# Labelbox vs Sieve

Labelbox records 762,803 monthly visits with -22.8% month-over-month growth and Contact for Pricing pricing. Sieve records 124 monthly visits with +1.6% growth and Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [Labelbox](https://openaitools.app/tool/labelbox) | [Sieve](https://openaitools.app/tool/sieve) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://labelbox.com | https://www.sieve.ai |
| Categories | AI Developer Tools, AI API, AI Workflow, AI Productivity Tools | AI API, AI Dubbing, AI Video Translator, AI Video Editor |
| Pricing Model | Contact for Pricing | Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 762,803 | 124 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -22.8% | +1.6% |
| Primary Market | United States | Global |
| Direct Visits | 370,024 | 54 |
| Review Score | 4.4 | 4.1 |
| Saved Count | 0 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Labelbox

Labelbox occupies an unusual position in the AI stack: it does not primarily sell a chatbot or a generator, it builds the environments and data that models learn from plus the agents that take over recurring engineering and research work. The homepage claim is direct — frontier AI labs train on Labelbox environments and expert data, while engineering and research teams hand their recurring backlog to agents running on Recursion. A recent Series E of more than $100 million signals a heavily funded bet on that thesis.,For enterprises, the newer half of the product is Recursion. Agents are triggered by real signals — a failing build, a PagerDuty alert, a new dependency release, a fresh model checkpoint, or a Monday morning schedule — and then work in the background until the job is done. The examples the company promotes are concrete deliverables rather than summaries: a tested pull request with a preview link, a postmortem draft in Confluence with every event sourced, an ablation table naming the changes that mattered, or a patch for each exposed service after a critical CVE. A grader agent scores each run, and the graded session leaves behind memories, notes and skills that the next session reads before it acts.,The original foundation remains the data business: labeling, annotation, curation and model evaluation supported by expert human reviewers, used for computer vision, NLP, supervised fine-tuning, RLHF and red teaming. In practice the two halves reinforce each other, since the environments that produce high-quality training data are the same environments where agents learn to do real work. Pricing is enterprise-style, routed through sales conversations and shaped by data volume and agent usage, with no public self-serve tier.

**Pricing & Plans:** Contact for pricing. Labelbox does not publish self-serve plans or public rate cards; its pricing route instead directs interested teams to talk to sales, and cost is shaped by data production scope, agent deployment and enterprise requirements. There is no published free tier. Prospective customers should request a quote based on their volumes and use cases.

- **Data labeling and expert annotation:** Structured annotation, curation, model evaluation and human-in-the-loop review across vision, language and generative tasks, used to build the training and eval data behind production models.
- **Autonomous agent sessions:** Recursion agents start on their own from builds, alerts, commits, checkpoints and schedules, then work in the background until the task is finished and reviewable.
- **Domain specialists by function:** Specialist agents cover software engineering, reliability, security, ML research, evals, R&D, product and finance workflows, from flaky test fixes to postmortem drafts and vulnerability patches.
- **Graded outcomes that compound:** Every agent run is scored by a grader, and graded sessions leave memories, notes and skills that the next session reads before acting, so quality compounds over time.
- **Native tool and data integrations:** Agents operate against the tools teams already use, including GitHub, Jira, Linear, Slack, Datadog, PagerDuty, BigQuery, Databricks, Vercel and cloud providers.

**Strengths:** Covers both sides of the problem: training and eval data production plus agents that act on recurring work; Backed by a recent $100M+ Series E and adoption by frontier AI labs, indicating real funding and demand; Agent runs produce concrete deliverables with proof — tests, reruns, ablations — rather than unverified suggestions; Integrates with the toolchain teams already run: GitHub, Jira, Linear, Slack, Datadog, PagerDuty, BigQuery and Databricks

**Limitations:** No self-serve pricing or open signup: everything routes through a sales conversation, which slows down evaluation; The platform assumes real engineering and research infrastructure (GitHub, cloud providers, data warehouses) to deliver value; Positioning has shifted quickly toward autonomous agent sessions, so teams wanting only labeling workflows may find it heavier than needed

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/labelbox.md)

## Sieve

Sieve began life as a video API company offering endpoints for translation, dubbing, background removal, lipsync, autocrop and transcription. That product line has since been superseded: the company published an announcement titled "Reintroducing Sieve" describing its transition from video APIs to supplying multimodal data at petabyte scale, and the original sievedata.com domain now resolves to sieve.ai.

Today Sieve operates as a data lab for what it calls real-world intelligence. Instead of selling individual API calls, it works with frontier AI companies to design, capture, annotate and deliver high-quality training and evaluation data. Its public offerings include egocentric first-person video of economically valuable work with hand-pose and sensor annotations, custom multi-camera studio recordings, simulated and real-world robotics evaluations, virtual-world capture with synchronised control inputs and camera metadata, and datasets targeting motion, causality and spatial reasoning.

