# Gumloop vs Miniloop

Gumloop records 379,557 monthly visits with -21.1% month-over-month growth and Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing pricing. Miniloop records 13,258 monthly visits with -16.9% growth and Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [Gumloop](https://openaitools.app/tool/gumloop) | [Miniloop](https://openaitools.app/tool/miniloop) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.gumloop.com | https://miniloop.ai |
| Categories | AI Workflow, No-Code&Low-Code, AI Agent, AI Web Scraping | AI Workflow, AI Productivity Tools, AI Developer Tools, AI SEO Tools |
| Pricing Model | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 379,557 | 13,258 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -21.1% | -16.9% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 125,579 | 5,342 |
| Review Score | 4.4 | 3.9 |
| Saved Count | 0 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Gumloop

Gumloop positions itself as "agent infrastructure" for teams that want AI to execute work rather than just answer questions. You describe a task in plain language, pick a model, attach the connectors your company already uses (Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Gmail, Gong, and hundreds more), and the agent runs it — on a schedule, on a trigger, or in a shared chat where colleagues can @mention it. Everything the agent can do is mirrored from what a human would do, including logging into sites with a saved credential, clicking through interfaces, uploading files, and pulling data back out.

A big part of the pitch is governance. Gumloop puts credentials in a vault agents can use without ever seeing, records every browser session step by step with passwords masked, and gives admins role-based access, audit logs, AI spend insights, and per-agent model controls. Multiple providers — Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, xAI and open models — are available side by side, so teams can route cheap work to cheap models and hard reasoning to frontier ones.

Pricing is usage-based with a credit system layered on top of a seat-free plan structure. The Pro tier starts at $37/month and bundles 20,000 credits, unlimited agents and unlimited seats, plus an orchestration fee on top of usage; Enterprise adds custom pricing, VPC options, SSO/SCIM, connector policies and dedicated support. There is a 14-day free trial to start.

**Pricing & Plans:** 14-day free trial; Pro starts at $37/month including 20,000 credits with unlimited agents and seats plus an orchestration fee on usage; Enterprise is custom-priced with contact sales.

- **No-code agent builder:** Describe the outcome you want and let teammates who understand the problem assemble the agent — no scripting or learning curve required.
- **400+ connectors and app triggers:** Wire agents into Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Gmail, Gong, NetSuite, Shopify and hundreds more tools, then fire them on schedules, webhooks or events.
- **Real browser with a credential vault:** Agents sign in with saved logins or 1Password, browse from trusted connections, clear CAPTCHAs, and hand the live session to a human when needed.
- **Any model, side by side:** Run 35+ models from Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, xAI and open-source providers, or bring your own API keys, with per-agent access control.
- **Enterprise governance by default:** Session recordings with masked passwords, audit logs, SCIM/SAML, role-based access, AI spend insights and custom data-retention rules.

**Strengths:** Genuinely no-code: non-engineers can ship working agents without touching Python or JSON; Very broad connector library plus a real browser, so agents can reach tools that have no API; Strong enterprise controls — credential vault, masked session recordings, audit logs, RBAC, SSO; Model-agnostic with BYO API keys, which helps control cost and avoid lock-in

**Limitations:** Credit-plus-orchestration-fee pricing can be hard to forecast at high volume; The platform is evolving fast from workflows toward agents, so some docs and legacy features may feel transitional; Unlimited seats means real cost scales with usage rather than headcount, which surprises some buyers; Advanced governance (VPC, policies, dedicated support) sits behind custom Enterprise pricing

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/gumloop.md)

## Miniloop

Miniloop targets growing teams that feel trapped by recurring per-seat CRM costs and feature bloat. The pitch is straightforward: a scoped, custom build powered by an experienced engineering team can now cost less than a multi-year Salesforce or HubSpot renewal, especially once you add mandatory modules, storage overages, premium support, and implementation partners. Instead of paying for seats, you pay an annual fee that covers the build, secure hosting, regular updates, and ongoing support.

The engagement runs in four stages. Miniloop first studies how your team actually uses its current CRM, mapping fields, pipelines, automations, and required integrations. Its engineers then build the database and interface, only including the reports and modules you use. Next comes full data migration, importing records, histories, and pipelines from your old system. Finally, Miniloop hosts and maintains the CRM either on managed servers or on your own infrastructure, staying on to handle changes and support.

