# DeepSeek vs Sendmux

DeepSeek records 372,761,591 monthly visits with +4.3% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Sendmux records 37 monthly visits with -98.3% growth and Free pricing.

| Metric | [DeepSeek](https://openaitools.app/tool/deepseek) | [Sendmux](https://openaitools.app/tool/sendmux) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.deepseek.com | https://sendmux.ai |
| Categories | Large Language Models (LLMs), Open Source AI Models, AI API, AI Chatbot | AI Developer Tools, AI Workflow, AI Email Assistant |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Free |
| Monthly Visits | 372,761,591 | 37 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +4.3% | -98.3% |
| Primary Market | China | United States |
| Direct Visits | 291,585,405 | 12 |
| Review Score | 4.8 | 4.2 |
| Saved Count | 44 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## DeepSeek

DeepSeek (Hangzhou DeepSeek Artificial Intelligence Co., Ltd.) is a frontier AI research organization that disrupted the global LLM market by pairing open-weight transparency with breakthrough Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) and reinforcement-learning reasoning efficiency. Following the landmark releases of DeepSeek-V3 and the peer-reviewed DeepSeek-R1 reasoning model, DeepSeek introduced the DeepSeek-V4 generation in 2026—featuring a hybrid attention architecture and a native 1-million-token context window across DeepSeek-V4-Pro (1.6T total parameters, 49B active per token) and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash (284B total parameters, 13B active per token).

Users can interact with DeepSeek in three ways: completely free through the consumer web portal (chat.deepseek.com) and mobile apps with one-click toggles for deep thinking and live web search; via DeepSeek's hosted, OpenAI-compatible developer API; or by self-hosting DeepSeek's open-weight checkpoints (including V3, R1, Prover-V2, and distilled Qwen/Llama variants) on private infrastructure. The models excel at competitive mathematics, algorithm design, repository-level software engineering, and structured data extraction, with automatic context caching on the API that slashes repeated prompt costs by over 95%.

In late 2026, DeepSeek remains the price-performance benchmark for developers and automation workflows. While the consumer chat interface remains free without a mandatory $20/month subscription tier, the developer API transitioned in late 2026 to two primary endpoints—`deepseek-flash` and `deepseek-v4-pro`—with time-of-day pricing. Off-peak API calls cost just $0.15 per million input tokens ($0.003 on cache hits) and $0.60 per million output tokens on Flash, and $0.66 input / $1.98 output on V4-Pro, making it a fraction of the cost of comparable Western frontier models.

**Pricing & Plans:** Free web and mobile chat app at chat.deepseek.com; pay-as-you-go OpenAI-compatible API with off-peak rates at $0.15/1M input ($0.003 cache hit) and $0.60/1M output for deepseek-flash (V4.1-Flash), and $0.66/1M input ($0.022 cache hit) and $1.98/1M output for deepseek-v4-pro (peak weekday UTC hours bill at 2x).

- **DeepSeek-V4 Hybrid Attention & 1M Context:** Leverages a sparse Mixture-of-Experts architecture (49B active parameters out of 1.6T on V4-Pro) to process up to 1 million tokens with minimal latency and memory overhead.
- **Transparent Chain-of-Thought Reasoning:** Pioneered by DeepSeek-R1 and integrated into V3.2 and V4 thinking modes, exposing step-by-step self-verification for complex math, logic, and code debugging.
- **Automatic Context Caching & Off-Peak API Pricing:** Drops input token costs to $0.003/1M on Flash and $0.022/1M on V4-Pro for cache hits, with 50% lower rates during off-peak UTC hours.
- **Free Consumer Web & Mobile Assistant:** Provides free access at chat.deepseek.com and on iOS/Android with document uploads, reasoning mode, and web search without paywalling core models.
- **Open-Weight Ecosystem & Self-Hosting Freedom:** Offers open weights for DeepSeek-V3, R1, Distill variants, and Prover models on Hugging Face and GitHub so enterprises can deploy within air-gapped environments.

**Strengths:** Completely free consumer web and mobile app with deep reasoning and web search included; Ultra-low API token rates ($0.15/$0.60 on Flash, $0.66/$1.98 on V4-Pro off-peak) with up to 98% savings on cached inputs; Drop-in OpenAI API compatibility makes switching or routing between models effortless; Strong open-weight lineage allows teams to self-host or fine-tune models without vendor lock-in

**Limitations:** Hosted API and web app store data on servers in China, prompting compliance restrictions for some Western enterprises and government agencies; Peak-hour API pricing (01:00–04:00 and 06:00–10:00 UTC on weekdays) doubles per-token costs compared to off-peak rates; Lacks native voice mode, video generation, and productivity suite integrations offered by ChatGPT and Google Gemini

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/deepseek.md)

## Sendmux

Agents that need to handle email usually end up stitched together from two or three services: one platform for sending, another for receiving, and a pile of glue code to reconcile them. Sendmux collapses that into a single API surface. It covers outbound mail, agent mailboxes, routing controls, and delivery events, so an agent can send, receive, route, and react without juggling separate accounts and bills.

A key design decision is that inbox data is formatted for machine consumption. Gmail and Outlook typically return full HTML bodies that burn thousands of tokens before the agent gets to the actual content. Sendmux strips signatures and quoted history by default and exposes links, headers, and attachment metadata only when asked, so the model spends its budget on the message rather than the markup.