Underneath the data products sits serious infrastructure. Sieve has published engineering work on embedding one billion videos and querying tens of billions of vectors, which is the kind of stack you need to make petabyte-scale audiovisual archives searchable for model training. The practical route in is a conversation rather than a signup: visitors are pointed at "Talk to us" and "Request data" flows, and the company is actively hiring researchers and engineers.

**Pricing & Plans:** No public price list. Sieve is positioned as a custom engagement led by a "Talk to us" / "Request data" contact flow, so commercial terms are scoped per project, data volume and capture complexity. Earlier self-serve API pricing is no longer published.

- **Egocentric data capture:** First-person recordings of economically valuable physical work, paired with hand-pose, motion and synchronised sensor annotations.
- **Studio and custom rig recordings:** Multi-camera video and audio collection with bespoke rigs and controlled environments built to a client's specification.
- **Robotics evaluations:** Both simulated and real-world test suites that measure how well robot policies perform across tasks and conditions.
- **Large-scale media infrastructure:** Petabyte-scale synchronised video and audio datasets, including published engineering work on embedding a billion videos for retrieval.
- **Real-world reasoning datasets:** Datasets and benchmarks targeting motion, causality and spatial relationships for models that must reason about the physical world.

**Strengths:** Deep specialisation in hard-to-collect embodied and egocentric data; In-house research and infrastructure proven at billion-video scale; Offers evaluations alongside datasets, not just raw media; Works directly with frontier labs, which signals high data quality standards

**Limitations:** Pricing is quote-based, so there is no self-serve cost transparency; Most offerings require an engagement rather than instant API signup; Documentation for the older video API suite is no longer reachable at the previous docs domain; Overkill for teams that only need a single simple video-processing endpoint

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/sieve.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Labelbox and Sieve compare in monthly traffic?

Labelbox has 762,803 monthly visits, while Sieve has 124. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Labelbox has a month-over-month growth rate of -22.8%; Sieve has +1.6%.

### How does pricing compare?

Labelbox: Contact for Pricing. Contact for pricing. Labelbox does not publish self-serve plans or public rate cards; its pricing route instead directs interested teams to talk to sales, and cost is shaped by data production scope, agent deployment and enterprise requirements. There is no published free tier. Prospective customers should request a quote based on their volumes and use cases. Sieve: Contact for Pricing. No public price list. Sieve is positioned as a custom engagement led by a "Talk to us" / "Request data" contact flow, so commercial terms are scoped per project, data volume and capture complexity. Earlier self-serve API pricing is no longer published.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Roboflow](https://openaitools.app/tool/roboflow) | 1,431,204 | +6.6% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Build, train, and deploy computer vision for the physical world | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/roboflow.md) |
| 2 | [ImageKit](https://openaitools.app/tool/imagekit) | 947,721 | -13.7% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Real-time image and video APIs, agentic DAM and creative automation in one platform | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/imagekit.md) |
| 3 | [Appen](https://openaitools.app/tool/appen-com) | 665,840 | +0.2% | Contact for Pricing | Relies heavily on managed human-in-the-loop workforce services for data validation, offering less self-serve technical tooling than Labelbox. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/appen-com.md) |
| 4 | [Scale](https://openaitools.app/tool/scale) | 616,915 | +12.5% | Contact for Pricing | The data, evaluations and systems behind AI that has to be right. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scale.md) |
| 5 | [SuperAnnotate](https://openaitools.app/tool/super-annotate) | 386,034 | +37.4% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | AI data infrastructure for building production-grade models | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/super-annotate.md) |
| 6 | [AI or Not](https://openaitools.app/tool/ai-or-not) | 375,863 | +12.3% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Multi-modal AI detection API that flags synthetic images, text, audio, video and deepfakes | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/ai-or-not.md) |
| 7 | [Weights & Biases (CoreWeave Forge)](https://openaitools.app/tool/prompts) | 315,624 | -80.2% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing, Free | Track, evaluate, and ship AI models and agents in one connected environment. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/prompts.md) |
| 8 | [Encord](https://openaitools.app/tool/encord-com) | 244,204 | +9.4% | Contact for Pricing | The multimodal data layer for computer vision and physical AI teams | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/encord-com.md) |
| 9 | [AI/ML API](https://openaitools.app/tool/ai-ml-api) | 232,946 | -20.1% | Pay-as-you-go credits (free to start); enterprise custom pricing on request | One universal API for 500+ AI models and 1,000+ agentic tools | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/ai-ml-api.md) |
| 10 | [Memories.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/memories-ai) | 188,127 | -14.6% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Video data infrastructure for physical AI and robot training | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/memories-ai.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/labelbox-vs-sieve

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)