# Law Insider vs Models.dev

Law Insider records 621,727 monthly visits with -6.5% month-over-month growth and Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing pricing. Models.dev records 200,451 monthly visits with -3.9% growth and Free pricing.

| Metric | [Law Insider](https://openaitools.app/tool/law-insider) | [Models.dev](https://openaitools.app/tool/models-dev) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.lawinsider.com | https://models.dev |
| Categories | AI Legal Assistant, AI Contract Generator, AI Contract Review, AI Assistant | AI Models, AI API, Open Source AI Models, AI Tools Directory |
| Pricing Model | Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Free |
| Monthly Visits | 621,727 | 200,451 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -6.5% | -3.9% |
| Primary Market | United States | China |
| Direct Visits | 143,066 | 136,316 |
| Review Score | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| Saved Count | 2 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Law Insider

Law Insider is built around a simple idea: legal AI should be verifiable. Instead of generating contract language out of thin air, the platform anchors its output in a large database of real, executed agreements, so users can open the original source documents and check the context behind any suggestion. The product spans three connected workflows — drafting and reviewing in a browser-based AI assistant, redlining and risk review inside Microsoft Word, and searching the contract library by type, jurisdiction, industry, and governing law.

The searchable database covers millions of contracts and hundreds of millions of clauses across many jurisdictions and languages, and is refreshed regularly. Each record is unique or executed, and users can open the underlying agreement directly. This makes the platform useful both as a drafting and review assistant and as a research and benchmarking resource for comparing how particular clauses are actually written in the market.

Security is a central selling point: the company states it does not train models on customer data, keeps customer documents private to each workspace, and separates them from the public contract database. A Pro subscription covers the browser AI assistant, the Word add-in, and search, while teams can add shared seats, custom playbooks, and single sign-on.

**Pricing & Plans:** Law Insider offers a free 7-day trial (card required) on its Pro plan, after which a monthly subscription applies (listed at $179/month at the time of writing). Teams pricing is customized and requires contacting sales, with the team plan starting from three seats.

- **AI contract assistant in the browser:** Draft clauses or full agreements, review uploaded contracts with issues ranked by risk, and compare language against real precedents — all in the web app.
- **Microsoft Word add-in:** Review, redline, draft, and compare versions directly inside Word, with tracked changes written into the document and playbook-based review.
- **Contract and clause search:** Search a large library of public contracts and clauses by contract type, jurisdiction, industry, governing law, company, and date, then open the source agreement.
- **Grounded, verifiable output:** Suggestions are linked back to the source documents used, so reviewers can confirm the context rather than trusting a black-box answer.
- **Data privacy and compliance:** Customer documents stay private to each workspace and are not used to train models; the company cites SOC 2 Type II, TX-RAMP, and GDPR alignment.

**Strengths:** Output is grounded in a large database of real contracts, making suggestions easier to verify; Covers drafting, review, redlining, and research in one subscription; Word add-in integrates cleanly into existing legal workflows; Clear stance on not training models on customer data

**Limitations:** Pro pricing is relatively high for individual users or small practices; A card is required to start the free trial; Team features such as SSO and admin controls sit behind a sales conversation

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/law-insider.md)

## Models.dev

Models.dev exists to answer a very practical developer question: which model should I use, and what will it cost? The site organises every entry under a canonical identifier in the form provider/model, so the same model served by several providers can be compared directly rather than guessed at. Columns cover context window, maximum output, whether input and output are supported, reasoning, tool calling, structured output, temperature control, open versus closed weights, price per million tokens, and release and update dates.

Because model releases move fast, the catalogue is built to stay current, with sortable and searchable tables that let you scan by lab or provider and filter down to what matters. Entries include both closed flagship models and open-weight alternatives, making it useful for cost planning as well as capability research.

The project is open source and free to use, and it is intended to be consumed programmatically. Developers can pull the catalogue into their own tooling through a JSON API or a type-safe SDK, which makes it a practical backend for dashboards, routing logic, or internal cost calculators rather than just a reference page to browse.

**Pricing & Plans:** Models.dev is free and open source. It is a reference database, so the prices it lists are the per-million-token rates charged by the model providers themselves, not a fee for using the site.

