# Katalon vs QA.tech

Katalon records 158,090 monthly visits with -29.6% month-over-month growth and Freemium, Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing pricing. QA.tech records 30,550 monthly visits with -4.4% growth and Paid, Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [Katalon](https://openaitools.app/tool/katalon-studio) | [QA.tech](https://openaitools.app/tool/qa-tech) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.katalon.com | https://qa.tech |
| Categories | AI Testing, No-Code&Low-Code, AI Code Generator, AI Developer Tools | AI Testing, AI Agent, AI Developer Tools, AI Productivity Tools |
| Pricing Model | Freemium, Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Paid, Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 158,090 | 30,550 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -29.6% | -4.4% |
| Primary Market | Vietnam | Sweden |
| Direct Visits | 87,966 | 21,231 |
| Review Score | 4.5 | 4.3 |
| Saved Count | 0 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Katalon

Katalon bundles four connected products under one umbrella it calls Katalon True: Katalon Studio for authoring tests, TestOps for test management and manual testing, TestCloud for running suites on real browsers and devices, and TrueTest for observing real user behaviour in production and spotting coverage gaps. Because authoring, tracking and execution live in the same system of record, requirements, test cases, evidence, defects and release health can be traced in one auditable place rather than across spreadsheets and disconnected tools.

The platform is explicitly built to support a mixed-skill team. Testers who prefer visual tooling can author tests with record-and-playback or keyword-driven steps, developers can drop into scripted full-code mode, and AI agents cover the middle ground by drafting test cases from a requirement, a Jira ticket or a natural-language prompt. Self-healing retries alternative locators when the UI changes, and failure analysis explains root causes in plain language so a broken run can be repaired and reviewed rather than quietly re-recorded.

Katalon also leans into interoperability. It supports Playwright scripts alongside native Katalon tests and consolidates the results in TestOps, exposes an MCP server so external coding agents such as Copilot, Cursor or Claude can drive test runs, and lets organisations bring their own AI provider (OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, Google Gemini or AWS Bedrock) instead of being locked to a single model vendor.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium with a free tier for local authoring and execution, plus a 30-day free trial of paid features. Professional is roughly $1,800 per seat per year (around $150 per seat per month) with AI agents, MCP server access, desktop testing, parallel execution and CI/CD integrations. Enterprise is quoted on contract and adds SSO/SAML, SCIM provisioning, RBAC, audit logs, private cloud or on-premises deployment, hybrid licensing and premium support.

- **Katalon AI agents and self-healing:** Generate automation scripts and test cases from natural language or tickets, get plain-language explanations, and let self-healing retry alternative locators when the UI changes so suites keep running through small front-end edits.
- **Unified multi-application testing:** Cover web, API, mobile (Android and iOS) and Windows desktop applications inside one authoring environment, with record-and-playback, data-driven testing, BDD/Cucumber support and a dual-mode debugger.
- **TestOps management and analytics:** Plan cycles, map requirements to cases, track coverage and flakiness, link defects in Jira, and gate releases using a shared live report that unifies manual, automated and AI-generated runs.
- **TestCloud execution environments:** Run suites in parallel on real browsers, real iOS and Android devices, or your own CI runners and on-premise Runtime Engine, with lane-based parallel execution for faster coverage.
- **MCP server and bring-your-own-AI:** Connect Katalon to external coding agents via MCP, and choose between the built-in Katalon AI Service or your own provider such as OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, Google Gemini or AWS Bedrock.

**Strengths:** Supports no-code, low-code and full-code authoring in one product, so mixed-skill QA teams do not need separate tools; Genuinely end-to-end scope: authoring, test management, cloud execution and production insights share a single system of record; Strong interoperability story, including Playwright support, an MCP server and a choice of AI providers; Free tier plus a 30-day trial makes it easy to evaluate before committing budget

**Limitations:** Professional pricing at roughly $150 per seat per month is steep for small teams; Commercial desktop testing, parallel execution and CI/CD execution are gated behind paid tiers; Enterprise capabilities such as SSO, audit logs and on-premises deployment require a sales conversation and annual contract

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/katalon-studio.md)

## QA.tech

QA.tech positions itself as the verification layer for teams shipping software with heavy AI assistance: coding got much faster, but review and QA did not keep pace. Instead of maintaining a fragile library of selectors and scripts, QA.tech runs autonomous agents that open your live web or native mobile app, work toward goals the way a person would, and report back on what actually works before code is merged.,The product is built around continuous, dynamic testing rather than one-off suites. Connect GitHub, GitLab or Bitbucket and a CI provider, and agents automatically pick up each pull request together with its preview environment, run end-to-end and exploratory passes, and comment on the PR with results. When something fails, you get screenshots, console and network activity and the agent's reasoning at the point of failure, which shortens time to root cause considerably.,Testing is also context-aware over time. Journeys and domain rules you spell out in chat accumulate as knowledge the agents reuse on every later run, and a blast-radius view flags changes that ship untested because a required test user or journey is missing. The platform is cloud-native, needs no code access, and is targeted at QA leads, engineers, CTOs and DevOps teams; Vercel Ventures and founder investors back the company. Pricing is not published as a simple self-serve number — teams book a demo, though a free getting-started path is offered.

