends code to remote services, which some compliance teams must review

Userpilot

AI-powered product growth platform for onboarding, adoption and retention

AI-assisted product analytics

Track feature usage, funnels, paths, retention and cohorts with event autocapture and AI-powered insights, without heavy data engineering.

No-code in-app engagement

Build onboarding flows, tooltips, banners, spotlights, checklists and resource centers without code, and target them with behavioural logic.

User feedback and NPS

Run NPS, CSAT and behavioural surveys across in-app, mobile and email channels, with AI summaries and sentiment and thematic analysis.

Session replay with privacy controls

Watch real sessions linked to funnels and drop-offs, with frustration signals such as rage clicks and errors, plus auto-masking for privacy.

Strengths & Pros

+Product analytics, onboarding, feedback, session replay and email sit in one platform, so insights and action stay connected.
+No-code builder lets product, design and marketing teams ship in-app experiences without engineering tickets.
+AI features are practical rather than decorative: Lia takes actions, and Agent Analytics measures real AI agent performance.
+MCP server and broad integrations let you push Userpilot data into the AI and analytics tools you already use.

Best Alternatives to Cursor & Userpilot (12)

Google Antigravity

16.1M/mo

Provides powerful parallel AI coding agents via a desktop command center, but is less integrated into a traditional editor.

AI AgentFreemium+8.1%

Screenshot of the Google Antigravity site showing downloads and agent product surfaces

Replit

10M/mo

SpecialistEnables instant cloud-based full-stack app building from natural language, but is less suited for local offline repositories.

AI App BuilderFreemium, Paid61% direct

Replit agent generating a working web application from a prompt

VS Code

7.4M/mo

Free / Open-sourceOffers unmatched extension support and official Copilot integration, but lacks Cursor's out-of-the-box deep codebase indexing and agentic editing.

AI Code AssistantFreemium29% direct