# Glean vs Starnus

Glean records 3,301,875 monthly visits with +0.1% month-over-month growth and Contact for Pricing pricing. Starnus records 2,601 monthly visits with -36.6% growth and Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [Glean](https://openaitools.app/tool/glean) | [Starnus](https://openaitools.app/tool/starnus) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.glean.com | https://starnus.com |
| Categories | AI Productivity Tools, AI Agent, AI Assistant, AI Search Engine | AI Sales, AI Sales Assistant, AI Agent, AI Lead Generation |
| Pricing Model | Contact for Pricing | Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 3,301,875 | 2,601 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +0.1% | -36.6% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 2,628,666 | 1,020 |
| Review Score | 4.6 | 3.9 |
| Saved Count | 7 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Glean

Glean addresses a problem most enterprises hit after their first wave of AI adoption: models are powerful but isolated from the context of the business. The platform builds an enterprise context layer by indexing and understanding content across the tools a company already runs on, then uses that grounding to improve both answer quality and efficiency. Because fewer irrelevant tokens need to be sent to a model, the same question costs less to serve.

The product surface spans four areas: enterprise search, an AI assistant for everyday work, an agent platform for automating long-running processes, and Glean Protect for security and governance. Administrators also get model routing and an AI gateway, letting them decide which models handle which requests without rebuilding integrations. Everything inherits the access permissions of the source systems, so answers stay within each employee's existing rights.

Glean serves large organisations across finance, healthcare, retail, technology, and government, with published customers including Booking.com, Zillow, and Ericsson. It holds SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, HIPAA, GDPR, and TX-RAMP Level 2 attestations, and reports 275+ connectors, 40+ supported language models, and 99.9%+ uptime on core services.

**Pricing & Plans:** Contact for pricing. Glean is licensed to organisations based on seats, connectors, and deployment scope, and is evaluated through a demo rather than self-serve purchase.

- **Permission-aware enterprise search:** Ask a question in plain language and get a cited answer assembled from documents, tickets, wikis, and messages across every connected system, with permissions respected.
- **Agent builder and orchestration:** Reusable agents handle multi-step workflows such as onboarding, account research, or incident follow-up by orchestrating actions across business apps.
- **Model routing and AI gateway:** Glean automatically picks and routes requests to the right model and reasoning level, giving teams access to 40+ LLMs through a single governed gateway.
- **Grounded content and analysis:** Draft on-brand documents, summarise meetings, analyse data, and create content grounded in company context rather than generic model knowledge.
- **Governance and observability:** Administrators get usage controls, spend visibility, audit logging, and compliance-ready governance for every AI interaction.

**Strengths:** Answers cite source systems and inherit their permissions, which removes the main blocker to enterprise-wide rollout; One platform covers search, assistant, and agents instead of three separate vendors; Model routing and token efficiency directly reduce the cost per AI query at scale; 275+ pre-built connectors shorten integration work considerably

**Limitations:** Enterprise pricing is quote-based, so budget planning requires a sales conversation; Full value depends on connecting many internal data sources, which takes IT effort; Smallest teams may find the platform more than they need

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/glean.md)

## Starnus

Starnus positions itself as an AI employee for outbound sales rather than a single-purpose tool. The workflow starts with an analysis step: you enter your website URL and six specialized agents read it in parallel — a site crawler, competitor mapper, proposition extractor, ICP builder, pain point analyser, and signal finder — returning a full picture in about 30 seconds with no account required. That ICP then drives everything downstream.

From the ICP, Starnus sources leads by scanning hundreds of signals and scoring each one for fit, filtering for quality rather than volume. Outreach runs across LinkedIn and email with personalized messages and follow-ups per lead, and reply detection stops sequences when someone responds. You approve messages before they send, keeping a human check on the account.

Starnus is designed around an approve-once weekly rhythm: it produces a week-by-week outbound plan, you review and approve it, and a fleet of agents (the site cites up to 26) executes lead sourcing, sending, follow-ups, and monitoring. A dashboard tracks leads found, emails sent, LinkedIn connections accepted, and open rates across every campaign. Starnus is built by a team based in Eindhoven, Netherlands, and markets itself as an all-in-one alternative to stitching together Apollo, Clay, and Lemlist.

**Pricing & Plans:** Starnus offers a free analysis entry point — you can run the ICP and competitor analysis at no cost without creating an account. Beyond that it uses a paid model with a self-serve tier plus a managed service for teams that want Starnus to run more of the motion; exact prices are not published publicly and are shared through a demo or sales conversation.

