# Devin vs Scorecard

Devin records 2,549,346 monthly visits with +1% month-over-month growth and Paid pricing. Scorecard records 6,344 monthly visits with +8.2% growth and Freemium pricing.

| Metric | [Devin](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin) | [Scorecard](https://openaitools.app/tool/scorecard) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://devin.ai | https://www.scorecard.io |
| Categories | AI Code Assistant, AI Agent, AI Developer Tools | AI Developer Tools, AI Agent, AI Testing, Large Language Models (LLMs) |
| Pricing Model | Paid | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 2,549,346 | 6,344 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +1% | +8.2% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 1,386,401 | 2,474 |
| Review Score | 4.3 | 4.4 |
| Saved Count | 0 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | website | Website |

## Devin

Devin sits at the agentic end of the AI coding spectrum. Instead of suggesting the next line, it takes a ticket-level goal - "add SAML SSO for enterprise customers" or "investigate this API latency spike" - explores the codebase across repositories, implements changes, runs tests, and explains the resulting pull request in plain language. It maintains a wiki-style map of the codebase so it can navigate unfamiliar services and keep documentation current as the code changes.

A defining feature is that Devin works on its own machine. It provisions Windows, Mac, and Linux virtual machines as needed, builds the project, exercises it in a browser, and can record itself clicking through the feature it just built. Long-running work continues in the cloud when your laptop is closed, and large tasks can be split across parallel agents that Devin coordinates and reports on.

For teams, Devin extends beyond one-off prompts. You can tag @Devin in Slack or Teams so it reads a thread and replies with a PR, set up automations that fix failing tests or patch vulnerable dependencies as they appear, and run security reviews. Pricing is seat-based and enterprise-oriented, with an Ultra tier for heavier autonomous usage, and Cognition has marketed large security-credit programs for enterprises.

**Pricing & Plans:** Paid, enterprise-oriented. Devin is sold on a per-seat subscription with tiered plans (including higher-capacity tiers for heavier autonomous use) plus usage allowances; Cognition also runs credit programs and enterprise agreements. Because plans and credit packages change, check Cognition's official pricing page for current numbers.

- **End-to-end autonomous coding:** Devin plans, writes code, runs tests, and opens pull requests across complex, multi-repository codebases without waiting for line-by-line approval.
- **Its own virtual machines:** Devin provisions Windows, Mac, and Linux VMs, builds and runs the project, and tests in a real browser - even recording itself using the feature it built.
- **Slack, Teams, and alert integration:** Mention @Devin in a thread to delegate a fix, or connect CI, PagerDuty, and issue trackers so it reacts to failures and alerts automatically.
- **Parallel cloud agents:** Delegate a large task and Devin splits it across parallel cloud agents that keep working after you close your laptop, then reports back.
- **Codebase wiki and automations:** Devin maintains a living map of the architecture and supports recurring automations such as dependency upgrades, test fixes, and security scans.

**Strengths:** Handles ticket-level autonomous work rather than only suggesting code completions; Tests in its own browser and VMs, which catches issues that pure code generation misses; Deep workflow integration with Slack, Teams, CI, and alerting tools; Keeps working in parallel cloud agents even when your machine is off

**Limitations:** Premium, seat-based pricing puts it out of reach for casual individual use; Complex or poorly specified tasks still need human review before merging; Maximum value depends on having a well-structured repo and clean test setup

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin.md)

## Scorecard

Scorecard describes itself as the simulation platform for agent self-improvement. Its premise is that you cannot QA your way to the frontier: as agents grow more complex, every change has to be tested against exponentially more scenarios, and reviewing production logs by hand does not scale. The platform replaces that backlog with a fast feedback loop by running your agent through thousands of realistic scenarios and returning scored results in minutes.

The product spans the full agent lifecycle. A simulation lab lets teams run structured experiments and try ideas quickly. A prompt space handles creation, testing and versioning so the best-performing prompts are stored with a history and shared as a single source of truth. A validated metric library provides industry benchmarks that can be customized or extended with custom metrics, which the company frames as helping teams avoid metrics they cannot trust.

Beyond testing, Scorecard also covers deployment: agents can be managed and shipped to production without touching an IDE, and real-world usage issues can be identified and addressed as they appear. The company targets teams building reliable AI agents and promotes the idea that continuous, simulation-driven evaluation is how frontier labs build best-in-class agents.

