# InVideo vs Matterbase

InVideo records 6,893,591 monthly visits with +4.6% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Matterbase records 4,450 monthly visits with -3.4% growth and Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [InVideo](https://openaitools.app/tool/invideo) | [Matterbase](https://openaitools.app/tool/matterbase) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://invideo.io | https://www.matterbase.com |
| Categories | AI Video Editor, AI Video Generator, Text to Video, AI Text-to-Speech | AI Interior Design, AI Design Assistant, AI Search Engine, AI Agent |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 6,893,591 | 4,450 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +4.6% | -3.4% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 2,342,046 | 1,748 |
| Review Score | 4.2 | 4.2 |
| Saved Count | 92 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## InVideo

InVideo pairs a full multitrack timeline editor with a set of AI agents that behave like an editing crew. Its editing agent watches and remembers every clip in a project, so you can locate any moment by describing it rather than scrubbing through hours of footage. Give a direction once and the agent can apply it across dozens of shots at once — from cutting pauses to matching a look across the timeline. Beyond the agent, Invideo leans on a familiar "Premiere-style" timeline where you can still step in and make frame-level decisions yourself.

What has made Invideo notable is its shift from a template-first tool into an agentic editor. The platform now advertises Agent Two as "the agentic video editor for serious creatives," with script writing, storyboarding, and custom role-based agents such as cinematographer, music designer, and sound designer. Multiplayer mode with live cursors lets producers, editors, and writers collaborate in real time on the same project.

The product also exposes an extensive library of AI generation tools and third-party models. Depending on plan, users get access to video models such as Google Veo, Kling, Wan, Pixverse, Hailuo, and Seedance, and image models like Nano Banana Pro, Ideogram, Seedream, and Flux Kontext, alongside voice generation, text to speech, music generation, and voice cloning. Invideo also lets you connect external agents such as Claude Cowork, ChatGPT Codex, and Gemini to operate on your timeline, and it markets itself to teams, advertisers, microdrama producers, and social media creators with SOC 2 and GDPR compliance claims.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium with a free tier and paid per-seat subscriptions. As listed on the site: Starter from about $10 per seat/month billed annually (400 credits/mo), Plus about $30 per seat/month (2,000 credits/mo), and Max about $75 per seat/month (5,000 credits/mo), each roughly 50% off versus monthly billing. Credits are consumed by AI generations, and enterprise plans are available.

- **Agent Two editing agent:** An agentic editing experience that indexes your footage and applies one direction across many clips, from trimming pauses to matching color, on a real multitrack timeline.
- **Full timeline editor with AI:** A professional-grade multitrack editor where AI handles the heavy lifting but you can always step in and adjust any cut, grade, or mix yourself.
- **Multi-model video, image, and audio generation:** Access to models such as Veo, Kling, Seedance, Nano Banana Pro, Ideogram, and Flux, plus AI voice generation, text to speech, music generation, and voice cloning.
- **Scripting and storyboarding:** Turn an idea or script into a shot-by-shot plan inside the app, and use an AI co-writer to help shape the script before generating.
- **Bring-your-own agent and real-time collaboration:** Connect agents like Claude Cowork, ChatGPT Codex, or Gemini to operate on your timeline, and collaborate with teammates via multiplayer mode with live cursors.

**Strengths:** Agentic editing lets you describe an edit in plain language instead of hand-editing clip by clip; A genuine multitrack timeline means AI assistance never locks you out of manual control; Broad model access (Veo, Kling, Seedance, Nano Banana and more) plus audio and voice tools in one place; Multiplayer collaboration with live cursors suits creative teams and agencies

**Limitations:** Credit-based system means heavy AI generation can consume allowances quickly; The most advanced models and Seedance access are gated to higher tiers; The breadth of agents and models can be overwhelming for first-time users

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/invideo.md)

## Matterbase

Matterbase starts from search rather than a product grid. You type something like "living room with oak floors" and the platform surfaces real interiors plus the individual products credited in those photos — sofas, tiles, lighting, hardware — with attribution to the designer and photographer who created the image. Products link back to the brands and suppliers that make them, which is what makes the results specifiable rather than just inspirational.

From there the workflow stays inside one tool. You drag products and materials into a material board, share it with a team or client for comments, and convert the board into a schedule that can be priced. Markup and rendering tools let you lasso an area of a rendering and change finishes, or shift the light from day to night. Studio libraries keep a shared product catalogue, supplier contacts, and permissions across a practice, and a clipper extension lets you pull products in from any brand's website.

