# LabFig vs Manus

LabFig records 4,976 monthly visits with +44.9% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Manus records 19,195,779 monthly visits with -1.7% growth and Free Trial pricing.

| Metric | [LabFig](https://openaitools.app/tool/labfig) | [Manus](https://openaitools.app/tool/manus) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://labfig.com | https://manus.im |
| Categories | AI Image Generator, Image to Image, Text to Image | AI Assistant, AI Agent, AI Copilot |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Free Trial |
| Monthly Visits | 4,976 | 19,195,779 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +44.9% | -1.7% |
| Primary Market | United States | Brazil |
| Direct Visits | 1,627 | 10,563,180 |
| Review Score | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Saved Count | 0 | 10 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## LabFig

LabFig targets a very specific pain point in academic work: producing clean, consistent scientific figures without a design background. Instead of learning vector software or paying a designer, researchers describe a figure in words, drop in a paper, upload a sketch, or take a photo of a whiteboard, and the tool returns a structured draft with panels, labels, and arrows laid out. It supports journal-oriented aesthetics, with styles modelled on Nature, Cell, or IEEE conventions so figures in the same manuscript look like a set.

What sets LabFig apart from generic image generators is the editing layer. Figures are vector-first: text, arrows, shapes, and colours remain editable after generation, and individual regions can be replaced or regenerated with a short prompt through a feature called Vector Canvas. Exports include SVG and PDF alongside PNG, which matters when a submission template expects resizable artwork. There is also a Figure Enhancer path for cleaning up an existing figure's colour and line weights.

The workbench runs in seven modes covering text, image, PDF, sketch, reference, photo, and enhancer inputs, with credits consumed per generation. Pricing is credit-based across Starter, Standard, and Premium tiers, and academic discounts are available for verified students and educators. LabFig is explicit that AI-generated drafts should be reviewed by a scientist before publication, which is a sensible framing for a tool aimed at manuscript work.

**Pricing & Plans:** Credit-based subscription plans: a Starter tier aimed at occasional figure work, a Standard tier for active PhD students and postdocs, and a Premium tier for high-throughput labs. Annual billing reduces the monthly rate, and verified students and educators receive a discount. Monthly list prices run roughly from about $29.9 to about $149.9 before discounts.

- **Six-plus input modes:** Generate from text descriptions, hand sketches, reference figures, research PDFs, or lab photos.
- **Vector Canvas editing:** Labels, arrows, shapes, and colours stay editable, and single regions can be regenerated with a prompt.
- **Journal-grade styles:** Match the visual conventions of Nature, Cell, or IEEE with one-click styles, or keep a consistent set across a paper.
- **Resizable vector export:** Export SVG and PDF for submissions plus 300 dpi PNG, so figures drop into templates without rework.
- **Figure Enhancer:** Improve the colour balance and line weights of a figure you already have instead of starting over.

**Strengths:** Works from the inputs researchers actually have, from PDFs and sketches to whiteboard photos; Figures stay vector-editable after generation, unlike one-shot image generators; Journal-oriented styles help keep every figure in a manuscript visually consistent; Academic discount available for verified students and educators

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/labfig.md)

## Manus

Manus positions itself as an "action engine" rather than a chatbot. You describe an outcome, and the agent breaks it into steps, decides which tools to use, browses the web when it needs current information, and assembles the final deliverable in a cloud sandbox. Typical outputs include presentation decks, working websites and small games, generated images and video, and long-form research reports assembled through its Wide Research workflow.

The product ships as a mobile app (iOS and Android), a desktop app, and a browser extension, plus a web console with an API for programmatic use. A Slack integration lets teams dispatch tasks from chat, and workspace features such as team plans and SSO make it viable inside organizations rather than only for individuals. Because the agent runs asynchronously, a common pattern is to queue a task, walk away, and review the result later.

Pricing combines a free trial-style entry point with paid subscription tiers and a business plan; exact credit allowances and seats change over time, so confirm current terms on the official pricing page. The obvious trade-off is control: autonomous agents can misread intent or burn credits on the wrong approach, so clear briefs and intermediate review matter.

**Pricing & Plans:** Free trial available, with paid subscription tiers and a business plan for teams and higher usage. Credit allowances and seat details change, so check the official pricing page.

