# Glasp vs mymind

Glasp records 889,564 monthly visits with -14.1% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. mymind records 221,816 monthly visits with -1% growth and Free Trial, Paid pricing.

| Metric | [Glasp](https://openaitools.app/tool/glasp) | [mymind](https://openaitools.app/tool/mymind) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://glasp.co | https://mymind.com |
| Categories | AI Research Tool, AI Agent, AI Summarizer, AI Youtube Summary | AI Knowledge Management, AI Note Taker, AI Search Engine, AI Assistant |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Free Trial, Paid |
| Monthly Visits | 889,564 | 221,816 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -14.1% | -1% |
| Primary Market | United States | Germany |
| Direct Visits | 400,603 | 166,312 |
| Review Score | 4.2 | 4.5 |
| Saved Count | 12 | 8 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Glasp

Glasp started from a simple observation: most people highlight things they never look at again. Instead of trapping highlights inside one app, Glasp makes them social. Install the extension, highlight a paragraph on any site or a line in a YouTube transcript, and it lands in your Glasp profile where you can add notes and tags. Because highlights are public by default unless you make them private, a feed of what like-minded people are reading and marking emerges — you can follow other users, see what resonates, and discover sources you would not have found on your own.

Your library becomes the raw material for AI features. Glasp can summarize a long article, a PDF or a YouTube video so you can decide whether it deserves reading, and it can organize what you have already saved into themes. The standout feature is the AI clone: by training on your own accumulated highlights and notes, it produces something that answers in the shape of your interests and reading history. There is also a digital-legacy angle, letting you hand your accumulated knowledge to someone else.

Glasp is free to start, with paid tiers for heavier use and greater AI capacity. Its real niche is learners, researchers, students and content curators who treat annotation as a public, collaborative practice rather than a private bookmark folder — and who want their saved material to do work for them later instead of gathering dust.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. A free tier covers the core highlighting, saving and sharing features with limited AI usage; paid plans add higher AI limits and additional capacity. Check glasp.co for current tier pricing, as it is not published in our listing data.

- **Web and YouTube highlighting:** Mark up passages on any website or lines in a YouTube transcript from a browser extension, then keep them in one searchable library.
- **Social learning feed:** Highlights are shared publicly by default, so you can follow other users, react to their picks and discover sources through people with similar interests.
- **AI summarization:** Generate summaries of long articles, PDFs and YouTube videos to judge relevance fast and to digest what you have already saved.
- **Your own AI clone:** Trained on your accumulated highlights and notes, the AI clone answers in the shape of your reading history and areas of interest.
- **Notes, tags and Kindle import:** Add your own commentary and tags to every highlight, and bring in Kindle highlights so your reading lives in one place.

**Strengths:** Turns throwaway highlighting into a genuinely reusable, searchable library; The social feed surfaces sources through people rather than an opaque algorithm; AI summarization and the AI clone are built on your own saved material, not generic content; Works across web pages, YouTube, PDFs and Kindle imports in one place

**Limitations:** Public-by-default sharing is not for everyone; private lives behind a toggle you have to remember; The AI clone only becomes useful after you have accumulated a real body of highlights; Free-tier AI usage is limited, so heavy summarization pushes you to a paid plan

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/glasp.md)

## mymind

mymind bills itself as "the extension for your mind." The core idea is frictionless capture: you save notes, links, images, quotes, articles, PDFs and even short videos with a click or a tap, and the app figures out the rest. There are no folders to design and no tag taxonomies to maintain — the platform detects whether an item is an article, a product, a book or a recipe, then files it visually so your saved library looks more like a mood board than a filing cabinet.

The AI layer is what replaces manual organization. On paid tiers you get automatic image tagging, text recognition inside screenshots and memes, article and PDF summaries, and Smart Spaces that group related saves around a theme without any setup. Search is deliberately associative: you can look for something by color, brand, keyword or approximate date, which mirrors how people actually recall things. Mastermind subscribers also get Reading Mode, full article backup even if the source disappears, bidirectional linking between notes, and video uploads up to 500 MB each.

mymind leans hard into privacy as a differentiator. There are no social features, no vanity metrics, no ads and no data selling; the company describes itself as a small indie team with no outside funding whose work is paid for entirely by members. Apps exist for iOS, Android, macOS and major browsers, with syncing across all of them. Pricing is straightforwardly subscription-based, with a basic Bookmarker tier for people who just want beautiful bookmarks and no AI.

If you need team collaboration, shared workspaces or enterprise admin controls, mymind is intentionally the wrong tool — it is designed for one person's private mind.

