# Fume vs QA.tech

Fume records 811 monthly visits with +492% month-over-month growth and Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing pricing. QA.tech records 30,550 monthly visits with -4.4% growth and Paid, Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [Fume](https://openaitools.app/tool/fume) | [QA.tech](https://openaitools.app/tool/qa-tech) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://fumedev.com | https://qa.tech |
| Categories | AI Testing, AI Agent, AI Developer Tools, AI Code Generator | AI Testing, AI Agent, AI Developer Tools, AI Productivity Tools |
| Pricing Model | Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Paid, Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 811 | 30,550 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +492% | -4.4% |
| Primary Market | Türkiye | Sweden |
| Direct Visits | 331 | 21,231 |
| Review Score | 4.3 | 4.3 |
| Saved Count | 0 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Fume

Fume positions itself not as a no-code test builder but as a full QA department. The workflow starts with a screencast: using Loom, a screen recorder or a similar tool, you walk through your application while narrating what matters. Fume analyses the recording and extracts test cases, with the team claiming you can cover around 80% of your most important user flows in under ten minutes. Tests then run twice a day automatically on Fume Cloud runners, with results posted into a shared channel and failure insights surfaced at a glance.

What distinguishes Fume from no-code alternatives is resilience. Playwright scripts are notoriously fragile, so Fume tests natively fall back to a browser-using AI agent to pick up exactly where a script left off, then self-heal the flaky test in the background. That means it can cope with dynamic application data at runtime and with substantial UX changes, rather than breaking every time a selector or flow shifts. The output is 100% Playwright, so you keep full codebase ownership and can run tests locally or inside your own CI/CD pipeline with a single API call — even if you stop paying.

Fume also offers migration for existing suites, converting Playwright, Selenium or Cypress tests so they immediately gain AI fallbacks and automatic maintenance. It is backed by Y Combinator and aimed at teams that want browser testing handled end to end rather than managed by hand. Published pricing centres on a Team plan at $500 per month with a 30-day free trial, while enterprise deployments are quoted individually.

**Pricing & Plans:** Fume offers a Team plan at $500/month designed for growing teams that need autonomous QA, including a 30-day free trial and free test runners on Fume Cloud. Enterprise pricing is custom and available through a sales conversation, with options for larger organisations and specific deployment needs.

- **Screencast to Playwright tests:** Record a Loom-style video while narrating what should be tested, and Fume extracts the test cases and writes them as native Playwright code — covering most key user flows in minutes.
- **AI agent fallbacks and self-healing:** When fragile selectors or changed UX break a script, tests fall back to a browser-using AI agent to continue, and the flaky test is self-healed in the background.
- **Free cloud test runners:** Tests run twice a day automatically on Fume Cloud runners at no extra cost, with results and failure insights delivered straight to your team's channel.
- **Full Playwright code ownership:** Every test is standard Playwright code you own, so you can run it locally or wire it into CI/CD with one API call and keep running even if you cancel.
- **Migration of existing suites:** Existing Playwright, Selenium or Cypress tests can be migrated to Fume so they instantly gain AI fallbacks and automatic maintenance.

**Strengths:** Test creation starts from a screen recording and spoken description rather than test code; Native AI fallbacks and self-healing address the fragility that normally plagues Playwright suites; You keep 100% Playwright code ownership and can run tests locally even after cancelling; Free cloud runners run tests twice daily, and failures land in your team channel with insights

**Limitations:** The Team plan is $500/month, which is a meaningful commitment for small teams compared with cheaper no-code builders; Coverage quality depends on how clearly you narrate and demonstrate flows in the recording; It is deliberately not a no-code builder, so teams wanting to avoid code entirely may find it less suited

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/fume.md)

## QA.tech

QA.tech positions itself as the verification layer for teams shipping software with heavy AI assistance: coding got much faster, but review and QA did not keep pace. Instead of maintaining a fragile library of selectors and scripts, QA.tech runs autonomous agents that open your live web or native mobile app, work toward goals the way a person would, and report back on what actually works before code is merged.,The product is built around continuous, dynamic testing rather than one-off suites. Connect GitHub, GitLab or Bitbucket and a CI provider, and agents automatically pick up each pull request together with its preview environment, run end-to-end and exploratory passes, and comment on the PR with results. When something fails, you get screenshots, console and network activity and the agent's reasoning at the point of failure, which shortens time to root cause considerably.,Testing is also context-aware over time. Journeys and domain rules you spell out in chat accumulate as knowledge the agents reuse on every later run, and a blast-radius view flags changes that ship untested because a required test user or journey is missing. The platform is cloud-native, needs no code access, and is targeted at QA leads, engineers, CTOs and DevOps teams; Vercel Ventures and founder investors back the company. Pricing is not published as a simple self-serve number — teams book a demo, though a free getting-started path is offered.

