# Devin vs ML.ai

Devin records 2,549,346 monthly visits with +1% month-over-month growth and Paid pricing. ML.ai records 0 monthly visits with 0% growth and Paid pricing.

| Metric | [Devin](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin) | [ML.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/ml-ai) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://devin.ai | https://ml.ai |
| Categories | AI Code Assistant, AI Agent, AI Developer Tools | AI Code Assistant, AI Code Generator, AI Code Review, AI Developer Tools |
| Pricing Model | Paid | Paid |
| Monthly Visits | 2,549,346 | 0 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +1% | 0% |
| Primary Market | United States | Global |
| Direct Visits | 1,386,401 | 0 |
| Review Score | 4.3 | 4.4 |
| Saved Count | 0 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | website | Website |

## Devin

Devin sits at the agentic end of the AI coding spectrum. Instead of suggesting the next line, it takes a ticket-level goal - "add SAML SSO for enterprise customers" or "investigate this API latency spike" - explores the codebase across repositories, implements changes, runs tests, and explains the resulting pull request in plain language. It maintains a wiki-style map of the codebase so it can navigate unfamiliar services and keep documentation current as the code changes.

A defining feature is that Devin works on its own machine. It provisions Windows, Mac, and Linux virtual machines as needed, builds the project, exercises it in a browser, and can record itself clicking through the feature it just built. Long-running work continues in the cloud when your laptop is closed, and large tasks can be split across parallel agents that Devin coordinates and reports on.

For teams, Devin extends beyond one-off prompts. You can tag @Devin in Slack or Teams so it reads a thread and replies with a PR, set up automations that fix failing tests or patch vulnerable dependencies as they appear, and run security reviews. Pricing is seat-based and enterprise-oriented, with an Ultra tier for heavier autonomous usage, and Cognition has marketed large security-credit programs for enterprises.

**Pricing & Plans:** Paid, enterprise-oriented. Devin is sold on a per-seat subscription with tiered plans (including higher-capacity tiers for heavier autonomous use) plus usage allowances; Cognition also runs credit programs and enterprise agreements. Because plans and credit packages change, check Cognition's official pricing page for current numbers.

- **End-to-end autonomous coding:** Devin plans, writes code, runs tests, and opens pull requests across complex, multi-repository codebases without waiting for line-by-line approval.
- **Its own virtual machines:** Devin provisions Windows, Mac, and Linux VMs, builds and runs the project, and tests in a real browser - even recording itself using the feature it built.
- **Slack, Teams, and alert integration:** Mention @Devin in a thread to delegate a fix, or connect CI, PagerDuty, and issue trackers so it reacts to failures and alerts automatically.
- **Parallel cloud agents:** Delegate a large task and Devin splits it across parallel cloud agents that keep working after you close your laptop, then reports back.
- **Codebase wiki and automations:** Devin maintains a living map of the architecture and supports recurring automations such as dependency upgrades, test fixes, and security scans.

**Strengths:** Handles ticket-level autonomous work rather than only suggesting code completions; Tests in its own browser and VMs, which catches issues that pure code generation misses; Deep workflow integration with Slack, Teams, CI, and alerting tools; Keeps working in parallel cloud agents even when your machine is off

**Limitations:** Premium, seat-based pricing puts it out of reach for casual individual use; Complex or poorly specified tasks still need human review before merging; Maximum value depends on having a well-structured repo and clean test setup

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin.md)

## ML.ai

ML.ai positions itself as the coding agent that never runs out - a direct jab at metered agents that stop mid-task when a token budget is exhausted. The product is a full agent, not a completion engine: you hand it an issue, it reads the relevant repository files, writes an explicit task plan, makes the edits, runs type checks, lint, unit and load tests, and opens a pull request. Nothing is written to disk until you allow it, and nothing merges until you approve it.

Two design choices stand out. First, a plan-and-approve guard: the agent declares which files it expects to change, you pick the tasks to run, and any edit that reaches outside the declared scope halts and asks first - asked once per turn rather than nagged continuously. Second, model routing: you set the outcome and an effort level (low, medium or high) and the agent routes each step to the model that fits it, rather than making you choose a vendor per request. In the vendor's own example, a five-step migration touches two models while staying inside a single task.

It runs anywhere you already work, from one account: a desktop app for macOS and Windows, IDE extensions for VS Code and JetBrains, and a CLI installable with a single curl script. Teams can launch many jobs in parallel across projects, each in its own sandbox, and end up with a set of pull requests to review. ML.ai publishes its own benchmark results (SWE-bench Verified 95.0%, SWE-bench Pro 92.6%, LiveCodeBench v6 83.4% on its flagship model) and cites enterprise customers, though as with all vendor benchmarks these should be treated as directional.

