# Evalify vs QuickFiling

Evalify records 496 monthly visits with +48.1% month-over-month growth and Contact for Pricing pricing. QuickFiling records 11,413 monthly visits with +38.8% growth and Free to start, pay per package pricing.

| Metric | [Evalify](https://openaitools.app/tool/evalify) | [QuickFiling](https://openaitools.app/tool/quickfiling) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.evalify.ai | https://quickfiling.us |
| Categories | AI Investing, AI Legal Assistant, AI Research Tool | AI Legal Assistant, AI Assistant, AI Writing Assistants, AI Forms |
| Pricing Model | Contact for Pricing | Free to start, pay per package |
| Monthly Visits | 496 | 11,413 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +48.1% | +38.8% |
| Primary Market | Global | Global |
| Direct Visits | 198 | 2,488 |
| Review Score | 4.2 | 4.2 |
| Saved Count | 1 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Evalify

Evalify targets the most labor-intensive part of patent practice: the search. Rather than handing back thousands of raw documents, it designs a search strategy with you, executes it across 200M+ patents and 170+ jurisdictions, then drafts a first-pass freedom-to-operate opinion with every flagged claim charted limitation by limitation. Multiple AI agents cross-examine the charts and explicitly surface where they disagree, so the attorney can see the uncertainty instead of a falsely tidy answer.

Each run returns two deliverables: a short FTO Brief covering the opinion, the Score, clearance by jurisdiction and the critical patents, plus a long Full Report documenting every charted claim, the patents screened out with reasons, and the methodology. Both can be exported as PDF or editable Word, and Counsel-Grade users can compose exports under their own firm's branding.

Confidentiality is treated as a first-class feature. Uploaded inputs — technical disclosures, draft claims, product descriptions — are never retained, the working copy is destroyed after processing, and client material is never used as training data. Analyses and reports stay in the user's own account. Evalify positions its output as a preliminary assessment requiring attorney review, not legal advice.

**Pricing & Plans:** Evalify does not publish a conventional public price list; the site routes prospective users to a pricing conversation and a free first analysis. In its manual-search comparison the company places its own cost per matter below $500, against thousands of dollars for a traditional search. A Standard tier exports the FTO Brief as PDF, while a Counsel-Grade tier unlocks the Export Composer (both documents as PDF or editable Word), monitoring of a matter and enterprise white-labeling. Confirm current figures directly with Evalify.

- **Drafted first-pass FTO opinion:** Produces a reasoned infringement verdict and per-jurisdiction risk framing in the structure attorneys already use, so the deliverable is an editable draft rather than a pile of search results.
- **Element-by-element claim charts:** Every limitation of every charted claim is mapped against the product with the verdict and the reasoning that produced it, making the analysis auditable rather than a black-box score.
- **Evalify Score (250-900):** A single clearance number built from the chart verdicts, designed to be defensible for an attorney and legible to a business client.
- **Multi-agent cross-examination:** Several AI agents review each claim chart and flag disagreements explicitly, so unresolved conflicts are visible and the human decides.
- **Zero-retention confidentiality:** Uploaded inputs are never stored, are wiped after processing, and are never used to train models; only your analyses and reports persist in your account.

**Strengths:** Turns an exhausting manual search into a drafted opinion with claim charts; Explicit zero-retention policy on client input material; Transparent cross-examination of AI charts instead of a single opaque answer; Export to editable Word and firm-branded, white-label output

**Limitations:** No public self-serve price list; cost requires a conversation; Output is explicitly a preliminary assessment and still requires attorney review; Pricing page URL currently returns a 404, so tier details must be confirmed directly

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/evalify.md)

## QuickFiling

Immigration petitions and grad-school applications reward preparation quality more than raw qualifications. A National Interest Waiver that fails often does so because the evidence does not map cleanly onto the Dhanasar prongs or the record is disorganised, not because the applicant lacks merit. QuickFiling's premise is that much of this preparation work — criteria mapping, evidence sorting, drafting, form filling, typesetting — is structured enough to be handled by a specialised assistant, cutting the process from months to hours and the cost from typical attorney fees to a one-time download charge.

The product is organised around named AI specialists rather than a generic chatbot. Dr. NIW handles EB-2 National Interest Waiver petitions built on the published Dhanasar framework. Dr. EB1A covers all ten extraordinary ability criteria, Dr. EB1B addresses the outstanding professor or researcher category with its six criteria plus experience and job-offer requirements, Dr. I-485 assembles the adjustment of status package with I-765 and I-131, and Dr. EB-5 guides investors through lawful source-of-funds documentation. Each includes RFE response preparation, which matters because a Request for Evidence is where many self-prepared filings stall.

The workflow is deliberately transparent: the assistant tells you what to provide, you review and approve every section, and the final output is a LaTeX-typeset PDF containing petition letter, exhibits, and forms in the right order. QuickFiling states explicitly that it is a self-help document preparation service and not a law firm — the package is yours, but so is the decision about what to file. Applicants with unusual fact patterns should still weigh attorney review.

