# Earmark vs Miro

Earmark records 2,015 monthly visits with -33.9% month-over-month growth and Free Trial, Paid pricing. Miro records 30,749,206 monthly visits with +1.7% growth and Freemium, Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [Earmark](https://openaitools.app/tool/earmark) | [Miro](https://openaitools.app/tool/miro) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.tryearmark.com | https://miro.com |
| Categories | AI Product Manager, AI Meeting Assistant, AI Agent, AI Productivity Tools | AI Project Management, AI Workflow, Whiteboard AI, AI Diagram Generator |
| Pricing Model | Free Trial, Paid | Freemium, Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 2,015 | 30,749,206 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -33.9% | +1.7% |
| Primary Market | Global | United States |
| Direct Visits | 793 | 20,179,618 |
| Review Score | 4.2 | 4.5 |
| Saved Count | 1 | 40 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Earmark

Earmark reframes the meeting as the work itself. Instead of taking notes and reconstructing decisions afterward, teams ask Earmark for the output they need — a spec, a decision record, a follow-up — and it drafts that document from the live conversation while the people with the answers are still in the room.

A core strength is handoff. Earmark prepares ticket drafts with titles, descriptions, and acceptance criteria for Linear or Jira, and can build briefs for Cursor or UI prompts for v0 that export with one click. Saved meetings live in Projects so invited teammates can query the shared context later. It can also suggest better questions during the discussion, improving as the conversation develops.

Privacy is treated seriously. Earmark states that customer meeting content is never used to train AI models and that its AI providers are held to the same rule. Meetings can be saved or run in Temporary Mode so their content stays out of history, transcript files can be stored locally as Markdown for use in Obsidian or with coding agents, and teams get a botless capture experience rather than a bot joining the call.

**Pricing & Plans:** Earmark offers a free trial with paid plans; see the pricing section on the site for current tiers and seat details.

- **Live deliverable drafting:** Ask for a spec, decision record, or follow-up and Earmark drafts it during the meeting so gaps surface while they are easy to fix.
- **Ticket and handoff exports:** Generate ticket drafts with acceptance criteria and export reviewed work to Linear or Jira, or briefs into Cursor and v0.
- **Botless capture with projects:** No bot joins the call, and saved meetings live in Projects where invited teammates can query the shared context later.
- **Suggested questions:** Earmark proposes clarifying questions in real time, sharpening as the discussion progresses.
- **Local Markdown transcripts:** The desktop app can save transcripts as Markdown files you can use in Obsidian or feed to coding agents.

**Strengths:** Deliverables are drafted live in the meeting rather than reconstructed later; One-click export into Linear, Jira, Cursor, and v0 fits existing workflows; Explicit commitment not to train AI models on customer meeting content; Botless capture plus local Markdown transcripts give teams flexibility and control

**Limitations:** Focused on product and engineering meetings, so other use cases get less tailored output; Temporary Mode and local transcript storage require deliberate setup; Best value depends on the team actually adopting the exported tickets and briefs

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/earmark.md)

## Miro

Miro is a visual collaboration platform built around an infinite, multiplayer canvas. Teams use it to run brainstorming sessions, design sprints, workshops, and retrospectives, sketching ideas as sticky notes, shapes, and freeform drawings that everyone can see and edit at the same time. What began as a digital whiteboard has expanded into an "innovation workspace" where the messy early thinking and the structured plan that follows live in one place.

Structured formats are a large part of that expansion. Miro boards can hold Docs, Tables, Slides, Kanban boards, and Timelines, so a research synthesis can flow straight into a roadmap without switching tools. Thousands of templates and prebuilt playbooks cover common ceremonies, from customer journey mapping to technical architecture diagrams. Deep integrations with Jira, Asana, Linear, ClickUp, Slack, and Microsoft let the canvas stay connected to where work actually gets executed.

AI now runs through the product. Miro can generate diagrams, tables, and summaries from board content, clean up images, and connect external assistants such as Claude, Cursor, or Copilot through an MCP server. Paid plans meter these features with AI credits, and enterprise tiers add SSO, governance controls, and advanced security. Pricing starts with a free tier for small teams and scales through per-member plans to custom enterprise agreements.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium with three paid paths. Free covers small teams with 3 editable boards, templates, and core formats. Starter runs about $8 per member/month billed yearly with unlimited private boards and 25 AI credits per member. Business is about $20 per member/month billed yearly with workspaces, prototyping, and AI workflows. Enterprise is quoted on request with SSO, governance, and dedicated support.

