# Devin vs Trae

Devin records 2,549,346 monthly visits with +1% month-over-month growth and Paid pricing. Trae records 702,366 monthly visits with -7.8% growth and Freemium pricing.

| Metric | [Devin](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin) | [Trae](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://devin.ai | https://www.trae.ai |
| Categories | AI Code Assistant, AI Agent, AI Developer Tools | AI Code Assistant, AI Code Generator, AI Agent, AI Developer Tools |
| Pricing Model | Paid | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 2,549,346 | 702,366 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +1% | -7.8% |
| Primary Market | United States | China |
| Direct Visits | 1,386,401 | 373,236 |
| Review Score | 4.3 | 4.7 |
| Saved Count | 0 | 6 |
| Supported Platforms | website | Website |

## Devin

Devin sits at the agentic end of the AI coding spectrum. Instead of suggesting the next line, it takes a ticket-level goal - "add SAML SSO for enterprise customers" or "investigate this API latency spike" - explores the codebase across repositories, implements changes, runs tests, and explains the resulting pull request in plain language. It maintains a wiki-style map of the codebase so it can navigate unfamiliar services and keep documentation current as the code changes.

A defining feature is that Devin works on its own machine. It provisions Windows, Mac, and Linux virtual machines as needed, builds the project, exercises it in a browser, and can record itself clicking through the feature it just built. Long-running work continues in the cloud when your laptop is closed, and large tasks can be split across parallel agents that Devin coordinates and reports on.

For teams, Devin extends beyond one-off prompts. You can tag @Devin in Slack or Teams so it reads a thread and replies with a PR, set up automations that fix failing tests or patch vulnerable dependencies as they appear, and run security reviews. Pricing is seat-based and enterprise-oriented, with an Ultra tier for heavier autonomous usage, and Cognition has marketed large security-credit programs for enterprises.

**Pricing & Plans:** Paid, enterprise-oriented. Devin is sold on a per-seat subscription with tiered plans (including higher-capacity tiers for heavier autonomous use) plus usage allowances; Cognition also runs credit programs and enterprise agreements. Because plans and credit packages change, check Cognition's official pricing page for current numbers.

- **End-to-end autonomous coding:** Devin plans, writes code, runs tests, and opens pull requests across complex, multi-repository codebases without waiting for line-by-line approval.
- **Its own virtual machines:** Devin provisions Windows, Mac, and Linux VMs, builds and runs the project, and tests in a real browser - even recording itself using the feature it built.
- **Slack, Teams, and alert integration:** Mention @Devin in a thread to delegate a fix, or connect CI, PagerDuty, and issue trackers so it reacts to failures and alerts automatically.
- **Parallel cloud agents:** Delegate a large task and Devin splits it across parallel cloud agents that keep working after you close your laptop, then reports back.
- **Codebase wiki and automations:** Devin maintains a living map of the architecture and supports recurring automations such as dependency upgrades, test fixes, and security scans.

**Strengths:** Handles ticket-level autonomous work rather than only suggesting code completions; Tests in its own browser and VMs, which catches issues that pure code generation misses; Deep workflow integration with Slack, Teams, CI, and alerting tools; Keeps working in parallel cloud agents even when your machine is off

**Limitations:** Premium, seat-based pricing puts it out of reach for casual individual use; Complex or poorly specified tasks still need human review before merging; Maximum value depends on having a well-structured repo and clean test setup

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin.md)

## Trae

Trae is an AI development platform that puts a coding agent at the centre of the editing experience. Its main product, TraeCode, is a full IDE with an integrated AI panel: instead of merely completing the next line, the assistant can inspect your project, reason about the change you want, edit several files at once, and run commands to verify the result. The diff-based review flow keeps you in charge of what is applied.

The stated positioning is "Collaborate with Intelligence" — the assistant works alongside you rather than replacing the editor. Practical uses include generating boilerplate and new modules, refactoring messy code, explaining an unfamiliar repository, fixing failing tests, and translating a plain-language task into working changes. Because the agent has project context, results tend to be more coherent across a codebase than single-file completion.

Alongside TraeCode, TraeWork applies the same assistant model to general work tasks, so the platform covers both engineering and everyday productivity. Trae ships as a desktop download and can also be used in the browser, making it easy to adopt without disrupting a whole toolchain.

