# InVideo vs ShareID

InVideo records 6,893,591 monthly visits with +4.6% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. ShareID records 3,618 monthly visits with +200.5% growth and Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [InVideo](https://openaitools.app/tool/invideo) | [ShareID](https://openaitools.app/tool/shareid) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://invideo.io | https://shareid.ai |
| Categories | AI Video Editor, AI Video Generator, Text to Video, AI Text-to-Speech | AI Face Recognition, AI Detector, AI Image Recognition |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 6,893,591 | 3,618 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +4.6% | +200.5% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 2,342,046 | 1,440 |
| Review Score | 4.2 | 4.1 |
| Saved Count | 92 | 2 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## InVideo

InVideo pairs a full multitrack timeline editor with a set of AI agents that behave like an editing crew. Its editing agent watches and remembers every clip in a project, so you can locate any moment by describing it rather than scrubbing through hours of footage. Give a direction once and the agent can apply it across dozens of shots at once — from cutting pauses to matching a look across the timeline. Beyond the agent, Invideo leans on a familiar "Premiere-style" timeline where you can still step in and make frame-level decisions yourself.

What has made Invideo notable is its shift from a template-first tool into an agentic editor. The platform now advertises Agent Two as "the agentic video editor for serious creatives," with script writing, storyboarding, and custom role-based agents such as cinematographer, music designer, and sound designer. Multiplayer mode with live cursors lets producers, editors, and writers collaborate in real time on the same project.

The product also exposes an extensive library of AI generation tools and third-party models. Depending on plan, users get access to video models such as Google Veo, Kling, Wan, Pixverse, Hailuo, and Seedance, and image models like Nano Banana Pro, Ideogram, Seedream, and Flux Kontext, alongside voice generation, text to speech, music generation, and voice cloning. Invideo also lets you connect external agents such as Claude Cowork, ChatGPT Codex, and Gemini to operate on your timeline, and it markets itself to teams, advertisers, microdrama producers, and social media creators with SOC 2 and GDPR compliance claims.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium with a free tier and paid per-seat subscriptions. As listed on the site: Starter from about $10 per seat/month billed annually (400 credits/mo), Plus about $30 per seat/month (2,000 credits/mo), and Max about $75 per seat/month (5,000 credits/mo), each roughly 50% off versus monthly billing. Credits are consumed by AI generations, and enterprise plans are available.

- **Agent Two editing agent:** An agentic editing experience that indexes your footage and applies one direction across many clips, from trimming pauses to matching color, on a real multitrack timeline.
- **Full timeline editor with AI:** A professional-grade multitrack editor where AI handles the heavy lifting but you can always step in and adjust any cut, grade, or mix yourself.
- **Multi-model video, image, and audio generation:** Access to models such as Veo, Kling, Seedance, Nano Banana Pro, Ideogram, and Flux, plus AI voice generation, text to speech, music generation, and voice cloning.
- **Scripting and storyboarding:** Turn an idea or script into a shot-by-shot plan inside the app, and use an AI co-writer to help shape the script before generating.
- **Bring-your-own agent and real-time collaboration:** Connect agents like Claude Cowork, ChatGPT Codex, or Gemini to operate on your timeline, and collaborate with teammates via multiplayer mode with live cursors.

**Strengths:** Agentic editing lets you describe an edit in plain language instead of hand-editing clip by clip; A genuine multitrack timeline means AI assistance never locks you out of manual control; Broad model access (Veo, Kling, Seedance, Nano Banana and more) plus audio and voice tools in one place; Multiplayer collaboration with live cursors suits creative teams and agencies

**Limitations:** Credit-based system means heavy AI generation can consume allowances quickly; The most advanced models and Seedance access are gated to higher tiers; The breadth of agents and models can be overwhelming for first-time users

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/invideo.md)

## ShareID

ShareID positions itself as an identity hub rather than a single verification widget. Its modules cover document authenticity checks performed by photo, video or NFC, active and passive liveness detection aligned with the low, substantial and high eIDAS 2.0 assurance levels, and the issuance and verification of EUDI Wallet attestations such as PID, EAA and QEAA. A fourth module, described as MFA 3.0, lets users authenticate to services with their EUDI Wallet instead of a password, reusing an identity verification already performed.

What makes the platform distinctive is the assembly model. You pick the journeys you need, stack optional behaviours such as reusable versus single-use identity, assisted or unattended flows and intelligent fallback, then deploy through customisable SDKs for web and native apps. Everything runs behind a management console where teams review each request, override automated rejections when the model got it wrong, and track volumes, success rates and fraud typologies. Results are retained only for the authorised retention window.

