# Glasp vs MARK•R

Glasp records 889,564 monthly visits with -14.1% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. MARK•R records 43 monthly visits with -95.1% growth and Freemium pricing.

| Metric | [Glasp](https://openaitools.app/tool/glasp) | [MARK•R](https://openaitools.app/tool/mark-r) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://glasp.co | https://mark-r.com |
| Categories | AI Research Tool, AI Agent, AI Summarizer, AI Youtube Summary | AI Assistant, AI Copilot, AI Writing Assistants, AI Research Tool |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 889,564 | 43 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -14.1% | -95.1% |
| Primary Market | United States | Global |
| Direct Visits | 400,603 | 16 |
| Review Score | 4.2 | 4.2 |
| Saved Count | 12 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Glasp

Glasp started from a simple observation: most people highlight things they never look at again. Instead of trapping highlights inside one app, Glasp makes them social. Install the extension, highlight a paragraph on any site or a line in a YouTube transcript, and it lands in your Glasp profile where you can add notes and tags. Because highlights are public by default unless you make them private, a feed of what like-minded people are reading and marking emerges — you can follow other users, see what resonates, and discover sources you would not have found on your own.

Your library becomes the raw material for AI features. Glasp can summarize a long article, a PDF or a YouTube video so you can decide whether it deserves reading, and it can organize what you have already saved into themes. The standout feature is the AI clone: by training on your own accumulated highlights and notes, it produces something that answers in the shape of your interests and reading history. There is also a digital-legacy angle, letting you hand your accumulated knowledge to someone else.

Glasp is free to start, with paid tiers for heavier use and greater AI capacity. Its real niche is learners, researchers, students and content curators who treat annotation as a public, collaborative practice rather than a private bookmark folder — and who want their saved material to do work for them later instead of gathering dust.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. A free tier covers the core highlighting, saving and sharing features with limited AI usage; paid plans add higher AI limits and additional capacity. Check glasp.co for current tier pricing, as it is not published in our listing data.

- **Web and YouTube highlighting:** Mark up passages on any website or lines in a YouTube transcript from a browser extension, then keep them in one searchable library.
- **Social learning feed:** Highlights are shared publicly by default, so you can follow other users, react to their picks and discover sources through people with similar interests.
- **AI summarization:** Generate summaries of long articles, PDFs and YouTube videos to judge relevance fast and to digest what you have already saved.
- **Your own AI clone:** Trained on your accumulated highlights and notes, the AI clone answers in the shape of your reading history and areas of interest.
- **Notes, tags and Kindle import:** Add your own commentary and tags to every highlight, and bring in Kindle highlights so your reading lives in one place.

**Strengths:** Turns throwaway highlighting into a genuinely reusable, searchable library; The social feed surfaces sources through people rather than an opaque algorithm; AI summarization and the AI clone are built on your own saved material, not generic content; Works across web pages, YouTube, PDFs and Kindle imports in one place

**Limitations:** Public-by-default sharing is not for everyone; private lives behind a toggle you have to remember; The AI clone only becomes useful after you have accumulated a real body of highlights; Free-tier AI usage is limited, so heavy summarization pushes you to a paid plan

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/glasp.md)

## MARK•R

MARK•R is a browser plugin built around one interaction: highlight text, then talk to it. Instead of copying a passage into a separate chatbot, you select it on the page and a small icon appears with an AI input field. Whatever you ask is answered inline, in the flow of reading, which keeps the source material and the conversation in the same visual context.

The distinguishing design decision is that MARK•R does not restrict itself to the highlighted fragment. It reads the surrounding page as well, so questions can be about the wider argument, the definitions used elsewhere in the article, or the assumptions behind a claim. That makes it more useful for interpretation and analysis than a simple selected-text rewriter, and it is the reason the plugin is marketed for research, study and content development rather than only for editing.

Practical applications cluster around comprehension and production. Students and researchers use it to unpack difficult concepts and terminology; professionals use it to clarify technical, legal or medical language; writers and marketers use it to generate summaries, outlines and alternative phrasing; and anyone drafting email in a browser can highlight the message they received and ask for suggested replies. Access is tiered: a free plan with a modest daily allowance of GPT-3.5 calls, paid Standard and Pro plans that add higher limits and GPT-4, and custom builds for organisations. The published plan structure references GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, so newer model options may not be available on this tool.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. A free tier provides 15 calls per day, 2,000 highlighted characters, 500 characters of prompt input, GPT-3.5 and 1,000 output characters. Standard is $8 per month and Pro is $12 per month, adding higher daily call limits, larger character allowances, longer output and GPT-4 access (one GPT-4 call equals 20 GPT-3.5 calls). Custom builds are available for organisations and enterprises.

