# Glasp vs Recap Glasp records 889,564 monthly visits with -14.1% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Recap records 228 monthly visits with -84.6% growth and Free pricing. | Metric | [Glasp](https://openaitools.app/tool/glasp) | [Recap](https://openaitools.app/tool/recap) | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Website URL | https://glasp.co | https://recapext.xyz | | Categories | AI Research Tool, AI Agent, AI Summarizer, AI Youtube Summary | AI Summarizer, Open Source AI Models, AI Chatbot, AI Browsers | | Pricing Model | Freemium | Free | | Monthly Visits | 889,564 | 228 | | MoM Growth Rate | -14.1% | -84.6% | | Primary Market | United States | Global | | Direct Visits | 400,603 | 90 | | Review Score | 4.2 | 4.3 | | Saved Count | 12 | 2 | | Supported Platforms | Website | Website | ## Glasp Glasp started from a simple observation: most people highlight things they never look at again. Instead of trapping highlights inside one app, Glasp makes them social. Install the extension, highlight a paragraph on any site or a line in a YouTube transcript, and it lands in your Glasp profile where you can add notes and tags. Because highlights are public by default unless you make them private, a feed of what like-minded people are reading and marking emerges — you can follow other users, see what resonates, and discover sources you would not have found on your own. Your library becomes the raw material for AI features. Glasp can summarize a long article, a PDF or a YouTube video so you can decide whether it deserves reading, and it can organize what you have already saved into themes. The standout feature is the AI clone: by training on your own accumulated highlights and notes, it produces something that answers in the shape of your interests and reading history. There is also a digital-legacy angle, letting you hand your accumulated knowledge to someone else. Glasp is free to start, with paid tiers for heavier use and greater AI capacity. Its real niche is learners, researchers, students and content curators who treat annotation as a public, collaborative practice rather than a private bookmark folder — and who want their saved material to do work for them later instead of gathering dust. **Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. A free tier covers the core highlighting, saving and sharing features with limited AI usage; paid plans add higher AI limits and additional capacity. Check glasp.co for current tier pricing, as it is not published in our listing data. - **Web and YouTube highlighting:** Mark up passages on any website or lines in a YouTube transcript from a browser extension, then keep them in one searchable library. - **Social learning feed:** Highlights are shared publicly by default, so you can follow other users, react to their picks and discover sources through people with similar interests. - **AI summarization:** Generate summaries of long articles, PDFs and YouTube videos to judge relevance fast and to digest what you have already saved. - **Your own AI clone:** Trained on your accumulated highlights and notes, the AI clone answers in the shape of your reading history and areas of interest. - **Notes, tags and Kindle import:** Add your own commentary and tags to every highlight, and bring in Kindle highlights so your reading lives in one place. **Strengths:** Turns throwaway highlighting into a genuinely reusable, searchable library; The social feed surfaces sources through people rather than an opaque algorithm; AI summarization and the AI clone are built on your own saved material, not generic content; Works across web pages, YouTube, PDFs and Kindle imports in one place **Limitations:** Public-by-default sharing is not for everyone; private lives behind a toggle you have to remember; The AI clone only becomes useful after you have accumulated a real body of highlights; Free-tier AI usage is limited, so heavy summarization pushes you to a paid plan [Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/glasp.md) ## Recap Most summarization tools treat a page as an all-or-nothing unit: press a button, receive an abstract of everything. Recap takes the opposite stance. You highlight the exact portion you want condensed, and it sends only that text to ChatGPT. The result is a summary of the argument you were actually reading rather than a blend of navigation, sidebars, comments, and unrelated sections. Recap is deliberately minimal. It installs as a Chrome extension, it works through your existing ChatGPT session, and it does not ask you to configure a document store or a pipeline. For readers who mostly want the gist of two or three paragraphs inside a long page, that narrow scope is the feature rather than a limitation. The project is open source and published on GitHub, which means the code can be inspected by anyone who wants to verify how selected text is handled. The project is maintained by Yaozhi Wang, publishes a changelog as it evolves, and can be reached at