Matterbase also exposes its catalogue to AI agents over MCP, so an external assistant can search products and Spaces on your behalf. Plans combine a free entry tier with credit-based usage and studio plans quoted through a demo. It is aimed at interior designers, architects, and design-led studios rather than consumers decorating a single room.

**Pricing & Plans:** A free tier to get started, credit-based plans that cover heavier search and board usage, and studio or team plans arranged through a demo. Exact figures are not stated here, so check the pricing page before committing.

- **Plain-language search over real projects:** Search by room type, colour, or a natural-language prompt to find interiors and the individual products credited inside them, with photographer and designer attribution.
- **Material boards:** Drag-and-drop boards for products, finishes, and materials that you can share with clients and teammates for comments and approval.
- **FF&E schedules:** Turn a board into a real-time schedule your studio can price, with product data carried over instead of retyped into spreadsheets.
- **Rendering edits:** Lasso or pin a region of a rendering to swap finishes and adjust lighting, from day to night, without leaving the platform.
- **Supplier connections and MCP access:** Request samples and quotes from the brands behind each product, and connect your own AI agent to search the catalogue over MCP.

**Strengths:** Search returns specifiable products with credits back to designer and photographer; Boards and schedules are connected, so approved selections flow straight into documentation; Studio libraries and permissions make it usable across a whole practice, not just one person; MCP support lets external AI agents search the catalogue directly

**Limitations:** Credit-based pricing can be hard to forecast for heavy search users; Studio-level pricing requires a demo conversation; Strongest for interiors and FF&E work, so it offers less for unrelated design disciplines

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/matterbase.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do InVideo and Matterbase compare in monthly traffic?

InVideo has 6,893,591 monthly visits, while Matterbase has 4,450. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

InVideo has a month-over-month growth rate of +4.6%; Matterbase has -3.4%.

### How does pricing compare?

InVideo: Freemium. Freemium with a free tier and paid per-seat subscriptions. As listed on the site: Starter from about $10 per seat/month billed annually (400 credits/mo), Plus about $30 per seat/month (2,000 credits/mo), and Max about $75 per seat/month (5,000 credits/mo), each roughly 50% off versus monthly billing. Credits are consumed by AI generations, and enterprise plans are available. Matterbase: Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing. A free tier to get started, credit-based plans that cover heavier search and board usage, and studio or team plans arranged through a demo. Exact figures are not stated here, so check the pricing page before committing.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [CapCut](https://openaitools.app/tool/capcut-com) | 54,700,686 | +13.2% | Freemium | Provides robust timeline editing and AI tools, but focuses more on social media content than automated script generation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/capcut-com.md) |
| 2 | [ElevenLabs](https://openaitools.app/tool/elevenlabs-io) | 42,396,771 | +26.1% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | AI audio platform for speech, agents, music and dubbing | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/elevenlabs-io.md) |
| 3 | [VEED.IO](https://openaitools.app/tool/veed-io) | 8,011,728 | +1.8% | Freemium, Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Offers seamless browser-based video editing and AI subtitle generation, though less focused on automated text-to-video scripting. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/veed-io.md) |
| 4 | [Runway](https://openaitools.app/tool/runwayml) | 7,498,396 | +16.9% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Excels in cinematic generative AI video models, but provides less traditional timeline editing for standard marketing videos. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/runwayml.md) |
| 5 | [Kapwing](https://openaitools.app/tool/kapwing-com) | 4,265,531 | -3.8% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Strong collaborative workspace with automated subtitles and AI tools, but lacks InVideo's deep multi-track script-to-video engine. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kapwing-com.md) |
| 6 | [Descript](https://openaitools.app/tool/descript) | 3,267,817 | +11.1% | Freemium, Paid | Pioneers text-based video and audio editing via transcripts, but is less suited for automated prompt-driven promotional video creation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/descript.md) |
| 7 | [Renderforest](https://openaitools.app/tool/renderforest) | 2,608,672 | +1.5% | Freemium | AI creative suite for videos, logos, images and websites | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/renderforest.md) |
| 8 | [Synthesia](https://openaitools.app/tool/synthesia) | 1,804,463 | +7.5% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Focuses heavily on professional AI avatar presentation videos, lacking InVideo's broad stock media library and script-to-video templates. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/synthesia.md) |
| 9 | [TopView.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/topview-ai) | 1,653,060 | -10.2% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Specializes in AI-driven marketing video creation and automated ad scripts, but has a narrower general video editing scope. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/topview-ai.md) |
| 10 | [FlexClip](https://openaitools.app/tool/flexclip) | 1,461,311 | -4.3% | Freemium, Free Trial | Delivers extensive template-driven video creation online, but features fewer advanced generative AI video agents than InVideo. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/flexclip.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/invideo-vs-matterbase

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)