**Pricing & Plans:** Paid, per seat. Every plan includes the full agent and the differentiator is concurrency - how many jobs run in parallel - rather than a token budget. Individual plans target solo builders, while Team and Enterprise tiers add more parallel jobs; enterprise buyers can contact sales for a quote. Long-running jobs are not cut off partway by credit exhaustion.

- **End-to-end task completion:** Give it an issue and it reproduces the bug, edits the code, runs your tests and opens a pull request while you focus on decisions.
- **Plan-and-approve scope guard:** The agent proposes a task list and names the files it expects to change. You select the tasks, and edits outside the declared scope stop and ask first.
- **Model routing and effort levels:** Each step of a task is routed to the model that fits it, with the vendor abstracted behind an effort setting and a stated outcome.
- **Parallel sandboxed jobs:** Launch many jobs across projects at the same time. Each agent runs in its own sandbox and reports back with a reviewable diff.
- **App, IDE and CLI in one account:** The same account connects a desktop app for macOS and Windows, extensions for VS Code and JetBrains, and a terminal CLI via a single install script.

**Strengths:** Completes whole tasks including tests and PR creation; Scope guard halts edits outside declared files; Per-seat pricing removes mid-task budget stops; Same agent in desktop app, IDE and CLI

**Limitations:** Per-seat pricing is less flexible than pay-per-token for very occasional users; Claimed benchmark numbers come from the vendor's own evaluation runs; Full agent capability requires the desktop app, IDE extension or CLI rather than a browser-only workflow

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/ml-ai.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Devin and ML.ai compare in monthly traffic?

Devin has 2,549,346 monthly visits, while ML.ai has 0. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Devin has a month-over-month growth rate of +1%; ML.ai has 0%.

### How does pricing compare?

Devin: Paid. Paid, enterprise-oriented. Devin is sold on a per-seat subscription with tiered plans (including higher-capacity tiers for heavier autonomous use) plus usage allowances; Cognition also runs credit programs and enterprise agreements. Because plans and credit packages change, check Cognition's official pricing page for current numbers. ML.ai: Paid. Paid, per seat. Every plan includes the full agent and the differentiator is concurrency - how many jobs run in parallel - rather than a token budget. Individual plans target solo builders, while Team and Enterprise tiers add more parallel jobs; enterprise buyers can contact sales for a quote. Long-running jobs are not cut off partway by credit exhaustion.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Cursor](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor) | 23,297,751 | +8.4% | Freemium | An AI-native code editor providing advanced multi-file code generation and editing, though less fully autonomous end-to-end than Devin. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor.md) |
| 2 | [Manus](https://openaitools.app/tool/manus) | 19,195,779 | -1.7% | Free Trial | A general autonomous agent platform executing multi-step goals and browsers, suitable for broader web and coding workflows. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/manus.md) |
| 3 | [Google Antigravity](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity) | 16,054,109 | +8.1% | Freemium | Google's agentic development platform running parallel AI coding agents across an IDE and CLI workspace. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity.md) |
| 4 | [Replit](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit) | 10,016,437 | -7.7% | Freemium, Paid | A cloud development platform featuring an AI agent that builds, runs, and deploys full-stack apps automatically. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit.md) |
| 5 | [Qoder](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder) | 5,145,040 | +81.8% | Freemium, Free Trial, Free | An agentic coding platform and IDE plugin that reads entire codebases to execute complex multi-file tasks. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder.md) |
| 6 | [Cursor](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor-sh) | 4,790,129 | +6.5% | Freemium | The AI coding agent that turns ideas into shipped software | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor-sh.md) |
| 7 | [Kiro](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro) | 3,330,476 | +4.6% | Freemium | A spec-driven AI IDE and agent platform that plans, builds, reviews, and verifies real engineering work. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro.md) |
| 8 | [Command Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code) | 2,358,177 | -12.1% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | The coding agent that learns your coding taste | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code.md) |
| 9 | [Orca](https://openaitools.app/tool/orca) | 1,025,891 | +1% | Free, Open Source, Enterprise on request | Run many coding agents in parallel, each in its own worktree | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/orca.md) |
| 10 | [Trae](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae) | 702,366 | -7.8% | Freemium | An AI IDE and coding agent that works on your project, not just your cursor | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/devin-vs-ml-ai

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)