# Dust vs Effy

Dust records 547,217 monthly visits with +1.8% month-over-month growth and Contact for Pricing pricing. Effy records 13,992 monthly visits with -26.1% growth and Freemium, Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [Dust](https://openaitools.app/tool/dust) | [Effy](https://openaitools.app/tool/effy) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://dust.tt | https://www.effy.ai |
| Categories | AI Assistant, Large Language Models (LLMs), AI Workflow, AI Knowledge Management | AI Productivity Tools, AI Task Management, AI Review Generator |
| Pricing Model | Contact for Pricing | Freemium, Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 547,217 | 13,992 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +1.8% | -26.1% |
| Primary Market | France | United States |
| Direct Visits | 456,919 | 5,599 |
| Review Score | 4.4 | 4.3 |
| Saved Count | 5 | 2 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Dust

Dust positions itself as 'multiplayer AI' for human-agent collaboration. Rather than giving each employee a private chatbot, it lets teams build agents that have shared access to company knowledge, connected tools, conversations and notifications, so work can move back and forth between people and AI. Agents can be reused across departments, and human review stays part of the loop where it matters.

The platform's differentiator is context. According to Dust, most AI tools can retrieve a single Slack message or CRM record, whereas its agents pull context together across Slack, CRM, documents and other company systems to answer with the full picture and then act on it. Over 70 connectors cover messaging, calendars, CRM, file storage, project management, data and finance tools, and agents can reach MCP servers through the same gateway.

Governance is a first-class feature. Dust offers a dual-layer permission model that separates what agents can access from who can use them, SCIM-synced groups, admin-gated overrides, audit logs and analytics for monitoring adoption, usage, cost and ROI. It is SOC 2 Type II certified, offers US or EU data residency and supports single-tenant deployment. Teams can build agents with 20+ frontier and open-source models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Mistral and others, choosing the right model per workflow. The company says more than 3,000 organizations and 300,000+ agents run on the platform.

**Pricing & Plans:** Contact for pricing. Dust offers a free trial after signup, but its plans are oriented toward teams and enterprises with usage-based credits, volume pricing and dedicated support; you need to talk to sales for exact figures.

- **Agents with company context:** Connect 70+ tools including Slack, Notion, Google Drive, GitHub, Salesforce and Zendesk so agents answer with real company knowledge instead of generic guesses.
- **70+ connectors and MCP support:** Reach messaging, CRM, docs, project management, data, finance and MCP servers through one platform, so agents can act across systems rather than just chat.
- **Model flexibility:** Build agents with 20+ frontier and open-source models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and Mistral, and pick the best model for each task.
- **AI-native governance:** A dual-layer permission model, SCIM-synced groups, admin-gated overrides, audit logs and usage analytics keep company data locked down while teams move fast.
- **Multiplayer collaboration:** People and agents share context, tools and notifications, so cross-functional workflows run with reusable skills and human review built in.

**Strengths:** Deep context gathering across 70+ enterprise connectors; Strong enterprise governance with permissions, audit logs and SOC 2 Type II; Model-agnostic: choose among 20+ frontier and open-source models; Shared, reusable agents that scale across departments

**Limitations:** Pricing is sales-led, so costs are hard to estimate before a demo; Setting up connectors and permissions takes real admin work; Best value comes with broad rollout, which is a heavier commitment for small teams

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/dust.md)

## Effy

Effy takes a deliberately focused approach to performance management. Instead of shipping fifteen modules employees never open, it concentrates on the two things most HR teams actually need to run: review cycles and the goals that should inform them. That means 360-degree feedback, peer reviews, upward reviews, self-assessments, probation check-ins and annual reviews, all with customizable forms, flexible workflows, visibility and anonymisation controls, and automated reminders through Slack and email.

The AI layer is where Effy saves the most time. Raw feedback is turned into clear summaries and reports ready to present, so managers spend their effort on conversations rather than on assembling comments into a document. Goals and OKRs cascade from company to team to individual level, with progress tracked as measurable metrics, project-style action items or auto-calculated values from child goals, and stakeholder reviews of accomplishments are built in.

Effy leans hard into the done-with-you model. The company reports that 350+ organisations across more than 30 countries use it and that 84% of customers launch without an implementation call, since most HR teams can run their first cycle the same day they sign up. Pricing starts at $3 per seat per month with no implementation fees, and the free plan covers up to five users with no time limit. Review data is hosted on AWS with an EU region available for data residency, and the platform states GDPR compliance with retention and deletion controls.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium with paid tiers. The free plan supports up to 5 users with no time limit, and the entry paid price is $3 per seat per month — the company states there are no implementation fees. Larger or more complex needs are priced via contact with sales.

