# Hoop vs Manus Hoop records 14,649 monthly visits with +31.9% month-over-month growth and Free Trial, Paid pricing. Manus records 19,195,779 monthly visits with -1.7% growth and Free Trial pricing. | Metric | [Hoop](https://openaitools.app/tool/hoop) | [Manus](https://openaitools.app/tool/manus) | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Website URL | https://www.hoop.app | https://manus.im | | Categories | AI Task Management, AI Assistant, AI Productivity Tools, AI Meeting Assistant | AI Assistant, AI Agent, AI Copilot | | Pricing Model | Free Trial, Paid | Free Trial | | Monthly Visits | 14,649 | 19,195,779 | | MoM Growth Rate | +31.9% | -1.7% | | Primary Market | United States | Brazil | | Direct Visits | 1,766 | 10,563,180 | | Review Score | 4.2 | 4.6 | | Saved Count | 0 | 10 | | Supported Platforms | Website | Website | ## Hoop The core problem Hoop targets is not a shortage of task managers but a shortage of capture. Commitments made in a Slack thread, promised in an email reply or agreed verbally in a meeting rarely make it into a to-do list at all, which is why follow-through fails. Hoop's approach is to watch the places where work is actually discussed, extract the commitments automatically, and keep each task linked to the conversation it came from so you can see why it exists. Because it is built by the team behind Trello and backed by Index Ventures, the product carries deliberate experience in how people organise lightweight work. Hoop describes itself as AI agents and tools that help individuals and teams focus, follow through and move work forward — positioning it as a companion layer over email, chat and meetings rather than another destination app you have to remember to open. Hoop is currently in a waitlist phase, so access is granted gradually and general pricing is not published. That makes it best suited to individuals and teams who already feel the pain of dropped commitments and are comfortable adopting an early product. **Pricing & Plans:** Free trial and paid tiers are listed for the product's commercial model; access is currently gated by a waitlist and public plan pricing is not published on the site. - **Automatic capture from work tools:** Extracts commitments from your email, Slack and meetings without you having to log them by hand. - **Context kept with every task:** Each commitment stays linked to the conversation or meeting it came from, so you know the background. - **Follow-through focus:** Designed around finishing what was promised rather than accumulating an unreadable backlog. - **For individuals and teams:** Works as a personal commitment tracker as well as a shared way of keeping team promises visible. - **Built by the Trello team:** Created by people with deep experience in lightweight, visual task organisation. **Strengths:** Attacks the real problem: capture, not just storage; Keeps original context attached so tasks make sense later; Built by an experienced team from the Trello lineage; Covers email, Slack and meetings rather than one channel **Limitations:** Currently gated behind a waitlist, so access is not immediate; Public pricing is not yet published; Value depends on connecting your work tools, which some teams restrict [Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/hoop.md) ## Manus Manus positions itself as an "action engine" rather than a chatbot. You describe an outcome, and the agent breaks it into steps, decides which tools to use, browses the web when it needs current information, and assembles the final deliverable in a cloud sandbox. Typical outputs include presentation decks, working websites and small games, generated images and video, and long-form research reports assembled through its Wide Research workflow. The product ships as a mobile app (iOS and Android), a desktop app, and a browser extension, plus a web console with an API for programmatic use. A Slack integration lets teams dispatch tasks from chat, and workspace features such as team plans and SSO make it viable inside organizations rather than only for individuals. Because the agent runs asynchronously, a common pattern is to queue a task, walk away, and review the result later. Pricing combines a free trial-style entry point with paid subscription tiers and a business plan; exact credit allowances and seats change over time, so confirm current terms on the official pricing page. The obvious trade-off is control: autonomous agents can misread intent or burn credits on the wrong approach, so clear briefs and intermediate review matter. **Pricing & Plans:** Free trial available, with paid subscription tiers and a business plan for teams and higher usage. Credit allowances and seat details change, so check the official pricing page. - **Autonomous task execution:** Give the agent a goal and it plans the steps, chooses tools, and