# Devin vs Oberhahn

Devin records 2,549,346 monthly visits with +1% month-over-month growth and Paid pricing. Oberhahn records 633 monthly visits with -70.9% growth and Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [Devin](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin) | [Oberhahn](https://openaitools.app/tool/oberhahn) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://devin.ai | https://oberhahn.com |
| Categories | AI Code Assistant, AI Agent, AI Developer Tools | AI Workflow, AI Monitor, AI Knowledge Management, AI Productivity Tools |
| Pricing Model | Paid | Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 2,549,346 | 633 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +1% | -70.9% |
| Primary Market | United States | Pakistan |
| Direct Visits | 1,386,401 | 259 |
| Review Score | 4.3 | 4.2 |
| Saved Count | 0 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | website | Website |

## Devin

Devin sits at the agentic end of the AI coding spectrum. Instead of suggesting the next line, it takes a ticket-level goal - "add SAML SSO for enterprise customers" or "investigate this API latency spike" - explores the codebase across repositories, implements changes, runs tests, and explains the resulting pull request in plain language. It maintains a wiki-style map of the codebase so it can navigate unfamiliar services and keep documentation current as the code changes.

A defining feature is that Devin works on its own machine. It provisions Windows, Mac, and Linux virtual machines as needed, builds the project, exercises it in a browser, and can record itself clicking through the feature it just built. Long-running work continues in the cloud when your laptop is closed, and large tasks can be split across parallel agents that Devin coordinates and reports on.

For teams, Devin extends beyond one-off prompts. You can tag @Devin in Slack or Teams so it reads a thread and replies with a PR, set up automations that fix failing tests or patch vulnerable dependencies as they appear, and run security reviews. Pricing is seat-based and enterprise-oriented, with an Ultra tier for heavier autonomous usage, and Cognition has marketed large security-credit programs for enterprises.

**Pricing & Plans:** Paid, enterprise-oriented. Devin is sold on a per-seat subscription with tiered plans (including higher-capacity tiers for heavier autonomous use) plus usage allowances; Cognition also runs credit programs and enterprise agreements. Because plans and credit packages change, check Cognition's official pricing page for current numbers.

- **End-to-end autonomous coding:** Devin plans, writes code, runs tests, and opens pull requests across complex, multi-repository codebases without waiting for line-by-line approval.
- **Its own virtual machines:** Devin provisions Windows, Mac, and Linux VMs, builds and runs the project, and tests in a real browser - even recording itself using the feature it built.
- **Slack, Teams, and alert integration:** Mention @Devin in a thread to delegate a fix, or connect CI, PagerDuty, and issue trackers so it reacts to failures and alerts automatically.
- **Parallel cloud agents:** Delegate a large task and Devin splits it across parallel cloud agents that keep working after you close your laptop, then reports back.
- **Codebase wiki and automations:** Devin maintains a living map of the architecture and supports recurring automations such as dependency upgrades, test fixes, and security scans.

**Strengths:** Handles ticket-level autonomous work rather than only suggesting code completions; Tests in its own browser and VMs, which catches issues that pure code generation misses; Deep workflow integration with Slack, Teams, CI, and alerting tools; Keeps working in parallel cloud agents even when your machine is off

**Limitations:** Premium, seat-based pricing puts it out of reach for casual individual use; Complex or poorly specified tasks still need human review before merging; Maximum value depends on having a well-structured repo and clean test setup

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin.md)

## Oberhahn

Most companies now spend real money on AI, yet very few can say which sessions produced results and which simply burned tokens. Oberhahn was built to close that gap. It connects the AI tools a team already pays for — including Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, GitHub Copilot, Salesforce, LangChain and Datadog — then folds every model call into one normalized ledger. Because the ledger is consistent, the platform can price it, forecast it and compare it across teams.

From that base Oberhahn layers four questions on top. Where does our AI spend stand right now? Who spent what, on which model? What work did that money buy? And where is this heading? Each answer is backed by the underlying session record, so a manager can open any row and read the whole thing, filter by source, team, project, tag or consumer, or type a query such as source:codex cost:>5.

The product also hunts for waste on your behalf. It ranks oversized models, week-over-week spikes, cache misses and runaway sessions by the money each one affects, and links every finding to the activity behind it. A separate security view reviews prompts and tool calls for leaked credentials, environment dumps and risky shell commands, first by severity and then by how often they repeat.

Oberhahn is aimed at founder-led teams, engineering managers and platform owners who want AI adoption to compound rather than sprawl. The pitch is simple: a win one team discovers today should become the default for everyone tomorrow, and the only way to spread what works is to measure it first.