- **Autonomous task execution:** Give the agent a goal and it plans the steps, chooses tools, and works through the task in a cloud environment without constant supervision.
- **Deliverable generation:** Produces finished artifacts such as slide decks, functional websites, small games, and formatted documents rather than raw text.
- **Wide Research:** Runs broad, multi-source investigations and compiles the findings into a structured report.
- **Media creation:** Generates images, video, and music as part of a larger task or as standalone outputs.
- **Integrations and API:** Connects to Slack for task dispatch, offers mobile and desktop apps, and exposes an API for embedding agent work in your own stack.

**Strengths:** Delivers finished artifacts instead of only conversational answers; Works across web, mobile, desktop, Slack, and API surfaces; Wide Research handles broad multi-source investigations well; Team plans and SSO make it usable in organizational settings

**Limitations:** Autonomous runs consume credits and can pursue the wrong approach if the brief is vague; Complex tasks benefit from human review at checkpoints; Output quality varies by task type, especially outside common formats

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/manus.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do LabFig and Manus compare in monthly traffic?

LabFig has 4,976 monthly visits, while Manus has 19,195,779. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

LabFig has a month-over-month growth rate of +44.9%; Manus has -1.7%.

### How does pricing compare?

LabFig: Freemium. Credit-based subscription plans: a Starter tier aimed at occasional figure work, a Standard tier for active PhD students and postdocs, and a Premium tier for high-throughput labs. Annual billing reduces the monthly rate, and verified students and educators receive a discount. Monthly list prices run roughly from about $29.9 to about $149.9 before discounts. Manus: Free Trial. Free trial available, with paid subscription tiers and a business plan for teams and higher usage. Credit allowances and seat details change, so check the official pricing page.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [ChatGPT](https://openaitools.app/tool/chatgpt-4) | 6,048,022,723 | +2.2% | Freemium | Provides powerful reasoning agents and deep research, but lacks Manus's specialized continuous cloud workspace execution. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/chatgpt-4.md) |
| 2 | [Claude](https://openaitools.app/tool/claude-2) | 1,253,439,413 | +23.8% | Freemium | Features advanced computer use and interactive artifacts, but operates primarily as a chat assistant rather than a dedicated autonomous agent platform. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/claude-2.md) |
| 3 | [Muse](https://openaitools.app/tool/muse-ai-1) | 45,751,822 | +228.3% | Contact for Pricing | Executes tasks using cloud virtual Linux machines, but focuses more on personal desktop automation than complex multi-app research. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/muse-ai-1.md) |
| 4 | [Hermes-Agent](https://openaitools.app/tool/hermes-agent-1) | 3,638,741 | -5.4% | Freemium | Provides open-source personal task automation, but lacks the polished cloud sandbox environment of Manus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/hermes-agent-1.md) |
| 5 | [Runable](https://openaitools.app/tool/runable) | 1,048,370 | -1.9% | Freemium | Automates multi-step workflows and asset creation, but with fewer built-in general browser navigation tools. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/runable.md) |
| 6 | [Skywork.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/skywork-ai) | 1,021,069 | -11.8% | Freemium | Converts prompts into structured office deliverables, but acts primarily as a document generation workspace. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/skywork-ai.md) |
| 7 | [Rendair AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/rendair-ai-platform) | 496,201 | +5.7% | Contact for Pricing | The AI workspace that turns architectural sketches and 3D models into client-ready visuals | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/rendair-ai-platform.md) |
| 8 | [LibreChat](https://openaitools.app/tool/librechat) | 346,879 | -3.5% | Free | Unites multiple models and custom agents in a self-hosted workspace, but lacks pre-built autonomous execution sandboxes. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/librechat.md) |
| 9 | [Lindy](https://openaitools.app/tool/lindy) | 323,329 | -0.2% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Deploys autonomous business agents for operational work, but targets enterprise workflows rather than general open-ended research. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/lindy.md) |
| 10 | [Hyperagent](https://openaitools.app/tool/hyperagent) | 182,523 | -51.8% | Contact for Pricing | Deploys agent fleets to build business deliverables, but requires more manual setup for complex web research. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/hyperagent.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/labfig-vs-manus

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)