# Earmark vs Glean

Earmark records 2,015 monthly visits with -33.9% month-over-month growth and Free Trial, Paid pricing. Glean records 3,301,875 monthly visits with +0.1% growth and Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [Earmark](https://openaitools.app/tool/earmark) | [Glean](https://openaitools.app/tool/glean) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.tryearmark.com | https://www.glean.com |
| Categories | AI Product Manager, AI Meeting Assistant, AI Agent, AI Productivity Tools | AI Productivity Tools, AI Agent, AI Assistant, AI Search Engine |
| Pricing Model | Free Trial, Paid | Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 2,015 | 3,301,875 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -33.9% | +0.1% |
| Primary Market | Global | United States |
| Direct Visits | 793 | 2,628,666 |
| Review Score | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Saved Count | 1 | 7 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Earmark

Earmark reframes the meeting as the work itself. Instead of taking notes and reconstructing decisions afterward, teams ask Earmark for the output they need — a spec, a decision record, a follow-up — and it drafts that document from the live conversation while the people with the answers are still in the room.

A core strength is handoff. Earmark prepares ticket drafts with titles, descriptions, and acceptance criteria for Linear or Jira, and can build briefs for Cursor or UI prompts for v0 that export with one click. Saved meetings live in Projects so invited teammates can query the shared context later. It can also suggest better questions during the discussion, improving as the conversation develops.

Privacy is treated seriously. Earmark states that customer meeting content is never used to train AI models and that its AI providers are held to the same rule. Meetings can be saved or run in Temporary Mode so their content stays out of history, transcript files can be stored locally as Markdown for use in Obsidian or with coding agents, and teams get a botless capture experience rather than a bot joining the call.

**Pricing & Plans:** Earmark offers a free trial with paid plans; see the pricing section on the site for current tiers and seat details.

- **Live deliverable drafting:** Ask for a spec, decision record, or follow-up and Earmark drafts it during the meeting so gaps surface while they are easy to fix.
- **Ticket and handoff exports:** Generate ticket drafts with acceptance criteria and export reviewed work to Linear or Jira, or briefs into Cursor and v0.
- **Botless capture with projects:** No bot joins the call, and saved meetings live in Projects where invited teammates can query the shared context later.
- **Suggested questions:** Earmark proposes clarifying questions in real time, sharpening as the discussion progresses.
- **Local Markdown transcripts:** The desktop app can save transcripts as Markdown files you can use in Obsidian or feed to coding agents.

**Strengths:** Deliverables are drafted live in the meeting rather than reconstructed later; One-click export into Linear, Jira, Cursor, and v0 fits existing workflows; Explicit commitment not to train AI models on customer meeting content; Botless capture plus local Markdown transcripts give teams flexibility and control

**Limitations:** Focused on product and engineering meetings, so other use cases get less tailored output; Temporary Mode and local transcript storage require deliberate setup; Best value depends on the team actually adopting the exported tickets and briefs

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/earmark.md)

## Glean

Glean addresses a problem most enterprises hit after their first wave of AI adoption: models are powerful but isolated from the context of the business. The platform builds an enterprise context layer by indexing and understanding content across the tools a company already runs on, then uses that grounding to improve both answer quality and efficiency. Because fewer irrelevant tokens need to be sent to a model, the same question costs less to serve.

The product surface spans four areas: enterprise search, an AI assistant for everyday work, an agent platform for automating long-running processes, and Glean Protect for security and governance. Administrators also get model routing and an AI gateway, letting them decide which models handle which requests without rebuilding integrations. Everything inherits the access permissions of the source systems, so answers stay within each employee's existing rights.

Glean serves large organisations across finance, healthcare, retail, technology, and government, with published customers including Booking.com, Zillow, and Ericsson. It holds SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, HIPAA, GDPR, and TX-RAMP Level 2 attestations, and reports 275+ connectors, 40+ supported language models, and 99.9%+ uptime on core services.