**Pricing & Plans:** Free to start, with paid upgrades that increase usage limits for premium models; enterprises can purchase through BytePlus. Usage is measured per AI request and varies by model, so heavy users should review the pricing page for current allowances before committing.

- **Project-aware code context:** Trae reads your project files and dependencies, so its suggestions account for how the codebase is actually structured rather than treating each file in isolation.
- **Agentic code generation and edits:** Describe a task and the agent plans and applies multi-file edits, shows a diff for review, and can run terminal commands as part of the change.
- **Debugging and code explanation:** Ask questions about unfamiliar code, get inline explanations, and have bugs or failing tests diagnosed and fixed with context.
- **TraeCode plus TraeWork:** TraeCode covers the coding workflow, while TraeWork applies an AI assistant to everyday knowledge tasks — both download for desktop, with a web option.
- **Free start with upgradable limits:** You can try it for free and scale up by choosing the plan that raises your usage limits, with enterprise options available.

**Strengths:** Free tier makes it easy to evaluate before paying; Agentic workflow handles multi-file changes and tests, not just autocomplete; Deep project context improves the relevance of suggestions; Covers both coding (TraeCode) and general work (TraeWork)

**Limitations:** Heavy usage of premium models quickly hits plan limits; It is a newer entrant, so some integrations and plugins are still maturing; Most of the polish is in the coding flow; other workflows are less developed; Usage-based limits can be confusing to predict for large teams

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Devin and Trae compare in monthly traffic?

Devin has 2,549,346 monthly visits, while Trae has 702,366. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Devin has a month-over-month growth rate of +1%; Trae has -7.8%.

### How does pricing compare?

Devin: Paid. Paid, enterprise-oriented. Devin is sold on a per-seat subscription with tiered plans (including higher-capacity tiers for heavier autonomous use) plus usage allowances; Cognition also runs credit programs and enterprise agreements. Because plans and credit packages change, check Cognition's official pricing page for current numbers. Trae: Freemium. Free to start, with paid upgrades that increase usage limits for premium models; enterprises can purchase through BytePlus. Usage is measured per AI request and varies by model, so heavy users should review the pricing page for current allowances before committing.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Claude](https://openaitools.app/tool/claude-2) | 1,253,439,413 | +23.8% | Freemium | Anthropic's frontier AI workspace powered by Claude 5.5 for agentic coding, analysis, and nuanced writing. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/claude-2.md) |
| 2 | [Cursor](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor) | 23,297,751 | +8.4% | Freemium | Offers much deeper IDE integration and superior multi-file editing, but requires a paid subscription for full features. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor.md) |
| 3 | [Manus](https://openaitools.app/tool/manus) | 19,195,779 | -1.7% | Free Trial | A general autonomous agent platform executing multi-step goals and browsers, suitable for broader web and coding workflows. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/manus.md) |
| 4 | [Google Antigravity](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity) | 16,054,109 | +8.1% | Freemium | Google's agent-first development platform for building and shipping software with AI agents | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity.md) |
| 5 | [Replit](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit) | 10,016,437 | -7.7% | Freemium, Paid | Excels at instant browser-based cloud deployment and full-stack app generation, but is less suited for heavy local multi-repo workflows. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit.md) |
| 6 | [VS Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/vs-code) | 7,397,370 | -3.8% | Freemium | Provides ultimate extensibility and open-source flexibility, but requires assembling your own extension stack to match Trae's native AI features. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/vs-code.md) |
| 7 | [Qoder](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder) | 5,145,040 | +81.8% | Freemium, Free Trial, Free | Provides powerful codebase-wide agentic planning and completion, but operates primarily as a plugin rather than a dedicated IDE. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder.md) |
| 8 | [Kiro](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro) | 3,330,476 | +4.6% | Freemium | Uses rigorous spec-driven engineering plans to verify changes, though with a more structured and rigid workflow than Trae. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro.md) |
| 9 | [Command Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code) | 2,358,177 | -12.1% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Focuses on terminal-first workflows with open-weight models, but lacks the graphical multi-file interface of Trae. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code.md) |
| 10 | [Orca](https://openaitools.app/tool/orca) | 1,025,891 | +1% | Free, Open Source, Enterprise on request | Run many coding agents in parallel, each in its own worktree | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/orca.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/devin-vs-trae

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)