# Fillout vs Firecrawl

Fillout records 3,923,917 monthly visits with -9.7% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Firecrawl records 1,828,239 monthly visits with -1.9% growth and Freemium, Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [Fillout](https://openaitools.app/tool/fillout-com) | [Firecrawl](https://openaitools.app/tool/firecrawl-dev) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.fillout.com | https://www.firecrawl.dev |
| Categories | AI Forms, AI Quiz Generator, AI Signature Generator, AI PDF | AI Data Mining, AI API, Large Language Models (LLMs), Open Source AI Models |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium, Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 3,923,917 | 1,828,239 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -9.7% | -1.9% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 2,306,833 | 740,258 |
| Review Score | 4.4 | 4.7 |
| Saved Count | 12 | 2 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Fillout

Fillout is a no-code platform for building forms, surveys, quizzes, and payment or scheduling pages. You can start from a description and let the built-in Zite AI assemble a ready-to-publish form in your brand, or drag and drop fields manually. Every submission is stored in a structured database you can filter, analyze, and connect to other tools.

Beyond basic data collection, Fillout adds intelligent routing, login-based forms that let respondents edit their own answers, digital signatures, and native integrations with 50+ apps. Branding is fully controllable, including custom domains, white-labeling, and embeds as popups, sliders, or full-screen pages.

A large number of organizations use Fillout for secure data intake, and the service advertises SOC II Type 2 compliance plus AES-256 encryption. A free tier covers casual use, while paid plans unlock advanced logic, higher limits, and team features.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. A free plan covers basic forms and submissions, with paid tiers for advanced logic, higher limits, file uploads, payments, and team collaboration.

- **AI form builder (Zite):** Describe the form you need in plain language and Zite generates a branded form with logic, file uploads, and payments.
- **Logic and workflows:** Add conditional logic, intelligent routing, and multi-step workflows to automate what happens after each response.
- **Editable and secure submissions:** Respondents can log in to update their answers, and forms can be restricted to internal users only.
- **Branding and embeds:** Use custom themes, fonts, logos, custom CSS, your own domain, and embed forms as popups, sliders, or full-screen pages.
- **50+ integrations and analytics:** Send responses to spreadsheets, CRMs, and other tools, then review and collaborate on results with flexible views.

**Strengths:** AI-assisted building makes first drafts fast; Deep logic, workflows, and 50+ integrations; Strong branding controls including white-label and custom domains; SOC II Type 2 compliance and AES-256 encryption

**Limitations:** Advanced features require paid plans; Feature depth can be overwhelming for simple one-off forms; Popular templates see heavy competition for the same look

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/fillout-com.md)

## Firecrawl

Firecrawl positions itself as the infrastructure layer that helps AI systems find, read, and act on the live web. Instead of wrestling with headless browsers, proxy rotation, JavaScript rendering, and messy HTML, teams send Firecrawl a URL or a query and receive clean, token-efficient content that a model can consume directly. The platform bundles search, scrape, map, crawl, and interact endpoints so an agent can discover sources, pull their contents, and then click, type, or navigate within a page.

The product is developer-first: official Python and Node.js SDKs, a REST API, a CLI, and an MCP server make it easy to plug into frameworks such as LangChain, LlamaIndex, or any agent runtime. Reliability engineering is a headline claim, with published benchmarks for scrape coverage, latency, and token savings, plus smart waiting for dynamically loaded content and support for structured extraction schemas.

Firecrawl also maintains an open-source core alongside its hosted, usage-metered service, and it has expanded beyond raw scraping toward curated, licensed web content through its Alexandria program. Typical adopters include AI chat products, deep-research tools, agent builders, sales-intelligence teams, and onboarding flows that need fresh web context.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium: a free tier lets you start without a card, paid plans scale by credits/usage, and enterprise or high-volume deals are handled through contact sales.