- **Instant ICP and competitor analysis:** Enter your URL and six specialized agents read your site in parallel to extract your proposition, build an ICP, map competitors, and surface pain points in about 30 seconds.
- **Fit-based lead sourcing and scoring:** Agents scan hundreds of signals and score each lead by ICP fit, then enrich contact details so you focus on prospects with real context rather than raw volume.
- **Multi-channel outreach autopilot:** Starnus writes and runs personalized sequences across LinkedIn and email, including connection requests, follow-ups, and reply detection, with every message approved before it sends.
- **Approve-once weekly planning:** Approve one weekly outbound plan and Starnus executes it step by step, reporting progress and results back to you.
- **Unified performance dashboard:** Leads found, emails sent, LinkedIn connections accepted, and open rates are tracked across every space and campaign in one dashboard.

**Strengths:** Free, no-account ICP and competitor analysis in about 30 seconds; Combines lead sourcing, scoring, email and LinkedIn outreach, and follow-ups in one platform; Human approval step on every outgoing message keeps you in control; Weekly plan-and-review rhythm is lower-effort than building workflows by hand

**Limitations:** No public self-serve pricing page, so you must book a demo to get exact plan costs; Runs an ongoing weekly plan rather than fully hands-off one-off campaigns, so light review is still needed; Some advanced integrations (e.g. specific CRM syncs) are not documented in detail on the site; Best suited to B2B teams; consumer or very small sender volumes may not see as much value

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/starnus.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Glean and Starnus compare in monthly traffic?

Glean has 3,301,875 monthly visits, while Starnus has 2,601. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Glean has a month-over-month growth rate of +0.1%; Starnus has -36.6%.

### How does pricing compare?

Glean: Contact for Pricing. Contact for pricing. Glean is licensed to organisations based on seats, connectors, and deployment scope, and is evaluated through a demo rather than self-serve purchase. Starnus: Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing. Starnus offers a free analysis entry point — you can run the ICP and competitor analysis at no cost without creating an account. Beyond that it uses a paid model with a self-serve tier plus a managed service for teams that want Starnus to run more of the motion; exact prices are not published publicly and are shared through a demo or sales conversation.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Notion](https://openaitools.app/tool/t) | 173,441,670 | +0.1% | Freemium | The AI workspace where teams and agents get work done together | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/t.md) |
| 2 | [Instantly](https://openaitools.app/tool/instantly) | 2,336,279 | +6% | Paid, Contact for Pricing | Sales engagement platform with AI agents for lead finding, outreach and deliverability | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/instantly.md) |
| 3 | [Explee](https://openaitools.app/tool/explee) | 1,280,107 | +12.1% | — | Your 24/7 AI outreach agent that finds leads and books demos | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/explee.md) |
| 4 | [Dust](https://openaitools.app/tool/dust) | 547,217 | +1.8% | Contact for Pricing | Builds collaborative enterprise AI agents connected to company knowledge, but offers less robust out-of-the-box universal search. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/dust.md) |
| 5 | [Success.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/success-ai) | 547,073 | +6.3% | Freemium, Free Trial | AI sales platform for unlimited B2B leads and outreach | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/success-ai.md) |
| 6 | [Gumloop](https://openaitools.app/tool/gumloop) | 379,557 | -21.1% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Build, share, and control AI agents that actually do the work | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/gumloop.md) |
| 7 | [Copy.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/copy-ai) | 344,338 | -14.8% | Freemium, Paid | AI-native GTM platform for sales and marketing workflows | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/copy-ai.md) |
| 8 | [Salesforge](https://openaitools.app/tool/salesforge) | 236,658 | -9.9% | Free Trial, Paid | Unlimited LinkedIn and email outreach, powered by AI SDR agents | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/salesforge.md) |
| 9 | [Moveworks](https://openaitools.app/tool/moveworks) | 168,527 | -4.3% | Contact for Pricing | Automates employee IT and HR support requests exceptionally well, but focuses less on general universal document search. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/moveworks.md) |
| 10 | [Kore.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/kore-ai) | 143,328 | -18.2% | Contact for Pricing | Deploys enterprise conversational assistants and automated workflows, but lacks Glean's unified organization-wide knowledge graph search. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kore-ai.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/glean-vs-starnus

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)