# GPUPerHour vs Workable GPUPerHour records 28,718 monthly visits with +25.3% month-over-month growth and Free pricing. Workable records 10,780,627 monthly visits with +5.5% growth and Free Trial, Paid pricing. | Metric | [GPUPerHour](https://openaitools.app/tool/gpuperhour) | [Workable](https://openaitools.app/tool/workable) | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Website URL | https://gpuperhour.com | https://www.workable.com | | Categories | AI Developer Tools, AI Tools Directory | AI Recruiting, AI Agent, AI CRM | | Pricing Model | Free | Free Trial, Paid | | Monthly Visits | 28,718 | 10,780,627 | | MoM Growth Rate | +25.3% | +5.5% | | Primary Market | United States | United States | | Direct Visits | 11,398 | 5,309,440 | | Review Score | 4.4 | 4.4 | | Saved Count | 4 | 0 | | Supported Platforms | Website | Website | ## GPUPerHour GPUPerHour solves a narrow but expensive problem: cloud GPU pricing is scattered across dozens of provider dashboards, in different units and with different availability. The site periodically scrapes the public pricing and inventory endpoints of 31 cloud GPU providers, normalises each listing to a price per GPU per hour (dividing a multi-GPU instance price by its GPU count) and tags it with its pricing type and security tier. The current-price summary deliberately uses only secure on-demand offers observed within roughly 15 minutes of the last refresh, excluding spot, reserved and peer-to-peer marketplace listings because those prices are not directly comparable. The result is a single live table covering H100 SXM5 and PCIe, H200, B200, B300, A100 80GB and 40GB, L40S, RTX PRO 6000, RTX 5090, RTX 4090 and RTX A6000, alongside the provider, a 30-day historical catalog average and the number of providers with stock. A daily price index with CSV downloads lets you track how pricing moves over time, while buying guides and hardware explainers cover practical topics such as comparing like-for-like GPUs, choosing by VRAM for a workload, accounting for storage and egress, and renting by the hour. The site also points to a companion console, DeployGPU, for provisioning on supported providers from one place. The key caveat is stated openly on the page: offer counts describe configurations, not the number of physical GPUs bookable, and availability can change before you complete a booking. Prices are per GPU-hour but providers bill for the whole instance, and storage, network transfer and commitment terms affect the final bill. GPUPerHour is a research and comparison layer, not a hosting provider itself. **Pricing & Plans:** Free to use as a price-comparison and research resource; GPUPerHour does not sell GPU capacity itself. The prices shown are third-party provider rates for secure on-demand instances, per GPU-hour, and a companion service (DeployGPU) offers deployment on supported providers. - **31-provider live price table:** Every tracked offer is normalised to a price per GPU-hour and shown with its provider, pricing type and security tier. - **Cheapest-offer summary:** A market snapshot highlights the lowest current secure on-demand price for each popular GPU model, from H100 and H200 to RTX 4090. - **Daily price index and CSV:** Historical catalog averages and downloadable daily data let you see how pricing for a given GPU has moved over the last 30 days. - **Buying guides and explainers:** Practical articles cover comparing like-for-like GPUs, choosing by VRAM, estimating the full bill with storage and egress, and renting by the hour. - **DeployGPU console:** A linked console lets you deploy on supported providers from a single place once you have picked an offer. **Strengths:** Aggregates 31 providers into comparable per-GPU-hour prices; Clearly states its methodology and excludes non-comparable spot and P2P listings; Free to use, with daily historical data and CSV downloads; Buying guides cover the full bill, not just the headline rate **Limitations:** Only covers providers whose pricing and inventory endpoints are publicly scrapable; The current-price view deliberately excludes spot and reserved capacity, which are often cheaper; It is a comparison resource, so you still create accounts and provision instances with the provider itself [Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/gpuperhour.md) ## Workable Workable positions itself as agentic software for recruiting and HR. The centrepiece is a native AI recruiting agent that operates inside the applicant tracking system: it continuously sources passive candidates from a 400M+ profile pool, evaluates every inbound applicant against up to 14 job criteria, messages candidates to verify interest and fill gaps, and produces a scored shortlist where strong fits auto-advance and clear rejections are filtered out. Because the agent inherits the platform's permissions and security model, every action is logged, permissioned and reviewable. Underneath the agent sits a deep, conventional ATS. Teams manage requisitions and approvals, custom pipelines and profiles, interview kits, scorecards and assessments, self-service interview scheduling, and offer management with e-signatures and integrated background checks. One click publishes a job to 200+ boards across 100+ countries, and a drag-and-drop careers page builder plus LinkedIn Preferred and Indeed Platinum partnerships help with visibility. A searchable talent CRM keeps past applicants warm for future roles. After the hire, Workable keeps going as a full HR platform: automated onboarding portals, employee self-service, employee records and document management, time off and attendance, performance and engagement tools, and payroll reporting. It is also deliberately open — MCP-native with comprehensive coverage for Claude, ChatGPT or custom agents, a documented REST API with webhooks, 270+ integrations, custom reporting dashboards and a mobile-first experience. Pricing combines a free trial with paid plans tiered by company size and modules. **Pricing & Plans:** Free trial available with paid subscription plans; pricing scales by company size and selected modules, with demo and enterprise options. Check the official pricing page for current rates. - **AI candidate sourcing:** The agent continuously searches 400M+ profiles, identifies strong fits before they apply and sends each a personalised outreach message for every open role. - **Automated screening and engagement:** Every applicant is scored against up to 14 job criteria with visible reasoning, then messaged directly to confirm interest and close information gaps before reaching a recruiter. - **Complete ATS underneath:** Requisitions, pipelines, interview kits and scorecards, interview scheduling, offer letters with e-signatures and integrated background checks in one platform. - **Job ad syndication and careers pages:** Publish jobs to 200+ boards in 100+ countries and build branded career sites with a drag-and-drop editor, plus LinkedIn and Indeed Apply integration. - **HR platform after the hire:** Onboarding, employee self-service, time off and attendance, performance reviews and engagement tools sit on the same employee data created during hiring. - **Open platform and integrations:** MCP-native coverage plus a documented REST API with webhooks, 270+ integrations, custom reporting dashboards and a mobile-first employee and candidate experience. **Strengths:** Native AI agent does real sourcing, screening and candidate messaging, not just keyword ranking; Runs on top of a complete ATS rather than being a bolt-on tool with limited context; Hiring context carries through to onboarding and HR, so talent data compounds over time; Open and MCP-native: bring Claude, ChatGPT or your own agents while Workable stays the system of record **Limitations:** Pricing scales with headcount and module selection, so costs grow as you add HR features; Full value depends on adopting both the ATS and HR modules, which is a bigger rollout for small teams; Very feature-rich, so administrators need time to configure workflows, permissions and approvals; Partner job-board and integration advantages vary by region and plan tier [Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/workable.md) ## Frequently Asked Questions ### How do GPUPerHour and Workable compare in monthly traffic? GPUPerHour has 28,718 monthly visits, while Workable has 10,780,627. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality. ### How do their growth rates compare? GPUPerHour has a month-over-month growth rate of +25.3%; Workable has +5.5%. ### How does pricing compare? GPUPerHour: Free. Free to use as a price-comparison and research resource; GPUPerHour does not sell GPU capacity itself. The prices shown are third-party provider rates for secure on-demand instances, per GPU-hour, and a companion service (DeployGPU) offers deployment on supported providers. Workable: Free Trial, Paid. Free trial available with paid subscription plans; pricing scales by company size and selected modules, with demo and enterprise options. Check the official pricing page for current rates. ## Alternatives | # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | 1 | [Recruit CRM](https://openaitools.app/tool/recruit-crm) | 729,799 | -7.8% | Contact for Pricing | Unifies applicant tracking and client management with AI outreach, but is tailored more heavily for agency recruiters. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/recruit-crm.md) | | 2 | [Kula AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/kula-ai) | 492,326 | +4.2% | Paid, Contact for Pricing | Provides an AI-native ATS with automated sourcing and CRM, but has a steeper learning curve than Workable. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kula-ai.md) | | 3 | [Manatal](https://openaitools.app/tool/manatal) | 459,004 | -1% | Free Trial, Paid | Combines an applicant tracking system with powerful AI candidate matching, but offers less built-in employee onboarding. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/manatal.md) | | 4 | [Sense](https://openaitools.app/tool/sensehq-com) | 435,090 | -5.8% | Contact for Pricing | Automates candidate engagement and communication using AI agents, but focuses less on traditional ATS pipeline management. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/sensehq-com.md) | | 5 | [PyjamaHR](https://openaitools.app/tool/pyjamahr) | 325,592 | -15.3% | Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Delivers an accessible AI-powered applicant tracking system, but lacks some of Workable's advanced enterprise features. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/pyjamahr.md) | | 6 | [TalentRecruit](https://openaitools.app/tool/talentrecruit) | 319,337 | -12.1% | Contact for Pricing | Autonomous hiring powered by agentic AI | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/talentrecruit.md) | | 7 | [Juicebox (PeopleGPT)](https://openaitools.app/tool/juicebox-work) | 293,157 | -3.4% | Paid | Generates ranked candidate lists from natural language prompts, but lacks Workable's broad HR and onboarding suite. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/juicebox-work.md) | | 8 | [mcp.so](https://openaitools.app/tool/mcp-server) | 286,704 | -3% | Free | Discover and share Model Context Protocol servers for AI agents and coding tools | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/mcp-server.md) | | 9 | [Metaview](https://openaitools.app/tool/metaview) | 259,340 | +54.3% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Automates interview note-taking and candidate screening pipelines, but is not a full standalone recruiting ATS. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/metaview.md) | | 10 | [Stork](https://openaitools.app/tool/stork) | 201,544 | +2.3% | Free | AI 工具目录、深度评测与每日 AI 新闻 | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/stork.md) | --- Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/gpuperhour-vs-workable More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)