- **Canonical model identifiers:** Every model uses a consistent provider/model format so the same model across providers can be compared directly.
- **Specification comparison:** Side-by-side context window, output limit, reasoning, tool calling, structured output, and temperature support.
- **Pricing transparency:** Input and output prices per million tokens listed alongside release and update dates.
- **Open and closed models:** Covers closed flagship APIs and open-weight models from many labs in one sortable catalogue.
- **Developer access:** Consume the catalogue through a JSON API or a type-safe SDK for your own tools and dashboards.

**Strengths:** Free and open source with no account required; Consistent canonical identifiers make cross-provider comparison reliable; Covers pricing, limits, and capabilities in one sortable table; Available as a JSON API and type-safe SDK for programmatic use

**Limitations:** It is a reference catalogue, not an inference or hosting service; Data quality depends on community and maintainer updates keeping pace with releases; Interface is aimed at developers and offers little guidance for non-technical users

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/models-dev.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Law Insider and Models.dev compare in monthly traffic?

Law Insider has 621,727 monthly visits, while Models.dev has 200,451. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Law Insider has a month-over-month growth rate of -6.5%; Models.dev has -3.9%.

### How does pricing compare?

Law Insider: Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing. Law Insider offers a free 7-day trial (card required) on its Pro plan, after which a monthly subscription applies (listed at $179/month at the time of writing). Teams pricing is customized and requires contacting sales, with the team plan starting from three seats. Models.dev: Free. Models.dev is free and open source. It is a reference database, so the prices it lists are the per-million-token rates charged by the model providers themselves, not a fee for using the site.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Thomson Reuters](https://openaitools.app/tool/thomson-reuters) | 17,919,413 | +5.5% | Contact for Pricing | Provides authoritative legal research and compliance content, but operates as a comprehensive information platform rather than a drafting add-in. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/thomson-reuters.md) |
| 2 | [Harvey](https://openaitools.app/tool/harvey-ai) | 1,832,998 | +26.1% | Contact for Pricing | Delivers enterprise-grade legal research and document analysis, but targets large law firms rather than self-service contract drafting. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/harvey-ai.md) |
| 3 | [AI Lawyer](https://openaitools.app/tool/ai-lawyer) | 221,106 | +1.5% | Free Trial | Your personal AI legal assistant for research, drafting, and document review | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/ai-lawyer.md) |
| 4 | [Stork](https://openaitools.app/tool/stork) | 201,544 | +2.3% | Free | Includes model pricing trackers and developer news alongside tools directories, but less focused on raw API specs. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/stork.md) |
| 5 | [LinkSquares](https://openaitools.app/tool/linksquares-com) | 107,827 | +57.2% | Contact for Pricing | Agentic contract lifecycle management that turns agreements into business results | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/linksquares-com.md) |
| 6 | [Gavel Exec](https://openaitools.app/tool/gavel-exec) | 73,189 | -11.6% | Paid, Free Trial | Performs contract redlining and drafting inside Microsoft Word, but emphasizes workflow automation over public clause research. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/gavel-exec.md) |
| 7 | [Spellbook](https://openaitools.app/tool/spellbook) | 65,733 | +26.1% | Free Trial | Integrates directly into Microsoft Word for contract drafting and redlining, but focuses on transactional law rather than public contract search. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/spellbook.md) |
| 8 | [InfraBase.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/infrabase-ai) | 39,072 | -13.6% | Free | Catalogues and compares AI infrastructure tools and services across categories, but lacks deep per-token pricing tables. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/infrabase-ai.md) |
| 9 | [Luminance](https://openaitools.app/tool/luminance-com) | 29,034 | -20% | Contact for Pricing | Excels at enterprise-scale contract intelligence and negotiation, but requires dedicated onboarding rather than self-serve Word drafting. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/luminance-com.md) |
| 10 | [Mike (MikeOSS)](https://openaitools.app/tool/mikeoss) | 16,196 | -36.5% | Free, Open Source (pay only model API costs) | Open-source legal AI platform for document review, research, drafting and reusable workflows | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/mikeoss.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/law-insider-vs-models-dev

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)