# Gumloop vs Rivet.dev

Gumloop records 379,557 monthly visits with -21.1% month-over-month growth and Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing pricing. Rivet.dev records 21,359 monthly visits with -44.3% growth and Freemium, Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [Gumloop](https://openaitools.app/tool/gumloop) | [Rivet.dev](https://openaitools.app/tool/rivet-dev) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.gumloop.com | https://rivet.dev |
| Categories | AI Workflow, No-Code&Low-Code, AI Agent, AI Web Scraping | AI Agent, AI Workflow, AI Developer Tools, AI App Builder |
| Pricing Model | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Freemium, Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 379,557 | 21,359 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -21.1% | -44.3% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 125,579 | 10,710 |
| Review Score | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| Saved Count | 0 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Gumloop

Gumloop positions itself as "agent infrastructure" for teams that want AI to execute work rather than just answer questions. You describe a task in plain language, pick a model, attach the connectors your company already uses (Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Gmail, Gong, and hundreds more), and the agent runs it — on a schedule, on a trigger, or in a shared chat where colleagues can @mention it. Everything the agent can do is mirrored from what a human would do, including logging into sites with a saved credential, clicking through interfaces, uploading files, and pulling data back out.

A big part of the pitch is governance. Gumloop puts credentials in a vault agents can use without ever seeing, records every browser session step by step with passwords masked, and gives admins role-based access, audit logs, AI spend insights, and per-agent model controls. Multiple providers — Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, xAI and open models — are available side by side, so teams can route cheap work to cheap models and hard reasoning to frontier ones.

Pricing is usage-based with a credit system layered on top of a seat-free plan structure. The Pro tier starts at $37/month and bundles 20,000 credits, unlimited agents and unlimited seats, plus an orchestration fee on top of usage; Enterprise adds custom pricing, VPC options, SSO/SCIM, connector policies and dedicated support. There is a 14-day free trial to start.

**Pricing & Plans:** 14-day free trial; Pro starts at $37/month including 20,000 credits with unlimited agents and seats plus an orchestration fee on usage; Enterprise is custom-priced with contact sales.

- **No-code agent builder:** Describe the outcome you want and let teammates who understand the problem assemble the agent — no scripting or learning curve required.
- **400+ connectors and app triggers:** Wire agents into Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Gmail, Gong, NetSuite, Shopify and hundreds more tools, then fire them on schedules, webhooks or events.
- **Real browser with a credential vault:** Agents sign in with saved logins or 1Password, browse from trusted connections, clear CAPTCHAs, and hand the live session to a human when needed.
- **Any model, side by side:** Run 35+ models from Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, xAI and open-source providers, or bring your own API keys, with per-agent access control.
- **Enterprise governance by default:** Session recordings with masked passwords, audit logs, SCIM/SAML, role-based access, AI spend insights and custom data-retention rules.

**Strengths:** Genuinely no-code: non-engineers can ship working agents without touching Python or JSON; Very broad connector library plus a real browser, so agents can reach tools that have no API; Strong enterprise controls — credential vault, masked session recordings, audit logs, RBAC, SSO; Model-agnostic with BYO API keys, which helps control cost and avoid lock-in

**Limitations:** Credit-plus-orchestration-fee pricing can be hard to forecast at high volume; The platform is evolving fast from workflows toward agents, so some docs and legacy features may feel transitional; Unlimited seats means real cost scales with usage rather than headcount, which surprises some buyers; Advanced governance (VPC, policies, dedicated support) sits behind custom Enterprise pricing

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/gumloop.md)

## Rivet.dev

At its core Rivet replaces the container per agent with an in-process primitive. An Actor runs inside your existing Node.js or Bun backend rather than in its own container or VM, which is why Rivet reports cold starts measured in single-digit milliseconds and a footprint of tens of kilobytes per Actor instead of hundreds of megabytes. Each Actor carries a SQLite database for memory, can access a filesystem and shell, sleeps when idle, and wakes with its durable state ready for the next request.

The platform handles the operational pieces teams usually build themselves: fault tolerance that reschedules Actors when a node goes down, multi-region placement that routes requests to wherever an Actor currently lives, end-to-end type safety where Actor definitions generate client types, and scheduling via cron or self-set timestamps. Storage is pulled apart into two tiers — a fast SSD for instant writes and object storage that settles writes at a fraction of the cost — so running many small databases stays affordable.

Rivet positions itself as infrastructure for the "agentic era" and can be deployed as a managed cloud, inside your own VPC through a bring-your-own-cloud model, or fully self-hosted down to air-gapped networks. It is open source under Apache 2.0, backed by Y Combinator and a16z Speedrun, and integrates with popular coding agents and frameworks.

**Pricing & Plans:** Rivet Cloud uses a plan-plus-nodes model. The control plane is Free ($0) for prototyping, Hobby at $10/month, Team at $120/month, and Enterprise at $900/month, each raising control-plane redundancy, Actor Node caps, and support. Actor Nodes are billed per month on top, from $4.20 (R-5) to $94.50 (R-160). Self-hosting is free and open source under Apache 2.0, and startups from Y Combinator or a16z Speedrun get 50% off the Team plan for 12 months.

