# Dust vs EvalCore

Dust records 547,217 monthly visits with +1.8% month-over-month growth and Contact for Pricing pricing. EvalCore records 0 monthly visits with 0% growth and Free pricing.

| Metric | [Dust](https://openaitools.app/tool/dust) | [EvalCore](https://openaitools.app/tool/evalcore) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://dust.tt | https://evalcore.cc |
| Categories | AI Assistant, Large Language Models (LLMs), AI Workflow, AI Knowledge Management | AI Testing, AI Developer Tools, Large Language Models (LLMs), AI Agent |
| Pricing Model | Contact for Pricing | Free |
| Monthly Visits | 547,217 | 0 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +1.8% | 0% |
| Primary Market | France | Global |
| Direct Visits | 456,919 | 0 |
| Review Score | 4.4 | 4.8 |
| Saved Count | 5 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Dust

Dust positions itself as 'multiplayer AI' for human-agent collaboration. Rather than giving each employee a private chatbot, it lets teams build agents that have shared access to company knowledge, connected tools, conversations and notifications, so work can move back and forth between people and AI. Agents can be reused across departments, and human review stays part of the loop where it matters.

The platform's differentiator is context. According to Dust, most AI tools can retrieve a single Slack message or CRM record, whereas its agents pull context together across Slack, CRM, documents and other company systems to answer with the full picture and then act on it. Over 70 connectors cover messaging, calendars, CRM, file storage, project management, data and finance tools, and agents can reach MCP servers through the same gateway.

Governance is a first-class feature. Dust offers a dual-layer permission model that separates what agents can access from who can use them, SCIM-synced groups, admin-gated overrides, audit logs and analytics for monitoring adoption, usage, cost and ROI. It is SOC 2 Type II certified, offers US or EU data residency and supports single-tenant deployment. Teams can build agents with 20+ frontier and open-source models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Mistral and others, choosing the right model per workflow. The company says more than 3,000 organizations and 300,000+ agents run on the platform.

**Pricing & Plans:** Contact for pricing. Dust offers a free trial after signup, but its plans are oriented toward teams and enterprises with usage-based credits, volume pricing and dedicated support; you need to talk to sales for exact figures.

- **Agents with company context:** Connect 70+ tools including Slack, Notion, Google Drive, GitHub, Salesforce and Zendesk so agents answer with real company knowledge instead of generic guesses.
- **70+ connectors and MCP support:** Reach messaging, CRM, docs, project management, data, finance and MCP servers through one platform, so agents can act across systems rather than just chat.
- **Model flexibility:** Build agents with 20+ frontier and open-source models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and Mistral, and pick the best model for each task.
- **AI-native governance:** A dual-layer permission model, SCIM-synced groups, admin-gated overrides, audit logs and usage analytics keep company data locked down while teams move fast.
- **Multiplayer collaboration:** People and agents share context, tools and notifications, so cross-functional workflows run with reusable skills and human review built in.

**Strengths:** Deep context gathering across 70+ enterprise connectors; Strong enterprise governance with permissions, audit logs and SOC 2 Type II; Model-agnostic: choose among 20+ frontier and open-source models; Shared, reusable agents that scale across departments

**Limitations:** Pricing is sales-led, so costs are hard to estimate before a demo; Setting up connectors and permissions takes real admin work; Best value comes with broad rollout, which is a heavier commitment for small teams

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/dust.md)

## EvalCore

EvalCore solves a common failure mode in AI engineering: you tweak a prompt, swap a model, or bump a dependency, and something quietly breaks in production. Instead of trying to re-run expensive, non-deterministic model calls in CI, EvalCore treats AI behaviour like a snapshot. An eval is just a YAML file describing a target and a JSONL dataset, with scorers stacked on top to define what "good" means.

The first run happens live against a real model — anything OpenAI-compatible, vLLM, Ollama, a custom REST API, a shell command, or OpenTelemetry/OpenInference traces. Every request and response is written to a local SQLite cassette, keyed by a hash of the canonical request, along with token and cost figures on the summary. From then on, CI replays those recordings byte-for-byte with `--cache replay`: no network, no API keys, no flaky judge model, and identical inputs always produce identical verdicts.

Because the cassette is committed to your repository, a `--baseline main` comparison fails only on genuine regressions, and the process exit code gates the pipeline. Trials, model comparisons, agent traces, gates, and reports are all a few lines of YAML or a flag rather than a framework. It ships as one small Rust binary, works with any language on the other side of the target, and collects no telemetry.

