# Hex vs Models.dev

Hex records 782,737 monthly visits with +10.8% month-over-month growth and Freemium, Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing, Free pricing. Models.dev records 200,451 monthly visits with -3.9% growth and Free pricing.

| Metric | [Hex](https://openaitools.app/tool/hex-tech) | [Models.dev](https://openaitools.app/tool/models-dev) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://hex.tech | https://models.dev |
| Categories | AI For Data Analytics, AI App Builder, AI Copilot, Large Language Models (LLMs) | AI Models, AI API, Open Source AI Models, AI Tools Directory |
| Pricing Model | Freemium, Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing, Free | Free |
| Monthly Visits | 782,737 | 200,451 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +10.8% | -3.9% |
| Primary Market | United States | China |
| Direct Visits | 621,753 | 136,316 |
| Review Score | 4.7 | 4.4 |
| Saved Count | 5 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Hex

Hex starts from a simple observation: dashboards tell you what happened, but they rarely answer the follow-up question. Its core is the Hex Agent, a conversational interface that plans a query, reasons over your organisation's context and returns an answer with the charts, tables and code that produced it. Because every answer is grounded in a semantic model and the underlying warehouse tables, users can inspect the SQL, check assumptions and trust the number before acting on it. The agent is reachable from the web workspace, from Slack, and from developer tools such as Claude and Codex via CLI and integrations.
Underneath the conversational layer sits a genuine notebook and app-building environment. Analysts write SQL, Python and R in the same project, chain cells into reproducible pipelines, and then turn selected cells into polished, parameterised data apps and dashboards that stakeholders can interact with. Hex 4.0 pushes this further with generative dashboards, AI app building and a Context Engine that keeps the company's definitions, metrics and semantics in one place. A Context Studio surfaces where the agent lacked grounding, and an Evals framework lets teams run graded test suites against the agent to measure accuracy over time.
That governance angle is what separates Hex from raw chat-with-your-data tools. Instead of an unsearchable answer in a side panel, you get a shareable, versionable artefact with lineage, plus a feedback loop that compounds context quality. It is used by data teams at a wide range of companies for self-serve exploration, executive reporting, embedded dashboards and operational analytics, with free, paid and enterprise tiers covering individuals through to regulated organisations needing SSO and advanced security.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium with a free tier to get started, paid plans for growing teams, and enterprise pricing (quoted on request) that adds governance, SSO and advanced security. A free trial is available for paid tiers.

- **Conversational Hex Agent:** Ask a question in plain language and get a reasoned answer with the SQL, charts and tables behind it, available in the Hex workspace, in Slack and from developer tools.
- **Notebooks and app builder:** Write SQL, Python and R side by side in one project, then turn cells into interactive, parameterised data apps and dashboards without a separate BI authoring tool.
- **Context Engine and Context Studio:** Centralise metrics, semantics and corporate definitions so answers stay consistent, and see exactly where the agent lacked grounding so you can fix it.
- **Evals for agent accuracy:** Run graded, rubric-based test suites against the agent to measure answer quality and catch regressions as your data and context evolve.
- **Generative dashboards and governance:** Produce dashboards from natural language, embed them where teams work, and manage access with enterprise-grade permissions and security.

**Strengths:** Unifies exploration, notebooks, dashboards and app building so teams stop paying for four overlapping tools; Answers are grounded in a semantic model and warehouse tables, and stay inspectable rather than opaque; Slack, CLI and developer-tool integrations meet users where they already work; Context Studio and Evals turn context quality into something measurable and improvable

**Limitations:** The full value depends on having a reasonably well-modelled warehouse, so it is heavier to adopt than a simple chat tool; The notebook-plus-agent surface is feature-rich enough to need onboarding for non-technical users; Governance and advanced security features are reserved for higher-priced and enterprise plans

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/hex-tech.md)

## Models.dev

Models.dev exists to answer a very practical developer question: which model should I use, and what will it cost? The site organises every entry under a canonical identifier in the form provider/model, so the same model served by several providers can be compared directly rather than guessed at. Columns cover context window, maximum output, whether input and output are supported, reasoning, tool calling, structured output, temperature control, open versus closed weights, price per million tokens, and release and update dates.

Because model releases move fast, the catalogue is built to stay current, with sortable and searchable tables that let you scan by lab or provider and filter down to what matters. Entries include both closed flagship models and open-weight alternatives, making it useful for cost planning as well as capability research.