- **Infinite collaborative canvas:** An infinite multiplayer board where cursors, comments, and live editing let remote and hybrid teams work in the same space simultaneously.
- **Structured formats on the canvas:** Docs, Tables, Slides, Kanban, and Timelines live alongside freeform drawing so a workshop can turn directly into a structured plan.
- **AI diagramming and synthesis:** Generate diagrams, tables, and summaries, remove image backgrounds, and connect external AI assistants through the MCP server.
- **Templates and playbooks:** 6,000-7,000+ templates for brainstorming, workshops, roadmapping, and process mapping give teams a running start.
- **Integrations and two-way sync:** Connect 250+ tools such as Jira, Asana, Linear, Slack, and Microsoft, with two-way sync available for planning workflows.

**Strengths:** Best-in-class infinite canvas that scales from a quick brainstorm to large workshops; Structured Docs, Tables, Slides, and Kanban reduce tool switching; Huge integration and template ecosystem including two-way Jira and Linear sync; Strong enterprise security, SSO, and admin controls for large organizations

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/miro.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Earmark and Miro compare in monthly traffic?

Earmark has 2,015 monthly visits, while Miro has 30,749,206. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Earmark has a month-over-month growth rate of -33.9%; Miro has +1.7%.

### How does pricing compare?

Earmark: Free Trial, Paid. Earmark offers a free trial with paid plans; see the pricing section on the site for current tiers and seat details. Miro: Freemium, Contact for Pricing. Freemium with three paid paths. Free covers small teams with 3 editable boards, templates, and core formats. Starter runs about $8 per member/month billed yearly with unlimited private boards and 25 AI credits per member. Business is about $20 per member/month billed yearly with workspaces, prototyping, and AI workflows. Enterprise is quoted on request with SSO, governance, and dedicated support.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Otter AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/otter-ai) | 7,360,981 | +9.6% | Freemium | AI meeting agent that transcribes, summarises, and turns every conversation into searchable knowledge | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/otter-ai.md) |
| 2 | [Fathom](https://openaitools.app/tool/fathom-2-0) | 5,620,385 | +0.2% | Freemium, Free Trial | AI notetaker that records, transcribes and summarizes meetings — bot-free | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/fathom-2-0.md) |
| 3 | [Fireflies.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/fireflies-ai) | 4,411,502 | +3% | Freemium | AI teammate that records, transcribes and summarizes every meeting | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/fireflies-ai.md) |
| 4 | [Read Speaker Coach](https://openaitools.app/tool/read-speaker-coach) | 4,071,302 | -4.8% | Freemium, Paid | Meeting summaries, transcripts, and AI search that turn meetings into outcomes | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/read-speaker-coach.md) |
| 5 | [Whimsical](https://openaitools.app/tool/whimsical) | 966,895 | -18.7% | Freemium | Stronger focus on structured mind mapping and flowcharting, but lacks Miro's massive template library and enterprise workshop features. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/whimsical.md) |
| 6 | [Eraser](https://openaitools.app/tool/eraser) | 534,396 | -23.6% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Excels at generating technical architecture diagrams directly from code, but less suited for freeform creative brainstorming. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/eraser.md) |
| 7 | [Boardmix](https://openaitools.app/tool/boardmix-online-whiteboard) | 447,560 | -6.2% | Freemium | Similar collaborative online whiteboard experience with strong AI diagramming, but offers fewer complex enterprise integration options. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/boardmix-online-whiteboard.md) |
| 8 | [Flowith](https://openaitools.app/tool/flowith) | 324,679 | -27.3% | Contact for Pricing | Features a spatial visual canvas integrated with multi-model chat agents, but less focused on team workshop facilitation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/flowith.md) |
| 9 | [Noota](https://openaitools.app/tool/noota) | 283,526 | +3.3% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Bot-free AI meeting assistant hosted in Europe | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/noota.md) |
| 10 | [Circleback](https://openaitools.app/tool/circleback) | 272,906 | +12.5% | Free Trial | AI notetaker and company brain that turns every meeting into searchable knowledge | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/circleback.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/earmark-vs-miro

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)