- **AI-generated review summaries:** Raw feedback from reviews is distilled into individual and company-wide reports that are ready to present, cutting the administrative work of each cycle.
- **Every review type in one system:** Run 360s, peer reviews, upward reviews, self-assessments, probation check-ins and annual reviews with customizable forms and flexible workflows.
- **Cascading goals and OKRs:** Set company, team and individual goals with auto-calculated progress, then include them automatically in review cycles.
- **Slack-native workflows:** Reminders and review tasks arrive where employees already work, with email automation for those who prefer it.
- **Anonymisation and data controls:** Visibility and anonymisation settings protect candid feedback, with AWS hosting, an optional EU region, GDPR compliance and retention controls.

**Strengths:** Publishes transparent starting pricing at $3 per seat per month with a genuinely usable free tier for up to 5 users; Fast setup — most teams launch without an implementation call, per the vendor; AI summaries and reports remove the biggest time sink in review cycles; Slack and email automation plus goal cascading keep the process running without chasing

**Limitations:** Positioned for 30–1,000+ employee companies, so very large enterprises may outgrow it; Fewer adjacent HR modules than broad suites like Lattice; Custom or complex needs move to contact-for-pricing, which is less predictable

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/effy.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Dust and Effy compare in monthly traffic?

Dust has 547,217 monthly visits, while Effy has 13,992. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Dust has a month-over-month growth rate of +1.8%; Effy has -26.1%.

### How does pricing compare?

Dust: Contact for Pricing. Contact for pricing. Dust offers a free trial after signup, but its plans are oriented toward teams and enterprises with usage-based credits, volume pricing and dedicated support; you need to talk to sales for exact figures. Effy: Freemium, Contact for Pricing. Freemium with paid tiers. The free plan supports up to 5 users with no time limit, and the entry paid price is $3 per seat per month — the company states there are no implementation fees. Larger or more complex needs are priced via contact with sales.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Notion](https://openaitools.app/tool/t) | 173,441,670 | +0.1% | Freemium | Provides a unified connected workspace for team documents and databases, but lacks Dust's advanced multi-source enterprise knowledge indexing. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/t.md) |
| 2 | [Salesforce Agentforce (formerly Einstein)](https://openaitools.app/tool/salesforce-einstein) | 111,910,743 | +2.2% | Freemium | Integrates deeply with CRM ecosystems to automate enterprise workflows, but is tightly bound to the Salesforce software suite. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/salesforce-einstein.md) |
| 3 | [Glean](https://openaitools.app/tool/glean) | 3,301,875 | +0.1% | Contact for Pricing | Offers robust enterprise-wide permission-aware search and knowledge management, but with less focus on custom multi-model agent workflows. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/glean.md) |
| 4 | [Abacus.AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/abacus-ai) | 3,278,636 | -1.7% | Contact for Pricing | Combines multi-model chat assistants and automated machine learning optimization, but with a heavier focus on data science pipelines. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/abacus-ai.md) |
| 5 | [Taskade](https://openaitools.app/tool/taskade) | 539,714 | -9.4% | Freemium | Turn one prompt into live business apps, AI agents and automated workflows | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/taskade.md) |
| 6 | [Motion](https://openaitools.app/tool/usemotion-com) | 511,886 | -15.5% | Free Trial, Paid | The AI super app for work — tasks, projects, calendar and meetings in one place | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/usemotion-com.md) |
| 7 | [Gumloop](https://openaitools.app/tool/gumloop) | 379,557 | -21.1% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Excels at visual no-code web scraping and data automation pipelines, but lacks Dust's dedicated internal knowledge base architecture. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/gumloop.md) |
| 8 | [Leapsome](https://openaitools.app/tool/leapsome) | 290,483 | -9.6% | Contact for Pricing | Agentic HR platform uniting HRIS, performance and talent management | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/leapsome.md) |
| 9 | [Tines](https://openaitools.app/tool/tines) | 273,260 | +24.4% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Focuses on secure enterprise workflow automation and security orchestration, but requires more manual setup for custom AI agents. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/tines.md) |
| 10 | [Careerflow](https://openaitools.app/tool/careerflow-ai) | 252,782 | -17.2% | Freemium | AI career copilot for resumes, LinkedIn, and the whole job hunt | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/careerflow-ai.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/dust-vs-effy

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)