# Fillout vs Qoder Fillout records 3,923,917 monthly visits with -9.7% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Qoder records 5,145,040 monthly visits with +81.8% growth and Freemium, Free Trial, Free pricing. | Metric | [Fillout](https://openaitools.app/tool/fillout-com) | [Qoder](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder) | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Website URL | https://www.fillout.com | https://qoder.com | | Categories | AI Forms, AI Quiz Generator, AI Signature Generator, AI PDF | AI Code Assistant, AI Agent, AI Developer Tools, AI Code Generator | | Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium, Free Trial, Free | | Monthly Visits | 3,923,917 | 5,145,040 | | MoM Growth Rate | -9.7% | +81.8% | | Primary Market | United States | China | | Direct Visits | 2,306,833 | 2,533,668 | | Review Score | 4.4 | 4.6 | | Saved Count | 12 | 4 | | Supported Platforms | Website | Website | ## Fillout Fillout is a no-code platform for building forms, surveys, quizzes, and payment or scheduling pages. You can start from a description and let the built-in Zite AI assemble a ready-to-publish form in your brand, or drag and drop fields manually. Every submission is stored in a structured database you can filter, analyze, and connect to other tools. Beyond basic data collection, Fillout adds intelligent routing, login-based forms that let respondents edit their own answers, digital signatures, and native integrations with 50+ apps. Branding is fully controllable, including custom domains, white-labeling, and embeds as popups, sliders, or full-screen pages. A large number of organizations use Fillout for secure data intake, and the service advertises SOC II Type 2 compliance plus AES-256 encryption. A free tier covers casual use, while paid plans unlock advanced logic, higher limits, and team features. **Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. A free plan covers basic forms and submissions, with paid tiers for advanced logic, higher limits, file uploads, payments, and team collaboration. - **AI form builder (Zite):** Describe the form you need in plain language and Zite generates a branded form with logic, file uploads, and payments. - **Logic and workflows:** Add conditional logic, intelligent routing, and multi-step workflows to automate what happens after each response. - **Editable and secure submissions:** Respondents can log in to update their answers, and forms can be restricted to internal users only. - **Branding and embeds:** Use custom themes, fonts, logos, custom CSS, your own domain, and embed forms as popups, sliders, or full-screen pages. - **50+ integrations and analytics:** Send responses to spreadsheets, CRMs, and other tools, then review and collaborate on results with flexible views. **Strengths:** AI-assisted building makes first drafts fast; Deep logic, workflows, and 50+ integrations; Strong branding controls including white-label and custom domains; SOC II Type 2 compliance and AES-256 encryption **Limitations:** Advanced features require paid plans; Feature depth can be overwhelming for simple one-off forms; Popular templates see heavy competition for the same look [Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/fillout-com.md) ## Qoder Qoder is an agentic coding platform built for real software engineering rather than isolated code snippets. Its family of products covers an AI-native desktop IDE, plugins for VS Code and JetBrains, a CLI for terminal-first developers, and a mobile app for monitoring agents on the go. The pitch is simple: bring an idea, and Qoder's agents plan, edit across files, run checks and hand back working code. The platform leans heavily on context. Qoder indexes and reasons over your entire repository so that suggestions, refactors and new features respect existing architecture, conventions and dependencies. Developers can work in different modes — inline completion for small edits, conversational chat for collaborative changes, and an autonomous agent mode for delegating larger tasks with approval gates. Spec-driven development and a knowledge/base-context layer help keep long-running tasks aligned with the actual project. Qoder is also extensible. An Agent SDK lets teams embed Qoder's agent capabilities into their own products, while Cloud Agents APIs support building productised, server-side agent flows. With generous free access for individuals and paid tiers for teams, Qoder targets the growing market of developers who want agentic help without abandoning their existing tools or editor. **Pricing & Plans:** Freemium with a free plan and a free trial for individuals; paid Pro and team/business tiers unlock higher usage limits, advanced agent models and enterprise features. Exact prices are listed on Qoder's pricing page. - **Agentic IDE:** An AI-native desktop IDE where agents read the codebase, plan multi-step work and complete tasks across many files. - **Coding agent modes:** Switch between autocomplete for quick edits, chat