Compliance is treated as a first-class feature: the platform states that all eIDAS 2.0 assurance levels are supported by design, and that it helps with GDPR and related requirements. It is available as SaaS, on-premise or on SecNumCloud. ShareID reports 92% first-attempt enrollment success and 99.9% document authentication accuracy, and states that 0% of personal or biometric data is stored. The company also works with the French Gendarmerie Nationale on document fraud detection.

**Pricing & Plans:** Not published; ShareID uses contact-for-pricing sales with a free trial available. Deployment can be SaaS, on-premise or on SecNumCloud, which typically implies volume- and scope-based quoting.

- **Document identity verification:** Verify ID document authenticity by photo, video or NFC at low, substantial or high eIDAS 2.0 assurance levels.
- **Active and passive liveness detection:** Detect spoofing attempts with liveness checks that adapt to your required assurance level and follow ETSI TS 119 461 alignment.
- **EUDI Wallet attestations:** Enroll users with their PID attestations and issue or verify EAA and QEAA attestations in line with EUDI Wallet specifications.
- **Passwordless strong authentication:** Let users sign in with their real, already-verified identity through EUDI Wallet authentication rather than a password.
- **Management console and analytics:** Review every verification request, override automated decisions, and monitor volumes, success rates and fraud typologies in one place.

**Strengths:** covers all eIDAS 2.0 assurance levels by design; States that no personal or biometric data is stored; Modular: pick only the verification blocks you need; Flexible deployment, including on-premise and SecNumCloud

**Limitations:** No public pricing; you must contact sales to get a quote; Feature depth aimed at regulated enterprises, which may be heavy for small teams; EU-centric design assumes users hold an EUDI Wallet or EU-recognised documents

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/shareid.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do InVideo and ShareID compare in monthly traffic?

InVideo has 6,893,591 monthly visits, while ShareID has 3,618. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

InVideo has a month-over-month growth rate of +4.6%; ShareID has +200.5%.

### How does pricing compare?

InVideo: Freemium. Freemium with a free tier and paid per-seat subscriptions. As listed on the site: Starter from about $10 per seat/month billed annually (400 credits/mo), Plus about $30 per seat/month (2,000 credits/mo), and Max about $75 per seat/month (5,000 credits/mo), each roughly 50% off versus monthly billing. Credits are consumed by AI generations, and enterprise plans are available. ShareID: Contact for Pricing. Not published; ShareID uses contact-for-pricing sales with a free trial available. Deployment can be SaaS, on-premise or on SecNumCloud, which typically implies volume- and scope-based quoting.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [CapCut](https://openaitools.app/tool/capcut-com) | 54,700,686 | +13.2% | Freemium | Provides robust timeline editing and AI tools, but focuses more on social media content than automated script generation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/capcut-com.md) |
| 2 | [ElevenLabs](https://openaitools.app/tool/elevenlabs-io) | 42,396,771 | +26.1% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | AI audio platform for speech, agents, music and dubbing | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/elevenlabs-io.md) |
| 3 | [VEED.IO](https://openaitools.app/tool/veed-io) | 8,011,728 | +1.8% | Freemium, Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Offers seamless browser-based video editing and AI subtitle generation, though less focused on automated text-to-video scripting. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/veed-io.md) |
| 4 | [Runway](https://openaitools.app/tool/runwayml) | 7,498,396 | +16.9% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Excels in cinematic generative AI video models, but provides less traditional timeline editing for standard marketing videos. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/runwayml.md) |
| 5 | [Kapwing](https://openaitools.app/tool/kapwing-com) | 4,265,531 | -3.8% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Strong collaborative workspace with automated subtitles and AI tools, but lacks InVideo's deep multi-track script-to-video engine. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kapwing-com.md) |
| 6 | [Descript](https://openaitools.app/tool/descript) | 3,267,817 | +11.1% | Freemium, Paid | Pioneers text-based video and audio editing via transcripts, but is less suited for automated prompt-driven promotional video creation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/descript.md) |
| 7 | [Undetectable AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/undetectable-ai) | 3,113,403 | +17.5% | Freemium | Detect, humanize and verify AI content in one place | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/undetectable-ai.md) |
| 8 | [Renderforest](https://openaitools.app/tool/renderforest) | 2,608,672 | +1.5% | Freemium | AI creative suite for videos, logos, images and websites | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/renderforest.md) |
| 9 | [Synthesia](https://openaitools.app/tool/synthesia) | 1,804,463 | +7.5% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Focuses heavily on professional AI avatar presentation videos, lacking InVideo's broad stock media library and script-to-video templates. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/synthesia.md) |
| 10 | [TopView.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/topview-ai) | 1,653,060 | -10.2% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Specializes in AI-driven marketing video creation and automated ad scripts, but has a narrower general video editing scope. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/topview-ai.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/invideo-vs-shareid

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)