# Fillout vs Jam

Fillout records 3,923,917 monthly visits with -9.7% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Jam records 570,598 monthly visits with -6% growth and Freemium, Paid pricing.

| Metric | [Fillout](https://openaitools.app/tool/fillout-com) | [Jam](https://openaitools.app/tool/jamgpt) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.fillout.com | https://jam.dev |
| Categories | AI Forms, AI Quiz Generator, AI Signature Generator, AI PDF | AI Developer Tools, AI Testing, AI Report Generator, AI Productivity Tools |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium, Paid |
| Monthly Visits | 3,923,917 | 570,598 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -9.7% | -6% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 2,306,833 | 443,324 |
| Review Score | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Saved Count | 12 | 2 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Fillout

Fillout is a no-code platform for building forms, surveys, quizzes, and payment or scheduling pages. You can start from a description and let the built-in Zite AI assemble a ready-to-publish form in your brand, or drag and drop fields manually. Every submission is stored in a structured database you can filter, analyze, and connect to other tools.

Beyond basic data collection, Fillout adds intelligent routing, login-based forms that let respondents edit their own answers, digital signatures, and native integrations with 50+ apps. Branding is fully controllable, including custom domains, white-labeling, and embeds as popups, sliders, or full-screen pages.

A large number of organizations use Fillout for secure data intake, and the service advertises SOC II Type 2 compliance plus AES-256 encryption. A free tier covers casual use, while paid plans unlock advanced logic, higher limits, and team features.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. A free plan covers basic forms and submissions, with paid tiers for advanced logic, higher limits, file uploads, payments, and team collaboration.

- **AI form builder (Zite):** Describe the form you need in plain language and Zite generates a branded form with logic, file uploads, and payments.
- **Logic and workflows:** Add conditional logic, intelligent routing, and multi-step workflows to automate what happens after each response.
- **Editable and secure submissions:** Respondents can log in to update their answers, and forms can be restricted to internal users only.
- **Branding and embeds:** Use custom themes, fonts, logos, custom CSS, your own domain, and embed forms as popups, sliders, or full-screen pages.
- **50+ integrations and analytics:** Send responses to spreadsheets, CRMs, and other tools, then review and collaborate on results with flexible views.

**Strengths:** AI-assisted building makes first drafts fast; Deep logic, workflows, and 50+ integrations; Strong branding controls including white-label and custom domains; SOC II Type 2 compliance and AES-256 encryption

**Limitations:** Advanced features require paid plans; Feature depth can be overwhelming for simple one-off forms; Popular templates see heavy competition for the same look

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/fillout-com.md)

## Jam

Traditional bug reports are slow: someone hits a problem, tries to describe it in words, screenshots the wrong moment, and a developer spends half an hour reproducing what the reporter already saw. Jam collapses that loop. A browser extension, an iOS app, or a Mac app records the moment, and the recording travels with available console logs, network requests, user events, and device details attached.

Jam AI then does the writing. It proposes a title, a summary, and reproduction steps, giving whoever picks up the ticket a clear starting point instead of a vague description. From there the Jam can be routed into Linear, Jira, or Slack for triage, or handed to AI tooling so a coding agent can dig into the issue and ship a fix. The same mechanism works for internal feedback and for customer-facing reports via a recording link.

The product's positioning is deliberately broad: it is not just a bug tracker but a capture layer for anything visual and transient — QA findings, UX issues, ideas, and support escalations. Teams use it to catch problems before customers file tickets, cut down on back-and-forth explanations, and spot recurring patterns across releases.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium with a free tier, paid per-seat plans, and enterprise/custom pricing on request; exact figures are listed on the Jam pricing page.

- **One-click capture:** Record your screen or grab a screenshot from the browser extension, the iOS app, or the Mac app.
- **Automatic technical context:** Available console logs, network requests, user events, and device details ride along with every recording.
- **Jam AI summaries:** Automatic title, summary, and reproduction steps give developers and agents a clear place to begin.
- **Tool integrations:** Push Jams into Linear, Jira, or Slack for triage, or into AI coding tools for investigation.
- **Recording links:** Send customers a link so they can capture the issue as it happens, with context attached.

**Strengths:** Captures logs and network activity automatically, which saves lengthy correspondence; AI summaries and repro steps remove the blank-page problem when filing a report; Available across browser, iOS, and Mac; Integrates with common issue trackers and AI coding tools

**Limitations:** Most useful capabilities sit behind paid plans; Full value depends on your team adopting it consistently; Capturing sensitive screens may require internal policy review

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/jamgpt.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Fillout and Jam compare in monthly traffic?

Fillout has 3,923,917 monthly visits, while Jam has 570,598. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Fillout has a month-over-month growth rate of -9.7%; Jam has -6%.

### How does pricing compare?

Fillout: Freemium. Freemium. A free plan covers basic forms and submissions, with paid tiers for advanced logic, higher limits, file uploads, payments, and team collaboration. Jam: Freemium, Paid. Freemium with a free tier, paid per-seat plans, and enterprise/custom pricing on request; exact figures are listed on the Jam pricing page.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [forms.app](https://openaitools.app/tool/forms-app) | 987,157 | -11.2% | Freemium, Paid | Broader template library and multi-channel sharing features, but less flexible multi-page layout customization than Fillout. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/forms-app.md) |
| 2 | [KaneAI](https://openaitools.app/tool/kaneai) | 901,340 | +13.2% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Plans and executes automated tests using natural language, replacing manual bug reproduction steps with AI agents. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kaneai.md) |
| 3 | [Qase](https://openaitools.app/tool/qase) | 319,213 | -25.5% | Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing, Free | Unifies test results and manual tracking, though lacking Jam's automatic visual screen recording and log capture. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/qase.md) |
| 4 | [BlockSurvey](https://openaitools.app/tool/block-survey) | 302,480 | -14.9% | Freemium, Paid | Superior privacy-first encryption and secure data handling, but more restrictive workflow automation and styling capabilities. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/block-survey.md) |
| 5 | [Makeform](https://openaitools.app/tool/makeform) | 160,692 | -10.8% | Freemium | Faster AI form generation with built-in logic, but fewer advanced database integration and multi-page routing features. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/makeform.md) |
| 6 | [Opinion Stage AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/opinion-stage-ai) | 120,996 | +2.5% | Contact for Pricing | AI quiz, poll and survey builder that turns traffic into leads | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/opinion-stage-ai.md) |
| 7 | [TestSprite](https://openaitools.app/tool/testsprite) | 114,205 | +15.8% | Freemium | Automatically writes and executes regression test suites, offering deeper test automation than front-end bug capture. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/testsprite.md) |
| 8 | [FormHug](https://openaitools.app/tool/formhug) | 92,118 | -4.8% | Freemium, Free | Includes unique MCP server support and fast AI form generation, but less mature ecosystem and third-party integrations. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/formhug.md) |
| 9 | [OpnForm](https://openaitools.app/tool/opnform) | 76,221 | +169% | Freemium, Free Trial | Fully open-source form builder with AI assistance, but lacks some of the advanced visual design customizability of Fillout. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/opnform.md) |
| 10 | [Momentic](https://openaitools.app/tool/momentic) | 68,819 | -15.2% | Freemium, Usage-based, Enterprise | Runs end-to-end AI tests to find application bugs, replacing manual bug recording with autonomous verification. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/momentic.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/fillout-com-vs-jamgpt

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)