On the sending side, Sendmux is deliberately not a single-provider lock-in. A mailbox credential works as both a Bearer token for HTTP and a password for SMTP, and routing can be bound to specific providers, delivery groups, weights, and quota windows. Events arrive through signed webhooks, an SSE stream, or typed change polling, which means agents can react in real time rather than running polling loops. SDKs for TypeScript and Python, a CLI, framework integrations, and an MCP endpoint make it straightforward to wire the whole thing into an existing agent stack.

**Pricing & Plans:** Sendmux is listed as free, with two free mailboxes available to start and agent onboarding designed to be self-service. Pricing beyond the initial free mailboxes is not detailed on the landing page, so check the pricing page for current tiers.

- **Agent mailboxes:** Provision mailboxes on verified domains or a shared myagent.mx address, with clean JSON output that strips signatures and quotes.
- **Provider-flexible sending:** Send over HTTP or SMTP using the same mailbox credential as a Bearer token and SMTP password, with Idempotency-Key retries and attachment support.
- **Routing controls:** Bind keys to providers, delivery groups, weights, and quota windows so traffic stays inside the boundaries you set.
- **Real-time events:** Signed webhooks for delivery and receipt events, an SSE stream for live mailbox clients, and typed change polling for resync.
- **Developer tooling:** Official SDKs for TypeScript and Python, a CLI, LangChain and AI SDK integrations, and a hosted MCP endpoint with OAuth.

**Strengths:** One API for sending, receiving, routing, and events; Inbox payloads tuned for LLM token efficiency; Not locked to a single sending provider; Practical developer tooling: SDKs, CLI, MCP, framework integrations

**Limitations:** Newer platform, so the surrounding ecosystem and community material are still small; Using your own sending providers puts deliverability and domain reputation on you; Agent mailboxes still depend on correct DNS setup for verified domains

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/sendmux.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do DeepSeek and Sendmux compare in monthly traffic?

DeepSeek has 372,761,591 monthly visits, while Sendmux has 37. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

DeepSeek has a month-over-month growth rate of +4.3%; Sendmux has -98.3%.

### How does pricing compare?

DeepSeek: Freemium. Free web and mobile chat app at chat.deepseek.com; pay-as-you-go OpenAI-compatible API with off-peak rates at $0.15/1M input ($0.003 cache hit) and $0.60/1M output for deepseek-flash (V4.1-Flash), and $0.66/1M input ($0.022 cache hit) and $1.98/1M output for deepseek-v4-pro (peak weekday UTC hours bill at 2x). Sendmux: Free. Sendmux is listed as free, with two free mailboxes available to start and agent onboarding designed to be self-service. Pricing beyond the initial free mailboxes is not detailed on the landing page, so check the pricing page for current tiers.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [ChatGPT](https://openaitools.app/tool/chatgpt-4) | 6,048,022,723 | +2.2% | Freemium | Provides stronger multi-modal reasoning and agentic tools, but lacks DeepSeek's ultra-low-cost API pricing. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/chatgpt-4.md) |
| 2 | [Google Gemini](https://openaitools.app/tool/gemini-gemini-advanced) | 2,637,398,242 | -0.1% | Freemium | Offers an enormous context window and deep Google ecosystem integration, but feels less specialized for pure reasoning tasks. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/gemini-gemini-advanced.md) |
| 3 | [Claude](https://openaitools.app/tool/claude-2) | 1,253,439,413 | +23.8% | Freemium | Delivers superior long-form coding artifacts and nuanced writing, but lacks DeepSeek's specialized open-weight reasoning models. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/claude-2.md) |
| 4 | [Grok](https://openaitools.app/tool/grok) | 203,846,050 | -0.8% | Freemium | Features real-time X social data integration, but is less cost-effective for dedicated developer coding workflows. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/grok.md) |
| 5 | [Perplexity](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai) | 88,310,223 | -3.7% | Freemium | Real-time AI answer engine and research workspace combining live web citations with frontier reasoning models. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai.md) |
| 6 | [Qwen 4 (Alibaba Qwen4)](https://openaitools.app/tool/qwen-4) | 35,101,353 | -6.2% | Freemium | Provides comparable open-weight foundation models and multilingual performance, but requires self-hosting or third-party inference setup. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/qwen-4.md) |
| 7 | [Cursor](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor) | 23,297,751 | +8.4% | Freemium | The AI coding agent for building ambitious software | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor.md) |
| 8 | [Kimi AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/kimi-chat) | 19,632,261 | -23.4% | Free | Excels at ultra-long document analysis and research, but lacks the same level of open-weight developer community support. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kimi-chat.md) |
| 9 | [Ollama](https://openaitools.app/tool/ollama) | 9,421,973 | +4.3% | Free, Freemium, Paid | Enables running open-source models locally on consumer hardware, but lacks DeepSeek's cloud-scale hosted reasoning power. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/ollama.md) |
| 10 | [Dify](https://openaitools.app/tool/dify-ai) | 819,691 | -15% | Freemium | Build, deploy, and govern production-ready agentic AI workflows | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/dify-ai.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/deepseek-vs-sendmux

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)