**Pricing & Plans:** Contact for pricing. Glean is licensed to organisations based on seats, connectors, and deployment scope, and is evaluated through a demo rather than self-serve purchase.

- **Permission-aware enterprise search:** Ask a question in plain language and get a cited answer assembled from documents, tickets, wikis, and messages across every connected system, with permissions respected.
- **Agent builder and orchestration:** Reusable agents handle multi-step workflows such as onboarding, account research, or incident follow-up by orchestrating actions across business apps.
- **Model routing and AI gateway:** Glean automatically picks and routes requests to the right model and reasoning level, giving teams access to 40+ LLMs through a single governed gateway.
- **Grounded content and analysis:** Draft on-brand documents, summarise meetings, analyse data, and create content grounded in company context rather than generic model knowledge.
- **Governance and observability:** Administrators get usage controls, spend visibility, audit logging, and compliance-ready governance for every AI interaction.

**Strengths:** Answers cite source systems and inherit their permissions, which removes the main blocker to enterprise-wide rollout; One platform covers search, assistant, and agents instead of three separate vendors; Model routing and token efficiency directly reduce the cost per AI query at scale; 275+ pre-built connectors shorten integration work considerably

**Limitations:** Enterprise pricing is quote-based, so budget planning requires a sales conversation; Full value depends on connecting many internal data sources, which takes IT effort; Smallest teams may find the platform more than they need

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/glean.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Earmark and Glean compare in monthly traffic?

Earmark has 2,015 monthly visits, while Glean has 3,301,875. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Earmark has a month-over-month growth rate of -33.9%; Glean has +0.1%.

### How does pricing compare?

Earmark: Free Trial, Paid. Earmark offers a free trial with paid plans; see the pricing section on the site for current tiers and seat details. Glean: Contact for Pricing. Contact for pricing. Glean is licensed to organisations based on seats, connectors, and deployment scope, and is evaluated through a demo rather than self-serve purchase.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Notion](https://openaitools.app/tool/t) | 173,441,670 | +0.1% | Freemium | The AI workspace where teams and agents get work done together | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/t.md) |
| 2 | [Otter AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/otter-ai) | 7,360,981 | +9.6% | Freemium | AI meeting agent that transcribes, summarises, and turns every conversation into searchable knowledge | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/otter-ai.md) |
| 3 | [Fathom](https://openaitools.app/tool/fathom-2-0) | 5,620,385 | +0.2% | Freemium, Free Trial | AI notetaker that records, transcribes and summarizes meetings — bot-free | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/fathom-2-0.md) |
| 4 | [Fireflies.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/fireflies-ai) | 4,411,502 | +3% | Freemium | AI teammate that records, transcribes and summarizes every meeting | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/fireflies-ai.md) |
| 5 | [Read Speaker Coach](https://openaitools.app/tool/read-speaker-coach) | 4,071,302 | -4.8% | Freemium, Paid | Meeting summaries, transcripts, and AI search that turn meetings into outcomes | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/read-speaker-coach.md) |
| 6 | [Dust](https://openaitools.app/tool/dust) | 547,217 | +1.8% | Contact for Pricing | Builds collaborative enterprise AI agents connected to company knowledge, but offers less robust out-of-the-box universal search. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/dust.md) |
| 7 | [Gumloop](https://openaitools.app/tool/gumloop) | 379,557 | -21.1% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Build, share, and control AI agents that actually do the work | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/gumloop.md) |
| 8 | [Noota](https://openaitools.app/tool/noota) | 283,526 | +3.3% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Bot-free AI meeting assistant hosted in Europe | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/noota.md) |
| 9 | [Circleback](https://openaitools.app/tool/circleback) | 272,906 | +12.5% | Free Trial | AI notetaker and company brain that turns every meeting into searchable knowledge | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/circleback.md) |
| 10 | [Mymeet.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/mymeet-ai) | 259,566 | -0.4% | Freemium | AI meeting assistant that transcribes, summarizes and assigns your action items | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/mymeet-ai.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/earmark-vs-glean

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)