# Evalify vs Surf

Evalify records 496 monthly visits with +48.1% month-over-month growth and Contact for Pricing pricing. Surf records 116,252 monthly visits with -18.9% growth and Free, Pro, Max, API credits pricing.

| Metric | [Evalify](https://openaitools.app/tool/evalify) | [Surf](https://openaitools.app/tool/surf) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.evalify.ai | https://asksurf.ai |
| Categories | AI Investing, AI Legal Assistant, AI Research Tool | AI Crypto, AI Copywriting, AI Creative Writing, AI For Finance |
| Pricing Model | Contact for Pricing | Free, Pro, Max, API credits |
| Monthly Visits | 496 | 116,252 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +48.1% | -18.9% |
| Primary Market | Global | South Korea |
| Direct Visits | 198 | 88,813 |
| Review Score | 4.2 | 4.2 |
| Saved Count | 1 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Evalify

Evalify targets the most labor-intensive part of patent practice: the search. Rather than handing back thousands of raw documents, it designs a search strategy with you, executes it across 200M+ patents and 170+ jurisdictions, then drafts a first-pass freedom-to-operate opinion with every flagged claim charted limitation by limitation. Multiple AI agents cross-examine the charts and explicitly surface where they disagree, so the attorney can see the uncertainty instead of a falsely tidy answer.

Each run returns two deliverables: a short FTO Brief covering the opinion, the Score, clearance by jurisdiction and the critical patents, plus a long Full Report documenting every charted claim, the patents screened out with reasons, and the methodology. Both can be exported as PDF or editable Word, and Counsel-Grade users can compose exports under their own firm's branding.

Confidentiality is treated as a first-class feature. Uploaded inputs — technical disclosures, draft claims, product descriptions — are never retained, the working copy is destroyed after processing, and client material is never used as training data. Analyses and reports stay in the user's own account. Evalify positions its output as a preliminary assessment requiring attorney review, not legal advice.

**Pricing & Plans:** Evalify does not publish a conventional public price list; the site routes prospective users to a pricing conversation and a free first analysis. In its manual-search comparison the company places its own cost per matter below $500, against thousands of dollars for a traditional search. A Standard tier exports the FTO Brief as PDF, while a Counsel-Grade tier unlocks the Export Composer (both documents as PDF or editable Word), monitoring of a matter and enterprise white-labeling. Confirm current figures directly with Evalify.

- **Drafted first-pass FTO opinion:** Produces a reasoned infringement verdict and per-jurisdiction risk framing in the structure attorneys already use, so the deliverable is an editable draft rather than a pile of search results.
- **Element-by-element claim charts:** Every limitation of every charted claim is mapped against the product with the verdict and the reasoning that produced it, making the analysis auditable rather than a black-box score.
- **Evalify Score (250-900):** A single clearance number built from the chart verdicts, designed to be defensible for an attorney and legible to a business client.
- **Multi-agent cross-examination:** Several AI agents review each claim chart and flag disagreements explicitly, so unresolved conflicts are visible and the human decides.
- **Zero-retention confidentiality:** Uploaded inputs are never stored, are wiped after processing, and are never used to train models; only your analyses and reports persist in your account.

**Strengths:** Turns an exhausting manual search into a drafted opinion with claim charts; Explicit zero-retention policy on client input material; Transparent cross-examination of AI charts instead of a single opaque answer; Export to editable Word and firm-branded, white-label output

**Limitations:** No public self-serve price list; cost requires a conversation; Output is explicitly a preliminary assessment and still requires attorney review; Pricing page URL currently returns a 404, so tier details must be confirmed directly

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/evalify.md)

## Surf

Surf positions itself as the intelligence layer for open financial markets. The core experience is conversational: you ask a question about a token, a protocol, a company, or a market move, and the system returns an answer grounded in live market feeds, onchain events, SEC filings, and news, with the underlying sources cited so you can verify the reasoning. Around that chat experience, Surf layers a set of named products such as CryptoPulse and Cryptopedia, plus an in-browser Studio for building analysis.

What separates Surf from a generic chatbot is the data plumbing behind it. The company says its datasets are kept current, structured, and unified across fragmented sources before any model touches them, which matters because much of crypto data is scattered across exchanges, chains, and regional venues. Surf also highlights its coverage of hard-to-source markets, including multilingual Asian centralized exchange data, as a differentiator for institutional research.

For builders, Surf exposes the same intelligence through an API, an MCP server, a CLI, and reusable agent skills, so a research desk can embed crypto and equities context directly into its own agents and internal tools. Surf states it is used by more than 500,000 users across 700-plus organizations, and its developer layer is documented separately for teams that want to integrate rather than click. Surf is operated by Cybertino Inc. and is not affiliated with any exchange or broker; outputs are research assistance, not investment advice.

