# Glasp vs Polimake

Glasp records 889,564 monthly visits with -14.1% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Polimake records 15,129 monthly visits with +22.4% growth and Freemium pricing.

| Metric | [Glasp](https://openaitools.app/tool/glasp) | [Polimake](https://openaitools.app/tool/polimake) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://glasp.co | https://polimake.com |
| Categories | AI Research Tool, AI Agent, AI Summarizer, AI Youtube Summary | AI Video Search, AI Image Recognition, AI Knowledge Management, AI Project Management |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 889,564 | 15,129 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -14.1% | +22.4% |
| Primary Market | United States | Mexico |
| Direct Visits | 400,603 | 4,843 |
| Review Score | 4.2 | 4.2 |
| Saved Count | 12 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Glasp

Glasp started from a simple observation: most people highlight things they never look at again. Instead of trapping highlights inside one app, Glasp makes them social. Install the extension, highlight a paragraph on any site or a line in a YouTube transcript, and it lands in your Glasp profile where you can add notes and tags. Because highlights are public by default unless you make them private, a feed of what like-minded people are reading and marking emerges — you can follow other users, see what resonates, and discover sources you would not have found on your own.

Your library becomes the raw material for AI features. Glasp can summarize a long article, a PDF or a YouTube video so you can decide whether it deserves reading, and it can organize what you have already saved into themes. The standout feature is the AI clone: by training on your own accumulated highlights and notes, it produces something that answers in the shape of your interests and reading history. There is also a digital-legacy angle, letting you hand your accumulated knowledge to someone else.

Glasp is free to start, with paid tiers for heavier use and greater AI capacity. Its real niche is learners, researchers, students and content curators who treat annotation as a public, collaborative practice rather than a private bookmark folder — and who want their saved material to do work for them later instead of gathering dust.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. A free tier covers the core highlighting, saving and sharing features with limited AI usage; paid plans add higher AI limits and additional capacity. Check glasp.co for current tier pricing, as it is not published in our listing data.

- **Web and YouTube highlighting:** Mark up passages on any website or lines in a YouTube transcript from a browser extension, then keep them in one searchable library.
- **Social learning feed:** Highlights are shared publicly by default, so you can follow other users, react to their picks and discover sources through people with similar interests.
- **AI summarization:** Generate summaries of long articles, PDFs and YouTube videos to judge relevance fast and to digest what you have already saved.
- **Your own AI clone:** Trained on your accumulated highlights and notes, the AI clone answers in the shape of your reading history and areas of interest.
- **Notes, tags and Kindle import:** Add your own commentary and tags to every highlight, and bring in Kindle highlights so your reading lives in one place.

**Strengths:** Turns throwaway highlighting into a genuinely reusable, searchable library; The social feed surfaces sources through people rather than an opaque algorithm; AI summarization and the AI clone are built on your own saved material, not generic content; Works across web pages, YouTube, PDFs and Kindle imports in one place

**Limitations:** Public-by-default sharing is not for everyone; private lives behind a toggle you have to remember; The AI clone only becomes useful after you have accumulated a real body of highlights; Free-tier AI usage is limited, so heavy summarization pushes you to a paid plan

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/glasp.md)

## Polimake

Polimake is aimed at creative, marketing and content teams who drown in unlabeled photos and video. It indexes your media library by what actually appears in each clip or image, not just filenames, so you can search frame-level concepts like 'the chef with the beard' or 'the dark, high-contrast shots' and get the right assets back. That search works inside video too, which is where traditional asset managers usually fall down.

Beyond search, Polimake functions as a light production and design surface. It offers a free desktop app with a video editor and design tools for Windows, transcription, and a way to ask an AI assistant to edit or assemble a piece from your own library rather than from stock. Examples on the site include turning a script into one shot per line and grouping photos into briefs, carousels or PDF dossiers.

The platform also emphasizes control and privacy. You can organize assets into projects and collections, share selections with clients through links that carry your branding and original-quality files, and revoke access or set link expiry when a project ends. Files are encrypted at rest and in transit, storage is European, permissions are granular, and the company states your material is never used to train models.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. A free plan lets you upload and organize media, search inside videos and use the free Windows desktop app with editor and transcription, with no credit card required. Paid tiers are billed monthly in euros: Creador around €19/month for a solo operator with one brand and a ChatGPT/Claude connector, Estudio around €89/month for teams of three to eight with up to five brands and advanced MCP, and Agencia around €159/month for larger libraries with unlimited projects and 1 TB storage. Storage scales from 100 GB to 1 TB across paid plans.

