# FlowGPT vs Models.dev

FlowGPT records 1,761,490 monthly visits with +13.3% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Models.dev records 200,451 monthly visits with -3.9% growth and Free pricing.

| Metric | [FlowGPT](https://openaitools.app/tool/flowgpt) | [Models.dev](https://openaitools.app/tool/models-dev) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://flowgpt.com | https://models.dev |
| Categories | AI Prompt Generator, Prompt Engineering, AI Chatbot | AI Models, AI API, Open Source AI Models, AI Tools Directory |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Free |
| Monthly Visits | 1,761,490 | 200,451 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +13.3% | -3.9% |
| Primary Market | United States | China |
| Direct Visits | 1,176,441 | 136,316 |
| Review Score | 3.9 | 4.4 |
| Saved Count | 16 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## FlowGPT

FlowGPT began as a place to collect ChatGPT prompts and has grown into an open platform for AI applications. Users publish "characters" — a prompt plus a personality, opening line, and sometimes a model choice — and the community chats with them, votes on them, and iterates on them. Categories range from coding assistants and academic writing to roleplay, games, marketing, and productivity.

Because the content is crowdsourced, quality varies widely, but that is also the appeal: the trending and leaderboard views surface prompts with proven engagement, and niche categories fill gaps that generic assistants ignore. Every character can be used in-browser, and creators get visibility plus a path to rewards through bounties and the platform's credit wallet.

The platform also offers membership tiers and a subscription for users who want more usage or premium capabilities. It is free to browse and to chat with most public bots, making it an easy entry point for anyone curious about prompt engineering without writing prompts themselves.

**Pricing & Plans:** Free to browse and chat with most community content; optional membership, subscription, and credit-wallet features exist for premium prompts and heavier usage.

- **Prompt and character library:** Browse a huge library of user-made chatbots and prompt templates sorted by trending, category, and popularity.
- **Chat in the browser:** Start a conversation with any published bot directly in the browser, no setup or API key required.
- **Creator tools:** Create a character with its own name, avatar, greeting, and instructions, then publish it to the community.
- **Leaderboards and views:** Trending charts and usage counters show which prompts are actually working for other people.
- **Bounties and wallet:** Bounties and a wallet system let creators earn or spend credits for premium prompts and features.

**Strengths:** Enormous, constantly updated library of prompts and characters; Chatting works instantly in the browser with no setup; Trending and leaderboard data helps you find prompts that actually work; Free to use for the vast majority of content

**Limitations:** Crowdsourced quality is uneven and some categories are unfiltered; Popular characters can feel repetitive or dated as models change; Some premium prompts require credits or a membership

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/flowgpt.md)

## Models.dev

Models.dev exists to answer a very practical developer question: which model should I use, and what will it cost? The site organises every entry under a canonical identifier in the form provider/model, so the same model served by several providers can be compared directly rather than guessed at. Columns cover context window, maximum output, whether input and output are supported, reasoning, tool calling, structured output, temperature control, open versus closed weights, price per million tokens, and release and update dates.

Because model releases move fast, the catalogue is built to stay current, with sortable and searchable tables that let you scan by lab or provider and filter down to what matters. Entries include both closed flagship models and open-weight alternatives, making it useful for cost planning as well as capability research.

The project is open source and free to use, and it is intended to be consumed programmatically. Developers can pull the catalogue into their own tooling through a JSON API or a type-safe SDK, which makes it a practical backend for dashboards, routing logic, or internal cost calculators rather than just a reference page to browse.

**Pricing & Plans:** Models.dev is free and open source. It is a reference database, so the prices it lists are the per-million-token rates charged by the model providers themselves, not a fee for using the site.