**Pricing & Plans:** Free to start, with a one-time fee charged only when you download the completed package. Listed prices range from $299 for I-485 to $749 for NIW and $949 for EB-1A and EB-1B, with EB-5 at $999. It is not a subscription.

- **Specialist per petition type:** Dr. NIW, Dr. EB1A, Dr. EB1B, Dr. I-485, and Dr. EB-5 each guide you through the specific statutory criteria and requirements for that petition category.
- **Evidence organisation and mining:** Import documents by URL or email, run citation analysis, and let the assistant tell you exactly what supporting material is still missing.
- **Section-by-section drafting:** Draft petition letters, sections, essays, and exhibits with section-by-section assistance — petitions, RFE responses, and admissions documents included.
- **Auto-filled forms and PDF editing:** AI fills the USCIS forms and an in-browser editor lets you highlight, cut pages, and annotate evidence PDFs, with full version history to revert any change.
- **LaTeX-assembled final package:** Everything is typeset in LaTeX and compiled into one professionally formatted, ready-to-submit PDF rather than a folder of loose files.

**Strengths:** Structured criteria mapping for NIW, EB-1A, EB-1B, I-485, and EB-5; Evidence import by URL or email plus citation analysis reduces manual sorting; Auto-filled USCIS forms and a built-in PDF editor remove extra tooling; LaTeX typesetting produces a professional, correctly ordered filing package

**Limitations:** It is a self-help document tool, not legal advice, so unusual cases may still need an attorney; Service currently concentrates on US immigration and admissions pathways; Fees apply at download even though the building process starts free; Output quality depends on how thoroughly you supply and organise your evidence

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/quickfiling.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Evalify and QuickFiling compare in monthly traffic?

Evalify has 496 monthly visits, while QuickFiling has 11,413. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Evalify has a month-over-month growth rate of +48.1%; QuickFiling has +38.8%.

### How does pricing compare?

Evalify: Contact for Pricing. Evalify does not publish a conventional public price list; the site routes prospective users to a pricing conversation and a free first analysis. In its manual-search comparison the company places its own cost per matter below $500, against thousands of dollars for a traditional search. A Standard tier exports the FTO Brief as PDF, while a Counsel-Grade tier unlocks the Export Composer (both documents as PDF or editable Word), monitoring of a matter and enterprise white-labeling. Confirm current figures directly with Evalify. QuickFiling: Free to start, pay per package. Free to start, with a one-time fee charged only when you download the completed package. Listed prices range from $299 for I-485 to $749 for NIW and $949 for EB-1A and EB-1B, with EB-5 at $999. It is not a subscription.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Thomson Reuters](https://openaitools.app/tool/thomson-reuters) | 17,919,413 | +5.5% | Contact for Pricing | Purpose-built AI and trusted content for legal, tax, risk and trade professionals | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/thomson-reuters.md) |
| 2 | [Harvey](https://openaitools.app/tool/harvey-ai) | 1,832,998 | +26.1% | Contact for Pricing | Domain-specific AI for law firms, in-house legal teams, and professional services | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/harvey-ai.md) |
| 3 | [pdf.net](https://openaitools.app/tool/pdf-net) | 1,257,131 | -22.3% | Freemium, Free | All-in-one online PDF editor with AI helpers for reading, summarizing, and generating documents | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/pdf-net.md) |
| 4 | [Filevine (LOIS)](https://openaitools.app/tool/demandsai) | 1,132,201 | +16.2% | Contact for Pricing | Legal AI and case management that runs across every matter in your firm. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/demandsai.md) |
| 5 | [Patsnap Eureka](https://openaitools.app/tool/patsnap-eureka) | 414,305 | +3.1% | Freemium | Domain-specific AI agents for innovation, R&D, and intellectual property | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/patsnap-eureka.md) |
| 6 | [AI Lawyer](https://openaitools.app/tool/ai-lawyer) | 221,106 | +1.5% | Free Trial | Your personal AI legal assistant for research, drafting, and document review | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/ai-lawyer.md) |
| 7 | [vLex](https://openaitools.app/tool/vlex-com-mx) | 140,457 | +0.7% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | Legal AI that understands the law | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/vlex-com-mx.md) |
| 8 | [Instafill.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/instafill) | 35,630 | -36.6% | Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | AI that fills your PDF and Word forms for you | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/instafill.md) |
| 9 | [LegalForce](https://openaitools.app/tool/legalforce-cloud-com) | 30,826 | -12.7% | Contact for Pricing | AI contract review backed by lawyer-curated standards and templates | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/legalforce-cloud-com.md) |
| 10 | [Mike (MikeOSS)](https://openaitools.app/tool/mikeoss) | 16,196 | -36.5% | Free, Open Source (pay only model API costs) | Open-source legal AI platform for document review, research, drafting and reusable workflows | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/mikeoss.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/evalify-vs-quickfiling

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)