# Katalon vs Models.dev

Katalon records 158,090 monthly visits with -29.6% month-over-month growth and Freemium, Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing pricing. Models.dev records 200,451 monthly visits with -3.9% growth and Free pricing.

| Metric | [Katalon](https://openaitools.app/tool/katalon-studio) | [Models.dev](https://openaitools.app/tool/models-dev) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.katalon.com | https://models.dev |
| Categories | AI Testing, No-Code&Low-Code, AI Code Generator, AI Developer Tools | AI Models, AI API, Open Source AI Models, AI Tools Directory |
| Pricing Model | Freemium, Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Free |
| Monthly Visits | 158,090 | 200,451 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -29.6% | -3.9% |
| Primary Market | Vietnam | China |
| Direct Visits | 87,966 | 136,316 |
| Review Score | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Saved Count | 0 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Katalon

Katalon bundles four connected products under one umbrella it calls Katalon True: Katalon Studio for authoring tests, TestOps for test management and manual testing, TestCloud for running suites on real browsers and devices, and TrueTest for observing real user behaviour in production and spotting coverage gaps. Because authoring, tracking and execution live in the same system of record, requirements, test cases, evidence, defects and release health can be traced in one auditable place rather than across spreadsheets and disconnected tools.

The platform is explicitly built to support a mixed-skill team. Testers who prefer visual tooling can author tests with record-and-playback or keyword-driven steps, developers can drop into scripted full-code mode, and AI agents cover the middle ground by drafting test cases from a requirement, a Jira ticket or a natural-language prompt. Self-healing retries alternative locators when the UI changes, and failure analysis explains root causes in plain language so a broken run can be repaired and reviewed rather than quietly re-recorded.

Katalon also leans into interoperability. It supports Playwright scripts alongside native Katalon tests and consolidates the results in TestOps, exposes an MCP server so external coding agents such as Copilot, Cursor or Claude can drive test runs, and lets organisations bring their own AI provider (OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, Google Gemini or AWS Bedrock) instead of being locked to a single model vendor.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium with a free tier for local authoring and execution, plus a 30-day free trial of paid features. Professional is roughly $1,800 per seat per year (around $150 per seat per month) with AI agents, MCP server access, desktop testing, parallel execution and CI/CD integrations. Enterprise is quoted on contract and adds SSO/SAML, SCIM provisioning, RBAC, audit logs, private cloud or on-premises deployment, hybrid licensing and premium support.

- **Katalon AI agents and self-healing:** Generate automation scripts and test cases from natural language or tickets, get plain-language explanations, and let self-healing retry alternative locators when the UI changes so suites keep running through small front-end edits.
- **Unified multi-application testing:** Cover web, API, mobile (Android and iOS) and Windows desktop applications inside one authoring environment, with record-and-playback, data-driven testing, BDD/Cucumber support and a dual-mode debugger.
- **TestOps management and analytics:** Plan cycles, map requirements to cases, track coverage and flakiness, link defects in Jira, and gate releases using a shared live report that unifies manual, automated and AI-generated runs.
- **TestCloud execution environments:** Run suites in parallel on real browsers, real iOS and Android devices, or your own CI runners and on-premise Runtime Engine, with lane-based parallel execution for faster coverage.
- **MCP server and bring-your-own-AI:** Connect Katalon to external coding agents via MCP, and choose between the built-in Katalon AI Service or your own provider such as OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, Google Gemini or AWS Bedrock.

**Strengths:** Supports no-code, low-code and full-code authoring in one product, so mixed-skill QA teams do not need separate tools; Genuinely end-to-end scope: authoring, test management, cloud execution and production insights share a single system of record; Strong interoperability story, including Playwright support, an MCP server and a choice of AI providers; Free tier plus a 30-day trial makes it easy to evaluate before committing budget

**Limitations:** Professional pricing at roughly $150 per seat per month is steep for small teams; Commercial desktop testing, parallel execution and CI/CD execution are gated behind paid tiers; Enterprise capabilities such as SSO, audit logs and on-premises deployment require a sales conversation and annual contract

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/katalon-studio.md)

## Models.dev

Models.dev exists to answer a very practical developer question: which model should I use, and what will it cost? The site organises every entry under a canonical identifier in the form provider/model, so the same model served by several providers can be compared directly rather than guessed at. Columns cover context window, maximum output, whether input and output are supported, reasoning, tool calling, structured output, temperature control, open versus closed weights, price per million tokens, and release and update dates.

Because model releases move fast, the catalogue is built to stay current, with sortable and searchable tables that let you scan by lab or provider and filter down to what matters. Entries include both closed flagship models and open-weight alternatives, making it useful for cost planning as well as capability research.

