# Fireworks vs Models.dev

Fireworks records 659,687 monthly visits with +6% month-over-month growth and Contact for Pricing pricing. Models.dev records 200,451 monthly visits with -3.9% growth and Free pricing.

| Metric | [Fireworks](https://openaitools.app/tool/fireworks-ai) | [Models.dev](https://openaitools.app/tool/models-dev) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://fireworks.ai | https://models.dev |
| Categories | AI API, Large Language Models (LLMs), Open Source AI Models, AI Image Generator | AI Models, AI API, Open Source AI Models, AI Tools Directory |
| Pricing Model | Contact for Pricing | Free |
| Monthly Visits | 659,687 | 200,451 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +6% | -3.9% |
| Primary Market | United States | China |
| Direct Visits | 313,827 | 136,316 |
| Review Score | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Saved Count | 2 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Fireworks

Fireworks is a platform for teams that want to own their AI rather than rent it. Its core claim is a co-optimised stack: inference, model ensembling and training built to work together, from CUDA kernels and caching up through routing and fine-tuning. Inference is optimised for speed, quality and cost — the company reports up to 4x the throughput of providers wrapping vLLM, quality benchmarked against each model's reference implementation, and cache hit rates high enough that cached input costs half or less.

The platform is explicitly multi-model. Rather than betting on a single frontier API, teams start with state-of-the-art open models, then improve their economics by routing or ensembling across models on a per-turn basis, optimising accuracy and cost per finished task. Where a general model is not enough, training lets you specialise a model on the data that makes your business distinctive.

Deployment flexibility matters as much as performance. You can run serverless and reserve throughput as you grow, keep data local, and reach 30+ regions behind one endpoint with policy-aligned data residency. Fireworks publishes a model library, docs, cookbooks and cookbooks-style resources for developers, and holds SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701 and ISO 42001 certifications — the last of which covers AI management systems, a signal aimed squarely at regulated enterprises.

**Pricing & Plans:** Usage-based pricing for inference, with per-million-token rates that vary by model, plus serverless options and reserved throughput for predictable loads. Training and ensembling carry their own charges. Enterprise and startup programs are available, and interested teams are directed to contact sales for platform, sovereign and custom deployments.

- **High-throughput inference:** Run open models and your own fine-tunes at up to 4x the throughput of providers that wrap vLLM, with lab-designed quality verified against reference implementations.
- **Cost-optimised caching:** Reach up to 99.6% cache hit rates, with cached input priced at half or less, so recurring workloads cost far less than emitting every token fresh.
- **Model ensembling and routing:** Route each turn to the model best suited to it, balancing accuracy against cost per completed task rather than locking in one model.
- **Training and specialisation:** Fine-tune open models on proprietary data to build domain-specific intelligence that competitors cannot simply rent from a frontier lab.
- **Global deployment with data residency:** One endpoint spanning 30+ regions, your cloud or Fireworks', with policy-aligned residency plus SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001 and ISO 42001 compliance.

**Strengths:** Co-optimised inference, ensembling and training in one stack; Open-model focus avoids being locked into one vendor's frontier pricing; Strong throughput, quality benchmarking and cache economics for high-volume workloads; Deployment flexibility including your cloud, your data locality and 30+ regions

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/fireworks-ai.md)

## Models.dev

Models.dev exists to answer a very practical developer question: which model should I use, and what will it cost? The site organises every entry under a canonical identifier in the form provider/model, so the same model served by several providers can be compared directly rather than guessed at. Columns cover context window, maximum output, whether input and output are supported, reasoning, tool calling, structured output, temperature control, open versus closed weights, price per million tokens, and release and update dates.

Because model releases move fast, the catalogue is built to stay current, with sortable and searchable tables that let you scan by lab or provider and filter down to what matters. Entries include both closed flagship models and open-weight alternatives, making it useful for cost planning as well as capability research.

The project is open source and free to use, and it is intended to be consumed programmatically. Developers can pull the catalogue into their own tooling through a JSON API or a type-safe SDK, which makes it a practical backend for dashboards, routing logic, or internal cost calculators rather than just a reference page to browse.

