# DeepSeek vs Evalify

DeepSeek records 372,761,591 monthly visits with +4.3% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Evalify records 496 monthly visits with +48.1% growth and Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [DeepSeek](https://openaitools.app/tool/deepseek) | [Evalify](https://openaitools.app/tool/evalify) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.deepseek.com | https://www.evalify.ai |
| Categories | Large Language Models (LLMs), Open Source AI Models, AI API, AI Chatbot | AI Investing, AI Legal Assistant, AI Research Tool |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 372,761,591 | 496 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +4.3% | +48.1% |
| Primary Market | China | Global |
| Direct Visits | 291,585,405 | 198 |
| Review Score | 4.8 | 4.2 |
| Saved Count | 44 | 1 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## DeepSeek

DeepSeek (Hangzhou DeepSeek Artificial Intelligence Co., Ltd.) is a frontier AI research organization that disrupted the global LLM market by pairing open-weight transparency with breakthrough Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) and reinforcement-learning reasoning efficiency. Following the landmark releases of DeepSeek-V3 and the peer-reviewed DeepSeek-R1 reasoning model, DeepSeek introduced the DeepSeek-V4 generation in 2026—featuring a hybrid attention architecture and a native 1-million-token context window across DeepSeek-V4-Pro (1.6T total parameters, 49B active per token) and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash (284B total parameters, 13B active per token).

Users can interact with DeepSeek in three ways: completely free through the consumer web portal (chat.deepseek.com) and mobile apps with one-click toggles for deep thinking and live web search; via DeepSeek's hosted, OpenAI-compatible developer API; or by self-hosting DeepSeek's open-weight checkpoints (including V3, R1, Prover-V2, and distilled Qwen/Llama variants) on private infrastructure. The models excel at competitive mathematics, algorithm design, repository-level software engineering, and structured data extraction, with automatic context caching on the API that slashes repeated prompt costs by over 95%.

In late 2026, DeepSeek remains the price-performance benchmark for developers and automation workflows. While the consumer chat interface remains free without a mandatory $20/month subscription tier, the developer API transitioned in late 2026 to two primary endpoints—`deepseek-flash` and `deepseek-v4-pro`—with time-of-day pricing. Off-peak API calls cost just $0.15 per million input tokens ($0.003 on cache hits) and $0.60 per million output tokens on Flash, and $0.66 input / $1.98 output on V4-Pro, making it a fraction of the cost of comparable Western frontier models.

**Pricing & Plans:** Free web and mobile chat app at chat.deepseek.com; pay-as-you-go OpenAI-compatible API with off-peak rates at $0.15/1M input ($0.003 cache hit) and $0.60/1M output for deepseek-flash (V4.1-Flash), and $0.66/1M input ($0.022 cache hit) and $1.98/1M output for deepseek-v4-pro (peak weekday UTC hours bill at 2x).

- **DeepSeek-V4 Hybrid Attention & 1M Context:** Leverages a sparse Mixture-of-Experts architecture (49B active parameters out of 1.6T on V4-Pro) to process up to 1 million tokens with minimal latency and memory overhead.
- **Transparent Chain-of-Thought Reasoning:** Pioneered by DeepSeek-R1 and integrated into V3.2 and V4 thinking modes, exposing step-by-step self-verification for complex math, logic, and code debugging.
- **Automatic Context Caching & Off-Peak API Pricing:** Drops input token costs to $0.003/1M on Flash and $0.022/1M on V4-Pro for cache hits, with 50% lower rates during off-peak UTC hours.
- **Free Consumer Web & Mobile Assistant:** Provides free access at chat.deepseek.com and on iOS/Android with document uploads, reasoning mode, and web search without paywalling core models.
- **Open-Weight Ecosystem & Self-Hosting Freedom:** Offers open weights for DeepSeek-V3, R1, Distill variants, and Prover models on Hugging Face and GitHub so enterprises can deploy within air-gapped environments.

**Strengths:** Completely free consumer web and mobile app with deep reasoning and web search included; Ultra-low API token rates ($0.15/$0.60 on Flash, $0.66/$1.98 on V4-Pro off-peak) with up to 98% savings on cached inputs; Drop-in OpenAI API compatibility makes switching or routing between models effortless; Strong open-weight lineage allows teams to self-host or fine-tune models without vendor lock-in

**Limitations:** Hosted API and web app store data on servers in China, prompting compliance restrictions for some Western enterprises and government agencies; Peak-hour API pricing (01:00–04:00 and 06:00–10:00 UTC on weekdays) doubles per-token costs compared to off-peak rates; Lacks native voice mode, video generation, and productivity suite integrations offered by ChatGPT and Google Gemini

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/deepseek.md)

## Evalify

Evalify targets the most labor-intensive part of patent practice: the search. Rather than handing back thousands of raw documents, it designs a search strategy with you, executes it across 200M+ patents and 170+ jurisdictions, then drafts a first-pass freedom-to-operate opinion with every flagged claim charted limitation by limitation. Multiple AI agents cross-examine the charts and explicitly surface where they disagree, so the attorney can see the uncertainty instead of a falsely tidy answer.

Each run returns two deliverables: a short FTO Brief covering the opinion, the Score, clearance by jurisdiction and the critical patents, plus a long Full Report documenting every charted claim, the patents screened out with reasons, and the methodology. Both can be exported as PDF or editable Word, and Counsel-Grade users can compose exports under their own firm's branding.

