# Labelbox vs supermemory

Labelbox records 762,803 monthly visits with -22.8% month-over-month growth and Contact for Pricing pricing. supermemory records 156,579 monthly visits with -7.7% growth and Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [Labelbox](https://openaitools.app/tool/labelbox) | [supermemory](https://openaitools.app/tool/supermemory-1) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://labelbox.com | https://supermemory.ai |
| Categories | AI Developer Tools, AI API, AI Workflow, AI Productivity Tools | AI API, Large Language Models (LLMs), AI Developer Tools, AI Agent |
| Pricing Model | Contact for Pricing | Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 762,803 | 156,579 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -22.8% | -7.7% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 370,024 | 71,163 |
| Review Score | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| Saved Count | 0 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Labelbox

Labelbox occupies an unusual position in the AI stack: it does not primarily sell a chatbot or a generator, it builds the environments and data that models learn from plus the agents that take over recurring engineering and research work. The homepage claim is direct — frontier AI labs train on Labelbox environments and expert data, while engineering and research teams hand their recurring backlog to agents running on Recursion. A recent Series E of more than $100 million signals a heavily funded bet on that thesis.,For enterprises, the newer half of the product is Recursion. Agents are triggered by real signals — a failing build, a PagerDuty alert, a new dependency release, a fresh model checkpoint, or a Monday morning schedule — and then work in the background until the job is done. The examples the company promotes are concrete deliverables rather than summaries: a tested pull request with a preview link, a postmortem draft in Confluence with every event sourced, an ablation table naming the changes that mattered, or a patch for each exposed service after a critical CVE. A grader agent scores each run, and the graded session leaves behind memories, notes and skills that the next session reads before it acts.,The original foundation remains the data business: labeling, annotation, curation and model evaluation supported by expert human reviewers, used for computer vision, NLP, supervised fine-tuning, RLHF and red teaming. In practice the two halves reinforce each other, since the environments that produce high-quality training data are the same environments where agents learn to do real work. Pricing is enterprise-style, routed through sales conversations and shaped by data volume and agent usage, with no public self-serve tier.

**Pricing & Plans:** Contact for pricing. Labelbox does not publish self-serve plans or public rate cards; its pricing route instead directs interested teams to talk to sales, and cost is shaped by data production scope, agent deployment and enterprise requirements. There is no published free tier. Prospective customers should request a quote based on their volumes and use cases.

- **Data labeling and expert annotation:** Structured annotation, curation, model evaluation and human-in-the-loop review across vision, language and generative tasks, used to build the training and eval data behind production models.
- **Autonomous agent sessions:** Recursion agents start on their own from builds, alerts, commits, checkpoints and schedules, then work in the background until the task is finished and reviewable.
- **Domain specialists by function:** Specialist agents cover software engineering, reliability, security, ML research, evals, R&D, product and finance workflows, from flaky test fixes to postmortem drafts and vulnerability patches.
- **Graded outcomes that compound:** Every agent run is scored by a grader, and graded sessions leave memories, notes and skills that the next session reads before acting, so quality compounds over time.
- **Native tool and data integrations:** Agents operate against the tools teams already use, including GitHub, Jira, Linear, Slack, Datadog, PagerDuty, BigQuery, Databricks, Vercel and cloud providers.

**Strengths:** Covers both sides of the problem: training and eval data production plus agents that act on recurring work; Backed by a recent $100M+ Series E and adoption by frontier AI labs, indicating real funding and demand; Agent runs produce concrete deliverables with proof — tests, reruns, ablations — rather than unverified suggestions; Integrates with the toolchain teams already run: GitHub, Jira, Linear, Slack, Datadog, PagerDuty, BigQuery and Databricks

**Limitations:** No self-serve pricing or open signup: everything routes through a sales conversation, which slows down evaluation; The platform assumes real engineering and research infrastructure (GitHub, cloud providers, data warehouses) to deliver value; Positioning has shifted quickly toward autonomous agent sessions, so teams wanting only labeling workflows may find it heavier than needed

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/labelbox.md)

## supermemory

Most LLM applications treat memory as an afterthought: chat history is stuffed into the prompt until the window fills up, and everything is lost on the next session or the next model switch. supermemory attacks that problem as infrastructure. Its learner-1 model reads incoming material — conversations, files, URLs, raw data — and performs update, merge, infer and forget operations against a vector-graph database, so learnings stay dense, interconnected and time-aware rather than piling up as an ever-growing transcript.

At request time the relevant memories are injected as tokens directly into the agent's context, which keeps the approach model-agnostic and harness-agnostic. Because learning and memory live outside the model providers, the same accumulated understanding travels with an application whether it runs on Claude, GPT-family models, Gemini or open-weight models, and whether it is driven by an SDK, a plugin or MCP.

The company positions this as the hard part of agent infrastructure and backs it with published numbers: sub-second recall on production traffic, roughly a trillion tokens processed per month, benchmarks on LongMemEval, LoCoMo and ConvoMem, and cost comparisons against markdown-file memory at large corpora. Enterprise features include SOC 2 Type II certification, a HIPAA BAA on higher tiers, GDPR compliance and deployment options ranging from cloud to VPC, on-premises and air-gapped environments.