- **Durable actors with persistent state:** Every Actor gets a SQLite database and a filesystem, so an agent's memory and progress survive restarts and idle periods without a separate database.
- **Lightweight secure sandboxing:** Run untrusted or AI-generated code on your own infrastructure with fine-grained control over network access, filesystem permissions, and resource limits.
- **Fault tolerance and workflows:** A node failure reschedules its Actors elsewhere with state intact, and multi-step work replays after a crash — with no checkpointing harness to build yourself.
- **Realtime and multiplayer:** Address an Actor directly over HTTP or hold a live WebSocket, and use the React SDK to subscribe components to an Actor's state in real time.
- **One-binary deployment and observability:** Ship with a single stateless Rust binary, embeds storage in S3-compatible buckets, and emits OpenTelemetry traces, metrics, and logs to your existing collector.

**Strengths:** Four-digit millisecond cold starts and a very small per-Actor memory footprint let a single server host far more agents; Open source (Apache 2.0) with a single Rust binary, so it can be self-hosted, run in a VPC, or air-gapped; Durable state via per-Actor SQLite plus object-storage-backed tiers keeps agents restart-safe and cheap; Strong developer ergonomics: typed SDKs, a React SDK, WebSocket networking, and OpenTelemetry baked in

**Limitations:** Requires Node.js or Bun and a working Rust-based control plane deployment for self-hosting, so it favors backend engineers over no-code users; Advanced durability and sandboxing concepts (Actors, WarpDrive storage) carry a learning curve; Managed cloud cost scales with Actor Nodes, which can climb for many mid-sized/sized nodes; Enterprise features like multi-tenancy and hardened compliance guidance sit behind sales conversations

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/rivet-dev.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Gumloop and Rivet.dev compare in monthly traffic?

Gumloop has 379,557 monthly visits, while Rivet.dev has 21,359. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Gumloop has a month-over-month growth rate of -21.1%; Rivet.dev has -44.3%.

### How does pricing compare?

Gumloop: Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing. 14-day free trial; Pro starts at $37/month including 20,000 credits with unlimited agents and seats plus an orchestration fee on usage; Enterprise is custom-priced with contact sales. Rivet.dev: Freemium, Contact for Pricing. Rivet Cloud uses a plan-plus-nodes model. The control plane is Free ($0) for prototyping, Hobby at $10/month, Team at $120/month, and Enterprise at $900/month, each raising control-plane redundancy, Actor Node caps, and support. Actor Nodes are billed per month on top, from $4.20 (R-5) to $94.50 (R-160). Self-hosting is free and open source under Apache 2.0, and startups from Y Combinator or a16z Speedrun get 50% off the Team plan for 12 months.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Manus](https://openaitools.app/tool/manus) | 19,195,779 | -1.7% | Free Trial | Executes autonomous multi-step web browser tasks, offering stronger general agentic execution than Gumloop's structured node pipelines. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/manus.md) |
| 2 | [Zapier](https://openaitools.app/tool/zapier-com) | 5,065,248 | +0.4% | Freemium, Free Trial, Paid | Connects thousands of popular apps with robust traditional automations, but offers less native AI agent flexibility than Gumloop. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/zapier-com.md) |
| 3 | [n8n](https://openaitools.app/tool/n8n) | 4,522,449 | -7.4% | Freemium | Provides powerful open-source node-based workflow automation, giving you more self-hosting control and flexibility than Gumloop. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/n8n.md) |
| 4 | [MindStudio](https://openaitools.app/tool/mindstudio) | 1,793,337 | +14.2% | Contact for Pricing | Provides a visual builder for custom AI agents and workflows, similar to Gumloop's automation capabilities. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/mindstudio.md) |
| 5 | [CREAO](https://openaitools.app/tool/creao) | 619,749 | +39.2% | Freemium | Builds recurring automated business workflows connected to enterprise applications, mirroring Gumloop's integration focus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/creao.md) |
| 6 | [Taskade](https://openaitools.app/tool/taskade) | 539,714 | -9.4% | Freemium | Combines AI task management with workflow automation, offering a more collaborative workspace than Gumloop's data pipeline focus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/taskade.md) |
| 7 | [Mastra](https://openaitools.app/tool/mastra) | 318,954 | -5% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | The TypeScript framework for building, deploying, and observing AI agents | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/mastra.md) |
| 8 | [PhantomBuster](https://openaitools.app/tool/phantombuster) | 279,012 | -10.1% | Freemium, Free Trial, Paid | Focuses specifically on cloud web scraping and lead generation automation rather than general AI agent workflows. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/phantombuster.md) |
| 9 | [Tines](https://openaitools.app/tool/tines) | 273,260 | +24.4% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Delivers enterprise-grade security and governance for automated workflows, but requires more deliberate setup than Gumloop. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/tines.md) |
| 10 | [Activepieces](https://openaitools.app/tool/activepieces) | 258,553 | +1.5% | Freemium | Offers an open-source automation builder with prebuilt connectors, providing a self-hostable alternative to Gumloop's cloud platform. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/activepieces.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/gumloop-vs-rivet-dev

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)