**Pricing & Plans:** Free and open source under the Apache-2.0 licence, with $0 cost in CI thanks to offline cassette replay. Install via cargo or prebuilt binaries; no signup, no server and no telemetry.

- **Record once, replay forever:** A live run captures every model request and response into a local SQLite cassette that CI can replay offline and deterministically at zero cost.
- **Anything can be a target:** Point EvalCore at OpenAI-compatible endpoints, vLLM, Ollama, your own REST APIs, shell commands, or OTel/OpenInference traces — no SDK required.
- **Scorers that define 'good':** Stack contains, judge-rubric and other scorers in YAML to express exactly what a correct answer looks like for each case.
- **Regression gates and baselines:** Compare against a baseline branch so only real regressions fail, and let the process exit code gate your pull requests.
- **Cost, tokens and reports built in:** Every summary reports token usage and spend for live runs, while trials, model comparisons and history give you a clear picture over time.

**Strengths:** Genuinely free and open source under Apache-2.0, with no usage-based pricing; Deterministic offline replay removes flaky, expensive model calls from CI; Single dependency-free binary that works regardless of your app's language; Configuration is plain YAML plus JSONL, so suites are easy to review and version

**Limitations:** Requires a Rust toolchain or a prebuilt binary and comfort with the command line; Cassettes must be recorded live first, so initial setup needs real API access; No hosted dashboard — results and history live in your repo and CI logs

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/evalcore.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Dust and EvalCore compare in monthly traffic?

Dust has 547,217 monthly visits, while EvalCore has 0. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Dust has a month-over-month growth rate of +1.8%; EvalCore has 0%.

### How does pricing compare?

Dust: Contact for Pricing. Contact for pricing. Dust offers a free trial after signup, but its plans are oriented toward teams and enterprises with usage-based credits, volume pricing and dedicated support; you need to talk to sales for exact figures. EvalCore: Free. Free and open source under the Apache-2.0 licence, with $0 cost in CI thanks to offline cassette replay. Install via cargo or prebuilt binaries; no signup, no server and no telemetry.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Notion](https://openaitools.app/tool/t) | 173,441,670 | +0.1% | Freemium | Provides a unified connected workspace for team documents and databases, but lacks Dust's advanced multi-source enterprise knowledge indexing. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/t.md) |
| 2 | [Salesforce Agentforce (formerly Einstein)](https://openaitools.app/tool/salesforce-einstein) | 111,910,743 | +2.2% | Freemium | Integrates deeply with CRM ecosystems to automate enterprise workflows, but is tightly bound to the Salesforce software suite. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/salesforce-einstein.md) |
| 3 | [Glean](https://openaitools.app/tool/glean) | 3,301,875 | +0.1% | Contact for Pricing | Offers robust enterprise-wide permission-aware search and knowledge management, but with less focus on custom multi-model agent workflows. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/glean.md) |
| 4 | [Abacus.AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/abacus-ai) | 3,278,636 | -1.7% | Contact for Pricing | Combines multi-model chat assistants and automated machine learning optimization, but with a heavier focus on data science pipelines. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/abacus-ai.md) |
| 5 | [KaneAI](https://openaitools.app/tool/kaneai) | 901,340 | +13.2% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | GenAI-native end-to-end QA agent that plans, writes and heals tests in plain language | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kaneai.md) |
| 6 | [Taskade](https://openaitools.app/tool/taskade) | 539,714 | -9.4% | Freemium | Turn one prompt into live business apps, AI agents and automated workflows | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/taskade.md) |
| 7 | [Gumloop](https://openaitools.app/tool/gumloop) | 379,557 | -21.1% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Excels at visual no-code web scraping and data automation pipelines, but lacks Dust's dedicated internal knowledge base architecture. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/gumloop.md) |
| 8 | [Tines](https://openaitools.app/tool/tines) | 273,260 | +24.4% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Focuses on secure enterprise workflow automation and security orchestration, but requires more manual setup for custom AI agents. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/tines.md) |
| 9 | [Arize AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/arize-com) | 249,028 | +3.2% | Paid, Contact for Pricing | Agent observability, evaluation, and continuous improvement for production AI | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/arize-com.md) |
| 10 | [Mindgard](https://openaitools.app/tool/mindgard) | 153,455 | +1.3% | Contact for Pricing | Attack-led AI security testing and red teaming | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/mindgard.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/dust-vs-evalcore

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)