**Pricing & Plans:** Scorecard uses a freemium-to-enterprise model. The site does not publish concrete price points; instead it offers a free or low-commitment way to start alongside paid and enterprise tiers, with a book-a-demo flow and contact-for-pricing for teams. Exact plan details should be confirmed directly with the vendor.

- **Fast feedback loop:** Run your agent through thousands of realistic scenarios and get scored feedback in minutes instead of waiting weeks for expert log review.
- **Experiment and simulation lab:** Create structured experiments and test ideas quickly in an AI laboratory before committing to a change.
- **Trustworthy metric library:** Start from a validated metric library of industry benchmarks, customize proven metrics, or build your own to track what matters.
- **Prompt versioning and storage:** Create, test and track your best-performing prompts in one place, keeping a history and a single source of truth for the team.
- **Production deployment:** Manage and deploy agents to production without touching an IDE, and identify real-world usage issues as they surface.

**Strengths:** Feedback in minutes rather than weeks of manual log review; Validated metric library with industry benchmarks you can customize; Prompt versioning keeps a history and a single source of truth; Covers the full lifecycle: experiment, evaluate, then deploy

**Limitations:** No public self-serve pricing shown — enterprise and team plans require a demo; Value depends on being able to define realistic scenarios for your agent domain; Scenario-based testing adds setup work before the fast feedback loop pays off; Small teams with a single simple prompt may not need a dedicated platform

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/scorecard.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Devin and Scorecard compare in monthly traffic?

Devin has 2,549,346 monthly visits, while Scorecard has 6,344. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Devin has a month-over-month growth rate of +1%; Scorecard has +8.2%.

### How does pricing compare?

Devin: Paid. Paid, enterprise-oriented. Devin is sold on a per-seat subscription with tiered plans (including higher-capacity tiers for heavier autonomous use) plus usage allowances; Cognition also runs credit programs and enterprise agreements. Because plans and credit packages change, check Cognition's official pricing page for current numbers. Scorecard: Freemium. Scorecard uses a freemium-to-enterprise model. The site does not publish concrete price points; instead it offers a free or low-commitment way to start alongside paid and enterprise tiers, with a book-a-demo flow and contact-for-pricing for teams. Exact plan details should be confirmed directly with the vendor.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Cursor](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor) | 23,297,751 | +8.4% | Freemium | An AI-native code editor providing advanced multi-file code generation and editing, though less fully autonomous end-to-end than Devin. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor.md) |
| 2 | [Manus](https://openaitools.app/tool/manus) | 19,195,779 | -1.7% | Free Trial | A general autonomous agent platform executing multi-step goals and browsers, suitable for broader web and coding workflows. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/manus.md) |
| 3 | [Google Antigravity](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity) | 16,054,109 | +8.1% | Freemium | Google's agentic development platform running parallel AI coding agents across an IDE and CLI workspace. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity.md) |
| 4 | [Replit](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit) | 10,016,437 | -7.7% | Freemium, Paid | A cloud development platform featuring an AI agent that builds, runs, and deploys full-stack apps automatically. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit.md) |
| 5 | [Qoder](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder) | 5,145,040 | +81.8% | Freemium, Free Trial, Free | An agentic coding platform and IDE plugin that reads entire codebases to execute complex multi-file tasks. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder.md) |
| 6 | [Kiro](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro) | 3,330,476 | +4.6% | Freemium | An AWS spec-driven AI IDE and agent platform that plans, builds, reviews, and verifies software engineering work. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro.md) |
| 7 | [Command Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code) | 2,358,177 | -12.1% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | The coding agent that learns your coding taste | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code.md) |
| 8 | [Orca](https://openaitools.app/tool/orca) | 1,025,891 | +1% | Free, Open Source, Enterprise on request | Run many coding agents in parallel, each in its own worktree | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/orca.md) |
| 9 | [KaneAI](https://openaitools.app/tool/kaneai) | 901,340 | +13.2% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | GenAI-native end-to-end QA agent that plans, writes and heals tests in plain language | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kaneai.md) |
| 10 | [Trae](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae) | 702,366 | -7.8% | Freemium | An AI-powered IDE and coding agent that indexes entire repositories to plan, build, and test software. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/devin-vs-scorecard

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)