The project is open source and free to use, and it is intended to be consumed programmatically. Developers can pull the catalogue into their own tooling through a JSON API or a type-safe SDK, which makes it a practical backend for dashboards, routing logic, or internal cost calculators rather than just a reference page to browse.

**Pricing & Plans:** Models.dev is free and open source. It is a reference database, so the prices it lists are the per-million-token rates charged by the model providers themselves, not a fee for using the site.

- **Canonical model identifiers:** Every model uses a consistent provider/model format so the same model across providers can be compared directly.
- **Specification comparison:** Side-by-side context window, output limit, reasoning, tool calling, structured output, and temperature support.
- **Pricing transparency:** Input and output prices per million tokens listed alongside release and update dates.
- **Open and closed models:** Covers closed flagship APIs and open-weight models from many labs in one sortable catalogue.
- **Developer access:** Consume the catalogue through a JSON API or a type-safe SDK for your own tools and dashboards.

**Strengths:** Free and open source with no account required; Consistent canonical identifiers make cross-provider comparison reliable; Covers pricing, limits, and capabilities in one sortable table; Available as a JSON API and type-safe SDK for programmatic use

**Limitations:** It is a reference catalogue, not an inference or hosting service; Data quality depends on community and maintainer updates keeping pace with releases; Interface is aimed at developers and offers little guidance for non-technical users

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/models-dev.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Hex and Models.dev compare in monthly traffic?

Hex has 782,737 monthly visits, while Models.dev has 200,451. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Hex has a month-over-month growth rate of +10.8%; Models.dev has -3.9%.

### How does pricing compare?

Hex: Freemium, Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing, Free. Freemium with a free tier to get started, paid plans for growing teams, and enterprise pricing (quoted on request) that adds governance, SSO and advanced security. A free trial is available for paid tiers. Models.dev: Free. Models.dev is free and open source. It is a reference database, so the prices it lists are the per-million-token rates charged by the model providers themselves, not a fee for using the site.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Julius AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/julius-ai) | 665,487 | +5% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | Faster for ad hoc statistical analysis and data visualization from natural language, but lacks Hex's robust notebook workflows. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/julius-ai.md) |
| 2 | [Stork](https://openaitools.app/tool/stork) | 201,544 | +2.3% | Free | Includes model pricing trackers and developer news alongside tools directories, but less focused on raw API specs. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/stork.md) |
| 3 | [Quadratic](https://openaitools.app/tool/quadratic-multiplayer) | 87,216 | -18.3% | Freemium | Offers a spreadsheet-based interface with live data and Python execution, but lacks Hex's structured data app builder. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/quadratic-multiplayer.md) |
| 4 | [Basedash](https://openaitools.app/tool/basedash-com) | 75,536 | +12.7% | Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Simpler plain-English querying and dashboard generation for databases, but lacks Hex's advanced polyglot notebook environment. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/basedash-com.md) |
| 5 | [InfraBase.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/infrabase-ai) | 39,072 | -13.6% | Free | Catalogues and compares AI infrastructure tools and services across categories, but lacks deep per-token pricing tables. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/infrabase-ai.md) |
| 6 | [Explo](https://openaitools.app/tool/explo) | 35,872 | -14% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Specializes in embedded white-label customer dashboards, but less suited for internal data team ad hoc analysis than Hex. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/explo.md) |
| 7 | [Wren AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/wren-ai-cloud) | 34,444 | -8.6% | Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing, Free | Focuses heavily on governed semantic layers and audited SQL generation, but lacks Hex's interactive data app builder. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/wren-ai-cloud.md) |
| 8 | [Athenic AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/athenic-ai) | 28,511 | +193.9% | Freemium | Stronger automated business reporting and governed chat analysis, but less flexible for custom Python coding than Hex. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/athenic-ai.md) |
| 9 | [Querio](https://openaitools.app/tool/querio-1-0) | 16,711 | -10.4% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Git-native analytics platform for collaborative data stacks, but requires more engineering setup than Hex's hosted environment. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/querio-1-0.md) |
| 10 | [Mito AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/mito-ai) | 13,542 | -20.4% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Open-source Jupyter spreadsheet extension for Python analysis, but lacks Hex's multi-user web app publishing features. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/mito-ai.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/hex-tech-vs-models-dev

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)