- **Highlight-to-ask interaction:** Selecting any passage on a page activates a dynamic icon and AI prompt field, so a question can be asked at the exact place you are reading rather than in a separate chat window.
- **Whole-page context:** Responses draw on the surrounding article or page, not just the highlighted fragment, which supports deeper questions about argument, terminology and implications.
- **Inline content generation:** Ask for an executive summary, a white-paper outline, slide talking points, suggested email replies or rewritten copy without leaving the browser.
- **Comprehension support:** Explain difficult terms, unpack technical or legal jargon and request simpler phrasing, which helps with dense academic, medical and financial material.
- **Tiered daily allowances:** Free, Standard and Pro plans set different daily call limits, character allowances, output lengths and model access, with custom enterprise builds available.

**Strengths:** Works inline on any page, so you never have to copy text into another tool; Uses the whole page as context, not just the highlighted passage; Low entry price with a genuinely usable free tier and clear plan differences; Broad range of applications from study and research to summaries and email replies

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/mark-r.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Glasp and MARK•R compare in monthly traffic?

Glasp has 889,564 monthly visits, while MARK•R has 43. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Glasp has a month-over-month growth rate of -14.1%; MARK•R has -95.1%.

### How does pricing compare?

Glasp: Freemium. Freemium. A free tier covers the core highlighting, saving and sharing features with limited AI usage; paid plans add higher AI limits and additional capacity. Check glasp.co for current tier pricing, as it is not published in our listing data. MARK•R: Freemium. Freemium. A free tier provides 15 calls per day, 2,000 highlighted characters, 500 characters of prompt input, GPT-3.5 and 1,000 output characters. Standard is $8 per month and Pro is $12 per month, adding higher daily call limits, larger character allowances, longer output and GPT-4 access (one GPT-4 call equals 20 GPT-3.5 calls). Custom builds are available for organisations and enterprises.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Notion](https://openaitools.app/tool/t) | 173,441,670 | +0.1% | Freemium | The AI workspace where teams and agents get work done together | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/t.md) |
| 2 | [Perplexity](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai) | 88,310,223 | -3.7% | Freemium | Real-time AI answer engine and research workspace combining live web citations with frontier reasoning models. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai.md) |
| 3 | [Monica](https://openaitools.app/tool/monica-ai) | 4,512,775 | -11.3% | Freemium | All-in-one AI assistant across web, browser, desktop and mobile | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/monica-ai.md) |
| 4 | [SciSpace](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace) | 4,464,111 | +8.6% | Freemium | Excels at deep scientific literature reading and analysis, whereas Glasp targets general web and video content curation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace.md) |
| 5 | [Sider](https://openaitools.app/tool/sider) | 2,644,740 | -10.6% | Freemium | AI sidebar and browser agent for reading, writing and research | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/sider.md) |
| 6 | [Merlin AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/merlin-ai-plugins) | 1,382,634 | +13.1% | Freemium | Provides faster multi-tab AI assistance and article summaries, but lacks dedicated social knowledge curation and note archiving features. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/merlin-ai-plugins.md) |
| 7 | [Merlin AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/merlin-ai) | 1,382,634 | +13.1% | Freemium | One-click AI assistant for browsing, writing and research | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/merlin-ai.md) |
| 8 | [HARPA AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/harpa-ai) | 537,461 | +99.3% | Freemium | One browser agent that combines every major AI model with web automation | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/harpa-ai.md) |
| 9 | [Scholarcy](https://openaitools.app/tool/scholarcy) | 195,058 | +4.6% | Freemium | Converts academic papers into structured summary flashcards, but lacks Glasp's broad web article and YouTube highlighting capabilities. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scholarcy.md) |
| 10 | [Glarity](https://openaitools.app/tool/glarity-summarize-google-and-youtube) | 188,823 | -49.6% | Freemium | Provides open-source YouTube and webpage summarization directly in search results, but lacks Glasp's long-term knowledge management. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/glarity-summarize-google-and-youtube.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/glasp-vs-mark-r

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)