recapext@gmail.com. Because it depends on ChatGPT rather than a hosted summarization backend, there is no separate processing service in the middle, and the extension remains free to use. **Pricing & Plans:** Recap is free to use, and the source code is open source. You need an active ChatGPT account, but the extension itself adds no charge. - **Section-level selection:** Select just the paragraph, passage, or block you care about rather than summarizing an entire page. - **ChatGPT-powered summarization:** Send the chosen text to ChatGPT and get a concise summary without leaving the page you are reading. - **Chrome extension install:** Adds to Chrome in one click from the Web Store, with no separate app or account to manage. - **Open-source codebase:** The source is published publicly on GitHub, so you can review exactly what the extension does. - **Active changelog:** The project publishes a changelog documenting updates and fixes as development continues. **Strengths:** Summarizes only the section you select, keeping output focused and relevant; Free and open source, with source code published on GitHub; Installs in one click as a Chrome extension with no separate account; Works within your existing ChatGPT session rather than a new pipeline **Limitations:** Limited to Chrome rather than other browsers; Requires an active ChatGPT session to function; Scope is intentionally narrow, so it is not a full reading or research workspace [Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/recap.md) ## Frequently Asked Questions ### How do Glasp and Recap compare in monthly traffic? Glasp has 889,564 monthly visits, while Recap has 228. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality. ### How do their growth rates compare? Glasp has a month-over-month growth rate of -14.1%; Recap has -84.6%. ### How does pricing compare? Glasp: Freemium. Freemium. A free tier covers the core highlighting, saving and sharing features with limited AI usage; paid plans add higher AI limits and additional capacity. Check glasp.co for current tier pricing, as it is not published in our listing data. Recap: Free. Recap is free to use, and the source code is open source. You need an active ChatGPT account, but the extension itself adds no charge. ## Alternatives | # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | 1 | [Notion](https://openaitools.app/tool/t) | 173,441,670 | +0.1% | Freemium | The AI workspace where teams and agents get work done together | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/t.md) | | 2 | [Perplexity](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai) | 88,310,223 | -3.7% | Freemium | Real-time AI answer engine and research workspace combining live web citations with frontier reasoning models. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai.md) | | 3 | [Tactiq](https://openaitools.app/tool/tactiq) | 6,521,542 | +4.1% | Freemium | Live meeting transcription and AI notes without a bot in the call | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/tactiq.md) | | 4 | [Monica](https://openaitools.app/tool/monica-ai) | 4,512,775 | -11.3% | Freemium | All-in-one AI assistant across web, browser, desktop and mobile | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/monica-ai.md) | | 5 | [SciSpace](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace) | 4,464,111 | +8.6% | Freemium | Excels at deep scientific literature reading and analysis, whereas Glasp targets general web and video content curation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace.md) | | 6 | [Sider](https://openaitools.app/tool/sider) | 2,644,740 | -10.6% | Freemium | AI sidebar and browser agent for reading, writing and research | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/sider.md) | | 7 | [Merlin AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/merlin-ai-plugins) | 1,382,634 | +13.1% | Freemium | Provides faster multi-tab AI assistance and article summaries, but lacks dedicated social knowledge curation and note archiving features. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/merlin-ai-plugins.md) | | 8 | [Merlin AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/merlin-ai) | 1,382,634 | +13.1% | Freemium | One-click AI assistant for browsing, writing and research | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/merlin-ai.md) | | 9 | [HARPA AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/harpa-ai) | 537,461 | +99.3% | Freemium | One browser agent that combines every major AI model with web automation | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/harpa-ai.md) | | 10 | [Scholarcy](https://openaitools.app/tool/scholarcy) | 195,058 | +4.6% | Freemium | Converts academic papers into structured summary flashcards, but lacks Glasp's broad web article and YouTube highlighting capabilities. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scholarcy.md) | --- Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/glasp-vs-recap More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)