**Pricing & Plans:** Surf publishes a tiered pricing page covering Free, Pro, and Max plans alongside API credit packages, with annual billing options and Studio credits bundled at higher tiers. Exact figures change over time, so check the official pricing page before purchasing.

- **Cited conversational analyst:** Ask questions about tokens, protocols, or equities in plain language and receive answers backed by visible sources rather than unsupported assertions.
- **Unified multi-source data:** Market prices, onchain events, SEC filings, and news are normalized into one structured layer so the model reasons over consistent inputs.
- **Developer integration layer:** API, MCP server, CLI, and agent skills let teams wire Surf intelligence into their own agents, dashboards, and internal research workflows.
- **CryptoPulse and Cryptopedia products:** Purpose-built modules for tracking market-moving developments and for looking up structured context on projects and assets.
- **Coverage of hard-to-source markets:** Surf emphasizes structured multilingual data from Asian centralized exchanges, a category many Western data vendors handle poorly.

**Strengths:** Answers come with citations, which makes verification practical rather than a leap of faith.; Covers both onchain crypto data and US equities in a single interface, useful for cross-asset research.; Genuine developer surface area: API, MCP, CLI, and agent skills, not just a chat box.; Institutional framing and published case studies signal real deployments with funds and exchanges.

**Limitations:** It is a research and intelligence tool, not a trading or execution venue, so it will not place orders for you.; Deeper data access and higher usage tiers sit behind paid plans and API credits.; Coverage quality varies by asset and venue; niche or thinly traded markets may return thinner answers.

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/surf.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Evalify and Surf compare in monthly traffic?

Evalify has 496 monthly visits, while Surf has 116,252. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Evalify has a month-over-month growth rate of +48.1%; Surf has -18.9%.

### How does pricing compare?

Evalify: Contact for Pricing. Evalify does not publish a conventional public price list; the site routes prospective users to a pricing conversation and a free first analysis. In its manual-search comparison the company places its own cost per matter below $500, against thousands of dollars for a traditional search. A Standard tier exports the FTO Brief as PDF, while a Counsel-Grade tier unlocks the Export Composer (both documents as PDF or editable Word), monitoring of a matter and enterprise white-labeling. Confirm current figures directly with Evalify. Surf: Free, Pro, Max, API credits. Surf publishes a tiered pricing page covering Free, Pro, and Max plans alongside API credit packages, with annual billing options and Studio credits bundled at higher tiers. Exact figures change over time, so check the official pricing page before purchasing.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Thomson Reuters](https://openaitools.app/tool/thomson-reuters) | 17,919,413 | +5.5% | Contact for Pricing | Purpose-built AI and trusted content for legal, tax, risk and trade professionals | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/thomson-reuters.md) |
| 2 | [Harvey](https://openaitools.app/tool/harvey-ai) | 1,832,998 | +26.1% | Contact for Pricing | Domain-specific AI for law firms, in-house legal teams, and professional services | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/harvey-ai.md) |
| 3 | [LuxAlgo](https://openaitools.app/tool/luxalgo) | 985,376 | +9.8% | Freemium, Free Trial, Paid | AI trading indicators, real-trade orderflow and charts in one platform | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/luxalgo.md) |
| 4 | [MacroMicro](https://openaitools.app/tool/macromicro) | 928,258 | +22.5% | Freemium, Paid | Global macro data and AI research platform for smarter economic decisions | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/macromicro.md) |
| 5 | [Patsnap Eureka](https://openaitools.app/tool/patsnap-eureka) | 414,305 | +3.1% | Freemium | Domain-specific AI agents for innovation, R&D, and intellectual property | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/patsnap-eureka.md) |
| 6 | [Aime](https://openaitools.app/tool/aime) | 260,428 | +11.4% | Freemium | AI investing copilot for stock research, screening and market signals | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/aime.md) |
| 7 | [AI Lawyer](https://openaitools.app/tool/ai-lawyer) | 221,106 | +1.5% | Free Trial | Your personal AI legal assistant for research, drafting, and document review | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/ai-lawyer.md) |
| 8 | [Intellectia.Ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/intellectia-ai) | 171,347 | +18% | Free Trial, Paid | AI-driven market analysis for faster, data-backed investing decisions | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/intellectia-ai.md) |
| 9 | [vLex](https://openaitools.app/tool/vlex-com-mx) | 140,457 | +0.7% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | Legal AI that understands the law | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/vlex-com-mx.md) |
| 10 | [Tradytics](https://openaitools.app/tool/tradytics-com) | 103,044 | -9.9% | Freemium, Free Trial | Options flow, dark pools and dealer gamma with an AI analyst built in | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/tradytics-com.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/evalify-vs-surf

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)