for collaborative coding, and an autonomous agent for delegated tasks with approval controls. - **Codebase awareness:** Repository-wide indexing and context engineering keep changes aligned with your architecture, style and dependencies. - **Works where you work:** Plugins for VS Code and JetBrains, a terminal CLI, and a mobile app for monitoring and approving agents remotely. - **Agent SDK and Cloud Agents:** Embed Qoder's agent capabilities into your own products via the Agent SDK, or build managed agent services with Cloud Agents APIs. **Strengths:** Full product family: IDE, plugins, CLI and mobile in one agentic platform; Strong codebase context and spec-driven workflows for real projects; Agent SDK and Cloud Agents APIs for building your own agent products; Free tier makes it easy to evaluate before committing **Limitations:** Agentic coding needs careful review of diffs before merging; Advanced limits and enterprise features require paid plans; Full value depends on adopting Qoder's IDE or plugins into your workflow [Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder.md) ## Frequently Asked Questions ### How do Fillout and Qoder compare in monthly traffic? Fillout has 3,923,917 monthly visits, while Qoder has 5,145,040. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality. ### How do their growth rates compare? Fillout has a month-over-month growth rate of -9.7%; Qoder has +81.8%. ### How does pricing compare? Fillout: Freemium. Freemium. A free plan covers basic forms and submissions, with paid tiers for advanced logic, higher limits, file uploads, payments, and team collaboration. Qoder: Freemium, Free Trial, Free. Freemium with a free plan and a free trial for individuals; paid Pro and team/business tiers unlock higher usage limits, advanced agent models and enterprise features. Exact prices are listed on Qoder's pricing page. ## Alternatives | # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | 1 | [Cursor](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor) | 23,297,751 | +8.4% | Freemium | Provides a deeply integrated AI-native IDE experience for multi-file code editing, but lacks Qoder's standalone agentic orchestration. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor.md) | | 2 | [Google Antigravity](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity) | 16,054,109 | +8.1% | Freemium | Orchestrates parallel coding agents across an IDE and CLI ecosystem, but operates within Google's specialized development stack. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity.md) | | 3 | [Replit](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit) | 10,016,437 | -7.7% | Freemium, Paid | Describe your idea and Replit builds a working app in minutes | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit.md) | | 4 | [Kiro](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro) | 3,330,476 | +4.6% | Freemium | Focuses on spec-driven AI development workflows inside an IDE, but is tailored tightly around AWS engineering paradigms. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro.md) | | 5 | [Devin](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin) | 2,549,346 | +1% | Paid | Offers fully autonomous multi-file software engineering in cloud sandboxes, but operates as a separate web platform rather than an IDE plugin. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin.md) | | 6 | [Pi Coding Agent](https://openaitools.app/tool/pi-coding-agent) | 1,929,244 | +4% | Free | A minimal, extensible terminal coding agent you can reshape | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/pi-coding-agent.md) | | 7 | [forms.app](https://openaitools.app/tool/forms-app) | 987,157 | -11.2% | Freemium, Paid | Broader template library and multi-channel sharing features, but less flexible multi-page layout customization than Fillout. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/forms-app.md) | | 8 | [Trae](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae) | 702,366 | -7.8% | Freemium | Features seamless multi-file project understanding and codebase editing inside an AI-driven IDE, though with slightly different agent customization options. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae.md) | | 9 | [Augment Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/augment-code) | 326,215 | +24.1% | Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | Specializes in enterprise-grade multi-file code contexts and SDLC orchestration, but involves a more centralized workspace setup. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/augment-code.md) | | 10 | [BlockSurvey](https://openaitools.app/tool/block-survey) | 302,480 | -14.9% | Freemium, Paid | Superior privacy-first encryption and secure data handling, but more restrictive workflow automation and styling capabilities. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/block-survey.md) | --- Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/fillout-com-vs-qoder More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)