# Devin vs Labelbox

Devin records 2,549,346 monthly visits with +1% month-over-month growth and Paid pricing. Labelbox records 762,803 monthly visits with -22.8% growth and Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [Devin](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin) | [Labelbox](https://openaitools.app/tool/labelbox) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://devin.ai | https://labelbox.com |
| Categories | AI Code Assistant, AI Agent, AI Developer Tools | AI Developer Tools, AI API, AI Workflow, AI Productivity Tools |
| Pricing Model | Paid | Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 2,549,346 | 762,803 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +1% | -22.8% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 1,386,401 | 370,024 |
| Review Score | 4.3 | 4.4 |
| Saved Count | 0 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | website | Website |

## Devin

Devin sits at the agentic end of the AI coding spectrum. Instead of suggesting the next line, it takes a ticket-level goal - "add SAML SSO for enterprise customers" or "investigate this API latency spike" - explores the codebase across repositories, implements changes, runs tests, and explains the resulting pull request in plain language. It maintains a wiki-style map of the codebase so it can navigate unfamiliar services and keep documentation current as the code changes.

A defining feature is that Devin works on its own machine. It provisions Windows, Mac, and Linux virtual machines as needed, builds the project, exercises it in a browser, and can record itself clicking through the feature it just built. Long-running work continues in the cloud when your laptop is closed, and large tasks can be split across parallel agents that Devin coordinates and reports on.

For teams, Devin extends beyond one-off prompts. You can tag @Devin in Slack or Teams so it reads a thread and replies with a PR, set up automations that fix failing tests or patch vulnerable dependencies as they appear, and run security reviews. Pricing is seat-based and enterprise-oriented, with an Ultra tier for heavier autonomous usage, and Cognition has marketed large security-credit programs for enterprises.

**Pricing & Plans:** Paid, enterprise-oriented. Devin is sold on a per-seat subscription with tiered plans (including higher-capacity tiers for heavier autonomous use) plus usage allowances; Cognition also runs credit programs and enterprise agreements. Because plans and credit packages change, check Cognition's official pricing page for current numbers.

- **End-to-end autonomous coding:** Devin plans, writes code, runs tests, and opens pull requests across complex, multi-repository codebases without waiting for line-by-line approval.
- **Its own virtual machines:** Devin provisions Windows, Mac, and Linux VMs, builds and runs the project, and tests in a real browser - even recording itself using the feature it built.
- **Slack, Teams, and alert integration:** Mention @Devin in a thread to delegate a fix, or connect CI, PagerDuty, and issue trackers so it reacts to failures and alerts automatically.
- **Parallel cloud agents:** Delegate a large task and Devin splits it across parallel cloud agents that keep working after you close your laptop, then reports back.
- **Codebase wiki and automations:** Devin maintains a living map of the architecture and supports recurring automations such as dependency upgrades, test fixes, and security scans.

**Strengths:** Handles ticket-level autonomous work rather than only suggesting code completions; Tests in its own browser and VMs, which catches issues that pure code generation misses; Deep workflow integration with Slack, Teams, CI, and alerting tools; Keeps working in parallel cloud agents even when your machine is off

**Limitations:** Premium, seat-based pricing puts it out of reach for casual individual use; Complex or poorly specified tasks still need human review before merging; Maximum value depends on having a well-structured repo and clean test setup

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin.md)

## Labelbox

Labelbox occupies an unusual position in the AI stack: it does not primarily sell a chatbot or a generator, it builds the environments and data that models learn from plus the agents that take over recurring engineering and research work. The homepage claim is direct — frontier AI labs train on Labelbox environments and expert data, while engineering and research teams hand their recurring backlog to agents running on Recursion. A recent Series E of more than $100 million signals a heavily funded bet on that thesis.,For enterprises, the newer half of the product is Recursion. Agents are triggered by real signals — a failing build, a PagerDuty alert, a new dependency release, a fresh model checkpoint, or a Monday morning schedule — and then work in the background until the job is done. The examples the company promotes are concrete deliverables rather than summaries: a tested pull request with a preview link, a postmortem draft in Confluence with every event sourced, an ablation table naming the changes that mattered, or a patch for each exposed service after a critical CVE. A grader agent scores each run, and the graded session leaves behind memories, notes and skills that the next session reads before it acts.,The original foundation remains the data business: labeling, annotation, curation and model evaluation supported by expert human reviewers, used for computer vision, NLP, supervised fine-tuning, RLHF and red teaming. In practice the two halves reinforce each other, since the environments that produce high-quality training data are the same environments where agents learn to do real work. Pricing is enterprise-style, routed through sales conversations and shaped by data volume and agent usage, with no public self-serve tier.