- **Canonical model identifiers:** Every model uses a consistent provider/model format so the same model across providers can be compared directly.
- **Specification comparison:** Side-by-side context window, output limit, reasoning, tool calling, structured output, and temperature support.
- **Pricing transparency:** Input and output prices per million tokens listed alongside release and update dates.
- **Open and closed models:** Covers closed flagship APIs and open-weight models from many labs in one sortable catalogue.
- **Developer access:** Consume the catalogue through a JSON API or a type-safe SDK for your own tools and dashboards.

**Strengths:** Free and open source with no account required; Consistent canonical identifiers make cross-provider comparison reliable; Covers pricing, limits, and capabilities in one sortable table; Available as a JSON API and type-safe SDK for programmatic use

**Limitations:** It is a reference catalogue, not an inference or hosting service; Data quality depends on community and maintainer updates keeping pace with releases; Interface is aimed at developers and offers little guidance for non-technical users

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/models-dev.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do FlowGPT and Models.dev compare in monthly traffic?

FlowGPT has 1,761,490 monthly visits, while Models.dev has 200,451. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

FlowGPT has a month-over-month growth rate of +13.3%; Models.dev has -3.9%.

### How does pricing compare?

FlowGPT: Freemium. Free to browse and chat with most community content; optional membership, subscription, and credit-wallet features exist for premium prompts and heavier usage. Models.dev: Free. Models.dev is free and open source. It is a reference database, so the prices it lists are the per-million-token rates charged by the model providers themselves, not a fee for using the site.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [MeiGen AI Prompts Gallery](https://openaitools.app/tool/meigen-ai-prompts-gallery) | 1,453,583 | -32.8% | Freemium | Includes integrated generation canvases for remixing prompts, but focuses more on visual media than persona chatbots. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/meigen-ai-prompts-gallery.md) |
| 2 | [PromptHero](https://openaitools.app/tool/prompthero) | 1,044,654 | -2.4% | Freemium | Offers a robust search engine for generative AI prompts, but lacks FlowGPT's interactive community chatbot personas. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/prompthero.md) |
| 3 | [PromptBase](https://openaitools.app/tool/promptbase) | 538,129 | -1.8% | Paid | Focuses on buying and selling verified prompt templates, whereas FlowGPT emphasizes free community sharing and chatbot chats. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/promptbase.md) |
| 4 | [Stork](https://openaitools.app/tool/stork) | 201,544 | +2.3% | Free | Includes model pricing trackers and developer news alongside tools directories, but less focused on raw API specs. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/stork.md) |
| 5 | [Learn Prompting](https://openaitools.app/tool/learn-prompting) | 159,807 | -8.6% | Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | Provides structured courses and guides on prompt engineering, whereas FlowGPT is primarily a social prompt discovery marketplace. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/learn-prompting.md) |
| 6 | [ChatGPT Shortcut](https://openaitools.app/tool/chatgpt-shortcut) | 84,028 | -9.9% | Free | Delivers organized copy-ready prompts with tag filtering, but does not support community-driven chatbot personas or direct chat. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/chatgpt-shortcut.md) |
| 7 | [AI for Work](https://openaitools.app/tool/ai-for-work) | 72,615 | -14.9% | Free | Specializes in professional job-specific prompt templates, but lacks FlowGPT's broad consumer prompt library and character chat features. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/ai-for-work.md) |
| 8 | [Promptomania](https://openaitools.app/tool/promptomania-com) | 62,219 | -12.9% | Free | Provides visual prompt builders and model directories, but lacks FlowGPT's social marketplace and user-created persona chats. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/promptomania-com.md) |
| 9 | [InfraBase.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/infrabase-ai) | 39,072 | -13.6% | Free | Catalogues and compares AI infrastructure tools and services across categories, but lacks deep per-token pricing tables. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/infrabase-ai.md) |
| 10 | [Snack Prompt](https://openaitools.app/tool/snack-prompt) | 35,155 | -11.4% | Freemium | Provides community-curated prompt libraries and automation workflows, but features less user-generated character roleplay than FlowGPT. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/snack-prompt.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/flowgpt-vs-models-dev

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)