**Pricing & Plans:** Pricing is split between self-serve tiers and enterprise contracts, which is why the site lists a contact-for-pricing model. Free, Pro and Max tiers cover standard PDF extraction and personal use, while Scale and Enterprise add advanced document extraction with OCR and figure/diagram descriptions, higher limits, security guarantees such as SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA BAA, and deployment choices including your VPC, your data center or air-gapped setups. Exact figures should be confirmed on the pricing page for current rates.

- **learner-1 memory model:** A dedicated model extracts, merges, infers and forgets across stored context so the memory graph keeps improving instead of simply accumulating.
- **Vector-graph memory store:** Learnings link to the entities, sources and moments around them, storing not just content but a time-aware map of how facts relate.
- **Model, harness and MCP agnostic:** Memory lives outside model providers and is used through APIs, SDKs, plugins and MCP, so context carries across models and tools.
- **Real-time context injection:** Relevant memories are injected as tokens into the prompt at request time, giving agents relevant context without unbounded transcripts.
- **Enterprise deployment and compliance:** SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA BAA on higher tiers, GDPR compliance, plus deployment in the cloud, your VPC, your data center or air-gapped.

**Strengths:** Memory is decoupled from model providers, so accumulated context survives model swaps; Rich engineering evidence, including published benchmarks, latency figures and cost comparisons; Multiple integration surfaces — REST API, SDKs, plugins and MCP; Strong enterprise posture with SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA BAA, GDPR and air-gapped deployment options

**Limitations:** Self-serve pricing on the public site is thin, and exact tier costs may require a sales conversation; It is infrastructure rather than an end-user app, so there is real integration work before you see value; Benchmark results and adoption figures are vendor-reported and worth validating against your own workload

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/supermemory-1.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Labelbox and supermemory compare in monthly traffic?

Labelbox has 762,803 monthly visits, while supermemory has 156,579. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Labelbox has a month-over-month growth rate of -22.8%; supermemory has -7.7%.

### How does pricing compare?

Labelbox: Contact for Pricing. Contact for pricing. Labelbox does not publish self-serve plans or public rate cards; its pricing route instead directs interested teams to talk to sales, and cost is shaped by data production scope, agent deployment and enterprise requirements. There is no published free tier. Prospective customers should request a quote based on their volumes and use cases. supermemory: Contact for Pricing. Pricing is split between self-serve tiers and enterprise contracts, which is why the site lists a contact-for-pricing model. Free, Pro and Max tiers cover standard PDF extraction and personal use, while Scale and Enterprise add advanced document extraction with OCR and figure/diagram descriptions, higher limits, security guarantees such as SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA BAA, and deployment choices including your VPC, your data center or air-gapped setups. Exact figures should be confirmed on the pricing page for current rates.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Composio](https://openaitools.app/tool/composio) | 2,782,603 | +22.8% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Focuses on tool integrations and authentication for agents, complementing memory engines rather than storing cross-session context. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/composio.md) |
| 2 | [Roboflow](https://openaitools.app/tool/roboflow) | 1,431,204 | +6.6% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Streamlines end-to-end computer vision workflows from annotation to model deployment, but lacks Labelbox's general enterprise agent orchestration. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/roboflow.md) |
| 3 | [Appen](https://openaitools.app/tool/appen-com) | 665,840 | +0.2% | Contact for Pricing | Relies heavily on managed human-in-the-loop workforce services for data validation, offering less self-serve technical tooling than Labelbox. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/appen-com.md) |
| 4 | [Scale](https://openaitools.app/tool/scale) | 616,915 | +12.5% | Contact for Pricing | Delivers enterprise-grade labeling and model evaluation at massive scale, but often requires higher enterprise budgets than Labelbox. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scale.md) |
| 5 | [LiteLLM](https://openaitools.app/tool/litellm) | 576,967 | +7.9% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | One open-source AI gateway for 100+ LLM providers | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/litellm.md) |
| 6 | [SuperAnnotate](https://openaitools.app/tool/super-annotate) | 386,034 | +37.4% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | Offers robust multimodal annotation and workflow automation, featuring slightly more intuitive data curation pipelines for computer vision teams. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/super-annotate.md) |
| 7 | [Weights & Biases (CoreWeave Forge)](https://openaitools.app/tool/prompts) | 315,624 | -80.2% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing, Free | Track, evaluate, and ship AI models and agents in one connected environment. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/prompts.md) |
| 8 | [Merge](https://openaitools.app/tool/merge-dev) | 313,201 | +1.7% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | The universal context engine connecting agents to data, tools, and models | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/merge-dev.md) |
| 9 | [Pinecone](https://openaitools.app/tool/pinecone) | 286,732 | -31% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Offers enterprise-grade scalable vector search and RAG storage, but lacks supermemory's automated agent memory graph abstractions. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/pinecone.md) |
| 10 | [Encord](https://openaitools.app/tool/encord-com) | 244,204 | +9.4% | Contact for Pricing | Specializes in advanced computer vision and physical AI data pipelines, though with a narrower focus than general text-and-image labeling. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/encord-com.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/labelbox-vs-supermemory-1

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)