- **Search, scrape, crawl, map:** Multiple endpoints cover discovery, single-page extraction, whole-site crawling, and URL mapping from one API.
- **LLM-ready output:** Returns Markdown, structured JSON, HTML, links, and screenshots while stripping navigation, ads, and footers to cut token usage.
- **Interact with pages:** After scraping, drive clicks, typing, scrolling, and navigation with prompts or code to reach data behind interaction.
- **Developer integrations:** Python and Node SDKs, REST API, CLI, and an MCP server let agents and IDEs connect in minutes.
- **Open-source core and reliability benchmarks:** A publicly developed core plus published coverage, latency, and token-efficiency benchmarks back the reliability claims.

**Strengths:** Handles JavaScript rendering, smart waits, and anti-bot complexity so you avoid maintaining your own scraper fleet; Token-efficient Markdown output reduces LLM input costs substantially; Rich integration surface: SDKs, REST, CLI, and MCP server for agent frameworks; Open-source core and published benchmarks improve transparency and trust

**Limitations:** Usage-based credits mean costs can grow quickly on large crawl jobs; Full feature depth may be overkill for teams that only need occasional single-page scraping; Coverage gaps remain on highly protected or login-gated sites

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/firecrawl-dev.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Fillout and Firecrawl compare in monthly traffic?

Fillout has 3,923,917 monthly visits, while Firecrawl has 1,828,239. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Fillout has a month-over-month growth rate of -9.7%; Firecrawl has -1.9%.

### How does pricing compare?

Fillout: Freemium. Freemium. A free plan covers basic forms and submissions, with paid tiers for advanced logic, higher limits, file uploads, payments, and team collaboration. Firecrawl: Freemium, Contact for Pricing. Freemium: a free tier lets you start without a card, paid plans scale by credits/usage, and enterprise or high-volume deals are handled through contact sales.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Apify](https://openaitools.app/tool/apify) | 4,147,762 | +3.9% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Massive marketplace of robust web scrapers and actors, but requires more configuration than Firecrawl's simple API. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/apify.md) |
| 2 | [TinyFish](https://openaitools.app/tool/tinyfish) | 1,124,952 | +199.7% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Combines live web search and cloud browsers for agentic automation, but less specialized in clean markdown generation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/tinyfish.md) |
| 3 | [Exa](https://openaitools.app/tool/exa-ai) | 1,062,574 | +16.8% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Optimized for semantic web search and AI agent retrieval, but less focused on full-site markdown crawling. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/exa-ai.md) |
| 4 | [Tavily](https://openaitools.app/tool/gpt-researcher) | 989,998 | -0.8% | Contact for Pricing | Bundles deep research agents and web search APIs, but less centered on raw site-to-markdown conversion. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/gpt-researcher.md) |
| 5 | [forms.app](https://openaitools.app/tool/forms-app) | 987,157 | -11.2% | Freemium, Paid | Broader template library and multi-channel sharing features, but less flexible multi-page layout customization than Fillout. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/forms-app.md) |
| 6 | [Bright Data](https://openaitools.app/tool/bright-data) | 802,752 | -5.9% | Free Trial, Paid | Enterprise proxy infrastructure with powerful scraping tools, but significantly higher complexity and pricing for simple markdown conversion. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/bright-data.md) |
| 7 | [BlockSurvey](https://openaitools.app/tool/block-survey) | 302,480 | -14.9% | Freemium, Paid | Superior privacy-first encryption and secure data handling, but more restrictive workflow automation and styling capabilities. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/block-survey.md) |
| 8 | [Jina AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/jina-ai) | 280,782 | -16.5% | Freemium, Paid | Provides excellent URL-to-Markdown document reading and neural search endpoints, but narrower full-site crawling depth. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/jina-ai.md) |
| 9 | [Browserless](https://openaitools.app/tool/browserless) | 185,543 | -21.2% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Cloud browsers for AI agents, scraping, and automation that won't get blocked | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/browserless.md) |
| 10 | [Makeform](https://openaitools.app/tool/makeform) | 160,692 | -10.8% | Freemium | Faster AI form generation with built-in logic, but fewer advanced database integration and multi-page routing features. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/makeform.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/fillout-com-vs-firecrawl-dev

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)