# Eraser vs Models.dev

Eraser records 534,396 monthly visits with -23.6% month-over-month growth and Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing pricing. Models.dev records 200,451 monthly visits with -3.9% growth and Free pricing.

| Metric | [Eraser](https://openaitools.app/tool/eraser) | [Models.dev](https://openaitools.app/tool/models-dev) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.eraser.io | https://models.dev |
| Categories | AI Diagram Generator, AI Copilot, AI Design Generator, AI Documents Generator | AI Models, AI API, Open Source AI Models, AI Tools Directory |
| Pricing Model | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Free |
| Monthly Visits | 534,396 | 200,451 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -23.6% | -3.9% |
| Primary Market | India | China |
| Direct Visits | 267,661 | 136,316 |
| Review Score | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Saved Count | 3 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Eraser

Eraser is a technical design platform aimed at the people who document architecture: enterprise architects, DevOps and platform engineers, consultants, and software teams. The core promise is speed without sloppiness, so instead of dragging boxes for hours you describe the system or point Eraser at a source of truth such as code, a cloud account, a CMDB, or a spreadsheet, and it produces a diagram that already follows sensible layout rules.

Beyond static images, Eraser supports interactive maps that zoom from a company-wide view down into a single service, guided explainers that walk teammates through a system, and AI documents for design docs and technical documentation. Team governance features such as shared style presets, naming rules, and reference architectures keep output consistent as more people create diagrams. An open-source agent toolkit and MCP server let tools like Claude, Cursor, and ChatGPT create, search, and export diagrams programmatically.

Prices are organized in tiers that include a free entry point, paid plans, and enterprise agreements, with multi-tenant, single-tenant, and self-hosted deployment options for larger organizations. Security posture includes SOC 2 Type 2 certification and SAML SSO.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium with paid plans and custom enterprise pricing. A free tier and free tools such as DiagramGPT are available, while paid individual and team plans plus enterprise agreements cover advanced governance, security, and deployment options; check the pricing page for current rates.

- **AI diagram generation:** Generate architecture diagrams, flowcharts, sequence diagrams, and BPMN from a text prompt, code, Terraform, or an uploaded PDF, Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Draw.io, or Visio file.
- **Maps from live systems:** Build interactive maps that sync with cloud accounts, repositories, and internal catalogs so the picture stays close to the real environment, with drill-down from org level to a single container.
- **Diagram-as-code integrations:** Paste code or connect private and public Git repositories, Confluence, Notion, VS Code, and GitHub to keep diagrams grounded in actual implementation.
- **Open-source agent toolkit and MCP server:** Run the agent toolkit in your own infrastructure under an MIT license and let MCP-compatible clients create, search, update, and export diagrams with OAuth or API tokens.
- **Team style governance:** Apply presets, naming and notation rules, and reference architectures so every teammate's diagram ships on-brand and consistent.

**Strengths:** Turns prompts, code, and files into properly laid-out diagrams instead of raw box-and-arrow output; Interactive maps and explainers make complex systems understandable to non-architects; MCP server and open-source toolkit fit agent-driven and self-hosted workflows; Enterprise controls such as SSO, SAML, and SOC 2 Type 2 certification

**Limitations:** Heaviest value comes with team and governance features that need setup; Advanced mapping and self-hosted deployment are aimed at larger organizations rather than solo users

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/eraser.md)

## Models.dev

Models.dev exists to answer a very practical developer question: which model should I use, and what will it cost? The site organises every entry under a canonical identifier in the form provider/model, so the same model served by several providers can be compared directly rather than guessed at. Columns cover context window, maximum output, whether input and output are supported, reasoning, tool calling, structured output, temperature control, open versus closed weights, price per million tokens, and release and update dates.

Because model releases move fast, the catalogue is built to stay current, with sortable and searchable tables that let you scan by lab or provider and filter down to what matters. Entries include both closed flagship models and open-weight alternatives, making it useful for cost planning as well as capability research.

The project is open source and free to use, and it is intended to be consumed programmatically. Developers can pull the catalogue into their own tooling through a JSON API or a type-safe SDK, which makes it a practical backend for dashboards, routing logic, or internal cost calculators rather than just a reference page to browse.