**Pricing & Plans:** Enterprise-style, contact-for-pricing model: the site offers a free getting-started path and a demo booking rather than public per-seat numbers, so exact costs depend on team size, coverage scope and mobile testing needs.

- **Plain-language test authoring:** Describe a journey or rule in chat and the agent turns it into durable test cases that survive refactors and redesigns.
- **PR-level verification:** Every pull request gets a dynamic exploratory pass with preview environments, failure breakdowns, screenshots, console and network logs.
- **Web and native mobile:** Agents target real browsers and native iOS and Android apps, so coverage reaches beyond the web front end.
- **CI, Git and issue-tracker integrations:** Findings flow into Jira and Linear, and agents can be queried over MCP by other coding agents.
- **Blast-radius analysis:** Detects when changes to a module are untested and recommends the exact journeys or test users needed to close the gap.

**Strengths:** Agents test visually without selectors, so suites survive redesigns and framework migrations; Runs automatically on every pull request with preview environments; Plain-English test authoring is accessible to non-engineers; Rich failure evidence — screenshots, logs, network data and agent reasoning

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/qa-tech.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Fume and QA.tech compare in monthly traffic?

Fume has 811 monthly visits, while QA.tech has 30,550. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Fume has a month-over-month growth rate of +492%; QA.tech has -4.4%.

### How does pricing compare?

Fume: Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing. Fume offers a Team plan at $500/month designed for growing teams that need autonomous QA, including a 30-day free trial and free test runners on Fume Cloud. Enterprise pricing is custom and available through a sales conversation, with options for larger organisations and specific deployment needs. QA.tech: Paid, Contact for Pricing. Enterprise-style, contact-for-pricing model: the site offers a free getting-started path and a demo booking rather than public per-seat numbers, so exact costs depend on team size, coverage scope and mobile testing needs.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [KaneAI](https://openaitools.app/tool/kaneai) | 901,340 | +13.2% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | GenAI-native end-to-end QA agent that plans, writes and heals tests in plain language | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kaneai.md) |
| 2 | [Qase](https://openaitools.app/tool/qase) | 319,213 | -25.5% | Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing, Free | Ship with confidence: one system of record for manual, automated, and CI tests | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/qase.md) |
| 3 | [Katalon](https://openaitools.app/tool/katalon-studio) | 158,090 | -29.6% | Freemium, Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | AI-augmented quality platform for web, mobile, API and desktop testing | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/katalon-studio.md) |
| 4 | [TestSprite](https://openaitools.app/tool/testsprite) | 114,205 | +15.8% | Freemium | Agentic end-to-end testing that writes, runs and heals your test suite | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/testsprite.md) |
| 5 | [testRigor](https://openaitools.app/tool/testrigor-com) | 105,865 | -2.7% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing, Free | Write end-to-end test automation in plain English, no code required | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/testrigor-com.md) |
| 6 | [Momentic](https://openaitools.app/tool/momentic) | 68,819 | -15.2% | Freemium, Usage-based, Enterprise | Agentic AI QA engineer for web, iOS, and Android testing | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/momentic.md) |
| 7 | [Autify](https://openaitools.app/tool/autify-com) | 60,130 | +6% | Contact for Pricing | AI testing platform for the entire software testing lifecycle | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/autify-com.md) |
| 8 | [Shiplight AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/shiplight-ai) | 33,676 | -8.2% | Contact for Pricing | Agent-native end-to-end testing that maintains itself | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/shiplight-ai.md) |
| 9 | [Virtuoso QA](https://openaitools.app/tool/virtuoso-qa) | 20,169 | +84.5% | Paid, Contact for Pricing | Agentic test automation that builds, runs and maintains your enterprise tests | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/virtuoso-qa.md) |
| 10 | [Autosana](https://openaitools.app/tool/autosana) | 12,057 | +138.3% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Natural-language end-to-end testing for mobile and web apps | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/autosana.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/fume-vs-qa-tech

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)