# Effy vs Workable

Effy records 13,992 monthly visits with -26.1% month-over-month growth and Freemium, Contact for Pricing pricing. Workable records 10,780,627 monthly visits with +5.5% growth and Free Trial, Paid pricing.

| Metric | [Effy](https://openaitools.app/tool/effy) | [Workable](https://openaitools.app/tool/workable) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.effy.ai | https://www.workable.com |
| Categories | AI Productivity Tools, AI Task Management, AI Review Generator | AI Recruiting, AI Agent, AI CRM |
| Pricing Model | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Free Trial, Paid |
| Monthly Visits | 13,992 | 10,780,627 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -26.1% | +5.5% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 5,599 | 5,309,440 |
| Review Score | 4.3 | 4.4 |
| Saved Count | 2 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Effy

Effy takes a deliberately focused approach to performance management. Instead of shipping fifteen modules employees never open, it concentrates on the two things most HR teams actually need to run: review cycles and the goals that should inform them. That means 360-degree feedback, peer reviews, upward reviews, self-assessments, probation check-ins and annual reviews, all with customizable forms, flexible workflows, visibility and anonymisation controls, and automated reminders through Slack and email.

The AI layer is where Effy saves the most time. Raw feedback is turned into clear summaries and reports ready to present, so managers spend their effort on conversations rather than on assembling comments into a document. Goals and OKRs cascade from company to team to individual level, with progress tracked as measurable metrics, project-style action items or auto-calculated values from child goals, and stakeholder reviews of accomplishments are built in.

Effy leans hard into the done-with-you model. The company reports that 350+ organisations across more than 30 countries use it and that 84% of customers launch without an implementation call, since most HR teams can run their first cycle the same day they sign up. Pricing starts at $3 per seat per month with no implementation fees, and the free plan covers up to five users with no time limit. Review data is hosted on AWS with an EU region available for data residency, and the platform states GDPR compliance with retention and deletion controls.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium with paid tiers. The free plan supports up to 5 users with no time limit, and the entry paid price is $3 per seat per month — the company states there are no implementation fees. Larger or more complex needs are priced via contact with sales.

- **AI-generated review summaries:** Raw feedback from reviews is distilled into individual and company-wide reports that are ready to present, cutting the administrative work of each cycle.
- **Every review type in one system:** Run 360s, peer reviews, upward reviews, self-assessments, probation check-ins and annual reviews with customizable forms and flexible workflows.
- **Cascading goals and OKRs:** Set company, team and individual goals with auto-calculated progress, then include them automatically in review cycles.
- **Slack-native workflows:** Reminders and review tasks arrive where employees already work, with email automation for those who prefer it.
- **Anonymisation and data controls:** Visibility and anonymisation settings protect candid feedback, with AWS hosting, an optional EU region, GDPR compliance and retention controls.

**Strengths:** Publishes transparent starting pricing at $3 per seat per month with a genuinely usable free tier for up to 5 users; Fast setup — most teams launch without an implementation call, per the vendor; AI summaries and reports remove the biggest time sink in review cycles; Slack and email automation plus goal cascading keep the process running without chasing

**Limitations:** Positioned for 30–1,000+ employee companies, so very large enterprises may outgrow it; Fewer adjacent HR modules than broad suites like Lattice; Custom or complex needs move to contact-for-pricing, which is less predictable

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/effy.md)

## Workable

Workable positions itself as agentic software for recruiting and HR. The centrepiece is a native AI recruiting agent that operates inside the applicant tracking system: it continuously sources passive candidates from a 400M+ profile pool, evaluates every inbound applicant against up to 14 job criteria, messages candidates to verify interest and fill gaps, and produces a scored shortlist where strong fits auto-advance and clear rejections are filtered out. Because the agent inherits the platform's permissions and security model, every action is logged, permissioned and reviewable.

Underneath the agent sits a deep, conventional ATS. Teams manage requisitions and approvals, custom pipelines and profiles, interview kits, scorecards and assessments, self-service interview scheduling, and offer management with e-signatures and integrated background checks. One click publishes a job to 200+ boards across 100+ countries, and a drag-and-drop careers page builder plus LinkedIn Preferred and Indeed Platinum partnerships help with visibility. A searchable talent CRM keeps past applicants warm for future roles.

After the hire, Workable keeps going as a full HR platform: automated onboarding portals, employee self-service, employee records and document management, time off and attendance, performance and engagement tools, and payroll reporting. It is also deliberately open — MCP-native with comprehensive coverage for Claude, ChatGPT or custom agents, a documented REST API with webhooks, 270+ integrations, custom reporting dashboards and a mobile-first experience. Pricing combines a free trial with paid plans tiered by company size and modules.