works through the task in a cloud environment without constant supervision. - **Deliverable generation:** Produces finished artifacts such as slide decks, functional websites, small games, and formatted documents rather than raw text. - **Wide Research:** Runs broad, multi-source investigations and compiles the findings into a structured report. - **Media creation:** Generates images, video, and music as part of a larger task or as standalone outputs. - **Integrations and API:** Connects to Slack for task dispatch, offers mobile and desktop apps, and exposes an API for embedding agent work in your own stack. **Strengths:** Delivers finished artifacts instead of only conversational answers; Works across web, mobile, desktop, Slack, and API surfaces; Wide Research handles broad multi-source investigations well; Team plans and SSO make it usable in organizational settings **Limitations:** Autonomous runs consume credits and can pursue the wrong approach if the brief is vague; Complex tasks benefit from human review at checkpoints; Output quality varies by task type, especially outside common formats [Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/manus.md) ## Frequently Asked Questions ### How do Hoop and Manus compare in monthly traffic? Hoop has 14,649 monthly visits, while Manus has 19,195,779. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality. ### How do their growth rates compare? Hoop has a month-over-month growth rate of +31.9%; Manus has -1.7%. ### How does pricing compare? Hoop: Free Trial, Paid. Free trial and paid tiers are listed for the product's commercial model; access is currently gated by a waitlist and public plan pricing is not published on the site. Manus: Free Trial. Free trial available, with paid subscription tiers and a business plan for teams and higher usage. Credit allowances and seat details change, so check the official pricing page. ## Alternatives | # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | 1 | [ChatGPT](https://openaitools.app/tool/chatgpt-4) | 6,048,022,723 | +2.2% | Freemium | Provides powerful reasoning agents and deep research, but lacks Manus's specialized continuous cloud workspace execution. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/chatgpt-4.md) | | 2 | [Claude](https://openaitools.app/tool/claude-2) | 1,253,439,413 | +23.8% | Freemium | Features advanced computer use and interactive artifacts, but operates primarily as a chat assistant rather than a dedicated autonomous agent platform. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/claude-2.md) | | 3 | [Muse](https://openaitools.app/tool/muse-ai-1) | 45,751,822 | +228.3% | Contact for Pricing | Executes tasks using cloud virtual Linux machines, but focuses more on personal desktop automation than complex multi-app research. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/muse-ai-1.md) | | 4 | [Otter AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/otter-ai) | 7,360,981 | +9.6% | Freemium | AI meeting agent that transcribes, summarises, and turns every conversation into searchable knowledge | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/otter-ai.md) | | 5 | [Fathom](https://openaitools.app/tool/fathom-2-0) | 5,620,385 | +0.2% | Freemium, Free Trial | AI notetaker that records, transcribes and summarizes meetings — bot-free | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/fathom-2-0.md) | | 6 | [Fireflies.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/fireflies-ai) | 4,411,502 | +3% | Freemium | AI teammate that records, transcribes and summarizes every meeting | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/fireflies-ai.md) | | 7 | [Hermes-Agent](https://openaitools.app/tool/hermes-agent-1) | 3,638,741 | -5.4% | Freemium | Provides open-source personal task automation, but lacks the polished cloud sandbox environment of Manus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/hermes-agent-1.md) | | 8 | [Runable](https://openaitools.app/tool/runable) | 1,048,370 | -1.9% | Freemium | Automates multi-step workflows and asset creation, but with fewer built-in general browser navigation tools. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/runable.md) | | 9 | [Skywork.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/skywork-ai) | 1,021,069 | -11.8% | Freemium | Converts prompts into structured office deliverables, but acts primarily as a document generation workspace. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/skywork-ai.md) | | 10 | [Jump](https://openaitools.app/tool/jump-ai) | 553,230 | +33.1% | Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Compliant AI assistant for financial advisors | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/jump-ai.md) | --- Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/hoop-vs-manus More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)