Because you can run the system on your own infrastructure and there are no per-seat fees, the model suits companies with strict compliance or data-residency needs and teams that expect headcount growth without identical bill growth. Each engagement gets a fixed quote before development starts, and Miniloop notes the service is a done-for-you build rather than a self-serve SaaS product, so it is not aimed at teams unwilling to work with an engineering partner.

**Pricing & Plans:** Contact for a quote. Pricing is project-based with a fixed quote issued before development begins, plus an ongoing annual fee covering build, hosting, updates, and support. No per-seat licensing.

- **Custom CRM built to your workflow:** Your database, pipelines, reports, and integrations are designed around your actual process, with no unused modules or workarounds.
- **No per-seat licensing:** A single annual fee covers the software and support, so adding users does not multiply your bill the way seat-based CRMs do.
- **Full data migration:** Miniloop's team imports records, histories, and pipelines from Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Attio, and similar systems.
- **Hosting on your terms:** Run the CRM on Miniloop's managed servers or on your own infrastructure to meet compliance and data-policy requirements.
- **Ongoing support and changes:** The team stays engaged after launch to handle updates, new integrations, and evolving requirements instead of leaving you with a ticket queue.

**Strengths:** Typically cuts CRM spend by 5x to 10x versus per-seat subscriptions; Software matches your real workflow, so nobody works around the tool; Can be hosted on your own infrastructure for compliance; Full migration handled by the vendor, not left as self-service work

**Limitations:** Not self-serve: you must work with a team and a scoping process; Custom builds require a longer onboarding than signing up for SaaS; Ongoing annual fee replaces, rather than eliminates, a recurring cost

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/miniloop.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Gumloop and Miniloop compare in monthly traffic?

Gumloop has 379,557 monthly visits, while Miniloop has 13,258. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Gumloop has a month-over-month growth rate of -21.1%; Miniloop has -16.9%.

### How does pricing compare?

Gumloop: Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing. 14-day free trial; Pro starts at $37/month including 20,000 credits with unlimited agents and seats plus an orchestration fee on usage; Enterprise is custom-priced with contact sales. Miniloop: Contact for Pricing. Contact for a quote. Pricing is project-based with a fixed quote issued before development begins, plus an ongoing annual fee covering build, hosting, updates, and support. No per-seat licensing.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Manus](https://openaitools.app/tool/manus) | 19,195,779 | -1.7% | Free Trial | Executes autonomous multi-step web browser tasks, offering stronger general agentic execution than Gumloop's structured node pipelines. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/manus.md) |
| 2 | [Zapier](https://openaitools.app/tool/zapier-com) | 5,065,248 | +0.4% | Freemium, Free Trial, Paid | Connects thousands of popular apps with robust traditional automations, but offers less native AI agent flexibility than Gumloop. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/zapier-com.md) |
| 3 | [n8n](https://openaitools.app/tool/n8n) | 4,522,449 | -7.4% | Freemium | Provides powerful open-source node-based workflow automation, giving you more self-hosting control and flexibility than Gumloop. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/n8n.md) |
| 4 | [MindStudio](https://openaitools.app/tool/mindstudio) | 1,793,337 | +14.2% | Contact for Pricing | No-code builder for custom AI agents and workflows | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/mindstudio.md) |
| 5 | [Attio](https://openaitools.app/tool/attio) | 1,652,928 | -4.2% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | The AI-native CRM for agentic revenue teams | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/attio.md) |
| 6 | [Recruit CRM](https://openaitools.app/tool/recruit-crm) | 729,799 | -7.8% | Contact for Pricing | AI-powered ATS + CRM that runs the entire recruitment desk in one place | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/recruit-crm.md) |
| 7 | [CREAO](https://openaitools.app/tool/creao) | 619,749 | +39.2% | Freemium | Builds recurring automated business workflows connected to enterprise applications, mirroring Gumloop's integration focus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/creao.md) |
| 8 | [Taskade](https://openaitools.app/tool/taskade) | 539,714 | -9.4% | Freemium | Combines AI task management with workflow automation, offering a more collaborative workspace than Gumloop's data pipeline focus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/taskade.md) |
| 9 | [PhantomBuster](https://openaitools.app/tool/phantombuster) | 279,012 | -10.1% | Freemium, Free Trial, Paid | Focuses specifically on cloud web scraping and lead generation automation rather than general AI agent workflows. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/phantombuster.md) |
| 10 | [Tines](https://openaitools.app/tool/tines) | 273,260 | +24.4% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Delivers enterprise-grade security and governance for automated workflows, but requires more deliberate setup than Gumloop. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/tines.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/gumloop-vs-miniloop

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)