**Pricing & Plans:** Free trial available with paid subscription plans; pricing scales by company size and selected modules, with demo and enterprise options. Check the official pricing page for current rates.

- **AI candidate sourcing:** The agent continuously searches 400M+ profiles, identifies strong fits before they apply and sends each a personalised outreach message for every open role.
- **Automated screening and engagement:** Every applicant is scored against up to 14 job criteria with visible reasoning, then messaged directly to confirm interest and close information gaps before reaching a recruiter.
- **Complete ATS underneath:** Requisitions, pipelines, interview kits and scorecards, interview scheduling, offer letters with e-signatures and integrated background checks in one platform.
- **Job ad syndication and careers pages:** Publish jobs to 200+ boards in 100+ countries and build branded career sites with a drag-and-drop editor, plus LinkedIn and Indeed Apply integration.
- **HR platform after the hire:** Onboarding, employee self-service, time off and attendance, performance reviews and engagement tools sit on the same employee data created during hiring.
- **Open platform and integrations:** MCP-native coverage plus a documented REST API with webhooks, 270+ integrations, custom reporting dashboards and a mobile-first employee and candidate experience.

**Strengths:** Native AI agent does real sourcing, screening and candidate messaging, not just keyword ranking; Runs on top of a complete ATS rather than being a bolt-on tool with limited context; Hiring context carries through to onboarding and HR, so talent data compounds over time; Open and MCP-native: bring Claude, ChatGPT or your own agents while Workable stays the system of record

**Limitations:** Pricing scales with headcount and module selection, so costs grow as you add HR features; Full value depends on adopting both the ATS and HR modules, which is a bigger rollout for small teams; Very feature-rich, so administrators need time to configure workflows, permissions and approvals; Partner job-board and integration advantages vary by region and plan tier

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/workable.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Effy and Workable compare in monthly traffic?

Effy has 13,992 monthly visits, while Workable has 10,780,627. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Effy has a month-over-month growth rate of -26.1%; Workable has +5.5%.

### How does pricing compare?

Effy: Freemium, Contact for Pricing. Freemium with paid tiers. The free plan supports up to 5 users with no time limit, and the entry paid price is $3 per seat per month — the company states there are no implementation fees. Larger or more complex needs are priced via contact with sales. Workable: Free Trial, Paid. Free trial available with paid subscription plans; pricing scales by company size and selected modules, with demo and enterprise options. Check the official pricing page for current rates.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Recruit CRM](https://openaitools.app/tool/recruit-crm) | 729,799 | -7.8% | Contact for Pricing | Unifies applicant tracking and client management with AI outreach, but is tailored more heavily for agency recruiters. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/recruit-crm.md) |
| 2 | [Motion](https://openaitools.app/tool/usemotion-com) | 511,886 | -15.5% | Free Trial, Paid | The AI super app for work — tasks, projects, calendar and meetings in one place | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/usemotion-com.md) |
| 3 | [Kula AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/kula-ai) | 492,326 | +4.2% | Paid, Contact for Pricing | Provides an AI-native ATS with automated sourcing and CRM, but has a steeper learning curve than Workable. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kula-ai.md) |
| 4 | [Manatal](https://openaitools.app/tool/manatal) | 459,004 | -1% | Free Trial, Paid | Combines an applicant tracking system with powerful AI candidate matching, but offers less built-in employee onboarding. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/manatal.md) |
| 5 | [Sense](https://openaitools.app/tool/sensehq-com) | 435,090 | -5.8% | Contact for Pricing | Automates candidate engagement and communication using AI agents, but focuses less on traditional ATS pipeline management. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/sensehq-com.md) |
| 6 | [PyjamaHR](https://openaitools.app/tool/pyjamahr) | 325,592 | -15.3% | Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Delivers an accessible AI-powered applicant tracking system, but lacks some of Workable's advanced enterprise features. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/pyjamahr.md) |
| 7 | [TalentRecruit](https://openaitools.app/tool/talentrecruit) | 319,337 | -12.1% | Contact for Pricing | Autonomous hiring powered by agentic AI | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/talentrecruit.md) |
| 8 | [Juicebox (PeopleGPT)](https://openaitools.app/tool/juicebox-work) | 293,157 | -3.4% | Paid | Generates ranked candidate lists from natural language prompts, but lacks Workable's broad HR and onboarding suite. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/juicebox-work.md) |
| 9 | [Leapsome](https://openaitools.app/tool/leapsome) | 290,483 | -9.6% | Contact for Pricing | Agentic HR platform uniting HRIS, performance and talent management | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/leapsome.md) |
| 10 | [Metaview](https://openaitools.app/tool/metaview) | 259,340 | +54.3% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Automates interview note-taking and candidate screening pipelines, but is not a full standalone recruiting ATS. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/metaview.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/effy-vs-workable

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)