**Pricing & Plans:** Models.dev is free and open source. It is a reference database, so the prices it lists are the per-million-token rates charged by the model providers themselves, not a fee for using the site.

- **Canonical model identifiers:** Every model uses a consistent provider/model format so the same model across providers can be compared directly.
- **Specification comparison:** Side-by-side context window, output limit, reasoning, tool calling, structured output, and temperature support.
- **Pricing transparency:** Input and output prices per million tokens listed alongside release and update dates.
- **Open and closed models:** Covers closed flagship APIs and open-weight models from many labs in one sortable catalogue.
- **Developer access:** Consume the catalogue through a JSON API or a type-safe SDK for your own tools and dashboards.

**Strengths:** Free and open source with no account required; Consistent canonical identifiers make cross-provider comparison reliable; Covers pricing, limits, and capabilities in one sortable table; Available as a JSON API and type-safe SDK for programmatic use

**Limitations:** It is a reference catalogue, not an inference or hosting service; Data quality depends on community and maintainer updates keeping pace with releases; Interface is aimed at developers and offers little guidance for non-technical users

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/models-dev.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Fireworks and Models.dev compare in monthly traffic?

Fireworks has 659,687 monthly visits, while Models.dev has 200,451. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Fireworks has a month-over-month growth rate of +6%; Models.dev has -3.9%.

### How does pricing compare?

Fireworks: Contact for Pricing. Usage-based pricing for inference, with per-million-token rates that vary by model, plus serverless options and reserved throughput for predictable loads. Training and ensembling carry their own charges. Enterprise and startup programs are available, and interested teams are directed to contact sales for platform, sovereign and custom deployments. Models.dev: Free. Models.dev is free and open source. It is a reference database, so the prices it lists are the per-million-token rates charged by the model providers themselves, not a fee for using the site.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [OpenRouter](https://openaitools.app/tool/openrouter-ai) | 19,941,437 | -6.2% | Paid | Acts as a unified API gateway across multiple providers, but lacks dedicated fine-tuning and custom model deployment infrastructure. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/openrouter-ai.md) |
| 2 | [Groq](https://openaitools.app/tool/groq) | 3,987,936 | +10% | Paid | Delivers ultra-fast token generation speeds using custom LPU hardware, but supports a smaller catalog of open models. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/groq.md) |
| 3 | [fal.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/fal-ai) | 3,093,684 | -3.7% | Paid, pay-as-you-go usage-based pricing | Specializes in lightning-fast serverless inference for generative media models, but focuses less on general text LLMs. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/fal-ai.md) |
| 4 | [Together AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/together-ai) | 1,645,930 | +64.9% | Freemium, Paid | Provides robust serverless inference and model fine-tuning similar to Fireworks, but with a broader developer cloud ecosystem. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/together-ai.md) |
| 5 | [Replicate AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/replicate-ai) | 904,038 | -8.4% | Paid | Features seamless deployment and fine-tuning for machine learning models, but can have higher latency for text inference. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/replicate-ai.md) |
| 6 | [Unsloth AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/unsloth-ai) | 887,457 | -17.6% | Free | Open-source, memory-efficient fine-tuning and local model running | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/unsloth-ai.md) |
| 7 | [Atlas Cloud](https://openaitools.app/tool/atlas-cloud) | 777,031 | -16.4% | Paid | One OpenAI-compatible API for 500+ image, video, audio, and LLM models | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/atlas-cloud.md) |
| 8 | [DeepInfra](https://openaitools.app/tool/deep-infra) | 457,810 | -8.9% | Paid | Offers exceptionally low-cost serverless inference for open-weight models, but provides fewer advanced fine-tuning orchestration tools. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/deep-infra.md) |
| 9 | [Runware](https://openaitools.app/tool/runware) | 402,862 | +27.1% | Paid | One API for 400K+ AI models, plus serverless and reserved GPUs on modular data centers | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/runware.md) |
| 10 | [SiliconFlow](https://openaitools.app/tool/siliconflow) | 276,303 | -10.5% | Pay-as-you-go | Hosts high-performance open and commercial models with competitive pricing, but has a less established western developer community. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/siliconflow.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/fireworks-ai-vs-models-dev

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)