**Pricing & Plans:** Subscription with a free trial. The Bookmarker is $4.99/month; Student of Life is $7.99/month or $79/year; Mastermind is $12.99/month or $129/year (yearly saves roughly 20%). A not-yet-released "Newton" plan at $299/year is listed as in development.

- **Zero-organization saving:** Save notes, links, quotes, images, articles, PDFs and videos in one click, and let mymind categorize them automatically instead of building folder structures.
- **Associative visual search:** Find saved items by color, brand, keyword or date. Image text recognition even lets you search words that appear inside screenshots, memes or handwriting.
- **AI tagging, summaries and PDF analysis:** Images get tagged automatically, and Mastermind members get paragraph summaries of articles, web pages and PDFs so old saves are still useful months later.
- **Smart Spaces and Same Vibe:** Smart Spaces auto-group saves around a search, theme or tag, while Same Vibe builds a mood board from images you already saved with a similar look and feel.
- **Private by design, synced everywhere:** No ads, no analytics-driven feeds, no data selling; your library syncs instantly between iOS, Android, macOS and browser extensions.

**Strengths:** Removes the ongoing chore of folders, labels and tag upkeep; Strong privacy stance with no ads, no social layer and an explicit no-data-selling promise; Excellent associative recall through color, brand, keyword and in-image text search; Native apps for iOS, Android, macOS and all major browsers with reliable cross-device sync

**Limitations:** Paid-only beyond the trial — there is no permanent free tier; Built for individuals, so no shared workspaces, team permissions or collaboration features; Blue-chip AI features such as summaries, article backup and video upload require the higher Mastermind plan

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/mymind.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Glasp and mymind compare in monthly traffic?

Glasp has 889,564 monthly visits, while mymind has 221,816. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Glasp has a month-over-month growth rate of -14.1%; mymind has -1%.

### How does pricing compare?

Glasp: Freemium. Freemium. A free tier covers the core highlighting, saving and sharing features with limited AI usage; paid plans add higher AI limits and additional capacity. Check glasp.co for current tier pricing, as it is not published in our listing data. mymind: Free Trial, Paid. Subscription with a free trial. The Bookmarker is $4.99/month; Student of Life is $7.99/month or $79/year; Mastermind is $12.99/month or $129/year (yearly saves roughly 20%). A not-yet-released "Newton" plan at $299/year is listed as in development.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Notion](https://openaitools.app/tool/t) | 173,441,670 | +0.1% | Freemium | The AI workspace where teams and agents get work done together | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/t.md) |
| 2 | [Perplexity](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai) | 88,310,223 | -3.7% | Freemium | Real-time AI answer engine and research workspace combining live web citations with frontier reasoning models. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai.md) |
| 3 | [SciSpace](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace) | 4,464,111 | +8.6% | Freemium | Excels at deep scientific literature reading and analysis, whereas Glasp targets general web and video content curation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace.md) |
| 4 | [Sider](https://openaitools.app/tool/sider) | 2,644,740 | -10.6% | Freemium | Offers a broader multi-model sidebar for quick page summarization, but lacks Glasp's community-driven public highlighting and curation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/sider.md) |
| 5 | [Merlin AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/merlin-ai-plugins) | 1,382,634 | +13.1% | Freemium | Provides faster multi-tab AI assistance and article summaries, but lacks dedicated social knowledge curation and note archiving features. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/merlin-ai-plugins.md) |
| 6 | [HARPA AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/harpa-ai) | 537,461 | +99.3% | Freemium | Delivers powerful web automation and page summarization, but features a steeper learning curve than Glasp's streamlined extension. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/harpa-ai.md) |
| 7 | [Capacities](https://openaitools.app/tool/capacities) | 339,396 | +5.7% | Freemium, Paid | Better object-based knowledge structuring and networked thinking, but lacks automatic visual tagging of web clippings. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/capacities.md) |
| 8 | [Scholarcy](https://openaitools.app/tool/scholarcy) | 195,058 | +4.6% | Freemium | Converts academic papers into structured summary flashcards, but lacks Glasp's broad web article and YouTube highlighting capabilities. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scholarcy.md) |
| 9 | [Glarity](https://openaitools.app/tool/glarity-summarize-google-and-youtube) | 188,823 | -49.6% | Freemium | Provides open-source YouTube and webpage summarization directly in search results, but lacks Glasp's long-term knowledge management. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/glarity-summarize-google-and-youtube.md) |
| 10 | [Saner.AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/saner-ai-beta-version) | 184,423 | -0.6% | Freemium | Stronger task and email integration for daily knowledge management, but less immersive visual card layout. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/saner-ai-beta-version.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/glasp-vs-mymind

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)