Executive Telemetry Verdict (BLUF)In our 2026 telemetry benchmark, DeepSeek leads total web traffic with 357.40M monthly visits (357,399,386) versus LibTV at 3.07M (3,069,471)—representing 116.4x volume and a difference of 354.33M visits per month. For month-over-month momentum, LibTV leads growth velocity at +9.5% (+266.1K visits/mo) compared with DeepSeek at +1.0%. Pricing compares DeepSeek (Freemium) against LibTV (Freemium, Paid), with primary geographic demand led by China (50.5%) for DeepSeek and China (80.3%) for LibTV.

Professional AI-assisted video creation platform and tools.
Verified 2026 monthly traffic volume, acquisition channels, pricing structure, and ecosystem footprint
| Dimension / Metric | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Official Domain | deepseek.com | liblib.tv |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium, Paid |
| Pricing Details | Free web and mobile chat app at chat.deepseek.com; pay-as-you-go OpenAI-compatible API with off-peak rates at $0.15/1M input ($0.003 cache hit) and $0.60/1M output for deepseek-flash (V4.1-Flash), and $0.66/1M input ($0.022 cache hit) and $1.98/1M output for deepseek-v4-pro (peak weekday UTC hours bill at 2x). | Freemium, Paid |
| Monthly Web Visits | 357.40M357,399,386 visits/mo | 3.07M3,069,471 visits/mo |
| MoM Traffic Delta | +3.60M3,597,280 visits delta | +266.1K266,138 visits delta |
| MoM Growth Velocity (%) | +1.0% | +9.5% |
| Primary Market & Share | 🇨🇳 China(50.5% share) | 🇨🇳 China(80.3% share) |
| Direct Visits / mo | 280.06M(280,059,676) | 1.97M(1,968,754) |
| Referral Visits / mo | 10.57M(10,570,000) | 214.3K(214,326) |
| Email Visits / mo | 2.21M(2,211,842) | 3.1K(3,123) |
| User Rating | 3.8 / 5.0(68 reviews) | 5.0 / 5.0(59 reviews) |
| Bookmarks | 44 saves | 0 saves |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |
| Chrome Extension Installs | — | — |
| Discord Community Members | — | — |
| Primary Categories |

High-efficiency open-weight and hosted reasoning AI powered by DeepSeek-V4 and R1 at ultra-low token costs.
Leverages a sparse Mixture-of-Experts architecture (49B active parameters out of 1.6T on V4-Pro) to process up to 1 million tokens with minimal latency and memory overhead.
Pioneered by DeepSeek-R1 and integrated into V3.2 and V4 thinking modes, exposing step-by-step self-verification for complex math, logic, and code debugging.
Drops input token costs to $0.003/1M on Flash and $0.022/1M on V4-Pro for cache hits, with 50% lower rates during off-peak UTC hours.
Provides free access at chat.deepseek.com and on iOS/Android with document uploads, reasoning mode, and web search without paywalling core models.

Professional AI-assisted video creation platform and tools.
Professional AI-assisted video creation platform and tools.
DeepSeek generates more monthly web traffic with 357.40M visits/mo (357,399,386) compared to LibTV with 3.07M visits/mo (3,069,471), giving DeepSeek 116.44x the monthly reach (354.33M additional visits). Across acquisition channels, DeepSeek records 280.06M direct visits, 10.57M referral visits, and 2.21M email visits per month, while LibTV records 1.97M direct visits, 214.3K referral visits, and 3.1K email visits per month.
LibTV is growing faster on a month-over-month velocity basis in 2026. DeepSeek posted a MoM growth velocity of +1.0% with a monthly traffic delta of +3.60M visits (3,597,280), whereas LibTV posted a MoM growth velocity of +9.5% with a delta of +266.1K visits (266,138). Regionally, DeepSeek's top market is China (50.5% share) and LibTV's top market is China (80.3% share).
DeepSeek operates on a Freemium pricing model (Free web and mobile chat app at chat.deepseek.com; pay-as-you-go OpenAI-compatible API with off-peak rates at $0.15/1M input ($0.003 cache hit) and $0.60/1M output for deepseek-flash (V4.1-Flash), and $0.66/1M input ($0.022 cache hit) and $1.98/1M output for deepseek-v4-pro (peak weekday UTC hours bill at 2x).), while LibTV operates on a Freemium, Paid model (supported on Website). In user satisfaction and community adoption, DeepSeek has 44 directory bookmarks and a 3.8/5.0 user rating, compared to 0 bookmarks and a 5.0/5.0 user rating for LibTV.
Based on category overlap and verified 2026 monthly traffic telemetry, the top alternatives to both DeepSeek and LibTV include ChatGPT (5.92B visits/mo, Freemium), Google Gemini (2.64B visits/mo, Freemium), Claude (1.01B visits/mo, Freemium), OpenAI Platform (259.46M visits/mo, Paid), Grok (205.46M visits/mo, Freemium). Teams evaluating DeepSeek vs LibTV frequently benchmark these competitors for pricing flexibility, platform support, and workflow integration.
Explore deep-dive profiles, verified alternative hubs, and related head-to-head matchups
Top competing AI tools ranked by verified monthly web traffic and category overlap

AI-powered camera control for cinematic video generation from photos.