# Harvey vs QuickFiling

Harvey records 1,832,998 monthly visits with +26.1% month-over-month growth and Contact for Pricing pricing. QuickFiling records 11,413 monthly visits with +38.8% growth and Free to start, pay per package pricing.

| Metric | [Harvey](https://openaitools.app/tool/harvey-ai) | [QuickFiling](https://openaitools.app/tool/quickfiling) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://harvey.ai | https://quickfiling.us |
| Categories | AI Assistant, AI Legal Assistant, AI Research Tool, AI Agent | AI Legal Assistant, AI Assistant, AI Writing Assistants, AI Forms |
| Pricing Model | Contact for Pricing | Free to start, pay per package |
| Monthly Visits | 1,832,998 | 11,413 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +26.1% | +38.8% |
| Primary Market | United States | Global |
| Direct Visits | 1,276,669 | 2,488 |
| Review Score | 4.6 | 4.2 |
| Saved Count | 2 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Harvey

Harvey is an AI platform designed from the ground up for the practice of law rather than adapted from a general-purpose chatbot. Its core surfaces include Agents for orchestrating multi-step legal tasks, Vault for storing and analyzing large document sets, Knowledge for legal, regulatory, and tax research, Spaces for shared client and co-counsel workspaces, Command Center for adoption analytics, and Memory for retaining user preferences across sessions. Together these pieces aim to let a firm or legal department run matters, research, and review from one place instead of stitching together disconnected tools.

The product has moved toward an agentic model, where complex matters are decomposed and routed to specialized agents that produce drafts, chronologies, and fact patterns for lawyer review. Workflow coverage now spans contract review and negotiation, regulatory horizon scanning, legal intake, and litigation support such as facts and chronologies. Connectors and an MCP-based library let teams bring Harvey into the tools they already use.

Commercially, Harvey serves thousands of legal organizations and has raised significant venture funding, positioning it as one of the best-capitalized entrants in legal AI. Access is arranged through a demo and enterprise agreement, so exact seat and usage pricing is quoted per organization rather than published as a public list price. Security, ethical walls, and data governance are treated as first-class requirements given the sensitivity of the material involved.

**Pricing & Plans:** Enterprise pricing, quoted on request. Harvey does not publish public list prices; prospective customers typically request a demo and receive a custom proposal based on team size, modules, and usage.

- **Legal agents and orchestration:** Task-level agents handle research, drafting, and analysis and can route complex multi-step matters to the right specialist agent automatically.
- **Vault document analysis:** Centralize thousands of contracts and matter documents in one secure repository, then extract clauses, terms, and portfolio-wide insights with a single query.
- **Legal, regulatory, and tax research:** Knowledge supports jurisdiction-aware research grounded in authoritative legal sources, with citations back to the underlying material.
- **Spaces and ethical walls:** Shared workspaces let firms, clients, and co-counsel collaborate with the governance controls sensitive legal work requires.
- **Command Center analytics:** See which teams and practice groups use Harvey, on what work, and benchmark adoption against comparable organizations.

**Strengths:** Purpose-built for legal work instead of a general chatbot with a legal wrapper; One governed platform spanning research, documents, agents, and analytics; Strong security posture and ethical-wall support for confidential matters; Backed by substantial funding and a large enterprise customer base

**Limitations:** No published pricing, so evaluation requires a sales process; Best value at enterprise scale, which can leave smaller firms underserved; Module breadth means onboarding and change management are real projects

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/harvey-ai.md)

## QuickFiling

Immigration petitions and grad-school applications reward preparation quality more than raw qualifications. A National Interest Waiver that fails often does so because the evidence does not map cleanly onto the Dhanasar prongs or the record is disorganised, not because the applicant lacks merit. QuickFiling's premise is that much of this preparation work — criteria mapping, evidence sorting, drafting, form filling, typesetting — is structured enough to be handled by a specialised assistant, cutting the process from months to hours and the cost from typical attorney fees to a one-time download charge.

The product is organised around named AI specialists rather than a generic chatbot. Dr. NIW handles EB-2 National Interest Waiver petitions built on the published Dhanasar framework. Dr. EB1A covers all ten extraordinary ability criteria, Dr. EB1B addresses the outstanding professor or researcher category with its six criteria plus experience and job-offer requirements, Dr. I-485 assembles the adjustment of status package with I-765 and I-131, and Dr. EB-5 guides investors through lawful source-of-funds documentation. Each includes RFE response preparation, which matters because a Request for Evidence is where many self-prepared filings stall.

The workflow is deliberately transparent: the assistant tells you what to provide, you review and approve every section, and the final output is a LaTeX-typeset PDF containing petition letter, exhibits, and forms in the right order. QuickFiling states explicitly that it is a self-help document preparation service and not a law firm — the package is yours, but so is the decision about what to file. Applicants with unusual fact patterns should still weigh attorney review.

