How do their growth rates compare?

ILoveMyQA has a month-over-month growth rate of -100%; Skillry has +1,762.1%.

How does pricing compare?

ILoveMyQA: Contact for Pricing. Pricing is not published on the site — it is a contact-for-pricing consulting engagement. The company describes its rates as competitive and month-to-month with no long-term contract, and notes discount arrangements for charities and educational associations plus a referral commission. Skillry: Freemium. Free Skills are available with a sign-in. Pro is $9.99/month (regularly $19.90) or $79/year (regularly $158), and a Founding Lifetime plan costs $169 one-time. All paid plans include Premium Skills, MCP/CLI/web install and ongoing updates; model and rendering costs are extra.

What are alternatives to ILoveMyQA and Skillry?

Other tools in related categories include Code Arena, clickworker, MotionSites, Impeccable, SkillsMP — Agent Skills Marketplace.

ILoveMyQA vs Skillry — Traffic (0 vs 535.82K), Pricing & Verdict

Open AI Tools

ILoveMyQA vs Skillry — Traffic (0 vs 535.82K), Pricing & Verdict | Open AI Tools

Side-by-Side Traffic & Specification Matrix

Dimension / Metric	ILoveMyQA	Skillry
Official Domain	ilovemyqa.com	skillry.dev
Pricing Model	Contact for Pricing	Freemium
Monthly Visits	0 (0)	535.82K (535,817)
MoM Traffic Delta	-28 (-100%)	+507.04K (+1,762.1%)
Primary Market & Share	🌐 Global (—)	🇺🇸 United States (17%)
Direct Visits / mo	0	242.88K
User Rating	4.2	4.5
Supported Platforms	Website	Website

ILoveMyQA

AI-assisted QA testing services for teams that can't afford a full QA hire

Real-device testing, no shortcuts

Tests run on actual hardware across modern desktop browsers, Windows and macOS versions, and a long list of iOS and Android phones and tablets including iPhone, iPad, Samsung Galaxy, Pixel and OnePlus models.

AI-assisted bug discovery

Existing data sets and AI analysis are used to point testers toward likely bottlenecks and problem areas instead of relying purely on manual exploration.

Business-readable bug reports

Reports arrive in clear English with bullet points and reproducible steps, prioritising critical issues over a flood of minor annoyances.

Flexible month-to-month engagement

No long contracts; scope can be dialled up or down as your development cycle changes, with onboarding that can start work within roughly 24 hours.

Strengths & Pros

+Documented bug reports written in plain, business-readable English with reproduction steps
+Testing on genuine devices rather than emulators, across desktop, iOS and Android
+No long contracts and flexible scope so testing matches your release cycle
+