The project is open source and free to use, and it is intended to be consumed programmatically. Developers can pull the catalogue into their own tooling through a JSON API or a type-safe SDK, which makes it a practical backend for dashboards, routing logic, or internal cost calculators rather than just a reference page to browse.

**Pricing & Plans:** Models.dev is free and open source. It is a reference database, so the prices it lists are the per-million-token rates charged by the model providers themselves, not a fee for using the site.

- **Canonical model identifiers:** Every model uses a consistent provider/model format so the same model across providers can be compared directly.
- **Specification comparison:** Side-by-side context window, output limit, reasoning, tool calling, structured output, and temperature support.
- **Pricing transparency:** Input and output prices per million tokens listed alongside release and update dates.
- **Open and closed models:** Covers closed flagship APIs and open-weight models from many labs in one sortable catalogue.
- **Developer access:** Consume the catalogue through a JSON API or a type-safe SDK for your own tools and dashboards.

**Strengths:** Free and open source with no account required; Consistent canonical identifiers make cross-provider comparison reliable; Covers pricing, limits, and capabilities in one sortable table; Available as a JSON API and type-safe SDK for programmatic use

**Limitations:** It is a reference catalogue, not an inference or hosting service; Data quality depends on community and maintainer updates keeping pace with releases; Interface is aimed at developers and offers little guidance for non-technical users

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/models-dev.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Katalon and Models.dev compare in monthly traffic?

Katalon has 158,090 monthly visits, while Models.dev has 200,451. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Katalon has a month-over-month growth rate of -29.6%; Models.dev has -3.9%.

### How does pricing compare?

Katalon: Freemium, Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing. Freemium with a free tier for local authoring and execution, plus a 30-day free trial of paid features. Professional is roughly $1,800 per seat per year (around $150 per seat per month) with AI agents, MCP server access, desktop testing, parallel execution and CI/CD integrations. Enterprise is quoted on contract and adds SSO/SAML, SCIM provisioning, RBAC, audit logs, private cloud or on-premises deployment, hybrid licensing and premium support. Models.dev: Free. Models.dev is free and open source. It is a reference database, so the prices it lists are the per-million-token rates charged by the model providers themselves, not a fee for using the site.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [KaneAI](https://openaitools.app/tool/kaneai) | 901,340 | +13.2% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Advanced conversational QA agent that builds and heals tests seamlessly, but has a less traditional scripted IDE workflow. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kaneai.md) |
| 2 | [Qase](https://openaitools.app/tool/qase) | 319,213 | -25.5% | Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing, Free | Ship with confidence: one system of record for manual, automated, and CI tests | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/qase.md) |
| 3 | [Stork](https://openaitools.app/tool/stork) | 201,544 | +2.3% | Free | Includes model pricing trackers and developer news alongside tools directories, but less focused on raw API specs. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/stork.md) |
| 4 | [Applitools Eyes](https://openaitools.app/tool/applitools-eyes) | 159,934 | -15.7% | Freemium, Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | AI-powered visual and functional testing that catches UI bugs on every page | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/applitools-eyes.md) |
| 5 | [TestSprite](https://openaitools.app/tool/testsprite) | 114,205 | +15.8% | Freemium | Automates test suite generation and regression testing efficiently, but with less emphasis on manual test planning. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/testsprite.md) |
| 6 | [testRigor](https://openaitools.app/tool/testrigor-com) | 105,865 | -2.7% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing, Free | Writes and maintains robust tests entirely in plain English, but offers fewer legacy low-code scripting features. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/testrigor-com.md) |
| 7 | [Momentic](https://openaitools.app/tool/momentic) | 68,819 | -15.2% | Freemium, Usage-based, Enterprise | Fast AI-driven end-to-end test runner with intelligent agents, but fewer enterprise test management reports. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/momentic.md) |
| 8 | [Autify](https://openaitools.app/tool/autify-com) | 60,130 | +6% | Contact for Pricing | Streamlines cross-browser web and mobile testing with AI maintenance, but lacks standalone desktop test recording. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/autify-com.md) |
| 9 | [InfraBase.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/infrabase-ai) | 39,072 | -13.6% | Free | Catalogues and compares AI infrastructure tools and services across categories, but lacks deep per-token pricing tables. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/infrabase-ai.md) |
| 10 | [Shiplight AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/shiplight-ai) | 33,676 | -8.2% | Contact for Pricing | Leverages coding agents and MCP for self-healing tests, but requires a developer-centric setup. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/shiplight-ai.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/katalon-studio-vs-models-dev

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)