# DeepSeek vs SJolt

DeepSeek records 372,761,591 monthly visits with +4.3% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. SJolt records 7,367 monthly visits with +379% growth and Paid pricing.

| Metric | [DeepSeek](https://openaitools.app/tool/deepseek) | [SJolt](https://openaitools.app/tool/sjolt) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.deepseek.com | https://sjolt.ai |
| Categories | Large Language Models (LLMs), Open Source AI Models, AI API, AI Chatbot | AI API, AI Image Generator, AI Video Generator, Text to Video |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Paid |
| Monthly Visits | 372,761,591 | 7,367 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +4.3% | +379% |
| Primary Market | China | Indonesia |
| Direct Visits | 291,585,405 | 2,394 |
| Review Score | 4.8 | 4.2 |
| Saved Count | 44 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## DeepSeek

DeepSeek (Hangzhou DeepSeek Artificial Intelligence Co., Ltd.) is a frontier AI research organization that disrupted the global LLM market by pairing open-weight transparency with breakthrough Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) and reinforcement-learning reasoning efficiency. Following the landmark releases of DeepSeek-V3 and the peer-reviewed DeepSeek-R1 reasoning model, DeepSeek introduced the DeepSeek-V4 generation in 2026—featuring a hybrid attention architecture and a native 1-million-token context window across DeepSeek-V4-Pro (1.6T total parameters, 49B active per token) and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash (284B total parameters, 13B active per token).

Users can interact with DeepSeek in three ways: completely free through the consumer web portal (chat.deepseek.com) and mobile apps with one-click toggles for deep thinking and live web search; via DeepSeek's hosted, OpenAI-compatible developer API; or by self-hosting DeepSeek's open-weight checkpoints (including V3, R1, Prover-V2, and distilled Qwen/Llama variants) on private infrastructure. The models excel at competitive mathematics, algorithm design, repository-level software engineering, and structured data extraction, with automatic context caching on the API that slashes repeated prompt costs by over 95%.

In late 2026, DeepSeek remains the price-performance benchmark for developers and automation workflows. While the consumer chat interface remains free without a mandatory $20/month subscription tier, the developer API transitioned in late 2026 to two primary endpoints—`deepseek-flash` and `deepseek-v4-pro`—with time-of-day pricing. Off-peak API calls cost just $0.15 per million input tokens ($0.003 on cache hits) and $0.60 per million output tokens on Flash, and $0.66 input / $1.98 output on V4-Pro, making it a fraction of the cost of comparable Western frontier models.

**Pricing & Plans:** Free web and mobile chat app at chat.deepseek.com; pay-as-you-go OpenAI-compatible API with off-peak rates at $0.15/1M input ($0.003 cache hit) and $0.60/1M output for deepseek-flash (V4.1-Flash), and $0.66/1M input ($0.022 cache hit) and $1.98/1M output for deepseek-v4-pro (peak weekday UTC hours bill at 2x).

- **DeepSeek-V4 Hybrid Attention & 1M Context:** Leverages a sparse Mixture-of-Experts architecture (49B active parameters out of 1.6T on V4-Pro) to process up to 1 million tokens with minimal latency and memory overhead.
- **Transparent Chain-of-Thought Reasoning:** Pioneered by DeepSeek-R1 and integrated into V3.2 and V4 thinking modes, exposing step-by-step self-verification for complex math, logic, and code debugging.
- **Automatic Context Caching & Off-Peak API Pricing:** Drops input token costs to $0.003/1M on Flash and $0.022/1M on V4-Pro for cache hits, with 50% lower rates during off-peak UTC hours.
- **Free Consumer Web & Mobile Assistant:** Provides free access at chat.deepseek.com and on iOS/Android with document uploads, reasoning mode, and web search without paywalling core models.
- **Open-Weight Ecosystem & Self-Hosting Freedom:** Offers open weights for DeepSeek-V3, R1, Distill variants, and Prover models on Hugging Face and GitHub so enterprises can deploy within air-gapped environments.

**Strengths:** Completely free consumer web and mobile app with deep reasoning and web search included; Ultra-low API token rates ($0.15/$0.60 on Flash, $0.66/$1.98 on V4-Pro off-peak) with up to 98% savings on cached inputs; Drop-in OpenAI API compatibility makes switching or routing between models effortless; Strong open-weight lineage allows teams to self-host or fine-tune models without vendor lock-in

**Limitations:** Hosted API and web app store data on servers in China, prompting compliance restrictions for some Western enterprises and government agencies; Peak-hour API pricing (01:00–04:00 and 06:00–10:00 UTC on weekdays) doubles per-token costs compared to off-peak rates; Lacks native voice mode, video generation, and productivity suite integrations offered by ChatGPT and Google Gemini

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/deepseek.md)

## SJolt

SJolt is an API aggregation layer built for teams that need more than one generation model in production. The catalog organizes image, video, and audio models by task — text-to-image, text-to-video, image-to-video, reference-guided video, video editing, music generation — and by the inputs and outputs each model supports. Rather than integrating each provider separately, you learn one request body and one result-retrieval flow, then swap model IDs as new versions ship from ByteDance, Google, Kuaishou, xAI, MiniMax, Alibaba, and Black Forest Labs.

The workflow SJolt emphasizes is discover, test, integrate, ship. You browse model pages that include sample outputs and per-tier pricing, open a playground that uses the exact API request fields, and verify output quality and cost against your own prompt and reference assets. Once a model fits, the same request moves into your product with the documentation's curl, JavaScript, or Python example as the starting point.