**Pricing & Plans:** Oberhahn offers a 30-day free trial with no credit card required. The Individual plan costs $49/month and covers the full product for two people, while the Manager plan costs $399/month and extends it to up to 100 people with team-wide standards and rollouts. An enterprise tier with SSO, RBAC, audit logs and SOC 2 is available on request via sales.

- **One-Click Stack Integration:** Connect coding assistants, agents, trackers and orchestration layers once, then watch every usage event flow into a single normalized ledger with no manual reconciliation.
- **Spend Ledger and Cost Overview:** See projected month-end spend, cost per session, spend per user, context-window use and an efficiency score, broken out by the source driving each dollar.
- **Work Attribution to Issues:** Every session links to real Linear, Jira or GitHub issues, so you can read cost per estimate point and see what shipped versus what sank.
- **Forecasts and Opportunity Alerts:** Oberhahn flags oversized models, cache misses, runaway sessions and duplicate workflows, each ranked by the spend it affects so you know what to investigate first.
- **Security and Leak Detection:** Prompt and tool-call exposures such as pasted credentials, environment dumps and risky commands are caught as they happen and re-checked against stored history.
- **Data Copilot:** Ask the built-in copilot questions in plain language and get answers grounded in your own spend, session and workflow data.

**Strengths:** Unifies AI usage from many sources into a single normalized ledger; Attributes spend all the way down to individual tracker issues and outcomes; Pairs cost dashboards with forecasts, waste detection and a natural-language copilot; Includes a security view that reviews prompts and tool calls for leaked credentials

**Limitations:** The feature set is still maturing and the site markets some capabilities as "what's coming next"; To attribute spend to outcomes you must connect trackers like Linear, Jira and GitHub; Its value compounds only after weeks of data, so the first days look sparse; Per-workflow intelligence requires coarse event normalization, and the price sits in the mid-to-premium range for teams

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/oberhahn.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Devin and Oberhahn compare in monthly traffic?

Devin has 2,549,346 monthly visits, while Oberhahn has 633. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Devin has a month-over-month growth rate of +1%; Oberhahn has -70.9%.

### How does pricing compare?

Devin: Paid. Paid, enterprise-oriented. Devin is sold on a per-seat subscription with tiered plans (including higher-capacity tiers for heavier autonomous use) plus usage allowances; Cognition also runs credit programs and enterprise agreements. Because plans and credit packages change, check Cognition's official pricing page for current numbers. Oberhahn: Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing. Oberhahn offers a 30-day free trial with no credit card required. The Individual plan costs $49/month and covers the full product for two people, while the Manager plan costs $399/month and extends it to up to 100 people with team-wide standards and rollouts. An enterprise tier with SSO, RBAC, audit logs and SOC 2 is available on request via sales.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Cursor](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor) | 23,297,751 | +8.4% | Freemium | An AI-native code editor providing advanced multi-file code generation and editing, though less fully autonomous end-to-end than Devin. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor.md) |
| 2 | [Manus](https://openaitools.app/tool/manus) | 19,195,779 | -1.7% | Free Trial | A general autonomous agent platform executing multi-step goals and browsers, suitable for broader web and coding workflows. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/manus.md) |
| 3 | [Google Antigravity](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity) | 16,054,109 | +8.1% | Freemium | Google's agentic development platform running parallel AI coding agents across an IDE and CLI workspace. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity.md) |
| 4 | [Replit](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit) | 10,016,437 | -7.7% | Freemium, Paid | A cloud development platform featuring an AI agent that builds, runs, and deploys full-stack apps automatically. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit.md) |
| 5 | [Datadog](https://openaitools.app/tool/datadog) | 5,175,760 | -4.8% | Freemium, Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing, Free | Unified observability, security and incident response for cloud-scale engineering teams | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/datadog.md) |
| 6 | [Qoder](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder) | 5,145,040 | +81.8% | Freemium, Free Trial, Free | An agentic coding platform and IDE plugin that reads entire codebases to execute complex multi-file tasks. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder.md) |
| 7 | [Kiro](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro) | 3,330,476 | +4.6% | Freemium | An AWS spec-driven AI IDE and agent platform that plans, builds, reviews, and verifies software engineering work. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro.md) |
| 8 | [Command Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code) | 2,358,177 | -12.1% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | The coding agent that learns your coding taste | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code.md) |
| 9 | [Orca](https://openaitools.app/tool/orca) | 1,025,891 | +1% | Free, Open Source, Enterprise on request | Run many coding agents in parallel, each in its own worktree | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/orca.md) |
| 10 | [Trae](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae) | 702,366 | -7.8% | Freemium | An AI-powered IDE and coding agent that indexes entire repositories to plan, build, and test software. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/devin-vs-oberhahn

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)