- **Search by what's in the shot:** Find photos and videos by describing their content in natural language, working inside clips rather than relying on filenames or tags.
- **AI connectors for ChatGPT and Claude:** Let an assistant search, edit and assemble content directly from your library, with an advanced MCP connector on higher tiers.
- **Free desktop editor and transcription:** A free Windows app provides video editing, design and transcription so you can work on your own machine without uploading everything.
- **Sharing with permissions and expiry:** Share selections via branded links at original quality, with granular view, comment, upload or download permissions and revocable, expiring access.
- **Privacy and European storage:** Files are encrypted at rest and in transit, stored in Europe, and the company states your content is never used to train models.

**Strengths:** Content-level search that works inside videos, not just file metadata; Native connectors to ChatGPT, Claude and MCP for AI-driven editing; Strong sharing controls with expiry and revocation; Free plan, free Windows desktop app, and European encrypted storage

**Limitations:** Desktop editor is currently Windows only; Higher storage and multi-brand features require paid plans; Revoking access does not delete copies someone already downloaded

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/polimake.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Glasp and Polimake compare in monthly traffic?

Glasp has 889,564 monthly visits, while Polimake has 15,129. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Glasp has a month-over-month growth rate of -14.1%; Polimake has +22.4%.

### How does pricing compare?

Glasp: Freemium. Freemium. A free tier covers the core highlighting, saving and sharing features with limited AI usage; paid plans add higher AI limits and additional capacity. Check glasp.co for current tier pricing, as it is not published in our listing data. Polimake: Freemium. Freemium. A free plan lets you upload and organize media, search inside videos and use the free Windows desktop app with editor and transcription, with no credit card required. Paid tiers are billed monthly in euros: Creador around €19/month for a solo operator with one brand and a ChatGPT/Claude connector, Estudio around €89/month for teams of three to eight with up to five brands and advanced MCP, and Agencia around €159/month for larger libraries with unlimited projects and 1 TB storage. Storage scales from 100 GB to 1 TB across paid plans.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Notion](https://openaitools.app/tool/t) | 173,441,670 | +0.1% | Freemium | The AI workspace where teams and agents get work done together | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/t.md) |
| 2 | [Perplexity](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai) | 88,310,223 | -3.7% | Freemium | Real-time AI answer engine and research workspace combining live web citations with frontier reasoning models. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai.md) |
| 3 | [SciSpace](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace) | 4,464,111 | +8.6% | Freemium | Excels at deep scientific literature reading and analysis, whereas Glasp targets general web and video content curation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace.md) |
| 4 | [Sider](https://openaitools.app/tool/sider) | 2,644,740 | -10.6% | Freemium | Offers a broader multi-model sidebar for quick page summarization, but lacks Glasp's community-driven public highlighting and curation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/sider.md) |
| 5 | [Merlin AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/merlin-ai-plugins) | 1,382,634 | +13.1% | Freemium | Provides faster multi-tab AI assistance and article summaries, but lacks dedicated social knowledge curation and note archiving features. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/merlin-ai-plugins.md) |
| 6 | [Wan.Video](https://openaitools.app/tool/wan-video) | 1,279,154 | -12.5% | Freemium | Alibaba's Wan model for AI video and image creation | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/wan-video.md) |
| 7 | [Kira](https://openaitools.app/tool/kira) | 1,156,442 | -29.2% | Freemium | AI photo and short-video studio built around trends and templates | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kira.md) |
| 8 | [VIVA](https://openaitools.app/tool/viva) | 570,582 | -15.2% | Free Trial | Create videos and images by chatting with an AI agent | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/viva.md) |
| 9 | [HARPA AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/harpa-ai) | 537,461 | +99.3% | Freemium | Delivers powerful web automation and page summarization, but features a steeper learning curve than Glasp's streamlined extension. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/harpa-ai.md) |
| 10 | [Customuse](https://openaitools.app/tool/customuse-com) | 379,276 | -3.5% | Free, Paid, Enterprise | Create 3D game assets, images and videos with AI in seconds | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/customuse-com.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/glasp-vs-polimake

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)