**Pricing & Plans:** Enterprise-style, contact-for-pricing model: the site offers a free getting-started path and a demo booking rather than public per-seat numbers, so exact costs depend on team size, coverage scope and mobile testing needs.

- **Plain-language test authoring:** Describe a journey or rule in chat and the agent turns it into durable test cases that survive refactors and redesigns.
- **PR-level verification:** Every pull request gets a dynamic exploratory pass with preview environments, failure breakdowns, screenshots, console and network logs.
- **Web and native mobile:** Agents target real browsers and native iOS and Android apps, so coverage reaches beyond the web front end.
- **CI, Git and issue-tracker integrations:** Findings flow into Jira and Linear, and agents can be queried over MCP by other coding agents.
- **Blast-radius analysis:** Detects when changes to a module are untested and recommends the exact journeys or test users needed to close the gap.

**Strengths:** Agents test visually without selectors, so suites survive redesigns and framework migrations; Runs automatically on every pull request with preview environments; Plain-English test authoring is accessible to non-engineers; Rich failure evidence — screenshots, logs, network data and agent reasoning

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/qa-tech.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Katalon and QA.tech compare in monthly traffic?

Katalon has 158,090 monthly visits, while QA.tech has 30,550. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Katalon has a month-over-month growth rate of -29.6%; QA.tech has -4.4%.

### How does pricing compare?

Katalon: Freemium, Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing. Freemium with a free tier for local authoring and execution, plus a 30-day free trial of paid features. Professional is roughly $1,800 per seat per year (around $150 per seat per month) with AI agents, MCP server access, desktop testing, parallel execution and CI/CD integrations. Enterprise is quoted on contract and adds SSO/SAML, SCIM provisioning, RBAC, audit logs, private cloud or on-premises deployment, hybrid licensing and premium support. QA.tech: Paid, Contact for Pricing. Enterprise-style, contact-for-pricing model: the site offers a free getting-started path and a demo booking rather than public per-seat numbers, so exact costs depend on team size, coverage scope and mobile testing needs.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [KaneAI](https://openaitools.app/tool/kaneai) | 901,340 | +13.2% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | GenAI-native end-to-end QA agent that plans, writes and heals tests in plain language | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kaneai.md) |
| 2 | [Qase](https://openaitools.app/tool/qase) | 319,213 | -25.5% | Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing, Free | Ship with confidence: one system of record for manual, automated, and CI tests | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/qase.md) |
| 3 | [Applitools Eyes](https://openaitools.app/tool/applitools-eyes) | 159,934 | -15.7% | Freemium, Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | AI-powered visual and functional testing that catches UI bugs on every page | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/applitools-eyes.md) |
| 4 | [TestSprite](https://openaitools.app/tool/testsprite) | 114,205 | +15.8% | Freemium | Agentic end-to-end testing that writes, runs and heals your test suite | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/testsprite.md) |
| 5 | [testRigor](https://openaitools.app/tool/testrigor-com) | 105,865 | -2.7% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing, Free | Write end-to-end test automation in plain English, no code required | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/testrigor-com.md) |
| 6 | [Momentic](https://openaitools.app/tool/momentic) | 68,819 | -15.2% | Freemium, Usage-based, Enterprise | Agentic AI QA engineer for web, iOS, and Android testing | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/momentic.md) |
| 7 | [Autify](https://openaitools.app/tool/autify-com) | 60,130 | +6% | Contact for Pricing | AI testing platform for the entire software testing lifecycle | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/autify-com.md) |
| 8 | [Shiplight AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/shiplight-ai) | 33,676 | -8.2% | Contact for Pricing | Leverages coding agents and MCP for self-healing tests, but requires a developer-centric setup. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/shiplight-ai.md) |
| 9 | [Virtuoso QA](https://openaitools.app/tool/virtuoso-qa) | 20,169 | +84.5% | Paid, Contact for Pricing | Agentic test automation that builds, runs and maintains your enterprise tests | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/virtuoso-qa.md) |
| 10 | [Autosana](https://openaitools.app/tool/autosana) | 12,057 | +138.3% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Natural-language end-to-end testing for mobile and web apps | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/autosana.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/katalon-studio-vs-qa-tech

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)