Confidentiality is treated as a first-class feature. Uploaded inputs — technical disclosures, draft claims, product descriptions — are never retained, the working copy is destroyed after processing, and client material is never used as training data. Analyses and reports stay in the user's own account. Evalify positions its output as a preliminary assessment requiring attorney review, not legal advice.

**Pricing & Plans:** Evalify does not publish a conventional public price list; the site routes prospective users to a pricing conversation and a free first analysis. In its manual-search comparison the company places its own cost per matter below $500, against thousands of dollars for a traditional search. A Standard tier exports the FTO Brief as PDF, while a Counsel-Grade tier unlocks the Export Composer (both documents as PDF or editable Word), monitoring of a matter and enterprise white-labeling. Confirm current figures directly with Evalify.

- **Drafted first-pass FTO opinion:** Produces a reasoned infringement verdict and per-jurisdiction risk framing in the structure attorneys already use, so the deliverable is an editable draft rather than a pile of search results.
- **Element-by-element claim charts:** Every limitation of every charted claim is mapped against the product with the verdict and the reasoning that produced it, making the analysis auditable rather than a black-box score.
- **Evalify Score (250-900):** A single clearance number built from the chart verdicts, designed to be defensible for an attorney and legible to a business client.
- **Multi-agent cross-examination:** Several AI agents review each claim chart and flag disagreements explicitly, so unresolved conflicts are visible and the human decides.
- **Zero-retention confidentiality:** Uploaded inputs are never stored, are wiped after processing, and are never used to train models; only your analyses and reports persist in your account.

**Strengths:** Turns an exhausting manual search into a drafted opinion with claim charts; Explicit zero-retention policy on client input material; Transparent cross-examination of AI charts instead of a single opaque answer; Export to editable Word and firm-branded, white-label output

**Limitations:** No public self-serve price list; cost requires a conversation; Output is explicitly a preliminary assessment and still requires attorney review; Pricing page URL currently returns a 404, so tier details must be confirmed directly

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/evalify.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do DeepSeek and Evalify compare in monthly traffic?

DeepSeek has 372,761,591 monthly visits, while Evalify has 496. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

DeepSeek has a month-over-month growth rate of +4.3%; Evalify has +48.1%.

### How does pricing compare?

DeepSeek: Freemium. Free web and mobile chat app at chat.deepseek.com; pay-as-you-go OpenAI-compatible API with off-peak rates at $0.15/1M input ($0.003 cache hit) and $0.60/1M output for deepseek-flash (V4.1-Flash), and $0.66/1M input ($0.022 cache hit) and $1.98/1M output for deepseek-v4-pro (peak weekday UTC hours bill at 2x). Evalify: Contact for Pricing. Evalify does not publish a conventional public price list; the site routes prospective users to a pricing conversation and a free first analysis. In its manual-search comparison the company places its own cost per matter below $500, against thousands of dollars for a traditional search. A Standard tier exports the FTO Brief as PDF, while a Counsel-Grade tier unlocks the Export Composer (both documents as PDF or editable Word), monitoring of a matter and enterprise white-labeling. Confirm current figures directly with Evalify.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [ChatGPT](https://openaitools.app/tool/chatgpt-4) | 6,048,022,723 | +2.2% | Freemium | Provides stronger multi-modal reasoning and agentic tools, but lacks DeepSeek's ultra-low-cost API pricing. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/chatgpt-4.md) |
| 2 | [Google Gemini](https://openaitools.app/tool/gemini-gemini-advanced) | 2,637,398,242 | -0.1% | Freemium | Offers an enormous context window and deep Google ecosystem integration, but feels less specialized for pure reasoning tasks. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/gemini-gemini-advanced.md) |
| 3 | [Claude](https://openaitools.app/tool/claude-2) | 1,253,439,413 | +23.8% | Freemium | Delivers superior long-form coding artifacts and nuanced writing, but lacks DeepSeek's specialized open-weight reasoning models. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/claude-2.md) |
| 4 | [Grok](https://openaitools.app/tool/grok) | 203,846,050 | -0.8% | Freemium | Features real-time X social data integration, but is less cost-effective for dedicated developer coding workflows. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/grok.md) |
| 5 | [Perplexity](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai) | 88,310,223 | -3.7% | Freemium | Real-time AI answer engine and research workspace combining live web citations with frontier reasoning models. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai.md) |
| 6 | [Qwen 4 (Alibaba Qwen4)](https://openaitools.app/tool/qwen-4) | 35,101,353 | -6.2% | Freemium | Provides comparable open-weight foundation models and multilingual performance, but requires self-hosting or third-party inference setup. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/qwen-4.md) |
| 7 | [Cursor](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor) | 23,297,751 | +8.4% | Freemium | The AI coding agent for building ambitious software | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor.md) |
| 8 | [Kimi AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/kimi-chat) | 19,632,261 | -23.4% | Free | Excels at ultra-long document analysis and research, but lacks the same level of open-weight developer community support. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kimi-chat.md) |
| 9 | [Thomson Reuters](https://openaitools.app/tool/thomson-reuters) | 17,919,413 | +5.5% | Contact for Pricing | Purpose-built AI and trusted content for legal, tax, risk and trade professionals | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/thomson-reuters.md) |
| 10 | [Ollama](https://openaitools.app/tool/ollama) | 9,421,973 | +4.3% | Free, Freemium, Paid | Enables running open-source models locally on consumer hardware, but lacks DeepSeek's cloud-scale hosted reasoning power. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/ollama.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/deepseek-vs-evalify

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)