**Pricing & Plans:** Free to start, with a one-time fee charged only when you download the completed package. Listed prices range from $299 for I-485 to $749 for NIW and $949 for EB-1A and EB-1B, with EB-5 at $999. It is not a subscription.

- **Specialist per petition type:** Dr. NIW, Dr. EB1A, Dr. EB1B, Dr. I-485, and Dr. EB-5 each guide you through the specific statutory criteria and requirements for that petition category.
- **Evidence organisation and mining:** Import documents by URL or email, run citation analysis, and let the assistant tell you exactly what supporting material is still missing.
- **Section-by-section drafting:** Draft petition letters, sections, essays, and exhibits with section-by-section assistance — petitions, RFE responses, and admissions documents included.
- **Auto-filled forms and PDF editing:** AI fills the USCIS forms and an in-browser editor lets you highlight, cut pages, and annotate evidence PDFs, with full version history to revert any change.
- **LaTeX-assembled final package:** Everything is typeset in LaTeX and compiled into one professionally formatted, ready-to-submit PDF rather than a folder of loose files.

**Strengths:** Structured criteria mapping for NIW, EB-1A, EB-1B, I-485, and EB-5; Evidence import by URL or email plus citation analysis reduces manual sorting; Auto-filled USCIS forms and a built-in PDF editor remove extra tooling; LaTeX typesetting produces a professional, correctly ordered filing package

**Limitations:** It is a self-help document tool, not legal advice, so unusual cases may still need an attorney; Service currently concentrates on US immigration and admissions pathways; Fees apply at download even though the building process starts free; Output quality depends on how thoroughly you supply and organise your evidence

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/quickfiling.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Harvey and QuickFiling compare in monthly traffic?

Harvey has 1,832,998 monthly visits, while QuickFiling has 11,413. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Harvey has a month-over-month growth rate of +26.1%; QuickFiling has +38.8%.

### How does pricing compare?

Harvey: Contact for Pricing. Enterprise pricing, quoted on request. Harvey does not publish public list prices; prospective customers typically request a demo and receive a custom proposal based on team size, modules, and usage. QuickFiling: Free to start, pay per package. Free to start, with a one-time fee charged only when you download the completed package. Listed prices range from $299 for I-485 to $749 for NIW and $949 for EB-1A and EB-1B, with EB-5 at $999. It is not a subscription.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Thomson Reuters](https://openaitools.app/tool/thomson-reuters) | 17,919,413 | +5.5% | Contact for Pricing | Purpose-built AI and trusted content for legal, tax, risk and trade professionals | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/thomson-reuters.md) |
| 2 | [pdf.net](https://openaitools.app/tool/pdf-net) | 1,257,131 | -22.3% | Freemium, Free | All-in-one online PDF editor with AI helpers for reading, summarizing, and generating documents | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/pdf-net.md) |
| 3 | [Filevine (LOIS)](https://openaitools.app/tool/demandsai) | 1,132,201 | +16.2% | Contact for Pricing | Legal AI and case management that runs across every matter in your firm. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/demandsai.md) |
| 4 | [AI Lawyer](https://openaitools.app/tool/ai-lawyer) | 221,106 | +1.5% | Free Trial | Your personal AI legal assistant for research, drafting, and document review | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/ai-lawyer.md) |
| 5 | [vLex](https://openaitools.app/tool/vlex-com-mx) | 140,457 | +0.7% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | Legal AI that understands the law | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/vlex-com-mx.md) |
| 6 | [LinkSquares](https://openaitools.app/tool/linksquares-com) | 107,827 | +57.2% | Contact for Pricing | Strong enterprise contract lifecycle management and search, but less versatile for open-ended legal AI research. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/linksquares-com.md) |
| 7 | [DiliTrust](https://openaitools.app/tool/dilitrust) | 106,417 | -4.6% | Contact for Pricing | Unites board management and contract workflows securely, but offers less flexibility in custom AI legal agents. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/dilitrust.md) |
| 8 | [Spellbook](https://openaitools.app/tool/spellbook) | 65,733 | +26.1% | Free Trial | Directly integrates into Microsoft Word for fast redlining, but lacks Harvey's browser-based enterprise workspace environment. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/spellbook.md) |
| 9 | [Instafill.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/instafill) | 35,630 | -36.6% | Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | AI that fills your PDF and Word forms for you | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/instafill.md) |
| 10 | [Luminance](https://openaitools.app/tool/luminance-com) | 29,034 | -20% | Contact for Pricing | Excels at automated contract negotiation and review, but less tailored for bespoke general legal research. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/luminance-com.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/harvey-ai-vs-quickfiling

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)