Operationally, SJolt leans on asynchronous job handling for anything long-running, since video and audio generation takes seconds to minutes. You submit a task, receive a task ID, and poll for status and results until it completes. Billing is usage-based from a single balance, with pricing published at the model, variant, and resolution level — for example Seedance 2.5 text-to-video from about $0.12 per second at 480p to $0.675 per second at 1080p, and Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash at roughly $0.03 per second at 360p. SJolt is an independent platform and is not affiliated with the model providers whose names appear in its catalog.

**Pricing & Plans:** SJolt is usage-based, with prepaid balance top-ups rather than subscription seats. Each model has published per-unit rates that vary by resolution, tier, and task type — for example ByteDance Seedance 2.5 text-to-video ranges from about $0.12 per second at 480p to $0.675 per second at 1080p, Google Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash is roughly $0.03–$0.08 per second depending on resolution, and image models such as FLUX.2 Pro are billed around $0.03 per generated image. The platform runs promotional discounts on some models, and all usage draws from one balance with model-level cost records.

- **One API across dozens of models:** A single catalog covering image, video, and audio generation plus editing and image-to-video workflows, with models grouped by task, inputs, and outputs so you can pick by capability.
- **Playground with API-identical fields:** Test models with API-ready inputs — prompt, aspect ratio, duration, source assets — so what you validate in the browser is what you ship in code.
- **Copy-paste integration docs:** Ready-to-use curl, JavaScript, and Python examples including task status polling and result retrieval, so integration is a copy-and-configure step.
- **Async job and status tracking:** Long-running video and audio jobs run through async queues with task IDs you poll for status and results, keeping generation off your request thread.
- **Transparent usage billing:** Every model's per-unit rate is published by resolution and task variant, and usage is drawn from one prepaid balance with model-level cost records for finance review.

**Strengths:** One integration pattern replaces separate SDKs and billing for many model providers; Playground uses the same fields as the API, so validated prompts transfer directly to code; Published per-second and per-image pricing by resolution makes cost comparison straightforward; Async task polling and result retrieval are documented end to end with curl, JS, and Python examples

**Limitations:** Costs scale by second of generated video, so long 4K clips add up quickly; You still need engineering work to handle async job polling and error handling in production; Model catalog and pricing change frequently as upstream providers ship new versions; No published rate limits or SLA details on the public marketing pages

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/sjolt.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do DeepSeek and SJolt compare in monthly traffic?

DeepSeek has 372,761,591 monthly visits, while SJolt has 7,367. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

DeepSeek has a month-over-month growth rate of +4.3%; SJolt has +379%.

### How does pricing compare?

DeepSeek: Freemium. Free web and mobile chat app at chat.deepseek.com; pay-as-you-go OpenAI-compatible API with off-peak rates at $0.15/1M input ($0.003 cache hit) and $0.60/1M output for deepseek-flash (V4.1-Flash), and $0.66/1M input ($0.022 cache hit) and $1.98/1M output for deepseek-v4-pro (peak weekday UTC hours bill at 2x). SJolt: Paid. SJolt is usage-based, with prepaid balance top-ups rather than subscription seats. Each model has published per-unit rates that vary by resolution, tier, and task type — for example ByteDance Seedance 2.5 text-to-video ranges from about $0.12 per second at 480p to $0.675 per second at 1080p, Google Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash is roughly $0.03–$0.08 per second depending on resolution, and image models such as FLUX.2 Pro are billed around $0.03 per generated image. The platform runs promotional discounts on some models, and all usage draws from one balance with model-level cost records.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [ChatGPT](https://openaitools.app/tool/chatgpt-4) | 6,048,022,723 | +2.2% | Freemium | Provides stronger multi-modal reasoning and agentic tools, but lacks DeepSeek's ultra-low-cost API pricing. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/chatgpt-4.md) |
| 2 | [Google Gemini](https://openaitools.app/tool/gemini-gemini-advanced) | 2,637,398,242 | -0.1% | Freemium | Offers an enormous context window and deep Google ecosystem integration, but feels less specialized for pure reasoning tasks. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/gemini-gemini-advanced.md) |
| 3 | [Claude](https://openaitools.app/tool/claude-2) | 1,253,439,413 | +23.8% | Freemium | Delivers superior long-form coding artifacts and nuanced writing, but lacks DeepSeek's specialized open-weight reasoning models. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/claude-2.md) |
| 4 | [Grok](https://openaitools.app/tool/grok) | 203,846,050 | -0.8% | Freemium | Features real-time X social data integration, but is less cost-effective for dedicated developer coding workflows. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/grok.md) |
| 5 | [Perplexity](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai) | 88,310,223 | -3.7% | Freemium | Real-time AI answer engine and research workspace combining live web citations with frontier reasoning models. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai.md) |
| 6 | [Qwen 4 (Alibaba Qwen4)](https://openaitools.app/tool/qwen-4) | 35,101,353 | -6.2% | Freemium | Provides comparable open-weight foundation models and multilingual performance, but requires self-hosting or third-party inference setup. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/qwen-4.md) |
| 7 | [Cursor](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor) | 23,297,751 | +8.4% | Freemium | The AI coding agent for building ambitious software | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor.md) |
| 8 | [Kimi AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/kimi-chat) | 19,632,261 | -23.4% | Free | Excels at ultra-long document analysis and research, but lacks the same level of open-weight developer community support. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kimi-chat.md) |
| 9 | [Ollama](https://openaitools.app/tool/ollama) | 9,421,973 | +4.3% | Free, Freemium, Paid | Enables running open-source models locally on consumer hardware, but lacks DeepSeek's cloud-scale hosted reasoning power. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/ollama.md) |
| 10 | [Runway](https://openaitools.app/tool/runwayml) | 7,498,396 | +16.9% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Generative video, image, and audio tools built on frontier AI research | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/runwayml.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/deepseek-vs-sjolt

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)