# Dechecker vs MyDetector

Dechecker records 111,347 monthly visits with +4.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. MyDetector records 534,478 monthly visits with +1.1% growth and Free pricing.

| Metric | [Dechecker](https://openaitools.app/tool/dechecker) | [MyDetector](https://openaitools.app/tool/mydetector) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://dechecker.ai | https://mydetector.ai |
| Categories | AI Checker, AI Checker Essay, AI Content Detector, AI Detector | AI Detector, AI Content Detector, Humanizer AI, AI Checker |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Free |
| Monthly Visits | 111,347 | 534,478 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +4.2% | +1.1% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 26,472 | 87,613 |
| Review Score | 3.8 | 3.5 |
| Saved Count | 1 | 3 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Dechecker

Dechecker centers on a paste-and-check workflow: you drop in up to roughly 1,000 words, or upload a document, and the detector returns an overall AI probability plus a sentence-level breakdown showing which passages triggered the model. Alongside the core check you can stack optional passes such as a plagiarism scan, a grammar pass and a fact-check, and the platform also exposes sibling tools for AI code detection, AI image detection, transcription, summarization and essay writing.

Its stated positioning is accuracy with few false positives, achieved by scoring sentence structure, phrasing rhythm and transitions rather than looking for fixed keyword lists. When something is flagged, the tool explains why that sentence reads as machine-generated and offers one-click rewriting so writers can smooth the pattern out instead of rewriting from scratch. Bulk document upload, downloadable reports and a saved history are provided for people checking more than one file.

Accessibility is the main selling point: the checker is free, needs no account for a basic run, and shows a "100 free credits" offer alongside paid options for heavier usage. Text is described as processed without being stored, which matters for students and professionals checking unpublished coursework or client material. The site is translated into several languages and claims more than a million users.

**Pricing & Plans:** Dechecker advertises a free tier with no registration required for basic AI checks, and the site surfaces a "claim your 100 credits" offer for signed-in users. Beyond that, plan details and paid tiers vary, so check the pricing page for current limits and per-word or per-credit bundles.

- **Sentence-level AI detection:** The checker returns an overall AI probability plus a per-sentence breakdown, so you can see exactly which lines read as machine-written instead of guessing from a single number.
- **Built-in humanizing rewrites:** Flagged sentences come with an explanation of what triggered the flag and one-click rewrite suggestions that reduce tell-tale AI patterns while keeping your meaning.
- **Add-on verification passes:** Optional plagiarism, grammar and fact-check modules can be layered onto the same text, turning a single submission into a broader originality and quality review.
- **Document upload and bulk scanning:** Paste text directly or upload files, and scan multiple documents in one pass when you are reviewing a stack of papers or drafts.
- **Report history and downloads:** Detection results are saved to a library and can be exported, which helps when you need a record of checks over time or proof of a review.
- **Extra detectors for code and images:** Separate tools detect AI-written code and AI-generated images, covering project types beyond plain essays and articles.

**Strengths:** Core AI check is free and requires no signup for a quick run; Sentence-level explanations make results actionable rather than just a score; Extra plagiarism, grammar and fact-check modules cover more ground in one place; Document upload, bulk scanning and saved reports suit multi-file workflows

**Limitations:** The free allowance is credit and word limited, so heavy use runs into paid tiers; AI detectors in general can still misfire on heavily edited or non-native human writing; Detection accuracy depends on language and text length, so very short passages are less reliable

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/dechecker.md)

## MyDetector

MyDetector approaches AI detection as a review workflow rather than a single pass-or-fail score. The detector estimates whether a passage was written by a person or a language model by measuring style, structure and wording, then marks and scores individual sentences so you can see exactly which lines triggered the result instead of guessing from a single number. A vocabulary panel adds readability-style insight into the language used.

Input is flexible. You can paste up to 200,000 characters or upload TXT, DOCX, PDF and PPT files, which makes it practical for whole documents rather than only short samples. You can switch between a faster checker model and a deeper analysis model depending on whether speed or detail matters more. Each run is saved to a history list, and a content comparison tool places AI-leaning and human-leaning passages next to each other.

Positioning is honest about the limits: the site states that no detector is fully exact and that structured human writing can be misflagged, so the score should be treated as a signal rather than proof. It supports English, Chinese, Japanese, Spanish, Portuguese, French, Russian, German and more. The site advertises a free trial and free credits on sign-up, with paid plans for higher volume. It is aimed at educators, editors, marketers, legal reviewers and researchers who need a quick originality signal.