**Pricing & Plans:** Models.dev is free and open source. It is a reference database, so the prices it lists are the per-million-token rates charged by the model providers themselves, not a fee for using the site.

- **Canonical model identifiers:** Every model uses a consistent provider/model format so the same model across providers can be compared directly.
- **Specification comparison:** Side-by-side context window, output limit, reasoning, tool calling, structured output, and temperature support.
- **Pricing transparency:** Input and output prices per million tokens listed alongside release and update dates.
- **Open and closed models:** Covers closed flagship APIs and open-weight models from many labs in one sortable catalogue.
- **Developer access:** Consume the catalogue through a JSON API or a type-safe SDK for your own tools and dashboards.

**Strengths:** Free and open source with no account required; Consistent canonical identifiers make cross-provider comparison reliable; Covers pricing, limits, and capabilities in one sortable table; Available as a JSON API and type-safe SDK for programmatic use

**Limitations:** It is a reference catalogue, not an inference or hosting service; Data quality depends on community and maintainer updates keeping pace with releases; Interface is aimed at developers and offers little guidance for non-technical users

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/models-dev.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Eraser and Models.dev compare in monthly traffic?

Eraser has 534,396 monthly visits, while Models.dev has 200,451. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Eraser has a month-over-month growth rate of -23.6%; Models.dev has -3.9%.

### How does pricing compare?

Eraser: Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing. Freemium with paid plans and custom enterprise pricing. A free tier and free tools such as DiagramGPT are available, while paid individual and team plans plus enterprise agreements cover advanced governance, security, and deployment options; check the pricing page for current rates. Models.dev: Free. Models.dev is free and open source. It is a reference database, so the prices it lists are the per-million-token rates charged by the model providers themselves, not a fee for using the site.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Miro](https://openaitools.app/tool/miro) | 30,749,206 | +1.7% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Offers an expansive infinite canvas for team brainstorming and visual workshops, but lacks Eraser's code-to-diagram automation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/miro.md) |
| 2 | [Napkin AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/napkin) | 1,029,978 | -17.5% | Freemium | Automatically embeds visual diagrams directly inside text documents, though it lacks Eraser's specialized cloud architecture focus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/napkin.md) |
| 3 | [EdrawMax](https://openaitools.app/tool/edrawmax-com) | 301,707 | -6.5% | Paid | Provides extensive drag-and-drop shapes and templates for general diagrams, but weaker automated code-to-diagram capabilities than Eraser. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/edrawmax-com.md) |
| 4 | [Stork](https://openaitools.app/tool/stork) | 201,544 | +2.3% | Free | Includes model pricing trackers and developer news alongside tools directories, but less focused on raw API specs. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/stork.md) |
| 5 | [Cloudairy](https://openaitools.app/tool/cloudairy) | 179,162 | -13% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Combines team whiteboarding, documentation, and diagramming in one platform, but less tailored for automated codebase architecture. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/cloudairy.md) |
| 6 | [ChartDB](https://openaitools.app/tool/chartdb) | 49,523 | -33.4% | Freemium | Open-source tool specifically tailored for database schema visualization and ER diagrams, but lacks general system documentation features. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/chartdb.md) |
| 7 | [Mermaid Chart](https://openaitools.app/tool/mermaid-chart) | 46,022 | +519% | Freemium, Free Trial | Stronger focus on standard Mermaid syntax and code-driven diagrams, but lacks Eraser's native autonomous architecture doc generation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/mermaid-chart.md) |
| 8 | [InfraBase.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/infrabase-ai) | 39,072 | -13.6% | Free | Catalogues and compares AI infrastructure tools and services across categories, but lacks deep per-token pricing tables. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/infrabase-ai.md) |
| 9 | [DocuWriter.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/docuwriter-ai) | 23,235 | +16% | Free Trial, Paid | AI code documentation for any codebase, kept current automatically | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/docuwriter-ai.md) |
| 10 | [Brainboard](https://openaitools.app/tool/brainboard-co) | 18,776 | +4.8% | Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | Excellent for turning cloud architecture directly into infrastructure-as-code, but narrower focus compared to general technical documentation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/brainboard-co.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/eraser-vs-models-dev

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)