# Fume vs Pie

Fume records 811 monthly visits with +492% month-over-month growth and Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing pricing. Pie records 11,551 monthly visits with +21.8% growth and Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [Fume](https://openaitools.app/tool/fume) | [Pie](https://openaitools.app/tool/pie) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://fumedev.com | https://pie.inc |
| Categories | AI Testing, AI Agent, AI Developer Tools, AI Code Generator | AI Testing, AI Agent, AI Developer Tools, No-Code&Low-Code |
| Pricing Model | Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 811 | 11,551 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +492% | +21.8% |
| Primary Market | Türkiye | United States |
| Direct Visits | 331 | 5,132 |
| Review Score | 4.3 | 4.5 |
| Saved Count | 0 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Fume

Fume positions itself not as a no-code test builder but as a full QA department. The workflow starts with a screencast: using Loom, a screen recorder or a similar tool, you walk through your application while narrating what matters. Fume analyses the recording and extracts test cases, with the team claiming you can cover around 80% of your most important user flows in under ten minutes. Tests then run twice a day automatically on Fume Cloud runners, with results posted into a shared channel and failure insights surfaced at a glance.

What distinguishes Fume from no-code alternatives is resilience. Playwright scripts are notoriously fragile, so Fume tests natively fall back to a browser-using AI agent to pick up exactly where a script left off, then self-heal the flaky test in the background. That means it can cope with dynamic application data at runtime and with substantial UX changes, rather than breaking every time a selector or flow shifts. The output is 100% Playwright, so you keep full codebase ownership and can run tests locally or inside your own CI/CD pipeline with a single API call — even if you stop paying.

Fume also offers migration for existing suites, converting Playwright, Selenium or Cypress tests so they immediately gain AI fallbacks and automatic maintenance. It is backed by Y Combinator and aimed at teams that want browser testing handled end to end rather than managed by hand. Published pricing centres on a Team plan at $500 per month with a 30-day free trial, while enterprise deployments are quoted individually.

**Pricing & Plans:** Fume offers a Team plan at $500/month designed for growing teams that need autonomous QA, including a 30-day free trial and free test runners on Fume Cloud. Enterprise pricing is custom and available through a sales conversation, with options for larger organisations and specific deployment needs.

- **Screencast to Playwright tests:** Record a Loom-style video while narrating what should be tested, and Fume extracts the test cases and writes them as native Playwright code — covering most key user flows in minutes.
- **AI agent fallbacks and self-healing:** When fragile selectors or changed UX break a script, tests fall back to a browser-using AI agent to continue, and the flaky test is self-healed in the background.
- **Free cloud test runners:** Tests run twice a day automatically on Fume Cloud runners at no extra cost, with results and failure insights delivered straight to your team's channel.
- **Full Playwright code ownership:** Every test is standard Playwright code you own, so you can run it locally or wire it into CI/CD with one API call and keep running even if you cancel.
- **Migration of existing suites:** Existing Playwright, Selenium or Cypress tests can be migrated to Fume so they instantly gain AI fallbacks and automatic maintenance.

**Strengths:** Test creation starts from a screen recording and spoken description rather than test code; Native AI fallbacks and self-healing address the fragility that normally plagues Playwright suites; You keep 100% Playwright code ownership and can run tests locally even after cancelling; Free cloud runners run tests twice daily, and failures land in your team channel with insights

**Limitations:** The Team plan is $500/month, which is a meaningful commitment for small teams compared with cheaper no-code builders; Coverage quality depends on how clearly you narrate and demonstrate flows in the recording; It is deliberately not a no-code builder, so teams wanting to avoid code entirely may find it less suited

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/fume.md)

## Pie

Pie approaches software quality from a different angle than script-based automation. Instead of maintaining selectors and assertions, it explores your product the way a person would: it maps real user flows, looks at the screen to find elements, and exercises each change the way a customer would. Because it relies on vision rather than selectors, coverage keeps working when the interface is redesigned, and self-healing tests are the norm rather than the exception.

The platform hooks into your development workflow. It reads pull requests, runs the affected journeys before release, and reports functional and usability problems that a passing status code would hide, such as a cart badge showing one item while the cart is actually empty. When it finds a confirmed issue, Pie drafts a fix pull request with the root cause explained, so engineers review a solution instead of a bug report. Only findings that are reproduced reach you, which keeps the signal high and the noise low.