**Pricing & Plans:** Free to use, with a free trial and free credits granted after account sign-up. The site advertises paid upgrades for higher volume; specific paid tier prices are not published on the page we reviewed.

- **Sentence-level AI highlighting:** Every flagged sentence is marked and individually scored, so you can locate suspected AI text without re-reading the whole draft.
- **Document upload support:** Detect inside TXT, DOCX, PDF and PPT files instead of copy-pasting, with up to 200,000 characters accepted per run.
- **Selectable detector models:** Switch between a fast checker and a deeper analysis model to balance speed against depth for each task.
- **Text humanization:** After detection, an adjustment step rewrites AI-leaning passages into a more natural human tone and improves flow.
- **History and comparison tools:** Saved run history restores previous inputs and results, while the comparison view sets AI-style and human-style passages side by side.

**Strengths:** Free trial plus free credits on sign-up, so you can test on real documents; Sentence-level scoring is far more actionable than a single percentage; Handles PDF, Word and PowerPoint uploads with a generous 200,000 character limit; Supports ten-plus languages including CJK and Russian

**Limitations:** Paid pricing is not published openly on the main page; No AI detector is exact — structured human writing can be misflagged; Uploaded file processing may be slower than plain text pasting; Humanizer output still needs human review before use

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/mydetector.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Dechecker and MyDetector compare in monthly traffic?

Dechecker has 111,347 monthly visits, while MyDetector has 534,478. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Dechecker has a month-over-month growth rate of +4.2%; MyDetector has +1.1%.

### How does pricing compare?

Dechecker: Freemium. Dechecker advertises a free tier with no registration required for basic AI checks, and the site surfaces a "claim your 100 credits" offer for signed-in users. Beyond that, plan details and paid tiers vary, so check the pricing page for current limits and per-word or per-credit bundles. MyDetector: Free. Free to use, with a free trial and free credits granted after account sign-up. The site advertises paid upgrades for higher volume; specific paid tier prices are not published on the page we reviewed.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [ZeroGPT](https://openaitools.app/tool/zerogpt) | 32,864,541 | +19.7% | Freemium, Paid | Much higher user traffic and broader detection datasets, but offers a similar core AI scoring and humanizing workflow. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/zerogpt.md) |
| 2 | [GPTZero](https://openaitools.app/tool/gptzero-me) | 23,246,989 | +32.5% | Freemium, Paid | Industry-standard accuracy trusted by educators, though it lacks the integrated side-by-side humanizer view found in MyDetector. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/gptzero-me.md) |
| 3 | [Undetectable AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/undetectable-ai) | 3,113,403 | +17.5% | Freemium | Stronger focus on aggressive text humanization to bypass detectors, but features a slightly different reporting dashboard. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/undetectable-ai.md) |
| 4 | [StealthWriter](https://openaitools.app/tool/stealthwriter) | 2,887,114 | +15.5% | Freemium | More flexible rewriting options and adjustable humanization styles, though its standalone detection accuracy varies. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/stealthwriter.md) |
| 5 | [Copyleaks](https://openaitools.app/tool/copyleaks) | 2,402,494 | -14.1% | Paid, Contact for Pricing | Enterprise-grade multi-format detection with robust API capabilities, but less oriented toward quick casual single-page humanizing. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/copyleaks.md) |
| 6 | [AI Humanize](https://openaitools.app/tool/ai-humanize) | 2,152,089 | +8.1% | Freemium, Paid | Turn AI-generated text into natural, human-sounding writing | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/ai-humanize.md) |
| 7 | [Originality.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/originality) | 2,049,639 | +2.8% | Paid | Professional-grade content integrity scanning with strong plagiarism checks, but requires a paid subscription for full analysis features. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/originality.md) |
| 8 | [Walter Writes AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/walter-ai) | 1,474,367 | +24.4% | Freemium | Make AI-written text sound like you wrote it | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/walter-ai.md) |
| 9 | [Decopy AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/decopy-ai) | 1,256,528 | -11% | Free | One workspace to write, check and summarize | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/decopy-ai.md) |
| 10 | [Phrasly](https://openaitools.app/tool/phrasly-ai) | 1,209,985 | +17.9% | Freemium, Subscription | Streamlined AI writing and humanizing assistant, but places less emphasis on advanced standalone content detection reports. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/phrasly-ai.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/dechecker-vs-mydetector

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)