**Pricing & Plans:** Contact for pricing. Labelbox does not publish self-serve plans or public rate cards; its pricing route instead directs interested teams to talk to sales, and cost is shaped by data production scope, agent deployment and enterprise requirements. There is no published free tier. Prospective customers should request a quote based on their volumes and use cases.

- **Data labeling and expert annotation:** Structured annotation, curation, model evaluation and human-in-the-loop review across vision, language and generative tasks, used to build the training and eval data behind production models.
- **Autonomous agent sessions:** Recursion agents start on their own from builds, alerts, commits, checkpoints and schedules, then work in the background until the task is finished and reviewable.
- **Domain specialists by function:** Specialist agents cover software engineering, reliability, security, ML research, evals, R&D, product and finance workflows, from flaky test fixes to postmortem drafts and vulnerability patches.
- **Graded outcomes that compound:** Every agent run is scored by a grader, and graded sessions leave memories, notes and skills that the next session reads before acting, so quality compounds over time.
- **Native tool and data integrations:** Agents operate against the tools teams already use, including GitHub, Jira, Linear, Slack, Datadog, PagerDuty, BigQuery, Databricks, Vercel and cloud providers.

**Strengths:** Covers both sides of the problem: training and eval data production plus agents that act on recurring work; Backed by a recent $100M+ Series E and adoption by frontier AI labs, indicating real funding and demand; Agent runs produce concrete deliverables with proof — tests, reruns, ablations — rather than unverified suggestions; Integrates with the toolchain teams already run: GitHub, Jira, Linear, Slack, Datadog, PagerDuty, BigQuery and Databricks

**Limitations:** No self-serve pricing or open signup: everything routes through a sales conversation, which slows down evaluation; The platform assumes real engineering and research infrastructure (GitHub, cloud providers, data warehouses) to deliver value; Positioning has shifted quickly toward autonomous agent sessions, so teams wanting only labeling workflows may find it heavier than needed

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/labelbox.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Devin and Labelbox compare in monthly traffic?

Devin has 2,549,346 monthly visits, while Labelbox has 762,803. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Devin has a month-over-month growth rate of +1%; Labelbox has -22.8%.

### How does pricing compare?

Devin: Paid. Paid, enterprise-oriented. Devin is sold on a per-seat subscription with tiered plans (including higher-capacity tiers for heavier autonomous use) plus usage allowances; Cognition also runs credit programs and enterprise agreements. Because plans and credit packages change, check Cognition's official pricing page for current numbers. Labelbox: Contact for Pricing. Contact for pricing. Labelbox does not publish self-serve plans or public rate cards; its pricing route instead directs interested teams to talk to sales, and cost is shaped by data production scope, agent deployment and enterprise requirements. There is no published free tier. Prospective customers should request a quote based on their volumes and use cases.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Cursor](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor) | 23,297,751 | +8.4% | Freemium | An AI-native code editor providing advanced multi-file code generation and editing, though less fully autonomous end-to-end than Devin. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor.md) |
| 2 | [Manus](https://openaitools.app/tool/manus) | 19,195,779 | -1.7% | Free Trial | A general autonomous agent platform executing multi-step goals and browsers, suitable for broader web and coding workflows. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/manus.md) |
| 3 | [Google Antigravity](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity) | 16,054,109 | +8.1% | Freemium | Google's agentic development platform running parallel AI coding agents across an IDE and CLI workspace. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity.md) |
| 4 | [Replit](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit) | 10,016,437 | -7.7% | Freemium, Paid | A cloud development platform featuring an AI agent that builds, runs, and deploys full-stack apps automatically. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit.md) |
| 5 | [Qoder](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder) | 5,145,040 | +81.8% | Freemium, Free Trial, Free | An agentic coding platform and IDE plugin that reads entire codebases to execute complex multi-file tasks. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder.md) |
| 6 | [Kiro](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro) | 3,330,476 | +4.6% | Freemium | An AWS spec-driven AI IDE and agent platform that plans, builds, reviews, and verifies software engineering work. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro.md) |
| 7 | [Command Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code) | 2,358,177 | -12.1% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | The coding agent that learns your coding taste | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code.md) |
| 8 | [Roboflow](https://openaitools.app/tool/roboflow) | 1,431,204 | +6.6% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Streamlines end-to-end computer vision workflows from annotation to model deployment, but lacks Labelbox's general enterprise agent orchestration. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/roboflow.md) |
| 9 | [Orca](https://openaitools.app/tool/orca) | 1,025,891 | +1% | Free, Open Source, Enterprise on request | Run many coding agents in parallel, each in its own worktree | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/orca.md) |
| 10 | [Trae](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae) | 702,366 | -7.8% | Freemium | An AI-powered IDE and coding agent that indexes entire repositories to plan, build, and test software. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/devin-vs-labelbox

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)