Pie runs on the surfaces where your customers actually are: iOS, Android, web, and cross-platform stacks such as React Native, Flutter and webviews. It integrates with GitHub, Slack, Jira and MCP, supports plain-English test authoring, and is built for security-conscious teams with SOC 2 Type 2 compliance and scoped access. Instead of replacing engineers, it takes the maintenance burden off manual QA so releases can move faster with more confidence.

**Pricing & Plans:** Custom pricing; the vendor asks you to book a demo for a quote. There is no published self-serve plan.

- **Vision-first autonomous discovery:** Pie maps your real user flows from a URL or build and finds elements by looking at the screen, so there are no selectors to maintain.
- **Tests every pull request:** Each PR is read and exercised against the running app, so regressions are caught before they reach users.
- **Self-healing coverage:** Tests survive redesigns and deep links because they rely on how the interface looks and behaves, not on brittle CSS or accessibility paths.
- **Automatic fix pull requests:** When Pie confirms a bug, it drafts a fix PR with the root cause and the applied change, ready for review and merge.
- **Runs across iOS, Android and web:** Coverage spans native mobile, browsers and popular cross-platform frameworks, with integrations for GitHub, Slack, Jira and MCP.

**Strengths:** No test scripts or selectors to write or maintain; Finds functional and usability bugs that assertion-based tests pass; Drafts fix pull requests instead of only filing bug reports; Covers iOS, Android and web, including cross-platform frameworks

**Limitations:** No public self-serve pricing; sales conversation required; Enterprise-oriented, so it may be heavy for very small teams; Best results depend on granting repository and app access

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/pie.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Fume and Pie compare in monthly traffic?

Fume has 811 monthly visits, while Pie has 11,551. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Fume has a month-over-month growth rate of +492%; Pie has +21.8%.

### How does pricing compare?

Fume: Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing. Fume offers a Team plan at $500/month designed for growing teams that need autonomous QA, including a 30-day free trial and free test runners on Fume Cloud. Enterprise pricing is custom and available through a sales conversation, with options for larger organisations and specific deployment needs. Pie: Contact for Pricing. Custom pricing; the vendor asks you to book a demo for a quote. There is no published self-serve plan.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Devin](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin) | 2,549,346 | +1% | Paid | Cognition's autonomous software engineer that ships real pull requests | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin.md) |
| 2 | [KaneAI](https://openaitools.app/tool/kaneai) | 901,340 | +13.2% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | GenAI-native end-to-end QA agent that plans, writes and heals tests in plain language | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kaneai.md) |
| 3 | [Qase](https://openaitools.app/tool/qase) | 319,213 | -25.5% | Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing, Free | Ship with confidence: one system of record for manual, automated, and CI tests | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/qase.md) |
| 4 | [ProjectDiscovery Neo](https://openaitools.app/tool/projectdiscovery-neo) | 158,530 | +22.5% | Paid, Contact for Pricing | AI security platform that finds exposures, proves they're exploitable, and ships the fix | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/projectdiscovery-neo.md) |
| 5 | [Katalon](https://openaitools.app/tool/katalon-studio) | 158,090 | -29.6% | Freemium, Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | AI-augmented quality platform for web, mobile, API and desktop testing | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/katalon-studio.md) |
| 6 | [TestSprite](https://openaitools.app/tool/testsprite) | 114,205 | +15.8% | Freemium | Agentic end-to-end testing that writes, runs and heals your test suite | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/testsprite.md) |
| 7 | [testRigor](https://openaitools.app/tool/testrigor-com) | 105,865 | -2.7% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing, Free | Write end-to-end test automation in plain English, no code required | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/testrigor-com.md) |
| 8 | [Momentic](https://openaitools.app/tool/momentic) | 68,819 | -15.2% | Freemium, Usage-based, Enterprise | Agentic AI QA engineer for web, iOS, and Android testing | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/momentic.md) |
| 9 | [Autify](https://openaitools.app/tool/autify-com) | 60,130 | +6% | Contact for Pricing | AI testing platform for the entire software testing lifecycle | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/autify-com.md) |
| 10 | [Shiplight AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/shiplight-ai) | 33,676 | -8.2% | Contact for Pricing | Agent-native end-to-end testing that maintains itself | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/shiplight-ai.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/fume-vs-pie

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)