# FluidStack vs Together AI

FluidStack records 154,620 monthly visits with +7.3% month-over-month growth and Paid, Contact for Pricing pricing. Together AI records 1,645,930 monthly visits with +64.9% growth and Freemium, Paid pricing.

| Metric | [FluidStack](https://openaitools.app/tool/fluidstack) | [Together AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/together-ai) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://fluidstack.io | https://www.together.ai |
| Categories | AI Developer Tools, AI Models, Large Language Models (LLMs) | AI Developer Tools, AI API, AI Models, Open Source AI Models |
| Pricing Model | Paid, Contact for Pricing | Freemium, Paid |
| Monthly Visits | 154,620 | 1,645,930 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +7.3% | +64.9% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 47,869 | 882,212 |
| Review Score | 4.4 | 4.7 |
| Saved Count | 1 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## FluidStack

FluidStack is an AI compute provider that builds the physical layer underneath frontier model work: data centers, power, cooling and very large GPU clusters. Its public positioning is deliberately infrastructural rather than product-led — it describes building gigawatt-scale compute, bringing new sites online in months, and operating tens of millions of accelerators reliably. For teams training or serving large models, that translates into reserved, single-tenant-class capacity that is provisioned and operated for you rather than an instant, self-serve VM catalogue.

A distinguishing theme is the pairing of power and compute. FluidStack writes about redesigning compute and power infrastructure from first principles, developing off-grid solar to supply clusters, and using closed-loop cooling that fills tanks once and recirculates water indefinitely. It also emphasises building in the United States with onshored manufacturing, framing infrastructure ownership as a strategic question about which values shape the technology being built. For AI organisations, these are increasingly relevant because energy availability, not chip supply alone, is the binding constraint on scaling.

If you need a small number of GPUs for a day, FluidStack is probably not the fastest route; capacity is engaged at enterprise scale through a sales process. If you are planning a multi-month training run or a production inference fleet and want dedicated, purpose-built infrastructure with managed operations, it is a strong candidate to evaluate alongside the major hyperscalers and specialised GPU clouds.

**Pricing & Plans:** Enterprise and contact-for-pricing. FluidStack does not publish per-GPU-hour rates or a self-serve sign-up on its website; capacity is scoped and quoted through a direct sales conversation based on cluster size, duration and hardware. Catalogue listings classify it as a paid product requiring contact for pricing.

- **Datacenter-scale compute built in-house:** FluidStack designs and builds large AI data centers, including high-density campuses with significant per-site power capacity, rather than reselling capacity from other clouds.
- **GPU clusters for training and inference:** Clusters are architected for large-scale model training and inference, with high-bandwidth interconnect and orchestration suitable for distributed workloads.
- **Power and cooling engineered together:** The company develops off-grid solar and recirculating closed-loop cooling, treating power and water efficiency as core engineering problems.
- **Managed operations and reliability:** Smart hands, cluster provisioning and operations support let research teams focus on models while FluidStack runs the physical and orchestration layers.
- **US-built and onshored supply chain:** Data centers are built in the United States with onshored manufacturing of compute and power infrastructure, a deliberate supply-chain and sovereignty choice.

**Strengths:** Purpose-built AI infrastructure rather than generic cloud resale; Power, cooling and data center design handled in-house, which matters at scale; Managed provisioning and operations for large training and inference clusters; Explicit positioning on US-built, onshored infrastructure

**Limitations:** No published self-serve pricing or instant sign-up; access requires a sales conversation; Enterprise-scale focus means very small individual workloads may not be a fit; Capacity is concentrated in US locations, which may matter for latency-sensitive or data-residency-bound teams

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/fluidstack.md)

## Together AI

Together AI is the AI Native Cloud — a full-stack platform for running, fine-tuning and training open-source models. It spans serverless inference APIs, dedicated endpoints, GPU clusters, post-training and storage, all backed by in-house systems research. Together AI is the AI Native Cloud — a full-stack platform for running, fine-tuning and training open-source models. It spans serverless inference APIs, dedicated endpoints, GPU clusters, post-training and storage, all backed by in-house systems research.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium, Paid

**Limitations:** Serverless pricing varies widely by model, so cost forecasting takes care; Heavy GPU-cluster and high-throughput workloads still require sales contact; Broad surface area (inference, GPU, fine-tuning, sandboxes, storage) can feel complex for beginners; Some newest models are marked experimental or preview and may change

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/together-ai.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do FluidStack and Together AI compare in monthly traffic?

FluidStack has 154,620 monthly visits, while Together AI has 1,645,930. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

FluidStack has a month-over-month growth rate of +7.3%; Together AI has +64.9%.

### How does pricing compare?

FluidStack: Paid, Contact for Pricing. Enterprise and contact-for-pricing. FluidStack does not publish per-GPU-hour rates or a self-serve sign-up on its website; capacity is scoped and quoted through a direct sales conversation based on cluster size, duration and hardware. Catalogue listings classify it as a paid product requiring contact for pricing. Together AI: Freemium, Paid. Freemium, Paid

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [OpenAI Platform](https://openaitools.app/tool/openai) | 234,678,639 | -9.6% | Paid | Provides industry-leading proprietary frontier models and enterprise reliability, but completely lacks support for open-weight community models. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/openai.md) |
| 2 | [Google AI Studio](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-ai-studio) | 112,620,020 | +2% | Freemium | Restricts API usage strictly to Gemini models, offering free prototyping tiers but lacking open-source model variety. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-ai-studio.md) |
| 3 | [OpenRouter](https://openaitools.app/tool/openrouter-ai) | 19,941,437 | -6.2% | Paid | Aggregates hundreds of models through a single API, offering broader model choice than Together AI's hosted lineup. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/openrouter-ai.md) |
| 4 | [Groq](https://openaitools.app/tool/groq) | 3,987,936 | +10% | Paid | Delivers dramatically faster token generation speeds using custom hardware, though with a more limited model selection. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/groq.md) |
| 5 | [fal.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/fal-ai) | 3,093,684 | -3.7% | Paid, pay-as-you-go usage-based pricing | One API for 1,500+ production-ready generative media models | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/fal-ai.md) |
| 6 | [RunPod](https://openaitools.app/tool/runpod) | 2,881,043 | +5.9% | Paid | Offers flexible on-demand GPU rentals and serverless endpoints, but lacks FluidStack's ultra-scale enterprise GPU clusters. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/runpod.md) |
| 7 | [Vast.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/vast-ai) | 1,257,554 | +2.8% | Paid | Delivers peer-to-peer GPU rental marketplaces for lower-cost experimentation, though with less enterprise infrastructure predictability. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/vast-ai.md) |
| 8 | [Modal](https://openaitools.app/tool/modal-com) | 1,196,021 | +30.2% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Provides serverless Python container execution for cloud jobs, but lacks raw multi-node cluster provisioning controls. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/modal-com.md) |
| 9 | [Nebius](https://openaitools.app/tool/nebius) | 1,145,711 | +10.7% | Paid, Contact for Pricing | Provides dedicated NVIDIA GPU clusters and managed cloud infrastructure, competing directly on enterprise-grade training workloads. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/nebius.md) |
| 10 | [Replicate AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/replicate-ai) | 904,038 | -8.4% | Paid | Focuses heavily on deploying custom machine learning models and media generation pipelines alongside standard text LLMs. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/replicate-ai.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/fluidstack-vs-together-ai

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)